2025-2026 Season — Page 223 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11101 | Northern Attack 14-1 | 1605 | 12-3 | 80% | 14 | MN |
| 11102 | GCVC 15-Austin | 1605 | 23-12 | 66% | 15 | IN |
| 11103 | SPORTING EDGE 16-Armour | 1605 | 40-22 | 63% | 16 | TX |
| 11104 | No Limits 13-Navy | 1605 | 42-27 | 61% | 13 | FL |
| 11105 | Spiketown Sheboygan 13-Black | 1605 | 17-11 | 61% | 13 | WI |
| 11106 | ENVY 18-Cyclone | 1605 | 22-15 | 59% | 18 | RI |
| 11107 | Prime 14-Taylor | 1605 | 34-22 | 61% | 14 | CO |
| 11108 | HP South 12 Diamond | 1605 | 23-15 | 59% | 12 | MO |
| 11109 | Jaguars 16-Black | 1605 | 30-17 | 63% | 16 | NY |
| 11110 | Boltz 18-25 | 1605 | 14-6 | 70% | 18 | AL |
| 11111 | LEVBC 12-National | 1605 | 27-27 | 49% | 12 | MD |
| 11112 | ONEVA 18-1 | 1605 | 10-6 | 63% | 18 | KS |
| 11113 | NDVBC Heat Wave 15 | 1605 | 31-18 | 58% | 15 | MO |
| 11114 | Tropics Girls 16-S elite | 1605 | 39-23 | 63% | 16 | FL |
| 11115 | Midwest United 13 Navy | 1605 | 22-14 | 61% | 13 | MN |
| 11116 | P3R 16-Platinum | 1605 | 31-28 | 53% | 16 | PA |
| 11117 | JJVA Club 16-A | 1605 | 13-10 | 57% | 16 | FL |
| 11118 | Core 13-National | 1605 | 33-19 | 63% | 13 | CA |
| 11119 | Boise Ignite VBC 17-National | 1605 | 11-4 | 73% | 17 | ID |
| 11120 | VV U15 | 1605 | 48-25 | 61% | 15 | VA |
| 11121 | Hitt 14 Deanna | 1605 | 7-4 | 64% | 14 | MI |
| 11122 | Force volleyball club-IC 17 Force volleyball club-IC | 1605 | 21-9 | 70% | 17 | MI |
| 11123 | Club MVP G13-1 | 1605 | 8-5 | 57% | 13 | MO |
| 11124 | adidas DYNASTY 10-1 | 1605 | 8-6 | 47% | 10 | KS |
| 11125 | Hunter's 17-Black | 1605 | 52-22 | 70% | 17 | FL |
| 11126 | Supernova 12-Allstars | 1605 | 20-15 | 57% | 12 | CA |
| 11127 | SWARM 16 | 1605 | 15-4 | 79% | 16 | SC |
| 11128 | Gold Cal Jrs 12-Air | 1605 | 10-4 | 71% | 12 | NV |
| 11129 | IMUA UVC 13-Ua | 1605 | 27-15 | 64% | 13 | CA |
| 11130 | IVC 15-National angela | 1605 | 20-8 | 67% | 15 | TX |
| 11131 | FORZA1 NORTH 17-Nat red | 1605 | 11-7 | 61% | 17 | CA |
| 11132 | MVP 60450 17-Black | 1605 | 10-7 | 59% | 17 | IL |
| 11133 | Iowa Vibe 13-1 | 1605 | 4-0 | 100% | 13 | IA |
| 11134 | OWV 16-Elite | 1605 | 6-1 | 86% | 16 | FL |
| 11135 | SA Empire 14 Gold | 1605 | 21-8 | 64% | 14 | TX |
| 11136 | GJ 13 PREMIER | 1605 | 32-29 | 52% | 13 | FL |
| 11137 | Elevate 12-Pink spring | 1605 | 7-1 | 88% | 12 | IL |
| 11138 | ALJRS 13 American | 1605 | 26-13 | 67% | 13 | AL |
| 11139 | Barefoot 13-Red | 1605 | 18-4 | 75% | 13 | TX |
| 11140 | BEVBC 13 Navy | 1605 | 34-12 | 68% | 13 | MD |
| 11141 | BVA 15-National luna | 1605 | 6-2 | 75% | 15 | MN |
| 11142 | Crosscourt 14-Purple | 1605 | 35-36 | 49% | 14 | PA |
| 11143 | USANY Calculus 15-1 | 1605 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | NY |
| 11144 | Downstate 13-Cobras | 1605 | 22-20 | 52% | 13 | NY |
| 11145 | DaKine 12-National pink | 1605 | 28-23 | 55% | 12 | WA |
| 11146 | AFVBC 14-Everest | 1605 | 27-19 | 59% | 14 | CA |
| 11147 | SASVBC G 16 KAWIKA | 1605 | 31-19 | 62% | 16 | HI |
| 11148 | Kilimanjaro - MVC 17 | 1605 | 17-16 | 52% | 17 | ON |
| 11149 | Thumb Fusion 16 | 1605 | 20-7 | 74% | 16 | MI |
| 11150 | Roanoke United 14 Alleghany | 1605 | 16-7 | 70% | 14 | VA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.