Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 226 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
11251 Wentzville Heat 10-Navy 1603 4-0 100% 10 MO
11252 FTL 16-Fusion usa libertyl 1603 5-1 83% 16 FL
11253 Ozark Storm 14-1s 1603 5-1 83% 14 MO
11254 SI Wave 15-White 1603 10-2 83% 15 IL
11255 Laker JO 14-1 1603 12-3 80% 14 MN
11256 OVVC 11-Green 1603 4-1 80% 11 OH
11257 Vaqueros 11-F ale 1603 18-7 72% 11 PR
11258 ARVC 13-Roadrunners 1603 17-7 71% 13 NM
11259 Forza 15-Black 1603 45-18 71% 15 IL
11260 LVT Select 14-Cece 1603 30-13 70% 14 FL
11261 SA Force 12 Select 1603 18-8 67% 12 TX
11262 Payson 18-S shelli/kenzie 1603 26-13 67% 18 AZ
11263 Flight 16 Edelweiss 1603 22-11 67% 16 IL
11264 NW Force 12-1 1603 8-4 67% 12 MO
11265 Balance 12-White 1603 21-10 66% 12 IL
11266 Digs 15-White 1603 29-15 66% 15 NJ
11267 PerfElite 15-1 1603 28-15 65% 15 NY
11268 Liberty 14-Elite 1603 22-10 65% 14 TX
11269 Velocity 15-Red 1 1603 13-7 65% 15 AR
11270 314 VBC 15-Navy 1603 49-27 64% 15 MO
11271 OK Charge 15-Amer tulsa 1603 27-15 64% 15 OK
11272 Xcel VB 14-1 adidas 1603 18-10 64% 14 TX
11273 MAC 18-1 elite 1603 35-20 64% 18 OR
11274 GCVBC 12-Bugjaski 1603 24-14 63% 12 OH
11275 SoCal Legends 16-Nike 1603 12-7 63% 16 CA
11276 MADFROG 15-East diamond 1603 5-3 63% 15 TX
11277 SASVBC G 16 KAWIKA 1603 31-19 62% 16 HI
11278 Venom 12-Black 1603 43-28 61% 12 AZ
11279 NYC Impact 14-Black 1603 25-16 61% 14 NY
11280 BSVBC 12-White 1603 21-14 60% 12 IL
11281 Gators 14-Black 1603 30-20 60% 14 MA
11282 319 United 15 Grace 1603 9-5 60% 15 IA
11283 Carolina ICE 17-Nat 1603 20-14 59% 17 SC
11284 OK Elevate 16-1 1603 28-17 58% 16 OK
11285 Red Storm 16-National white 1603 25-18 58% 16 LA
11286 C1VB 13-Regional coral 1603 19-14 58% 13 SC
11287 APEX1 18-Green 1603 28-20 58% 18 CA
11288 SOMD 16-Black 1603 17-9 57% 16 MD
11289 SC Rockstar 16-Sam 1603 34-26 57% 16 CA
11290 Corpus Christi Storm 14-1 1603 24-17 57% 14 TX
11291 501 Volley 14-2 1603 4-3 57% 14 AR
11292 Ichiban 14-Resilience 1603 24-19 56% 14 GA
11293 Texas One 14-Navy 1603 14-9 56% 14 TX
11294 WSA Gators 17-Elite blue 1603 30-25 55% 17 FL
11295 DaKine 12-National pink 1603 28-23 55% 12 WA
11296 Monon 11-1e voltage 1603 24-20 55% 11 IN
11297 Beach Cities 12-Smack 1603 19-16 54% 12 CA
11298 WI Flight 16-Black 1603 21-19 53% 16 WI
11299 Hype 15-1 1603 31-30 51% 15 MN
11300 OMNI 15-Power 1603 27-26 51% 15 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.