2025-2026 Season — Page 224 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11151 | VAQUE 17-1 | 1605 | 6-2 | 75% | 17 | PR |
| 11152 | Empire 15-Power ryan | 1604 | 37-19 | 66% | 15 | CA |
| 11153 | Idaho ONE 15-Gray | 1604 | 33-25 | 57% | 15 | ID |
| 11154 | COVC 15-1 | 1604 | 8-9 | 47% | 15 | OR |
| 11155 | EU 15-Black | 1604 | 26-31 | 46% | 15 | IN |
| 11156 | DCVB 15-1 | 1604 | 20-18 | 51% | 15 | OK |
| 11157 | Arkansas Jrs 16-1 | 1604 | 4-1 | 80% | 16 | AR |
| 11158 | Crimson 15-National | 1604 | 33-21 | 61% | 15 | CO |
| 11159 | Apex 15-1 girls | 1604 | 25-45 | 36% | 15 | SC |
| 11160 | PVC 18-S | 1604 | 8-5 | 62% | 18 | FL |
| 11161 | West TN Volleyball 12 West Tn Warriors-O’Bright (DE) | 1604 | 3-1 | 60% | 12 | TN |
| 11162 | TAV 12-Gold | 1604 | 22-14 | 58% | 12 | TX |
| 11163 | Va Wave 16-Crest pacific | 1604 | 42-19 | 69% | 16 | VA |
| 11164 | WC 16-2 | 1604 | 16-5 | 76% | 16 | FL |
| 11165 | Sartell 17-1 | 1604 | 21-8 | 66% | 17 | MN |
| 11166 | Iowa Select 16-Black | 1604 | 22-22 | 48% | 16 | IA |
| 11167 | Va Wave 17 Tsunami | 1604 | 28-23 | 55% | 17 | VA |
| 11168 | RockwoodThunder 16-Carolina | 1604 | 27-24 | 53% | 16 | MO |
| 11169 | NCWVBC 14-1 gold | 1604 | 23-15 | 61% | 14 | WA |
| 11170 | Vision 14-Exv black | 1604 | 22-16 | 51% | 14 | TX |
| 11171 | Slam VBC 16-1 | 1604 | 6-5 | 55% | 16 | MN |
| 11172 | CinciVB Acad 11-Hayes | 1604 | 20-14 | 59% | 11 | OH |
| 11173 | Vaqueros 11-F ale | 1604 | 18-7 | 72% | 11 | PR |
| 11174 | Big Sky 14-3 | 1604 | 21-12 | 54% | 14 | MT |
| 11175 | Lansing Volleyball 16 | 1604 | 4-0 | 100% | 16 | NY |
| 11176 | SA Magic 14 PREMIER | 1604 | 30-26 | 54% | 14 | TX |
| 11177 | CPU Storm 14-Black | 1604 | 6-3 | 43% | 14 | IA |
| 11178 | 850 Elite Volleyball Club 13-1 | 1604 | 15-21 | 42% | 13 | AL |
| 11179 | Riptide Volleyball Academy 14-Blue | 1604 | 13-1 | 93% | 14 | FL |
| 11180 | Club Sand 13-Mike | 1604 | 4-13 | 18% | 13 | UT |
| 11181 | CLBRK 14-2 | 1604 | 12-4 | 75% | 14 | WI |
| 11182 | BRAVO 13-Red | 1604 | 33-19 | 63% | 13 | KY |
| 11183 | Iowa Select 13-Mizuno | 1604 | 25-22 | 52% | 13 | IA |
| 11184 | Hardin Volleydogs 16-1 | 1604 | 10-4 | 56% | 16 | MT |
| 11185 | Forza 15-Black | 1604 | 45-18 | 71% | 15 | IL |
| 11186 | Rock Ridge 12 | 1604 | 5-2 | 71% | 12 | MN |
| 11187 | SA Force 12 Select | 1604 | 18-8 | 67% | 12 | TX |
| 11188 | Hype VB 12-Burt | 1604 | 6-2 | 75% | 12 | MS |
| 11189 | Gardiner 16-1 | 1604 | 8-4 | 57% | 16 | MT |
| 11190 | Invicta 14-Sarah | 1604 | 33-17 | 65% | 14 | UT |
| 11191 | GSA 14 | 1604 | 6-2 | 75% | 14 | ID |
| 11192 | Laker JO 14-1 | 1604 | 12-3 | 80% | 14 | MN |
| 11193 | ECVC 13-BLACK | 1604 | 25-31 | 45% | 13 | VA |
| 11194 | Elite 14-National tiago | 1604 | 48-21 | 70% | 14 | FL |
| 11195 | Emerald Coast 14-National - india | 1604 | 7-5 | 58% | 14 | FL |
| 11196 | IOWA VIBE TEAL 16-2 | 1604 | 4-0 | 100% | 16 | IA |
| 11197 | Cadets 13-C | 1604 | 17-11 | 61% | 13 | IN |
| 11198 | Georgetown Impact 16-2 | 1604 | 8-4 | 62% | 16 | OH |
| 11199 | EVA 18 Elite | 1604 | 17-12 | 59% | 18 | AR |
| 11200 | BAVC 18-National joslin | 1604 | 12-8 | 60% | 18 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.