Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 221 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
11001 Chi City 14-1 regional 1607 19-7 70% 14 IL
11002 Club Koa 14-Crest 1607 25-12 68% 14 CA
11003 FC Elite 16-Ex 1607 17-2 89% 16 WI
11004 MVSA 10-Lightning 1607 15-7 58% 10 MD
11005 575 15-Lpnb savannah 1607 37-25 60% 15 GA
11006 SVA 14-S red 1607 4-0 100% 14 MN
11007 Lions Starved Rock 17-Nat 1607 24-17 59% 17 IL
11008 EPTX Bombers 13 1607 14-9 61% 13 TX
11009 Firehawks 17-1 1607 10-5 67% 17 AZ
11010 Performance 16-1 1606 21-9 68% 16
11011 Carcajou Bleu 15 1606 6-3 67% 15
11012 Velocity 219 15-National 1606 51-18 74% 15 IN
11013 IPV 15-Hp 1606 26-10 70% 15 IL
11014 RHVC 18-1 1606 26-14 65% 18 KY
11015 Prodigy 15-3 elite 1606 36-20 64% 15 NY
11016 Brooklyn Elite Volleyball 15-Empire 1606 33-28 54% 15 NY
11017 865VB 15-Elite 1606 27-10 73% 15 TN
11018 Netforce 16-Ryan 1606 11-8 58% 16 AL
11019 Roanoke United 15-Red 1606 31-30 51% 15 VA
11020 Bama Elite 16-N iron titans 1606 35-18 66% 16 AL
11021 Aspire NW 14-2 beaverton 1606 23-14 62% 14 OR
11022 A5 Volleyball Club 17-North 1606 6-2 75% 17 GA
11023 White Cloud Volleyball Club 13 1606 7-3 70% 13 AZ
11024 Colorado Juniors 11-Christi 1606 28-21 57% 11 CO
11025 Tstreet 12-Julia 1606 22-12 65% 12 CA
11026 CJHEAT 14-1 1606 20-10 67% 14 NJ
11027 RVC 12-Blue 1606 40-16 71% 12 KY
11028 Aspire 16-Black 1606 37-30 55% 16 AZ
11029 PR Select 15-1 1606 7-10 41% 15 PR
11030 Mill City 15-Orange 1606 19-20 49% 15 MA
11031 Eagan Juniors 12 1606 9-5 64% 12 MN
11032 Boss CLE 15-4 1606 15-11 58% 15 OH
11033 DVC 14-Gray 1606 9-3 75% 14 OH
11034 TIGERS 13 1606 32-21 60% 13 IN
11035 Synergy 12-Diller 1606 5-1 83% 12 OH
11036 Iowa Elite 13-Storm 1606 15-6 71% 13 IA
11037 Blaze 12-1 1606 7-3 70% 12 IA
11038 HOV 16 Navy 1606 21-10 68% 16 VA
11039 GoTime 16-1n 1606 35-28 56% 16 IN
11040 BVC 16 Sam 1606 21-13 62% 16 CA
11041 Goshen 14-Habecker 1606 5-1 83% 14 IN
11042 SVC 16 National 1606 22-15 59% 16 IA
11043 HP Illinois 12-Select 1606 15-15 50% 12 MO
11044 KCV 14-1 faith 1606 4-1 80% 14 CA
11045 STORM 16-2national 1606 12-4 75% 16 CA
11046 South County 14-Blue 1606 12-23 34% 14 RI
11047 Freeze ND 16 Polar 1606 43-33 56% 16 ND
11048 Ozark Juniors 13 National 1606 27-22 55% 13 AR
11049 Dig 13-Black lindsey 1606 2-0 100% 13 TX
11050 Princeton 15-1 national 1606 7-15 32% 15 NJ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.