2025-2026 Season — Page 219 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10901 | Storm 12-Black (WA) | 1608 | 6-3 | 67% | 12 | |
| 10902 | ECJVC 14-Premier | 1608 | 27-13 | 68% | 14 | NC |
| 10903 | BEVBC 16-White | 1608 | 40-16 | 68% | 16 | MD |
| 10904 | FeVA 15 (BG) | 1608 | 39-20 | 66% | 15 | WI |
| 10905 | Buckeye 16-Red elite | 1608 | 28-15 | 65% | 16 | OH |
| 10906 | 575 13-Can matt | 1608 | 40-22 | 65% | 13 | GA |
| 10907 | SCP 15-Laurie | 1608 | 29-18 | 62% | 15 | SC |
| 10908 | HRVC Hurricanes 13-1 | 1608 | 3-2 | 60% | 13 | ON |
| 10909 | HOU STELLAR 13-Select | 1608 | 10-8 | 56% | 13 | TX |
| 10910 | Platform 16-Adidas | 1608 | 27-30 | 47% | 16 | IA |
| 10911 | Ga Fusion 15-1 | 1608 | 17-7 | 71% | 15 | GA |
| 10912 | Black Rock Amanda 14 | 1608 | 14-4 | 70% | 14 | UT |
| 10913 | A5 18-Matia | 1608 | 32-18 | 64% | 18 | GA |
| 10914 | Valley Juniors 15 Jason | 1608 | 21-20 | 51% | 15 | VA |
| 10915 | Portland VBC 16-1 blue | 1608 | 26-29 | 47% | 16 | OR |
| 10916 | Hunter's 17-Black | 1608 | 52-22 | 70% | 17 | FL |
| 10917 | Blaze 12-1 | 1608 | 7-3 | 70% | 12 | IA |
| 10918 | Jr Huskies 13-1 | 1608 | 10-7 | 59% | 13 | CT |
| 10919 | Ignite 15-Red | 1608 | 40-27 | 60% | 15 | WA |
| 10920 | Michio Chicago 14-Bulls | 1608 | 5-1 | 83% | 14 | IL |
| 10921 | Elevate 16-Blue | 1608 | 35-36 | 47% | 16 | TX |
| 10922 | NORCO 12-Blue | 1608 | 17-13 | 57% | 12 | CO |
| 10923 | Princeton 13-Black | 1608 | 15-16 | 48% | 13 | NJ |
| 10924 | RDE 14-Reed | 1608 | 9-6 | 60% | 14 | CO |
| 10925 | TNVBC 14 | 1608 | 19-12 | 61% | 14 | CA |
| 10926 | ID Crush 14-Vinson | 1608 | 23-18 | 56% | 14 | ID |
| 10927 | Ks Networks Volleyball Club 15-2 | 1608 | 6-2 | 75% | 15 | KS |
| 10928 | Adrenaline 12-Allison | 1608 | 7-3 | 39% | 12 | IA |
| 10929 | Big Sky 17-1 westside | 1608 | 31-18 | 60% | 17 | MT |
| 10930 | Cloud Peak 15 Elite | 1608 | 30-16 | 65% | 15 | WY |
| 10931 | Northeast 16-Blue | 1608 | 23-13 | 64% | 16 | CT |
| 10932 | RUSH Y 18-Black | 1608 | 28-11 | 72% | 18 | AZ |
| 10933 | Elevate Athletics 18-Black julia | 1608 | 12-22 | 35% | 18 | UT |
| 10934 | HJV 15-Molten | 1608 | 24-8 | 75% | 15 | TX |
| 10935 | SPVB 14-Red | 1608 | 24-27 | 47% | 14 | IL |
| 10936 | MAVS KC 14-2 | 1608 | 3-2 | 43% | 14 | KS |
| 10937 | BVC 17-1 bolts | 1608 | 6-2 | 75% | 17 | DE |
| 10938 | Dinamite 14-Miguel | 1608 | 5-3 | 63% | 14 | CA |
| 10939 | Michio Chicago 12-White sox | 1608 | 4-1 | 80% | 12 | IL |
| 10940 | 913Athletics 16-3 | 1608 | 9-3 | 56% | 16 | KS |
| 10941 | Wave 13 | 1608 | 13-7 | 59% | 13 | CA |
| 10942 | LEGACY 13-Elite jon | 1608 | 39-38 | 51% | 13 | FL |
| 10943 | C1VB 13-Regional blue | 1608 | 25-10 | 71% | 13 | SC |
| 10944 | RVA WEST 14-Navy | 1608 | 16-6 | 73% | 14 | WI |
| 10945 | Colorado Elite 18-Grizzly | 1608 | 29-19 | 60% | 18 | CO |
| 10946 | Midwest Penguins 13-1 | 1608 | 41-24 | 63% | 13 | WI |
| 10947 | CHiX 16-BLACK | 1608 | 30-16 | 65% | 16 | OH |
| 10948 | Tropics Girls 16-S elite | 1608 | 39-23 | 63% | 16 | FL |
| 10949 | Dig This! VBC 18-Black | 1608 | 9-5 | 64% | 18 | NV |
| 10950 | AP 14-Lite highlighter | 1608 | 13-7 | 65% | 14 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.