2025-2026 Season — Page 225 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11201 | Cannon Falls JO 10-1 | 1604 | 4-1 | 80% | 10 | MN |
| 11202 | MEVC 11-Power | 1604 | 22-8 | 65% | 11 | MD |
| 11203 | Pulse Volleyball Club 13-Rich | 1604 | 22-17 | 56% | 13 | CA |
| 11204 | HEAT 17-National boo | 1604 | 34-25 | 58% | 17 | CA |
| 11205 | Electric Volleyball 16-1 | 1604 | 10-5 | 67% | 16 | KS |
| 11206 | 253 Elite 15-Ekahi | 1604 | 38-20 | 66% | 15 | WA |
| 11207 | TSUNAMI 14-2 | 1604 | 14-6 | 70% | 14 | OR |
| 11208 | Platform 16-Adidas | 1604 | 27-30 | 47% | 16 | IA |
| 11209 | AZ SKY 12-Blue | 1604 | 35-31 | 53% | 12 | AZ |
| 11210 | TXP 14 ADAM | 1604 | 20-10 | 61% | 14 | TX |
| 11211 | Annapolis 14 Travel | 1604 | 28-23 | 55% | 14 | MD |
| 11212 | Rise Volleyball Club 13-1 | 1604 | 28-14 | 67% | 13 | OK |
| 11213 | TXP 18-Black cojo | 1604 | 16-27 | 37% | 18 | TX |
| 11214 | Legacy 15-Select | 1604 | 5-0 | 100% | 15 | SC |
| 11215 | SG Elite 15-Elite | 1604 | 6-2 | 75% | 15 | CA |
| 11216 | KIVA 12-Grey | 1604 | 35-22 | 61% | 12 | KY |
| 11217 | Venom Dynasty 18-Girls | 1604 | 4-2 | 67% | 18 | ON |
| 11218 | FAUCONS WHITE 14 | 1604 | 6-2 | 75% | 14 | CT |
| 11219 | Miami Wave 12-Teal | 1604 | 25-20 | 56% | 12 | FL |
| 11220 | Champions 14-1 elite | 1604 | 9-7 | 56% | 14 | AL |
| 11221 | Club SyrV 18-Premier | 1604 | 17-20 | 43% | 18 | NY |
| 11222 | MoCo Volleyball Club 15 MOCO Monsoon (CH) | 1603 | 45-24 | 63% | 15 | |
| 11223 | Oxford Volleyball Academy 15 15U OVA REN (DE) | 1603 | 19-17 | 53% | 15 | |
| 11224 | Ks Networks Volleyball Club 15-2 | 1603 | 6-2 | 75% | 15 | KS |
| 11225 | VVA 15-Talavera | 1603 | 27-14 | 66% | 15 | CA |
| 11226 | Invasion Volleyball Club 15-2 | 1603 | 5-1 | 83% | 15 | MO |
| 11227 | MEVC 12 National | 1603 | 38-30 | 55% | 12 | MD |
| 11228 | Pohaku 12-1 | 1603 | 20-27 | 41% | 12 | KS |
| 11229 | Rise Volleyball Academy 15-2 | 1603 | 13-15 | 46% | 15 | OH |
| 11230 | Vibe Volleyball 16-1 | 1603 | 4-3 | 57% | 16 | FL |
| 11231 | FTL 16-Fusion usa libertyl | 1603 | 5-1 | 83% | 16 | FL |
| 11232 | ELLEVATE Academy 14 | 1603 | 4-3 | 57% | 14 | LA |
| 11233 | SA Elite 14-4 silver | 1603 | 12-8 | 55% | 14 | TX |
| 11234 | Downstate 16-Black | 1603 | 33-27 | 55% | 16 | NY |
| 11235 | Zona VBC 16-R1 | 1603 | 14-8 | 64% | 16 | AZ |
| 11236 | MKE Sting 12-Silver | 1603 | 28-22 | 56% | 12 | WI |
| 11237 | WV Galaxy 14 | 1603 | 27-17 | 61% | 14 | WV |
| 11238 | NNVC 18 | 1603 | 20-20 | 44% | 18 | NV |
| 11239 | SF TREMORS 16-Jaguars | 1603 | 27-19 | 59% | 16 | CA |
| 11240 | 913Athletics 16-2 | 1603 | 5-2 | 71% | 16 | KS |
| 11241 | FAV 18 Maverick | 1603 | 7-4 | 64% | 18 | CA |
| 11242 | Cap City 12-Reg diamonds | 1603 | 10-10 | 38% | 12 | MT |
| 11243 | PRISM 16-Katie | 1603 | 19-7 | 73% | 16 | CA |
| 11244 | MC Panthers 10-Gold | 1603 | 12-3 | 75% | 10 | TX |
| 11245 | C1VB 13 Select | 1603 | 26-12 | 68% | 13 | SC |
| 11246 | Chicago Elite 12-Peach | 1603 | 12-5 | 71% | 12 | IL |
| 11247 | OVVC 11-Green | 1603 | 4-1 | 80% | 11 | OH |
| 11248 | CCVBC 13-MARILU | 1603 | 20-19 | 51% | 13 | CA |
| 11249 | RVA G15 Navy | 1603 | 53-59 | 47% | 15 | WI |
| 11250 | Nova Volleyball Club 18-Premier matt | 1603 | 19-19 | 50% | 18 | CT |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.