Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 226 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
11251 Bluff Impact 12-Royal 1603 17-10 63% 12 MO
11252 BHJ 14-Green 1603 21-13 62% 14 SD
11253 Top Flight 17 Elite 1603 22-33 40% 17 IL
11254 MPV 12-Elite green 1603 14-8 61% 12 UT
11255 Abingdon Falcons 14 1603 21-9 70% 14 VA
11256 SGV 14-Blazers 1603 7-2 78% 14 GA
11257 FC Elite 14 Adidas 1603 21-9 70% 14 WI
11258 C1VB 15-Elite grvl 1603 24-14 63% 15 SC
11259 EXCEL 17-National blue 1603 22-22 49% 17 TX
11260 Northern Lights 11-2 1603 36-24 60% 11 MN
11261 Bayside Vipers 13-1 1603 21-10 68% 13 NY
11262 SC Rockstar 16-Sam 1603 34-26 57% 16 CA
11263 Heartland Big Lake 11 1603 4-1 80% 11 MN
11264 Southern Elite 12 Elite 1603 18-13 58% 12 LA
11265 Platform 14-Navy 1603 19-8 68% 14 IA
11266 EVRC 16-Laura 1603 19-10 66% 16 IN
11267 Black Creek VBC 17-1 1603 27-16 63% 17 FL
11268 NW Force 12-1 1603 8-4 67% 12 MO
11269 Wentzville Heat 10-Navy 1603 4-0 100% 10 MO
11270 BRYC 17 Royal 1603 38-31 54% 17 VA
11271 Pitt United 14-Blue 1603 26-15 62% 14 PA
11272 TNVBC 14 1603 19-12 61% 14 CA
11273 WEM 17 1603 11-6 65% 17 MN
11274 KSA 14-Blue 1603 33-13 72% 14 KY
11275 MOJO Elite Volleyball 17-Black 1603 13-14 46% 17 VA
11276 FaR Out 14 Maroon 1603 30-13 70% 14 MI
11277 CVC 13 National 1603 34-27 56% 13 KY
11278 ACVC 16-White 1603 36-22 62% 16 CA
11279 PVA 17-2 1603 5-1 83% 17 MO
11280 Paris Purge 14 1603 13-6 65% 14 AR
11281 EVC 14 National 1603 32-20 62% 14 IL
11282 LAVA 13 Whitney 1603 18-10 64% 13 NC
11283 Kokoro Volleyball 13-1 1603 42-30 58% 13 MN
11284 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 16-2 1603 4-2 67% 16 KS
11285 Wisconsin Blaze 14-White 1603 23-16 59% 14 WI
11286 BW HEAT 13-1 1603 6-0 100% 13 WI
11287 Anthem United 18-Agape 1603 21-11 66% 18 GA
11288 Rising Tide 13-S sharks 1603 35-22 61% 13 SC
11289 Coast United 13 1603 23-26 47% 13 SC
11290 SJVC 14-1 1603 9-14 39% 14 FL
11291 NCWVBC 17-1 gold 1603 15-11 58% 17 WA
11292 Titans Athena 17 1603 4-13 24% 17 ON
11293 DJVBC 15-1 1602 5-1 83% 15 PA
11294 Azalea 15-Mylee 1602 12-6 67% 15 FL
11295 Apex NW 12-Summit 1602 6-0 100% 12 WA
11296 NWAJS 16-Adidas 1602 6-3 67% 16 NE
11297 UEPA 18-Gold 1602 3-0 100% 18 TX
11298 Coastline 13-Black 1602 15-9 63% 13 NC
11299 ThunderVanbc 16-1 1602 3-4 43% 16 WA
11300 Vibe 13-1 1602 9-20 31% 13 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.