Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 229 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
11401 Blaze 13-1 1601 7-3 70% 13 IA
11402 Networks Acad 15-1 1601 7-3 64% 15 AL
11403 Boston United 16-Northeast 1601 37-21 64% 16 MA
11404 EU 13-Silver 1601 21-9 70% 13 IN
11405 Lakewood Area Volleyball Association 13-1 1601 5-2 71% 13 NC
11406 NWI Premier 16U Black 1601 9-8 53% 16 IA
11407 Heat 13-White 1601 14-7 67% 13 WI
11408 VCN 17-Black 1601 4-11 27% 17 NE
11409 Adrenaline 12-Allison 1601 7-3 39% 12 IA
11410 Maine Juniors Volleyball Club 18-National 1601 8-1 89% 18 MA
11411 BEVBC 16-White 1601 40-16 68% 16 MD
11412 No Limits 14 Silver 1601 10-4 71% 14 IA
11413 FAV 16 Phoenix 1601 28-12 70% 16 CA
11414 Altitude 13-Black 1601 48-27 64% 13 AZ
11415 Alamo 12 Elite 1601 31-25 54% 12 TX
11416 BTownVBC 13-Red 1601 26-16 62% 13 IN
11417 Houston Force 13 Galaxy 1601 26-13 63% 13 TX
11418 MCV 13-Bullion 1601 8-3 73% 13 NC
11419 Digs 15-White 1601 29-15 66% 15 NJ
11420 Sandhills 18-Erin 1601 14-9 61% 18 NC
11421 Boltz 13-Desertaces 1601 28-24 54% 13 AZ
11422 WI Flight 16-Black 1601 21-19 53% 16 WI
11423 Arete 12-Navy 1601 25-20 49% 12 TX
11424 OC Lady Elite 15-Black 1601 23-24 49% 15 NY
11425 clubSAV 14-National val 1601 17-28 38% 14 GA
11426 LYNX Volleyball Club 15-Girls - vernon 1601 7-2 78% 15
11427 FORZA1 NORTH 15-National black 1601 20-15 57% 15 CA
11428 Kajun Heat 12 1600 19-8 70% 12
11429 Court Queenz 14 Court Queenz (NO) 1600 7-7 50% 14
11430 Hot Shots 14-Purple 1600 12-6 67% 14 NY
11431 NYC Juniors 14-Bk 1600 8-10 44% 14 NY
11432 SIVA 14-White 1600 17-10 61% 14 ID
11433 KIVA 17-Black 1600 40-36 53% 17 KY
11434 Ridgecrest Starlings 14-Brylie 1600 13-9 59% 14 CA
11435 Adversity G14 Adidas 1600 15-29 34% 14 IL
11436 TX LEGACY 12-BLACK 1600 27-17 60% 12 TX
11437 WI Flight 11 Antigo 1600 7-2 78% 11 WI
11438 Aubier Vikings 15-1 1600 7-2 78% 15 MA
11439 LIV 15-Royal sierra 1600 30-34 47% 15 CA
11440 Ascent 14-1 1600 23-19 48% 14 MT
11441 White Stone 14 1600 12-8 60% 14 CA
11442 WVC Eve 15-S 1600 13-16 45% 15 UT
11443 Caswell Quest 13 1600 11-10 52% 13 NC
11444 Airdrie Hawks 15-Girls white 1600 6-1 86% 15 HI
11445 Yuba Elite VBC 14-Black 1600 18-9 67% 14 CA
11446 TPV 11-Red 1600 25-13 66% 11 TN
11447 Southwest Extreme 16-1 1600 7-1 88% 16 LA
11448 Cap City MT 14-Select diamonds 1600 18-17 40% 14 MT
11449 Courthouse 16-Blue 1600 30-21 58% 16 OR
11450 CC Rattlers 16-1 1600 19-13 59% 16 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.