Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 221 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
11001 BRUSA 18-2 costa 1607 6-2 75% 18 CA
11002 Sky High Adidas 14-Silver 1607 33-20 62% 14 IL
11003 MVP 14-Blue 1607 35-37 49% 14 WI
11004 AEV 15-National 1607 23-15 61% 15 TX
11005 IMUA UVC 13-Ua 1607 27-15 64% 13 CA
11006 Fearless 18U 1607 25-15 61% 18 IA
11007 FIRST TRIUMPH 12-1 1607 4-0 100% 12 TX
11008 CVC 13 National 1607 34-27 56% 13 TX
11009 BVC 16 Sam 1607 21-13 62% 16 CA
11010 KIVA 14-Grey 1607 37-19 66% 14 KY
11011 H Skyline 14-Gray 1607 14-10 58% 14 TX
11012 JNVBC 17-E teal 1607 23-17 55% 17 IA
11013 BRAVO 12-Black 1607 33-17 66% 12 KY
11014 PSVA 16-2 1607 33-24 58% 16 FL
11015 No Limits VBC 17-National 1607 4-3 57% 17 FL
11016 BOOST 15 Navy 1607 23-13 57% 15 IA
11017 PEPVB 12-Black 1607 11-7 58% 12 GA
11018 Club Velocity 12-3 1607 12-5 71% 12 AR
11019 CADO 16 REMEDY 1607 23-19 53% 16 NY
11020 LTX SELECT 16-Yellow 1607 17-13 57% 16 TX
11021 Emerald Rain 17-Elite 1607 32-29 52% 17 WA
11022 Seal Beach 14-White 1607 12-11 52% 14 CA
11023 DJVBC 12-1 1607 4-2 67% 12 DE
11024 RVC 12-Blue 1607 40-16 71% 12 TX
11025 Coalition 18-1 1607 27-17 61% 18 CO
11026 603 United 14-Central blue 1607 26-8 76% 14 NH
11027 Boston United 17-National - kyle 1607 24-39 38% 17 MA
11028 Elevation 14-Ascent 1607 27-24 53% 14 CO
11029 SOUTH SHORE 14-Mizuno 1607 14-11 56% 14 MA
11030 DCVA 12-R 1607 5-4 56% 12 NM
11031 Rock Ridge 12 1607 5-2 71% 12
11032 VEVA Fury 17-Orange 1607 32-14 70% 17 PA
11033 Lions SWest Prairie 18-S 1607 20-10 67% 18 IL
11034 Yorktowne VB 18-Red 1607 28-16 64% 18 PA
11035 BC 15-1 1607 5-3 63% 15 CA
11036 SF Elite 13-Jason 1607 19-25 43% 13 CA
11037 Iowa PowerPlex 18-Wieland 1606 4-1 80% 18
11038 MMP 16-Black 1606 11-9 55% 16
11039 Rocky Elite 15-Black 1606 37-26 59% 15 CO
11040 SMV 14-1 1606 11-3 79% 14 MN
11041 Rice City 14-Red 1606 18-8 69% 14 LA
11042 Arkansas Jrs 16-1 1606 4-1 80% 16 AR
11043 Elite 14-National tiago 1606 48-21 70% 14 FL
11044 WV Galaxy 14 1606 27-17 61% 14 WV
11045 Eagan Juniors 12 1606 9-5 64% 12 MN
11046 DCVB 15-1 1606 20-18 51% 15 OK
11047 Houston Force 14-Empire 1606 31-26 54% 14 TX
11048 Premier Nebraska 11-Red 1606 7-9 44% 11 NE
11049 ONE Volleyball Academy G14-1 1606 6-3 67% 14 KS
11050 XTEAM 15-1 1606 5-2 71% 15 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.