2025-2026 Season — Page 227 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11301 | CCVBC 13-MARILU | 1603 | 20-19 | 51% | 13 | CA |
| 11302 | Blaze 16-Elite | 1603 | 5-3 | 50% | 16 | IA |
| 11303 | Colorado Springs Alt CSA 13-Navy | 1603 | 13-14 | 48% | 13 | CO |
| 11304 | DIG 12-Black | 1603 | 15-12 | 47% | 12 | TX |
| 11305 | ID Peak 18-National | 1603 | 6-7 | 46% | 18 | ID |
| 11306 | 915 13-Blue | 1603 | 27-31 | 46% | 13 | TX |
| 11307 | EMV 11-National black april | 1603 | 3-4 | 43% | 11 | TX |
| 11308 | Pohaku 12-1 | 1603 | 19-25 | 43% | 12 | KS |
| 11309 | 850 ELITE 13-1 | 1603 | 15-21 | 42% | 13 | FL |
| 11310 | ASHOK 14-1 | 1603 | 25-13 | 66% | 14 | |
| 11311 | AV Coach JESS 15 | 1603 | 4-4 | 50% | 15 | |
| 11312 | Burley 15 | 1603 | 6-7 | 46% | 15 | |
| 11313 | Titans Hyperion 15 | 1603 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | |
| 11314 | SR 12-1 | 1602 | 4-1 | 80% | 12 | |
| 11315 | KC Ignite Volleyball Club 17-1 | 1602 | 6-1 | 75% | 17 | |
| 11316 | ENG_VB 15 | 1602 | 18-10 | 64% | 15 | |
| 11317 | Sierra Volleyball Club 14 | 1602 | 12-4 | 75% | 14 | |
| 11318 | ONEVA 18-1 | 1602 | 8-4 | 67% | 18 | |
| 11319 | TX IMPACT 11-1 navy | 1602 | 5-2 | 56% | 11 | TX |
| 11320 | HP Illinois 11-Select | 1602 | 18-15 | 53% | 11 | IL |
| 11321 | AP 14-Black | 1602 | 25-22 | 53% | 14 | TX |
| 11322 | Impact 11-Black | 1602 | 12-10 | 55% | 11 | TX |
| 11323 | Pulse 13 Rich | 1602 | 22-17 | 56% | 13 | CA |
| 11324 | Apex NW 12-Summit | 1602 | 6-0 | 100% | 12 | WA |
| 11325 | SEC Elite 15-Teale | 1602 | 3-0 | 100% | 15 | CO |
| 11326 | AVC 13-Blue | 1602 | 5-1 | 83% | 13 | FL |
| 11327 | Invasion Volleyball Club 14-1 | 1602 | 5-1 | 83% | 14 | MO |
| 11328 | Spiketown Reign 18-Black | 1602 | 8-2 | 80% | 18 | WI |
| 11329 | XFactor 18-1 | 1602 | 15-5 | 75% | 18 | VA |
| 11330 | Hype VB 12-Burt | 1602 | 6-2 | 75% | 12 | CO |
| 11331 | Dig This! VBC 12-Black | 1602 | 6-2 | 75% | 12 | NV |
| 11332 | FVP 14-Regional | 1602 | 24-9 | 73% | 14 | WI |
| 11333 | ASVC 16-N1e | 1602 | 59-23 | 72% | 16 | AZ |
| 11334 | MSSVC 16-Lightning | 1602 | 5-2 | 71% | 16 | WV |
| 11335 | Elite Alliance 16-2 | 1602 | 10-4 | 71% | 16 | SD |
| 11336 | Palm Beach Jrs 16 Elite | 1602 | 31-14 | 69% | 16 | FL |
| 11337 | MGA 13-Stars | 1602 | 25-11 | 69% | 13 | MA |
| 11338 | Austin Skyline 15-Black-kelsey | 1602 | 9-4 | 69% | 15 | TX |
| 11339 | TNT 17 Diamond | 1602 | 20-10 | 67% | 17 | PA |
| 11340 | Cajun Elite 14-S nyah | 1602 | 4-2 | 67% | 14 | LA |
| 11341 | BCVC 13-Smack | 1602 | 12-6 | 67% | 13 | CA |
| 11342 | GCVC 15-Austin | 1602 | 23-12 | 66% | 15 | IN |
| 11343 | SAND 17-Black | 1602 | 25-13 | 66% | 17 | UT |
| 11344 | Club Integrity 12-1 | 1602 | 25-13 | 66% | 12 | PA |
| 11345 | TC ELITE 13-Bre | 1602 | 28-15 | 65% | 13 | LA |
| 11346 | Invicta 14-Sarah | 1602 | 33-17 | 65% | 14 | UT |
| 11347 | SC Legends 15-Gold | 1602 | 22-12 | 65% | 15 | CA |
| 11348 | Boston United 16-Northeast | 1602 | 37-21 | 64% | 16 | MA |
| 11349 | Blue Heat 12 Elite | 1602 | 20-10 | 63% | 12 | MO |
| 11350 | ALLEGIANT 18-Blue | 1602 | 31-16 | 63% | 18 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.