2025-2026 Season — Page 226 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11251 | Bluff Impact 12-Royal | 1603 | 17-10 | 63% | 12 | MO |
| 11252 | BHJ 14-Green | 1603 | 21-13 | 62% | 14 | SD |
| 11253 | Top Flight 17 Elite | 1603 | 22-33 | 40% | 17 | IL |
| 11254 | MPV 12-Elite green | 1603 | 14-8 | 61% | 12 | UT |
| 11255 | Abingdon Falcons 14 | 1603 | 21-9 | 70% | 14 | VA |
| 11256 | SGV 14-Blazers | 1603 | 7-2 | 78% | 14 | GA |
| 11257 | FC Elite 14 Adidas | 1603 | 21-9 | 70% | 14 | WI |
| 11258 | C1VB 15-Elite grvl | 1603 | 24-14 | 63% | 15 | SC |
| 11259 | EXCEL 17-National blue | 1603 | 22-22 | 49% | 17 | TX |
| 11260 | Northern Lights 11-2 | 1603 | 36-24 | 60% | 11 | MN |
| 11261 | Bayside Vipers 13-1 | 1603 | 21-10 | 68% | 13 | NY |
| 11262 | SC Rockstar 16-Sam | 1603 | 34-26 | 57% | 16 | CA |
| 11263 | Heartland Big Lake 11 | 1603 | 4-1 | 80% | 11 | MN |
| 11264 | Southern Elite 12 Elite | 1603 | 18-13 | 58% | 12 | LA |
| 11265 | Platform 14-Navy | 1603 | 19-8 | 68% | 14 | IA |
| 11266 | EVRC 16-Laura | 1603 | 19-10 | 66% | 16 | IN |
| 11267 | Black Creek VBC 17-1 | 1603 | 27-16 | 63% | 17 | FL |
| 11268 | NW Force 12-1 | 1603 | 8-4 | 67% | 12 | MO |
| 11269 | Wentzville Heat 10-Navy | 1603 | 4-0 | 100% | 10 | MO |
| 11270 | BRYC 17 Royal | 1603 | 38-31 | 54% | 17 | VA |
| 11271 | Pitt United 14-Blue | 1603 | 26-15 | 62% | 14 | PA |
| 11272 | TNVBC 14 | 1603 | 19-12 | 61% | 14 | CA |
| 11273 | WEM 17 | 1603 | 11-6 | 65% | 17 | MN |
| 11274 | KSA 14-Blue | 1603 | 33-13 | 72% | 14 | KY |
| 11275 | MOJO Elite Volleyball 17-Black | 1603 | 13-14 | 46% | 17 | VA |
| 11276 | FaR Out 14 Maroon | 1603 | 30-13 | 70% | 14 | MI |
| 11277 | CVC 13 National | 1603 | 34-27 | 56% | 13 | KY |
| 11278 | ACVC 16-White | 1603 | 36-22 | 62% | 16 | CA |
| 11279 | PVA 17-2 | 1603 | 5-1 | 83% | 17 | MO |
| 11280 | Paris Purge 14 | 1603 | 13-6 | 65% | 14 | AR |
| 11281 | EVC 14 National | 1603 | 32-20 | 62% | 14 | IL |
| 11282 | LAVA 13 Whitney | 1603 | 18-10 | 64% | 13 | NC |
| 11283 | Kokoro Volleyball 13-1 | 1603 | 42-30 | 58% | 13 | MN |
| 11284 | Ks Networks Volleyball Club 16-2 | 1603 | 4-2 | 67% | 16 | KS |
| 11285 | Wisconsin Blaze 14-White | 1603 | 23-16 | 59% | 14 | WI |
| 11286 | BW HEAT 13-1 | 1603 | 6-0 | 100% | 13 | WI |
| 11287 | Anthem United 18-Agape | 1603 | 21-11 | 66% | 18 | GA |
| 11288 | Rising Tide 13-S sharks | 1603 | 35-22 | 61% | 13 | SC |
| 11289 | Coast United 13 | 1603 | 23-26 | 47% | 13 | SC |
| 11290 | SJVC 14-1 | 1603 | 9-14 | 39% | 14 | FL |
| 11291 | NCWVBC 17-1 gold | 1603 | 15-11 | 58% | 17 | WA |
| 11292 | Titans Athena 17 | 1603 | 4-13 | 24% | 17 | ON |
| 11293 | DJVBC 15-1 | 1602 | 5-1 | 83% | 15 | PA |
| 11294 | Azalea 15-Mylee | 1602 | 12-6 | 67% | 15 | FL |
| 11295 | Apex NW 12-Summit | 1602 | 6-0 | 100% | 12 | WA |
| 11296 | NWAJS 16-Adidas | 1602 | 6-3 | 67% | 16 | NE |
| 11297 | UEPA 18-Gold | 1602 | 3-0 | 100% | 18 | TX |
| 11298 | Coastline 13-Black | 1602 | 15-9 | 63% | 13 | NC |
| 11299 | ThunderVanbc 16-1 | 1602 | 3-4 | 43% | 16 | WA |
| 11300 | Vibe 13-1 | 1602 | 9-20 | 31% | 13 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.