Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 220 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10951 TAV 12-Gold 1608 22-14 58% 12 TX
10952 MPV 17-National black 1608 22-26 46% 17 UT
10953 Northern Attack 14-1 1608 12-3 80% 14 WI
10954 New York Elite 14-Black 1608 22-20 52% 14 NY
10955 ECA 13 1608 3-0 100% 13
10956 Onondaga Hurricanes 17 1608 11-1 92% 17
10957 OP2 12-2 national 1608 4-0 80% 12
10958 VVC 18-R 1608 18-8 69% 18
10959 Siskiyou vbc 17-1 black 1608 9-4 69% 17
10960 Pipeline SCVBC 16-Ultra jamie 1608 5-3 63% 16
10961 RVC Rush 14 1608 24-11 63% 14
10962 Havoc Elite 17-1 1608 31-38 45% 17
10963 Cen-Tex Lightning 12 Hill 1608 3-0 100% 12 TX
10964 UEPA 18-Gold 1608 3-0 100% 18 TX
10965 Elevate 12-Pink spring 1608 7-1 88% 12 TX
10966 OYA 15-Prime 1608 24-10 71% 15 CA
10967 Metro VBC 15-Black 1608 36-21 63% 15 IN
10968 Club Koa Crest 15-Black 1608 24-21 53% 15 CA
10969 Warriors Elite VBC 14-S black 1607 9-4 60% 14
10970 Downstate 13-Cobras 1607 22-20 52% 13
10971 Wichita Legacy 15-1 1607 6-5 38% 15
10972 Supreme Volleyball 15-1 1607 5-4 31% 15
10973 DVA 13-Premier 1607 24-17 59% 13 PA
10974 JNVBC 13-Black 1607 10-5 59% 13 IA
10975 Ozark Juniors 13 National 1607 27-22 55% 13 AR
10976 Charged Up 16-White 1607 12-4 75% 16 MI
10977 FC Elite 16-Ex 1607 17-2 89% 16 WI
10978 EU 13-Silver 1607 21-9 70% 13 IN
10979 SDVBC 18-Danielle 1607 24-28 46% 18 CA
10980 SVA 14-1 1607 13-9 59% 14 AZ
10981 A5 Gwinnett 17-Jt 1607 33-34 49% 17 GA
10982 SOINE 10-1 1607 16-7 70% 10 KY
10983 Mater Dei Jr Cats 14-Spahn 1607 14-6 70% 14 IN
10984 SAND 14-Black 1607 22-18 55% 14 UT
10985 MVC 12-3 1607 6-1 86% 12 MI
10986 Ohana 16-Mike wazowski 1607 5-0 100% 16 IA
10987 AZ SKY 12-Blue 1607 35-31 53% 12 AZ
10988 West Shore YMCA 17-Blue 1607 7-6 54% 17 PA
10989 GP 14-State black 1607 50-26 66% 14 FL
10990 Decatur Force 12 Aqua 1607 15-9 63% 12 IN
10991 NEVA 12-2 1607 5-1 83% 12 UT
10992 Black Hills Juniors 14-Green 1607 5-3 63% 14 SD
10993 MoCo MAVS 12-Red 1607 22-20 52% 12 TX
10994 FTL 16-Fusion usa-liberty winston 1607 4-1 80% 16 FL
10995 Club 801 16-National jeff 1607 34-38 47% 16 UT
10996 Va Wave 17 Tsunami 1607 28-23 55% 17 VA
10997 A5 12-Kim 1607 6-3 67% 12 GA
10998 Fearless Elite 16-1 1607 32-11 74% 16 AR
10999 ADREN 15-1 1607 22-23 49% 15 OH
11000 DVC 14-Gray 1607 9-3 75% 14 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.