Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 223 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
11101 618 VBC 16 1605 21-15 53% 16
11102 Mountain1 16-2 tilda 1605 18-10 53% 16
11103 Champions 14-1 elite 1605 9-7 56% 14
11104 NWAJS 16-Adidas 1605 6-3 67% 16
11105 Iowa Juniors 16-Black 1605 6-3 67% 16
11106 ENVY 12-1 lavaflow 1605 26-13 67% 12 NE
11107 Gators 18-Black 1605 32-26 55% 18 MA
11108 Texas Heat 14-1 1605 22-10 67% 14 TX
11109 26 NU Breed 18-G 1605 6-3 67% 18 CA
11110 Chaos 12u White 1605 4-1 67% 12 MN
11111 VC United 16-Navy elite 1605 24-16 60% 16 IL
11112 CMASS EDGE 16-White 1605 26-19 58% 16 MA
11113 Supernova 12-Allstars 1605 20-15 57% 12 CA
11114 AVC CLE 13-Blue 1605 30-23 57% 13 OH
11115 Idaho Show 17-Natl wong 1605 4-3 57% 17 ID
11116 Colorado Elite 15 Grizzly 1605 32-25 56% 15 CO
11117 BEV 15 Empire 1605 36-32 53% 15 NY
11118 P3R 16-Platinum 1605 31-28 53% 16 PA
11119 Supernova 15 Allstars 1605 25-23 52% 15 CA
11120 ID Crush 13-Blue 1605 32-29 52% 13 ID
11121 Vision 14-Exv black 1605 22-16 51% 14 CA
11122 Caroga Lake 13 1605 8-5 50% 13 NY
11123 TORCH 16-Nicolette 1605 19-19 50% 16 CA
11124 IMPACT 16-National 1605 4-4 50% 16 AK
11125 Victory 15-Elite gray 1605 26-22 49% 15 TX
11126 LEVBC 12-National 1605 27-27 49% 12 MD
11127 501 Volley 15-2 national 1605 28-32 47% 15 AR
11128 adidas DYNASTY 10-1 1605 8-6 47% 10 KS
11129 SECC Rebels VBA 15-1 1605 22-9 63% 15 MA
11130 AR SELECT 15-Elite 1605 55-21 72% 15 AR
11131 EVOLVE 15-Black 1605 29-10 69% 15 TX
11132 LAVA 13 Whitney 1605 18-10 64% 13 NC
11133 Lions Starved Rock 17-Nat 1605 24-17 59% 17 IL
11134 Monti Club JO 16-1 1605 30-15 67% 16 MN
11135 Iowa Vibe 13-1 1605 4-0 100% 13 IA
11136 MiElite 14-Ns east 1605 23-15 61% 14 MI
11137 Empire 15-Power ryan 1605 37-19 66% 15 CA
11138 Southern Heat 13 1605 4-0 100% 13 WI
11139 Lansing Volleyball 16 1605 4-0 100% 16 NY
11140 DVA 15 Premier 1605 28-16 64% 15 PA
11141 Keweenaw VBC 16-2 1605 11-5 69% 16 MI
11142 MoCo MAVS 16-White 1605 40-22 65% 16 TX
11143 PAVC - NC 16-Onyx 1605 31-21 60% 16 NC
11144 BSE 16-1 1605 17-10 63% 16 FL
11145 575 14-Lpr jeff 1605 25-16 61% 14 GA
11146 TSUNAMI 14-2 1605 14-6 70% 14 OR
11147 Boise Ignite VBC 17-National 1605 11-4 73% 17 ID
11148 Michio Chicago 12-Select 1605 17-8 68% 12 IL
11149 Hammerhead 17-1 1605 27-15 64% 17 MN
11150 J Hermiller 13 1605 3-1 75% 13 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.