Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 222 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
11051 Ignite 15-Red 1606 40-27 60% 15 WA
11052 AZ OUTLAWS 16 ELITE 1606 34-19 64% 16 AZ
11053 Notorious 16-Adam/leo 1606 12-3 80% 16 CA
11054 Mission Trails 14-Ken 1606 7-1 88% 14 CA
11055 EMV 11-National black april 1606 3-4 43% 11 TX
11056 Desert Stars Angels 14-1 1606 21-8 72% 14 NM
11057 Adrenaline 17-Lindsey 1606 23-13 64% 17 IA
11058 Sportime 18-Black 1606 29-18 62% 18 NY
11059 Pulelehua 10-S 1606 3-0 100% 10 HI
11060 ENVY 14-Black 1606 9-5 60% 14 IA
11061 NJ RONIN 17 KATANA 1606 27-23 54% 17 NJ
11062 QCA 17-Under armour black 1606 19-10 66% 17 MS
11063 Nova Volleyball Club 17 Nova Northeast MAROON 1606 7-1 78% 17 PA
11064 TVS 11 Cookie 1606 9-4 60% 11 TX
11065 Bay Area Eagles 14-2 1606 33-23 59% 14 CA
11066 Unified 14-1 1606 28-24 54% 14 MI
11067 RVA Girls 14 1606 44-17 72% 14 MD
11068 TX Premier 16-National 1606 23-24 49% 16 TX
11069 Momentum Volleyball Club 17-Tara/david 1606 11-10 52% 17 AZ
11070 EMV 13-Royal chelsee 1606 21-10 60% 13 TX
11071 SLVVC 17-Blue 1606 37-18 65% 17 MO
11072 MADFROG 15-East diamond 1606 5-3 63% 15 TX
11073 Gold Coast 14-1 1606 27-14 66% 14 FL
11074 MVC 12-3 1606 6-1 86% 12 MI
11075 Rogue Volleyball 17 Rogue Volleyball 1606 26-10 72% 17 OH
11076 Downstate 17-Cobras 1606 45-27 63% 17 NY
11077 NPJ Seattle 14-Black 1606 47-39 55% 14 WA
11078 Rice City 12-Red 1606 16-11 57% 12 LA
11079 MN Premier 16-1 1606 18-9 67% 16 MN
11080 DJVBC 12-1 1606 4-2 67% 12 PA
11081 VVB 13-Andria 1606 28-13 68% 13 GA
11082 Kairos 12 Beta 1606 31-28 53% 12 SD
11083 Diablo Black 14-1 1605 5-2 71% 14 CA
11084 GI Vikes 12-Black 1605 4-0 67% 12 NE
11085 Miami United 14-Matt 1605 4-1 80% 14 FL
11086 MDJRS 14 Open 1605 35-17 61% 14 MD
11087 Dubuque Insanity 16-1 1605 3-0 100% 16 IA
11088 New York Elite 14-Black 1605 22-20 52% 14 NY
11089 FH 15-Alaka'i-courtney 1605 21-18 48% 15 TX
11090 Trinity Volleyball Club 14 Trinity Volleyball Club 1605 5-0 100% 14 OR
11091 GP 14-State black 1605 50-26 66% 14 FL
11092 CJVA 16-Onyx 1605 32-42 43% 16 NJ
11093 Caroga Lake 13 1605 8-5 50% 13 NY
11094 IMPACT 16-National 1605 4-4 50% 16 AK
11095 Rockwood Thunder 12-Black 1605 25-17 60% 12 MO
11096 Chaos 12u White 1605 4-1 67% 12 ND
11097 ND Elite 18-Winter emery 1605 15-5 71% 18 ND
11098 HP Illinois 11-Select 1605 18-15 53% 11 MO
11099 Coastal 18-1 national 1605 31-32 48% 18 MA
11100 Hub City 16u 1605 34-15 64% 16 MD
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.