Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 224 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
11151 VAQUE 17-1 1605 6-2 75% 17 PR
11152 Empire 15-Power ryan 1604 37-19 66% 15 CA
11153 Idaho ONE 15-Gray 1604 33-25 57% 15 ID
11154 COVC 15-1 1604 8-9 47% 15 OR
11155 EU 15-Black 1604 26-31 46% 15 IN
11156 DCVB 15-1 1604 20-18 51% 15 OK
11157 Arkansas Jrs 16-1 1604 4-1 80% 16 AR
11158 Crimson 15-National 1604 33-21 61% 15 CO
11159 Apex 15-1 girls 1604 25-45 36% 15 SC
11160 PVC 18-S 1604 8-5 62% 18 FL
11161 West TN Volleyball 12 West Tn Warriors-O’Bright (DE) 1604 3-1 60% 12 TN
11162 TAV 12-Gold 1604 22-14 58% 12 TX
11163 Va Wave 16-Crest pacific 1604 42-19 69% 16 VA
11164 WC 16-2 1604 16-5 76% 16 FL
11165 Sartell 17-1 1604 21-8 66% 17 MN
11166 Iowa Select 16-Black 1604 22-22 48% 16 IA
11167 Va Wave 17 Tsunami 1604 28-23 55% 17 VA
11168 RockwoodThunder 16-Carolina 1604 27-24 53% 16 MO
11169 NCWVBC 14-1 gold 1604 23-15 61% 14 WA
11170 Vision 14-Exv black 1604 22-16 51% 14 TX
11171 Slam VBC 16-1 1604 6-5 55% 16 MN
11172 CinciVB Acad 11-Hayes 1604 20-14 59% 11 OH
11173 Vaqueros 11-F ale 1604 18-7 72% 11 PR
11174 Big Sky 14-3 1604 21-12 54% 14 MT
11175 Lansing Volleyball 16 1604 4-0 100% 16 NY
11176 SA Magic 14 PREMIER 1604 30-26 54% 14 TX
11177 CPU Storm 14-Black 1604 6-3 43% 14 IA
11178 850 Elite Volleyball Club 13-1 1604 15-21 42% 13 AL
11179 Riptide Volleyball Academy 14-Blue 1604 13-1 93% 14 FL
11180 Club Sand 13-Mike 1604 4-13 18% 13 UT
11181 CLBRK 14-2 1604 12-4 75% 14 WI
11182 BRAVO 13-Red 1604 33-19 63% 13 KY
11183 Iowa Select 13-Mizuno 1604 25-22 52% 13 IA
11184 Hardin Volleydogs 16-1 1604 10-4 56% 16 MT
11185 Forza 15-Black 1604 45-18 71% 15 IL
11186 Rock Ridge 12 1604 5-2 71% 12 MN
11187 SA Force 12 Select 1604 18-8 67% 12 TX
11188 Hype VB 12-Burt 1604 6-2 75% 12 MS
11189 Gardiner 16-1 1604 8-4 57% 16 MT
11190 Invicta 14-Sarah 1604 33-17 65% 14 UT
11191 GSA 14 1604 6-2 75% 14 ID
11192 Laker JO 14-1 1604 12-3 80% 14 MN
11193 ECVC 13-BLACK 1604 25-31 45% 13 VA
11194 Elite 14-National tiago 1604 48-21 70% 14 FL
11195 Emerald Coast 14-National - india 1604 7-5 58% 14 FL
11196 IOWA VIBE TEAL 16-2 1604 4-0 100% 16 IA
11197 Cadets 13-C 1604 17-11 61% 13 IN
11198 Georgetown Impact 16-2 1604 8-4 62% 16 OH
11199 EVA 18 Elite 1604 17-12 59% 18 AR
11200 BAVC 18-National joslin 1604 12-8 60% 18 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.