2025-2026 Season — Page 221 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11001 | Chi City 14-1 regional | 1607 | 19-7 | 70% | 14 | IL |
| 11002 | Club Koa 14-Crest | 1607 | 25-12 | 68% | 14 | CA |
| 11003 | FC Elite 16-Ex | 1607 | 17-2 | 89% | 16 | WI |
| 11004 | MVSA 10-Lightning | 1607 | 15-7 | 58% | 10 | MD |
| 11005 | 575 15-Lpnb savannah | 1607 | 37-25 | 60% | 15 | GA |
| 11006 | SVA 14-S red | 1607 | 4-0 | 100% | 14 | MN |
| 11007 | Lions Starved Rock 17-Nat | 1607 | 24-17 | 59% | 17 | IL |
| 11008 | EPTX Bombers 13 | 1607 | 14-9 | 61% | 13 | TX |
| 11009 | Firehawks 17-1 | 1607 | 10-5 | 67% | 17 | AZ |
| 11010 | Performance 16-1 | 1606 | 21-9 | 68% | 16 | |
| 11011 | Carcajou Bleu 15 | 1606 | 6-3 | 67% | 15 | |
| 11012 | Velocity 219 15-National | 1606 | 51-18 | 74% | 15 | IN |
| 11013 | IPV 15-Hp | 1606 | 26-10 | 70% | 15 | IL |
| 11014 | RHVC 18-1 | 1606 | 26-14 | 65% | 18 | KY |
| 11015 | Prodigy 15-3 elite | 1606 | 36-20 | 64% | 15 | NY |
| 11016 | Brooklyn Elite Volleyball 15-Empire | 1606 | 33-28 | 54% | 15 | NY |
| 11017 | 865VB 15-Elite | 1606 | 27-10 | 73% | 15 | TN |
| 11018 | Netforce 16-Ryan | 1606 | 11-8 | 58% | 16 | AL |
| 11019 | Roanoke United 15-Red | 1606 | 31-30 | 51% | 15 | VA |
| 11020 | Bama Elite 16-N iron titans | 1606 | 35-18 | 66% | 16 | AL |
| 11021 | Aspire NW 14-2 beaverton | 1606 | 23-14 | 62% | 14 | OR |
| 11022 | A5 Volleyball Club 17-North | 1606 | 6-2 | 75% | 17 | GA |
| 11023 | White Cloud Volleyball Club 13 | 1606 | 7-3 | 70% | 13 | AZ |
| 11024 | Colorado Juniors 11-Christi | 1606 | 28-21 | 57% | 11 | CO |
| 11025 | Tstreet 12-Julia | 1606 | 22-12 | 65% | 12 | CA |
| 11026 | CJHEAT 14-1 | 1606 | 20-10 | 67% | 14 | NJ |
| 11027 | RVC 12-Blue | 1606 | 40-16 | 71% | 12 | KY |
| 11028 | Aspire 16-Black | 1606 | 37-30 | 55% | 16 | AZ |
| 11029 | PR Select 15-1 | 1606 | 7-10 | 41% | 15 | PR |
| 11030 | Mill City 15-Orange | 1606 | 19-20 | 49% | 15 | MA |
| 11031 | Eagan Juniors 12 | 1606 | 9-5 | 64% | 12 | MN |
| 11032 | Boss CLE 15-4 | 1606 | 15-11 | 58% | 15 | OH |
| 11033 | DVC 14-Gray | 1606 | 9-3 | 75% | 14 | OH |
| 11034 | TIGERS 13 | 1606 | 32-21 | 60% | 13 | IN |
| 11035 | Synergy 12-Diller | 1606 | 5-1 | 83% | 12 | OH |
| 11036 | Iowa Elite 13-Storm | 1606 | 15-6 | 71% | 13 | IA |
| 11037 | Blaze 12-1 | 1606 | 7-3 | 70% | 12 | IA |
| 11038 | HOV 16 Navy | 1606 | 21-10 | 68% | 16 | VA |
| 11039 | GoTime 16-1n | 1606 | 35-28 | 56% | 16 | IN |
| 11040 | BVC 16 Sam | 1606 | 21-13 | 62% | 16 | CA |
| 11041 | Goshen 14-Habecker | 1606 | 5-1 | 83% | 14 | IN |
| 11042 | SVC 16 National | 1606 | 22-15 | 59% | 16 | IA |
| 11043 | HP Illinois 12-Select | 1606 | 15-15 | 50% | 12 | MO |
| 11044 | KCV 14-1 faith | 1606 | 4-1 | 80% | 14 | CA |
| 11045 | STORM 16-2national | 1606 | 12-4 | 75% | 16 | CA |
| 11046 | South County 14-Blue | 1606 | 12-23 | 34% | 14 | RI |
| 11047 | Freeze ND 16 Polar | 1606 | 43-33 | 56% | 16 | ND |
| 11048 | Ozark Juniors 13 National | 1606 | 27-22 | 55% | 13 | AR |
| 11049 | Dig 13-Black lindsey | 1606 | 2-0 | 100% | 13 | TX |
| 11050 | Princeton 15-1 national | 1606 | 7-15 | 32% | 15 | NJ |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.