Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 222 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
11051 Wildfire 13-N claire 1606 28-28 50% 13 FL
11052 ATOMIC 12 National 1606 36-18 67% 12 MI
11053 Coastline 13-Black 1606 15-9 63% 13 NC
11054 Dig 13-Black lindsey 1606 2-0 100% 13 TX
11055 GCVC 18 Silver 1606 14-23 38% 18 OH
11056 Barefoot 13-Red 1606 18-4 75% 13 TX
11057 L2 15-2 1606 34-28 55% 15 MI
11058 TW Skyline 16 Silver 1606 23-11 68% 16 TX
11059 360 14-Kaos red 1606 18-18 45% 14 TX
11060 AEV 14 Select 1606 19-8 70% 14 TX
11061 248 Elite 14-Blue 1606 13-6 68% 14 MI
11062 TX432 15-1 1606 3-4 43% 15 TX
11063 SA Force 15-Select 1606 29-16 64% 15 TX
11064 Platform 14-Navy 1606 19-8 68% 14 IA
11065 Peak VA 15-Blue 1606 25-20 52% 15 TX
11066 Adrenaline 12-Alicia 1606 9-3 64% 12 IA
11067 Sportime 18-Black 1606 29-18 62% 18 NY
11068 CMASS EDGE 15-Black 1606 19-48 28% 15 MA
11069 Elite Alliance 18-1 1606 7-3 70% 18 SD
11070 HP South 12 Diamond 1606 23-15 59% 12 MO
11071 Midwest United 13 Navy 1606 22-14 61% 13 MN
11072 Tstreet 12-Julia 1606 22-12 65% 12 CA
11073 ARIZONA STORM 13-Boltz 1606 31-29 52% 13 AZ
11074 BVA 15-National luna 1606 6-2 75% 15 CA
11075 KIVA 17-Black 1606 40-36 53% 17 KY
11076 NYC Impact 16-National 1606 37-24 61% 16 NY
11077 Cobra 14-Black 1606 12-5 63% 14 LA
11078 EMV 13-Royal chelsee 1606 21-10 60% 13 TX
11079 NxtLvl 17-Blue 1606 24-34 41% 17 PA
11080 Stingray Black 15-1 1606 12-8 60% 15 CA
11081 CVC 12-3 1606 18-8 67% 12 MN
11082 Fighting Angels 16-1 1606 13-11 54% 16 NV
11083 EPTX Bombers 13 1606 14-9 61% 13 TX
11084 WVBA 14 Molten 1606 38-32 54% 14 WA
11085 Hub City 16u 1606 34-15 64% 16 MD
11086 Mill City 15-Orange 1606 19-20 49% 15 MA
11087 No Limits 11-Elite 1606 13-8 62% 11 FL
11088 UVA 14-Vivian 1606 23-18 56% 14 LA
11089 ESCAED 16-1 1606 6-1 86% 16 PR
11090 Dig This! VBC 18-Black national 1606 3-1 75% 18 NV
11091 Alliance 16-Regional 1606 16-8 67% 16 TN
11092 United VBA 14-Gray 1606 18-11 62% 14 TX
11093 TFVC 14-1 1606 16-10 62% 14 TN
11094 OptimalVBC 12-1 1606 4-0 100% 12 GA
11095 Pulelehua 10-S 1606 3-0 100% 10
11096 Goshen 14-Habecker 1606 5-1 83% 14
11097 Carcajou Bleu 15 1606 6-3 67% 15
11098 CEGCYRA Eureka Hornets 12 1606 3-0 100% 12 IL
11099 TVS 11 Cookie 1606 9-4 60% 11 TX
11100 ENVY 14-Black 1606 9-5 60% 14 NE
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.