2025-2026 Season — Page 220 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10951 | Sunshine 15 Westside | 1607 | 25-37 | 40% | 15 | CA |
| 10952 | OYA 15-Prime | 1607 | 24-10 | 71% | 15 | CA |
| 10953 | ITVC (HI) 15 S | 1607 | 6-1 | 86% | 15 | NV |
| 10954 | Great Plains 15 | 1607 | 4-1 | 80% | 15 | NE |
| 10955 | SA Force 15-Select | 1607 | 29-16 | 64% | 15 | TX |
| 10956 | EVOLVE 15-Black | 1607 | 29-10 | 69% | 15 | TX |
| 10957 | FTL 16-Fusion usa-liberty winston | 1607 | 4-1 | 80% | 16 | FL |
| 10958 | Wichita Xpress 14-1 | 1607 | 6-1 | 86% | 14 | KS |
| 10959 | Midwest Magic 16U | 1607 | 20-7 | 74% | 16 | IA |
| 10960 | FIRST TRIUMPH 12-1 | 1607 | 4-0 | 100% | 12 | TX |
| 10961 | Lions SWest Prairie 18-S | 1607 | 20-10 | 67% | 18 | IL |
| 10962 | KVBC 13-1s | 1607 | 27-17 | 61% | 13 | MN |
| 10963 | Masters Volleyball Academy- Carolina's 13-1 | 1607 | 18-9 | 67% | 13 | SC |
| 10964 | Renaissance 14-Black | 1607 | 37-29 | 56% | 14 | OH |
| 10965 | EVA 13-Green cierra | 1607 | 20-10 | 67% | 13 | KY |
| 10966 | Chaos El Paso 16 Chaos Aftershock | 1607 | 42-20 | 68% | 16 | TX |
| 10967 | Academy 17 Jade | 1607 | 30-28 | 52% | 17 | NC |
| 10968 | Impact VC 13-1 | 1607 | 17-8 | 68% | 13 | TX |
| 10969 | BRUSA 18-2 costa | 1607 | 6-2 | 75% | 18 | CA |
| 10970 | LTX SELECT 16-Yellow | 1607 | 17-13 | 57% | 16 | TX |
| 10971 | Michio Chicago 12-White sox | 1607 | 4-1 | 80% | 12 | IL |
| 10972 | Ignite Volleyball Club 17-National | 1607 | 45-68 | 40% | 17 | AZ |
| 10973 | CVVC 12 | 1607 | 6-2 | 75% | 12 | UT |
| 10974 | SSVBC 18-2 | 1607 | 16-24 | 40% | 18 | NH |
| 10975 | Ohana 16-Mike wazowski | 1607 | 5-0 | 100% | 16 | FL |
| 10976 | NORCO 12-Blue | 1607 | 17-13 | 57% | 12 | CO |
| 10977 | Siskiyou Volleyball Club 18 17-1 | 1607 | 7-1 | 88% | 18 | OR |
| 10978 | SADDLEBACK 14-Monty | 1607 | 23-18 | 56% | 14 | CA |
| 10979 | TW Skyline 16 Silver | 1607 | 23-11 | 68% | 16 | TX |
| 10980 | J Hermiller 13 | 1607 | 3-1 | 75% | 13 | OH |
| 10981 | OptimalVBC 12-1 | 1607 | 4-0 | 100% | 12 | GA |
| 10982 | ARIZONA STORM 13-Boltz | 1607 | 31-29 | 52% | 13 | AZ |
| 10983 | ECVC 12-Nat sowal - maggie | 1607 | 23-12 | 66% | 12 | AL |
| 10984 | SASVBC 11-Steph | 1607 | 22-16 | 58% | 11 | HI |
| 10985 | A5 Gwinnett 17-Jt | 1607 | 33-34 | 49% | 17 | GA |
| 10986 | No Limits 11-Elite | 1607 | 13-8 | 62% | 11 | NV |
| 10987 | Weber Elite Volleyball Club 13 Weber Elite Trina A | 1607 | 3-1 | 75% | 13 | UT |
| 10988 | RUSH Y 18-Black | 1607 | 28-11 | 72% | 18 | AZ |
| 10989 | ID Peak 18-National | 1607 | 6-7 | 46% | 18 | UT |
| 10990 | Golden Bear 14-Nike | 1607 | 22-12 | 65% | 14 | CA |
| 10991 | Grandlake 13-Kramer | 1607 | 4-1 | 80% | 13 | OH |
| 10992 | XFactor 18-1 | 1607 | 15-5 | 75% | 18 | NV |
| 10993 | OBX Wave 14-Black regional plus | 1607 | 12-5 | 71% | 14 | VA |
| 10994 | 319 United 15 Grace | 1607 | 9-5 | 60% | 15 | IA |
| 10995 | The EDGE 16-Walter black | 1607 | 31-22 | 58% | 16 | CO |
| 10996 | Marshall 12-Orange | 1607 | 7-4 | 64% | 12 | MN |
| 10997 | Ultimate 13-Blue | 1607 | 40-15 | 73% | 13 | IL |
| 10998 | Synergy 17-Abbott | 1607 | 17-8 | 68% | 17 | OH |
| 10999 | Vortex 16-National | 1607 | 20-24 | 45% | 16 | UT |
| 11000 | AV 16-1 | 1607 | 18-9 | 67% | 16 | MN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.