Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 228 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
11351 SC Legends 15-Gold 1602 22-12 65% 15 CA
11352 NE Shock 15-Fire 1602 10-5 67% 15 CT
11353 TopSpin 15-Red 1602 21-12 64% 15 KY
11354 OK Charge 15-Nat'l tulsa 1602 26-15 63% 15 OK
11355 SECC Rebels VBA 15-1 1602 22-9 63% 15 MA
11356 314 VBC 15-Navy 1602 49-27 64% 15 MO
11357 K2 - MVC 18 1602 7-8 47% 18 ON
11358 Advisory Alpha 15 Advisory Alpha 1602 4-1 80% 15
11359 Spokane Elite 17-1 1601 6-3 67% 17
11360 DIG 12-Black 1601 15-12 47% 12 TX
11361 LCVC 11-G 1 (NC) 1601 20-15 57% 11 CA
11362 Southern Heat 13 1601 4-0 100% 13 WI
11363 TC ELITE 16-Sonny 1601 7-3 70% 16 LA
11364 RVBC 13U Blue 1601 17-8 65% 13 PA
11365 Fearless 18U 1601 25-15 61% 18 IA
11366 UtahIce 14-Leah 1601 6-2 75% 14 UT
11367 Blue Heat 12 Elite 1601 20-10 63% 12 MO
11368 HBJ 17-Ravyn 1601 25-12 68% 17 AR
11369 CINCY EAST 12-3 white 1601 11-4 73% 12 OH
11370 IconVBC 14-Adidas 1601 14-18 44% 14 CA
11371 Elevate Athletics 18-Black julia 1601 12-22 35% 18 UT
11372 CADO 16-1 1601 2-3 40% 16 NY
11373 CVC 13 National (NO) 1601 36-31 54% 13 ND
11374 OK Elevate 16-1 1601 28-17 58% 16 OK
11375 Club North Volleyball KC 16-2 1601 7-4 41% 16 MO
11376 VVA 15-Gagliano 1601 6-1 86% 15 NV
11377 SM Velocity Force 18 1601 15-20 42% 18 AZ
11378 BORINQUEN COQUI 15-2f 1601 5-7 42% 15 PR
11379 UNION 12-Ky white 1601 26-18 59% 12 IN
11380 AEV 15-National 1601 23-15 61% 15 TX
11381 Goldenwest 14-Asics 1601 19-21 48% 14 CA
11382 SPORTING EDGE 15-Armour 1601 35-27 55% 15 TX
11383 Ozark Storm 14-1s 1601 5-1 83% 14 MO
11384 Empower 17-National black 1601 33-30 52% 17 CA
11385 RVT 15-2 swim 1601 22-12 65% 15 NY
11386 Rancho 15 Gold 1601 29-21 58% 15 CA
11387 AV Coach JESS 15 1601 4-4 50% 15 CA
11388 Elite Alliance 16-2 1601 10-4 71% 16 SD
11389 MN Attack 14-2 1601 15-6 71% 14 MN
11390 Next Level 15 Naupaka 1601 29-23 56% 15 NV
11391 Jr Vikings 12-Blue 1601 13-9 59% 12 WI
11392 STMATT 10-1 1601 8-3 73% 10 IN
11393 Yorktowne VB 18-Red 1601 28-16 64% 18 PA
11394 ENVY 12-1 lavaflow 1601 26-13 67% 12 RI
11395 Main Beach 14-Power 1601 13-8 62% 14 CA
11396 NH Brainerd 14-1 1601 8-3 73% 14 MN
11397 IJV 12 Emerald 1601 18-6 75% 12 IL
11398 LV FORCE VB 17-1 1601 4-3 57% 17 PA
11399 Eastlake 12-Jaykob 1601 6-2 75% 12 CA
11400 Champions 14-Short 1601 9-3 60% 14 AL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.