2025-2026 Season — Page 225 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11201 | Unified 14-1 east | 1604 | 33-18 | 65% | 14 | MI |
| 11202 | Pulse 15 Camerlengo | 1604 | 34-20 | 63% | 15 | CA |
| 11203 | LVBC 16-1 | 1604 | 37-21 | 63% | 16 | CO |
| 11204 | Juggernaut 14-National 2 | 1604 | 44-26 | 63% | 14 | CO |
| 11205 | OK Charge 15-Nat'l tulsa | 1604 | 26-15 | 63% | 15 | OK |
| 11206 | Ignite 12-1 | 1604 | 26-12 | 63% | 12 | TX |
| 11207 | Suwannee Elite 18-1 | 1604 | 5-3 | 63% | 18 | FL |
| 11208 | ESVBC 16-Tsunami | 1604 | 16-10 | 62% | 16 | MD |
| 11209 | BTownVBC 13-Red | 1604 | 26-16 | 62% | 13 | IN |
| 11210 | Aspire NW 14-2 beaverton | 1604 | 23-14 | 62% | 14 | WA |
| 11211 | HP Illinois 14-Select | 1604 | 33-19 | 61% | 14 | IL |
| 11212 | IA Juniors 17-Black | 1604 | 28-18 | 60% | 17 | IA |
| 11213 | ONE Volleyball 16 | 1604 | 3-2 | 60% | 16 | GA |
| 11214 | CinciVB Acad 11-Hayes | 1604 | 20-14 | 59% | 11 | OH |
| 11215 | GO Volley 11-Black | 1604 | 30-19 | 59% | 11 | VA |
| 11216 | MVP 60450 17-Black | 1604 | 10-7 | 59% | 17 | IL |
| 11217 | ETA1 12-Black | 1604 | 7-4 | 58% | 12 | TX |
| 11218 | Boss CLE 15-4 | 1604 | 15-11 | 58% | 15 | OH |
| 11219 | STATC 15-1 | 1604 | 19-14 | 58% | 15 | MO |
| 11220 | TVA 15-Smack paige | 1604 | 34-25 | 58% | 15 | FL |
| 11221 | PVC 14-Blue | 1604 | 11-5 | 58% | 14 | NJ |
| 11222 | WVC 13-Cruz | 1604 | 16-11 | 57% | 13 | IN |
| 11223 | SMASH 17-Black ice | 1604 | 5-5 | 50% | 17 | MA |
| 11224 | Vernal Velocity 12-White | 1604 | 7-5 | 50% | 12 | UT |
| 11225 | Arete 12-Navy | 1604 | 25-20 | 49% | 12 | TX |
| 11226 | Renaissance 16-Black | 1604 | 28-32 | 47% | 16 | PA |
| 11227 | EliteVBTC 13-Blue | 1604 | 24-29 | 45% | 13 | OH |
| 11228 | SSVBC 18-2 | 1604 | 16-24 | 40% | 18 | NH |
| 11229 | CADO 16-1 | 1604 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | NY |
| 11230 | SJVC 14-1 | 1604 | 9-14 | 39% | 14 | FL |
| 11231 | Club Sand 13-Mike | 1604 | 4-13 | 18% | 13 | UT |
| 11232 | Dubuque Insanity 16-1 | 1604 | 3-0 | 100% | 16 | |
| 11233 | Gold Cal Jrs 12-Air | 1604 | 10-4 | 71% | 12 | |
| 11234 | Gold Coast 14-1 | 1604 | 27-14 | 66% | 14 | |
| 11235 | Dallas Premier 17-Black g | 1604 | 3-6 | 33% | 17 | |
| 11236 | Mhvc 14-1 | 1604 | 16-6 | 73% | 14 | CA |
| 11237 | Sunshine 14-Excel | 1604 | 29-24 | 55% | 14 | CA |
| 11238 | Xtreme 14-Black | 1604 | 22-18 | 55% | 14 | CO |
| 11239 | Wisconsin Attack 16-Blue | 1604 | 23-19 | 55% | 16 | WI |
| 11240 | Big Sky 14-3 | 1604 | 21-12 | 54% | 14 | MT |
| 11241 | PSVC 18-Dani | 1604 | 18-16 | 53% | 18 | SC |
| 11242 | RockwoodThunder 16-Carolina | 1604 | 27-24 | 53% | 16 | MO |
| 11243 | TVC 16 | 1604 | 31-37 | 45% | 16 | MS |
| 11244 | Coast United 13 | 1604 | 23-26 | 47% | 13 | CA |
| 11245 | KSA 13-Red | 1603 | 28-10 | 74% | 13 | |
| 11246 | RTR JO VB 16 | 1603 | 7-2 | 78% | 16 | |
| 11247 | KSA 14-Blue | 1603 | 33-13 | 72% | 14 | |
| 11248 | Heartland Big Lake 11 | 1603 | 4-1 | 80% | 11 | |
| 11249 | BW HEAT 13-1 | 1603 | 6-0 | 100% | 13 | WI |
| 11250 | Legacy 15-Select | 1603 | 5-0 | 100% | 15 | MI |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.