Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 218 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10851 Renaissance 16-Black (KE) 1609 33-19 63% 16 PA
10852 ERAA 14-1 1609 20-17 54% 14 MN
10853 City 14-Navy 1609 15-6 71% 14 CA
10854 MVSA 10-Lightning 1609 15-7 58% 10 MD
10855 ENCORE 16-Red 1609 38-22 63% 16 CA
10856 Iowa Select 13-Mizuno 1609 25-22 52% 13 IA
10857 KIVA 12-Grey 1609 35-22 61% 12 KY
10858 CORE Girls 16-Titanium 1609 13-7 65% 16 CA
10859 Bay Area Eagles 17-Mariah 1609 20-18 53% 17 CA
10860 BRAVO 13-Red 1609 33-19 63% 13 KY
10861 GJ 13 PREMIER 1609 32-29 52% 13 FL
10862 Lions 13-Navy 1609 25-15 63% 13 IL
10863 UVA 11-B juniors 1609 12-8 60% 11 LA
10864 Wythe Elite 14 Krystal 1609 16-6 73% 14 VA
10865 Anthem United 16-Navy 1609 4-0 80% 16 GA
10866 Cajun Elite 10-Payton/jenni 1609 17-6 74% 10 LA
10867 SADDLEBACK 14-Monty 1609 23-18 56% 14 CA
10868 Invasion Volleyball Club 15-2 1609 5-1 83% 15 MO
10869 Quicksets 16-1 1609 3-0 100% 16 HI
10870 CI Spikers 15-1 1609 13-8 62% 15 MN
10871 EPAN 15 1609 19-12 61% 15 WV
10872 Tribe 16-1 1609 5-1 83% 16 OH
10873 Southland Aces 15-1 black 1609 18-12 60% 15 MO
10874 Adira 12-Miller 1609 17-9 63% 12 TN
10875 Reef VBC 18-National 1609 4-0 100% 18 CA
10876 MN CORE 11-1 1609 6-2 75% 11 MN
10877 SC Rockstar 11-Paige 1609 16-5 76% 11 CA
10878 TX Premier 15-National 1609 28-18 58% 15 TX
10879 Eagles Select 12 1609 7-2 78% 12
10880 Wetaskiwin Volleyball Club 15-Ug 1609 6-3 67% 15
10881 OP2 11-1 elite 1609 3-1 60% 11
10882 Memphis Metro 15-Elite black 1609 4-4 50% 15
10883 Roanoke United 14 Alleghany 1609 16-7 70% 14 VA
10884 Va Wave 16-Crest pacific 1609 42-19 69% 16 VA
10885 VEVA Brave 14-Orange 1609 32-14 70% 14 PA
10886 RRVC 15 National 1609 47-21 69% 15 VA
10887 G3 15-National ben 1609 45-21 68% 15 MO
10888 ADREN 15-2 1609 21-10 68% 15 OH
10889 Bayside Vipers 13-1 1609 21-10 68% 13 NY
10890 RISE 712-15-1 1609 21-9 68% 15 IA
10891 LSV Lemons 12 1609 4-2 67% 12 FL
10892 CCVC 13-National 1609 28-14 67% 13 AL
10893 Bama Elite 15-N wolfpack 1609 36-18 67% 15 AL
10894 SA Magic 15-Elite 1609 31-29 49% 15 TX
10895 Idaho ONE 16-Black 1609 22-27 45% 16 ID
10896 MiElite 13-Elite 1609 21-29 42% 13 MI
10897 Ozark Juniors 12 National 1609 22-35 37% 12 AR
10898 Munciana Indy 18 Blaze 1609 24-43 36% 18 IN
10899 VEVA Fury 17-Blue 1609 17-30 36% 17 PA
10900 Great Plains 15 1608 4-1 80% 15
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.