Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 225 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
11201 Unified 14-1 east 1604 33-18 65% 14 MI
11202 Pulse 15 Camerlengo 1604 34-20 63% 15 CA
11203 LVBC 16-1 1604 37-21 63% 16 CO
11204 Juggernaut 14-National 2 1604 44-26 63% 14 CO
11205 OK Charge 15-Nat'l tulsa 1604 26-15 63% 15 OK
11206 Ignite 12-1 1604 26-12 63% 12 TX
11207 Suwannee Elite 18-1 1604 5-3 63% 18 FL
11208 ESVBC 16-Tsunami 1604 16-10 62% 16 MD
11209 BTownVBC 13-Red 1604 26-16 62% 13 IN
11210 Aspire NW 14-2 beaverton 1604 23-14 62% 14 WA
11211 HP Illinois 14-Select 1604 33-19 61% 14 IL
11212 IA Juniors 17-Black 1604 28-18 60% 17 IA
11213 ONE Volleyball 16 1604 3-2 60% 16 GA
11214 CinciVB Acad 11-Hayes 1604 20-14 59% 11 OH
11215 GO Volley 11-Black 1604 30-19 59% 11 VA
11216 MVP 60450 17-Black 1604 10-7 59% 17 IL
11217 ETA1 12-Black 1604 7-4 58% 12 TX
11218 Boss CLE 15-4 1604 15-11 58% 15 OH
11219 STATC 15-1 1604 19-14 58% 15 MO
11220 TVA 15-Smack paige 1604 34-25 58% 15 FL
11221 PVC 14-Blue 1604 11-5 58% 14 NJ
11222 WVC 13-Cruz 1604 16-11 57% 13 IN
11223 SMASH 17-Black ice 1604 5-5 50% 17 MA
11224 Vernal Velocity 12-White 1604 7-5 50% 12 UT
11225 Arete 12-Navy 1604 25-20 49% 12 TX
11226 Renaissance 16-Black 1604 28-32 47% 16 PA
11227 EliteVBTC 13-Blue 1604 24-29 45% 13 OH
11228 SSVBC 18-2 1604 16-24 40% 18 NH
11229 CADO 16-1 1604 2-3 40% 16 NY
11230 SJVC 14-1 1604 9-14 39% 14 FL
11231 Club Sand 13-Mike 1604 4-13 18% 13 UT
11232 Dubuque Insanity 16-1 1604 3-0 100% 16
11233 Gold Cal Jrs 12-Air 1604 10-4 71% 12
11234 Gold Coast 14-1 1604 27-14 66% 14
11235 Dallas Premier 17-Black g 1604 3-6 33% 17
11236 Mhvc 14-1 1604 16-6 73% 14 CA
11237 Sunshine 14-Excel 1604 29-24 55% 14 CA
11238 Xtreme 14-Black 1604 22-18 55% 14 CO
11239 Wisconsin Attack 16-Blue 1604 23-19 55% 16 WI
11240 Big Sky 14-3 1604 21-12 54% 14 MT
11241 PSVC 18-Dani 1604 18-16 53% 18 SC
11242 RockwoodThunder 16-Carolina 1604 27-24 53% 16 MO
11243 TVC 16 1604 31-37 45% 16 MS
11244 Coast United 13 1604 23-26 47% 13 CA
11245 KSA 13-Red 1603 28-10 74% 13
11246 RTR JO VB 16 1603 7-2 78% 16
11247 KSA 14-Blue 1603 33-13 72% 14
11248 Heartland Big Lake 11 1603 4-1 80% 11
11249 BW HEAT 13-1 1603 6-0 100% 13 WI
11250 Legacy 15-Select 1603 5-0 100% 15 MI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.