Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 219 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10901 Reign 17-National 1608 5-3 63% 17 TX
10902 Houston Force 14-Empire 1608 31-26 54% 14 TX
10903 VC United 16-Navy elite 1608 24-16 60% 16 IL
10904 Yaquina Juniors 14-1 1608 12-9 57% 14 OR
10905 Electric Volleyball 13-2 1608 11-3 79% 13 KS
10906 Rise 12-S 1608 25-11 66% 12 OK
10907 Rose City 15-1 1608 12-5 71% 15 MI
10908 Reef VBC 18-National 1608 4-0 100% 18 CA
10909 Club Velocity 12-3 1608 12-5 71% 12 MN
10910 Chewblocka 14 1608 9-4 69% 14 NV
10911 Decatur Hawks Elite 13 Decatur Elite Blue (HO) 1608 17-11 61% 13 IN
10912 Juggernaut 14-National 2 1608 44-26 63% 14 CO
10913 ATOMIC 12 National 1608 36-18 67% 12 AZ
10914 Aftershock 17-Black 1608 34-15 69% 17 CA
10915 414 15-Blue 1608 33-13 72% 15 WI
10916 CORE Girls 16-Titanium 1608 13-7 65% 16 NJ
10917 DVA 15 Premier 1608 28-16 64% 15 PA
10918 Team Yakima 16-Summit 1608 30-17 64% 16 WA
10919 Direction 13 Royal 1608 31-15 67% 13 NC
10920 Renaissance 16-Black 1608 28-32 47% 16 OH
10921 Premier Nebraska 11-Red 1608 7-9 44% 11 NE
10922 Bay Area Eagles 17-Mariah 1608 20-18 53% 17 CA
10923 JVB 16-S 1608 12-8 60% 16 MN
10924 Cen-Tex Lightning 12 Hill 1608 3-0 100% 12 TX
10925 913Athletics 16-3 1608 9-3 56% 16 KS
10926 Putnam 13-R ashland 1608 25-17 60% 13 OH
10927 JNVBC 17-E teal 1608 23-17 55% 17 IA
10928 Renaissance 16-Black (KE) 1608 33-19 63% 16 PA
10929 Idaho Show 16-Natl smith 1608 5-3 63% 16 ID
10930 SMASH 17-Black ice 1608 5-5 50% 17 MA
10931 Gators 18-Black 1608 32-26 55% 18 MA
10932 HOU STELLAR 13-Select 1608 10-8 56% 13 TX
10933 575 14-Lpr jeff 1608 25-16 61% 14 GA
10934 LTVA 17U 1608 19-11 63% 17 NV
10935 310VBC 15-1 1608 5-3 63% 15 HI
10936 NEVA 12-2 1608 5-1 83% 12 PR
10937 Michio Chicago 14-Bulls 1608 5-1 83% 14 IL
10938 LEGND 12-Teal 1608 4-1 80% 12 OH
10939 AP 14-Black 1608 25-22 53% 14 TX
10940 Freeze ND 16-Chill 1608 13-7 57% 16 ND
10941 Monon 13-5r sparrows 1608 32-13 71% 13 IN
10942 Tstreet LV 13-Laura 1608 25-30 45% 13 CA
10943 Palm Beach Jrs 16 Elite 1608 31-14 69% 16 FL
10944 SPVC 16-1 premier 1608 25-9 74% 16 LA
10945 OP2 12-2 national 1608 4-0 80% 12
10946 Storm 12-Black (EV) 1608 6-3 67% 12
10947 Frenchtown 16-Casey 1607 3-4 38% 16
10948 Erie Elite Carolina 15 1607 15-5 75% 15 OH
10949 No Limits 15 National (EV) 1607 27-23 54% 15 WA
10950 FCA Force 15-1 grace 1607 8-3 73% 15 NC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.