Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 223 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
11101 Northern Attack 14-1 1605 12-3 80% 14 MN
11102 GCVC 15-Austin 1605 23-12 66% 15 IN
11103 SPORTING EDGE 16-Armour 1605 40-22 63% 16 TX
11104 No Limits 13-Navy 1605 42-27 61% 13 FL
11105 Spiketown Sheboygan 13-Black 1605 17-11 61% 13 WI
11106 ENVY 18-Cyclone 1605 22-15 59% 18 RI
11107 Prime 14-Taylor 1605 34-22 61% 14 CO
11108 HP South 12 Diamond 1605 23-15 59% 12 MO
11109 Jaguars 16-Black 1605 30-17 63% 16 NY
11110 Boltz 18-25 1605 14-6 70% 18 AL
11111 LEVBC 12-National 1605 27-27 49% 12 MD
11112 ONEVA 18-1 1605 10-6 63% 18 KS
11113 NDVBC Heat Wave 15 1605 31-18 58% 15 MO
11114 Tropics Girls 16-S elite 1605 39-23 63% 16 FL
11115 Midwest United 13 Navy 1605 22-14 61% 13 MN
11116 P3R 16-Platinum 1605 31-28 53% 16 PA
11117 JJVA Club 16-A 1605 13-10 57% 16 FL
11118 Core 13-National 1605 33-19 63% 13 CA
11119 Boise Ignite VBC 17-National 1605 11-4 73% 17 ID
11120 VV U15 1605 48-25 61% 15 VA
11121 Hitt 14 Deanna 1605 7-4 64% 14 MI
11122 Force volleyball club-IC 17 Force volleyball club-IC 1605 21-9 70% 17 MI
11123 Club MVP G13-1 1605 8-5 57% 13 MO
11124 adidas DYNASTY 10-1 1605 8-6 47% 10 KS
11125 Hunter's 17-Black 1605 52-22 70% 17 FL
11126 Supernova 12-Allstars 1605 20-15 57% 12 CA
11127 SWARM 16 1605 15-4 79% 16 SC
11128 Gold Cal Jrs 12-Air 1605 10-4 71% 12 NV
11129 IMUA UVC 13-Ua 1605 27-15 64% 13 CA
11130 IVC 15-National angela 1605 20-8 67% 15 TX
11131 FORZA1 NORTH 17-Nat red 1605 11-7 61% 17 CA
11132 MVP 60450 17-Black 1605 10-7 59% 17 IL
11133 Iowa Vibe 13-1 1605 4-0 100% 13 IA
11134 OWV 16-Elite 1605 6-1 86% 16 FL
11135 SA Empire 14 Gold 1605 21-8 64% 14 TX
11136 GJ 13 PREMIER 1605 32-29 52% 13 FL
11137 Elevate 12-Pink spring 1605 7-1 88% 12 IL
11138 ALJRS 13 American 1605 26-13 67% 13 AL
11139 Barefoot 13-Red 1605 18-4 75% 13 TX
11140 BEVBC 13 Navy 1605 34-12 68% 13 MD
11141 BVA 15-National luna 1605 6-2 75% 15 MN
11142 Crosscourt 14-Purple 1605 35-36 49% 14 PA
11143 USANY Calculus 15-1 1605 2-3 40% 15 NY
11144 Downstate 13-Cobras 1605 22-20 52% 13 NY
11145 DaKine 12-National pink 1605 28-23 55% 12 WA
11146 AFVBC 14-Everest 1605 27-19 59% 14 CA
11147 SASVBC G 16 KAWIKA 1605 31-19 62% 16 HI
11148 Kilimanjaro - MVC 17 1605 17-16 52% 17 ON
11149 Thumb Fusion 16 1605 20-7 74% 16 MI
11150 Roanoke United 14 Alleghany 1605 16-7 70% 14 VA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.