Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 225 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
11201 Cannon Falls JO 10-1 1604 4-1 80% 10 MN
11202 MEVC 11-Power 1604 22-8 65% 11 MD
11203 Pulse Volleyball Club 13-Rich 1604 22-17 56% 13 CA
11204 HEAT 17-National boo 1604 34-25 58% 17 CA
11205 Electric Volleyball 16-1 1604 10-5 67% 16 KS
11206 253 Elite 15-Ekahi 1604 38-20 66% 15 WA
11207 TSUNAMI 14-2 1604 14-6 70% 14 OR
11208 Platform 16-Adidas 1604 27-30 47% 16 IA
11209 AZ SKY 12-Blue 1604 35-31 53% 12 AZ
11210 TXP 14 ADAM 1604 20-10 61% 14 TX
11211 Annapolis 14 Travel 1604 28-23 55% 14 MD
11212 Rise Volleyball Club 13-1 1604 28-14 67% 13 OK
11213 TXP 18-Black cojo 1604 16-27 37% 18 TX
11214 Legacy 15-Select 1604 5-0 100% 15 SC
11215 SG Elite 15-Elite 1604 6-2 75% 15 CA
11216 KIVA 12-Grey 1604 35-22 61% 12 KY
11217 Venom Dynasty 18-Girls 1604 4-2 67% 18 ON
11218 FAUCONS WHITE 14 1604 6-2 75% 14 CT
11219 Miami Wave 12-Teal 1604 25-20 56% 12 FL
11220 Champions 14-1 elite 1604 9-7 56% 14 AL
11221 Club SyrV 18-Premier 1604 17-20 43% 18 NY
11222 MoCo Volleyball Club 15 MOCO Monsoon (CH) 1603 45-24 63% 15
11223 Oxford Volleyball Academy 15 15U OVA REN (DE) 1603 19-17 53% 15
11224 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 15-2 1603 6-2 75% 15 KS
11225 VVA 15-Talavera 1603 27-14 66% 15 CA
11226 Invasion Volleyball Club 15-2 1603 5-1 83% 15 MO
11227 MEVC 12 National 1603 38-30 55% 12 MD
11228 Pohaku 12-1 1603 20-27 41% 12 KS
11229 Rise Volleyball Academy 15-2 1603 13-15 46% 15 OH
11230 Vibe Volleyball 16-1 1603 4-3 57% 16 FL
11231 FTL 16-Fusion usa libertyl 1603 5-1 83% 16 FL
11232 ELLEVATE Academy 14 1603 4-3 57% 14 LA
11233 SA Elite 14-4 silver 1603 12-8 55% 14 TX
11234 Downstate 16-Black 1603 33-27 55% 16 NY
11235 Zona VBC 16-R1 1603 14-8 64% 16 AZ
11236 MKE Sting 12-Silver 1603 28-22 56% 12 WI
11237 WV Galaxy 14 1603 27-17 61% 14 WV
11238 NNVC 18 1603 20-20 44% 18 NV
11239 SF TREMORS 16-Jaguars 1603 27-19 59% 16 CA
11240 913Athletics 16-2 1603 5-2 71% 16 KS
11241 FAV 18 Maverick 1603 7-4 64% 18 CA
11242 Cap City 12-Reg diamonds 1603 10-10 38% 12 MT
11243 PRISM 16-Katie 1603 19-7 73% 16 CA
11244 MC Panthers 10-Gold 1603 12-3 75% 10 TX
11245 C1VB 13 Select 1603 26-12 68% 13 SC
11246 Chicago Elite 12-Peach 1603 12-5 71% 12 IL
11247 OVVC 11-Green 1603 4-1 80% 11 OH
11248 CCVBC 13-MARILU 1603 20-19 51% 13 CA
11249 RVA G15 Navy 1603 53-59 47% 15 WI
11250 Nova Volleyball Club 18-Premier matt 1603 19-19 50% 18 CT
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.