Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 227 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
11301 CCVBC 13-MARILU 1603 20-19 51% 13 CA
11302 Blaze 16-Elite 1603 5-3 50% 16 IA
11303 Colorado Springs Alt CSA 13-Navy 1603 13-14 48% 13 CO
11304 DIG 12-Black 1603 15-12 47% 12 TX
11305 ID Peak 18-National 1603 6-7 46% 18 ID
11306 915 13-Blue 1603 27-31 46% 13 TX
11307 EMV 11-National black april 1603 3-4 43% 11 TX
11308 Pohaku 12-1 1603 19-25 43% 12 KS
11309 850 ELITE 13-1 1603 15-21 42% 13 FL
11310 ASHOK 14-1 1603 25-13 66% 14
11311 AV Coach JESS 15 1603 4-4 50% 15
11312 Burley 15 1603 6-7 46% 15
11313 Titans Hyperion 15 1603 2-3 40% 15
11314 SR 12-1 1602 4-1 80% 12
11315 KC Ignite Volleyball Club 17-1 1602 6-1 75% 17
11316 ENG_VB 15 1602 18-10 64% 15
11317 Sierra Volleyball Club 14 1602 12-4 75% 14
11318 ONEVA 18-1 1602 8-4 67% 18
11319 TX IMPACT 11-1 navy 1602 5-2 56% 11 TX
11320 HP Illinois 11-Select 1602 18-15 53% 11 IL
11321 AP 14-Black 1602 25-22 53% 14 TX
11322 Impact 11-Black 1602 12-10 55% 11 TX
11323 Pulse 13 Rich 1602 22-17 56% 13 CA
11324 Apex NW 12-Summit 1602 6-0 100% 12 WA
11325 SEC Elite 15-Teale 1602 3-0 100% 15 CO
11326 AVC 13-Blue 1602 5-1 83% 13 FL
11327 Invasion Volleyball Club 14-1 1602 5-1 83% 14 MO
11328 Spiketown Reign 18-Black 1602 8-2 80% 18 WI
11329 XFactor 18-1 1602 15-5 75% 18 VA
11330 Hype VB 12-Burt 1602 6-2 75% 12 CO
11331 Dig This! VBC 12-Black 1602 6-2 75% 12 NV
11332 FVP 14-Regional 1602 24-9 73% 14 WI
11333 ASVC 16-N1e 1602 59-23 72% 16 AZ
11334 MSSVC 16-Lightning 1602 5-2 71% 16 WV
11335 Elite Alliance 16-2 1602 10-4 71% 16 SD
11336 Palm Beach Jrs 16 Elite 1602 31-14 69% 16 FL
11337 MGA 13-Stars 1602 25-11 69% 13 MA
11338 Austin Skyline 15-Black-kelsey 1602 9-4 69% 15 TX
11339 TNT 17 Diamond 1602 20-10 67% 17 PA
11340 Cajun Elite 14-S nyah 1602 4-2 67% 14 LA
11341 BCVC 13-Smack 1602 12-6 67% 13 CA
11342 GCVC 15-Austin 1602 23-12 66% 15 IN
11343 SAND 17-Black 1602 25-13 66% 17 UT
11344 Club Integrity 12-1 1602 25-13 66% 12 PA
11345 TC ELITE 13-Bre 1602 28-15 65% 13 LA
11346 Invicta 14-Sarah 1602 33-17 65% 14 UT
11347 SC Legends 15-Gold 1602 22-12 65% 15 CA
11348 Boston United 16-Northeast 1602 37-21 64% 16 MA
11349 Blue Heat 12 Elite 1602 20-10 63% 12 MO
11350 ALLEGIANT 18-Blue 1602 31-16 63% 18 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.