Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 224 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
11151 Erie Elite Carolina 15 1605 15-5 75% 15 PA
11152 FORZA1 NORTH 17-Nat red 1605 11-7 61% 17 CA
11153 SWVBC G14-BLUE 1605 37-20 65% 14 WI
11154 MEVC 11-Power 1605 22-8 65% 11 MD
11155 SASVBC 11-Steph 1605 22-16 58% 11 HI
11156 OK Charge South 13-1 1605 31-14 69% 13 OK
11157 C1VB 15-Elite grvl 1605 24-14 63% 15 SC
11158 CAVE 13-Gold 1605 15-7 68% 13 PA
11159 SA Empire 14 Gold 1605 21-8 64% 14 TX
11160 MAVS KC 18-2 1605 5-2 71% 18 KS
11161 A3 15-X 1605 31-18 63% 15 TN
11162 Grandlake 18-George 1605 4-2 67% 18 OH
11163 Rockwood Thunder 12-Black 1605 25-17 60% 12 MO
11164 FC Elite 14 Adidas 1605 21-9 70% 14 WI
11165 Prodigy 14-Red 1605 22-15 59% 14 NY
11166 Core 13-National 1605 33-19 63% 13 NJ
11167 IOWA VIBE TEAL 16-2 1605 4-0 100% 16
11168 Mission Trails 14-Ken 1605 7-1 88% 14
11169 Miami United 14-Matt 1605 4-1 80% 14
11170 TI Elite 15 SS 1605 25-14 64% 15
11171 USANY Calculus 15-1 1605 2-3 40% 15
11172 MVIce 18-P cass 1605 4-7 36% 18
11173 Fresno Heat HEAT 13-Travel robert 1605 12-4 75% 13 CA
11174 Golden Bear 14-Nike 1605 22-12 65% 14 CA
11175 LVC 12-Pink 1605 13-5 62% 12 NY
11176 KVBC 13-1s 1604 27-17 61% 13
11177 Frenchtown 16-Casey 1604 3-4 38% 16
11178 WWVA 14-1 nighthawks 1604 4-1 80% 14
11179 ONEVA 18-2 1604 4-2 67% 18
11180 VVA 15-Talavera 1604 27-14 66% 15 CA
11181 Flyers 15-Usa-kevin 1604 22-27 42% 15 TX
11182 253 Elite 15-Ekahi 1604 38-20 66% 15 WA
11183 OWV 16-Elite 1604 6-1 86% 16 FL
11184 Synergy 12-Diller 1604 5-1 83% 12 OH
11185 Invasion Volleyball Club 16-2 1604 5-1 83% 16 MO
11186 Cannon Falls JO 10-1 1604 4-1 80% 10 MN
11187 IJV 12 Emerald 1604 18-6 75% 12 IL
11188 AR VC 14-B 1604 9-3 75% 14 NM
11189 TORRI 15-Alexandre 1604 6-2 75% 15 PR
11190 Gators 15-White 1604 30-10 75% 15 MA
11191 SG Elite 15-Elite 1604 6-2 75% 15 CA
11192 MC Panthers 10-Gold 1604 12-3 75% 10 TX
11193 Thumb Fusion 16 1604 20-7 74% 16 MI
11194 SPVC 16-1 premier 1604 25-9 74% 16 LA
11195 South Shore Slam 14-Lime 1604 16-7 70% 14 WI
11196 Abingdon Falcons 14 1604 21-9 70% 14 VA
11197 Countdown 14 National 1604 33-14 70% 14 FL
11198 Academy 16 Pearl 1604 39-18 68% 16 NC
11199 Cloud Peak 11 Elite 1604 34-16 68% 11 WY
11200 Ichiban 14-G.a.b.i 1604 19-8 68% 14 GA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.