Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 228 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
11351 Bluff Impact 12-Royal 1602 17-10 63% 12 MO
11352 LTVA 17U 1602 19-11 63% 17 CA
11353 Next Level 15-2 1602 5-3 63% 15 CA
11354 NSDVB 16 1602 24-15 62% 16 CA
11355 Tsunami 14-2n cara 1602 14-9 61% 14 GA
11356 FC United 15-Black 1602 29-19 59% 15 MO
11357 SF TREMORS 16-Jaguars 1602 27-19 59% 16 CA
11358 Cajunland 14-N 1602 26-19 58% 14 LA
11359 ELLEVATE Academy 14 1602 4-3 57% 14 LA
11360 WI Juniors 12-1 1602 36-34 51% 12 WI
11361 NRG 15-Ampr blue 1602 1-1 50% 15 TX
11362 Pelican State 15 1602 15-16 48% 15 LA
11363 NYC Juniors 14-Bk 1602 8-10 44% 14 NY
11364 CPU Storm 14-Black 1602 6-3 43% 14 IA
11365 SM Velocity Force 18 1602 15-20 42% 18 AZ
11366 TXP 18-Black cojo 1602 16-27 37% 18 TX
11367 Northwood 12-O'keefe 1602 4-2 67% 12
11368 SVC 17 18-Blue 1602 20-12 63% 18
11369 Yuba Elite VBC 14-Black 1602 18-9 67% 14 CA
11370 LCVC 11-G 1 (NC) 1602 20-15 57% 11 CA
11371 GoTime 16-1n 1602 35-28 56% 16 IN
11372 Academy 17 Jade 1602 30-28 52% 17 NC
11373 RENO 14-1 1602 22-21 51% 14 NV
11374 EndMo VBC 17-Power blue 1602 24-24 50% 17 PA
11375 Beach Elite 14-Blue 1602 16-13 50% 14 CA
11376 Club Attack 14 Brantlea 1601 15-6 71% 14
11377 Hot Shots 14-Purple 1601 12-6 67% 14
11378 Cadets 13-C 1601 17-11 61% 13
11379 SRJ 18-Select 1601 20-10 67% 18
11380 R1SE Legacy 18 1601 11-9 55% 18
11381 LES 15 Leiporshia 1601 17-7 61% 15
11382 SOBO Storm 14-Lightning 1601 19-11 59% 14
11383 WEM 17 1601 11-6 65% 17
11384 South Strand Heat 16-1 1601 30-14 68% 16 SC
11385 HEAT 16-Travel jennifer 1601 16-8 67% 16 CA
11386 ECEVBC 15 Typhoon 1601 44-19 67% 15 MD
11387 Rockwood Thunder 14-White 1601 27-24 51% 14 MO
11388 Palm Beach Jrs 13-1 1601 15-8 65% 13 FL
11389 VVA 15-Gagliano 1601 6-1 86% 15 CA
11390 Onslow Freedom 14 1601 9-2 82% 14 NC
11391 Ichiban 11-Eagles 1601 27-6 79% 11 GA
11392 Iowa Vibe 13-1 teal 1601 11-3 79% 13 IA
11393 RADD Elite 12-1 1601 13-4 76% 12 FL
11394 VCNebraska 13-Navy 1601 9-3 75% 13 NE
11395 MSVC 14-Adidas sara 1601 8-3 73% 14 FL
11396 VoltageVB 13-White 1601 8-3 73% 13 FL
11397 AR SELECT 18-Ntl 1601 18-7 72% 18 AR
11398 Spa City 14-Coral 1601 24-10 71% 14 NY
11399 MN Attack 14-2 1601 15-6 71% 14 MN
11400 Club Unite 15-Knox blue 1601 28-12 70% 15 TN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.