Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 229 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
11401 IPV 15-Hp 1601 26-10 70% 15 IL
11402 LV 13 Hurricane 1601 16-7 70% 13 TX
11403 MATRIX 17 Elite 1601 26-15 63% 17 CA
11404 Storm 18-Adidas 1601 34-20 63% 18 AR
11405 1W 14-2 elite 1601 21-13 62% 14 WI
11406 PVC 18-S 1601 8-5 62% 18 FL
11407 BHJ 14-Green 1601 16-10 62% 14 SD
11408 CWAVE Basilisco 12 1601 28-18 61% 12 OH
11409 SIVA 14-White 1601 17-10 61% 14 ID
11410 Uno Girls 14-Elite 1601 30-19 61% 14 IL
11411 Dime 14-Fresh 1601 22-14 61% 14 CA
11412 M2 Volleyball 15-E3 1601 50-33 60% 15 GA
11413 Husky 13-Black 1601 25-17 60% 13 CT
11414 Arkansas Jrs 15-1 1601 6-4 60% 15 AR
11415 Jr Vikings 12-Blue 1601 13-9 59% 12 WI
11416 Mintonette Sports 14-4 1601 38-26 59% 14 OH
11417 Courthouse 16-Blue 1601 30-21 58% 16 OR
11418 ECVC 15-National - cheyenne 1601 12-9 57% 15 FL
11419 C1VB 17-Elite 1601 8-6 57% 17 SC
11420 Rice City 12-Red 1601 16-11 57% 12 LA
11421 Ignite 18 Elite 1601 42-39 52% 18 IN
11422 SoCal VBC 17-Cardiff 1601 23-21 52% 17 CA
11423 Valor-AR 15-Elite 1601 29-28 51% 15 AR
11424 Lomanview 10-Ileana 1601 3-3 50% 10 PR
11425 RVC 15-Blue 1601 32-32 50% 15 MI
11426 OR Performance 12-A 1601 3-3 50% 12 PR
11427 EXCEL 17-National blue 1601 22-22 49% 17 TX
11428 OC Lady Elite 15-Black 1601 23-24 49% 15 NY
11429 Apex NW 15-Summit 1601 25-30 45% 15 WA
11430 Wildfire 15-N premier 1601 10-17 37% 15 FL
11431 Vibe 13-1 1601 9-20 31% 13 CA
11432 SCBandits 18-1 1601 3-7 30% 18 ON
11433 LIVBC Girls 15-Red 1601 15-8 65% 15 NY
11434 Mizuno Northern Lights 14-X 1601 6-0 100% 14
11435 ME 16-Yellow garnet 1601 7-2 78% 16
11436 LYNX Volleyball Club 15-Girls - vernon 1601 7-2 78% 15
11437 Eastlake 12-Jaykob 1601 6-2 75% 12
11438 ESVC1 17-1 1601 5-2 71% 17
11439 FAV 16 Phoenix 1601 28-12 70% 16 CA
11440 Blaze 11-Plains aces 1601 12-6 63% 11
11441 Mauloa 12-Green 1601 13-8 62% 12
11442 Spokane Ignite 17-Ignition 1601 7-8 47% 17
11443 Ridgecrest Starlings 14-Brylie 1601 13-9 59% 14 CA
11444 Slainte 17-Nationals 1601 11-11 50% 17 CA
11445 Five Starz 17-Black amanda 1601 24-27 47% 17 CA
11446 IconVBC 14-Adidas 1601 14-18 44% 14 CA
11447 DCVA 15-Aaron 1601 22-16 58% 15 NM
11448 Cap City 12-Reg diamonds 1600 10-10 38% 12
11449 LES 16-Jake 1600 15-8 63% 16
11450 Downstate 16-Black 1600 33-27 55% 16
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.