Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 220 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10951 Sunshine 15 Westside 1607 25-37 40% 15 CA
10952 OYA 15-Prime 1607 24-10 71% 15 CA
10953 ITVC (HI) 15 S 1607 6-1 86% 15 NV
10954 Great Plains 15 1607 4-1 80% 15 NE
10955 SA Force 15-Select 1607 29-16 64% 15 TX
10956 EVOLVE 15-Black 1607 29-10 69% 15 TX
10957 FTL 16-Fusion usa-liberty winston 1607 4-1 80% 16 FL
10958 Wichita Xpress 14-1 1607 6-1 86% 14 KS
10959 Midwest Magic 16U 1607 20-7 74% 16 IA
10960 FIRST TRIUMPH 12-1 1607 4-0 100% 12 TX
10961 Lions SWest Prairie 18-S 1607 20-10 67% 18 IL
10962 KVBC 13-1s 1607 27-17 61% 13 MN
10963 Masters Volleyball Academy- Carolina's 13-1 1607 18-9 67% 13 SC
10964 Renaissance 14-Black 1607 37-29 56% 14 OH
10965 EVA 13-Green cierra 1607 20-10 67% 13 KY
10966 Chaos El Paso 16 Chaos Aftershock 1607 42-20 68% 16 TX
10967 Academy 17 Jade 1607 30-28 52% 17 NC
10968 Impact VC 13-1 1607 17-8 68% 13 TX
10969 BRUSA 18-2 costa 1607 6-2 75% 18 CA
10970 LTX SELECT 16-Yellow 1607 17-13 57% 16 TX
10971 Michio Chicago 12-White sox 1607 4-1 80% 12 IL
10972 Ignite Volleyball Club 17-National 1607 45-68 40% 17 AZ
10973 CVVC 12 1607 6-2 75% 12 UT
10974 SSVBC 18-2 1607 16-24 40% 18 NH
10975 Ohana 16-Mike wazowski 1607 5-0 100% 16 FL
10976 NORCO 12-Blue 1607 17-13 57% 12 CO
10977 Siskiyou Volleyball Club 18 17-1 1607 7-1 88% 18 OR
10978 SADDLEBACK 14-Monty 1607 23-18 56% 14 CA
10979 TW Skyline 16 Silver 1607 23-11 68% 16 TX
10980 J Hermiller 13 1607 3-1 75% 13 OH
10981 OptimalVBC 12-1 1607 4-0 100% 12 GA
10982 ARIZONA STORM 13-Boltz 1607 31-29 52% 13 AZ
10983 ECVC 12-Nat sowal - maggie 1607 23-12 66% 12 AL
10984 SASVBC 11-Steph 1607 22-16 58% 11 HI
10985 A5 Gwinnett 17-Jt 1607 33-34 49% 17 GA
10986 No Limits 11-Elite 1607 13-8 62% 11 NV
10987 Weber Elite Volleyball Club 13 Weber Elite Trina A 1607 3-1 75% 13 UT
10988 RUSH Y 18-Black 1607 28-11 72% 18 AZ
10989 ID Peak 18-National 1607 6-7 46% 18 UT
10990 Golden Bear 14-Nike 1607 22-12 65% 14 CA
10991 Grandlake 13-Kramer 1607 4-1 80% 13 OH
10992 XFactor 18-1 1607 15-5 75% 18 NV
10993 OBX Wave 14-Black regional plus 1607 12-5 71% 14 VA
10994 319 United 15 Grace 1607 9-5 60% 15 IA
10995 The EDGE 16-Walter black 1607 31-22 58% 16 CO
10996 Marshall 12-Orange 1607 7-4 64% 12 MN
10997 Ultimate 13-Blue 1607 40-15 73% 13 IL
10998 Synergy 17-Abbott 1607 17-8 68% 17 OH
10999 Vortex 16-National 1607 20-24 45% 16 UT
11000 AV 16-1 1607 18-9 67% 16 MN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.