Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 219 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10901 Storm 12-Black (WA) 1608 6-3 67% 12
10902 ECJVC 14-Premier 1608 27-13 68% 14 NC
10903 BEVBC 16-White 1608 40-16 68% 16 MD
10904 FeVA 15 (BG) 1608 39-20 66% 15 WI
10905 Buckeye 16-Red elite 1608 28-15 65% 16 OH
10906 575 13-Can matt 1608 40-22 65% 13 GA
10907 SCP 15-Laurie 1608 29-18 62% 15 SC
10908 HRVC Hurricanes 13-1 1608 3-2 60% 13 ON
10909 HOU STELLAR 13-Select 1608 10-8 56% 13 TX
10910 Platform 16-Adidas 1608 27-30 47% 16 IA
10911 Ga Fusion 15-1 1608 17-7 71% 15 GA
10912 Black Rock Amanda 14 1608 14-4 70% 14 UT
10913 A5 18-Matia 1608 32-18 64% 18 GA
10914 Valley Juniors 15 Jason 1608 21-20 51% 15 VA
10915 Portland VBC 16-1 blue 1608 26-29 47% 16 OR
10916 Hunter's 17-Black 1608 52-22 70% 17 FL
10917 Blaze 12-1 1608 7-3 70% 12 IA
10918 Jr Huskies 13-1 1608 10-7 59% 13 CT
10919 Ignite 15-Red 1608 40-27 60% 15 WA
10920 Michio Chicago 14-Bulls 1608 5-1 83% 14 IL
10921 Elevate 16-Blue 1608 35-36 47% 16 TX
10922 NORCO 12-Blue 1608 17-13 57% 12 CO
10923 Princeton 13-Black 1608 15-16 48% 13 NJ
10924 RDE 14-Reed 1608 9-6 60% 14 CO
10925 TNVBC 14 1608 19-12 61% 14 CA
10926 ID Crush 14-Vinson 1608 23-18 56% 14 ID
10927 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 15-2 1608 6-2 75% 15 KS
10928 Adrenaline 12-Allison 1608 7-3 39% 12 IA
10929 Big Sky 17-1 westside 1608 31-18 60% 17 MT
10930 Cloud Peak 15 Elite 1608 30-16 65% 15 WY
10931 Northeast 16-Blue 1608 23-13 64% 16 CT
10932 RUSH Y 18-Black 1608 28-11 72% 18 AZ
10933 Elevate Athletics 18-Black julia 1608 12-22 35% 18 UT
10934 HJV 15-Molten 1608 24-8 75% 15 TX
10935 SPVB 14-Red 1608 24-27 47% 14 IL
10936 MAVS KC 14-2 1608 3-2 43% 14 KS
10937 BVC 17-1 bolts 1608 6-2 75% 17 DE
10938 Dinamite 14-Miguel 1608 5-3 63% 14 CA
10939 Michio Chicago 12-White sox 1608 4-1 80% 12 IL
10940 913Athletics 16-3 1608 9-3 56% 16 KS
10941 Wave 13 1608 13-7 59% 13 CA
10942 LEGACY 13-Elite jon 1608 39-38 51% 13 FL
10943 C1VB 13-Regional blue 1608 25-10 71% 13 SC
10944 RVA WEST 14-Navy 1608 16-6 73% 14 WI
10945 Colorado Elite 18-Grizzly 1608 29-19 60% 18 CO
10946 Midwest Penguins 13-1 1608 41-24 63% 13 WI
10947 CHiX 16-BLACK 1608 30-16 65% 16 OH
10948 Tropics Girls 16-S elite 1608 39-23 63% 16 FL
10949 Dig This! VBC 18-Black 1608 9-5 64% 18 NV
10950 AP 14-Lite highlighter 1608 13-7 65% 14 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.