Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 217 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10801 REFINE 12 Refine Hustle Holland 1610 7-3 64% 12 AL
10802 ID Crush 13-Blue 1610 32-29 52% 13 ID
10803 Cajun Elite 13 Hannah 1610 23-9 72% 13 LA
10804 TX Premier 15-National 1610 28-18 58% 15 TX
10805 PREVA 15-1 1610 3-4 43% 15 PR
10806 TEVO 14 TEVO-White 1610 13-7 65% 14
10807 Webo 10-1s laura 1610 8-3 73% 10 IN
10808 Columbia Jrs 16-1 black 1609 19-12 61% 16
10809 FVP 14-Regional 1609 24-9 73% 14 WI
10810 SAND 14-Black 1609 22-18 55% 14 CA
10811 SRJ 18-Select 1609 20-10 67% 18 WA
10812 WSA Gators 17-Elite blue 1609 30-25 55% 17 FL
10813 AR SELECT 15-Elite 1609 55-21 72% 15 AR
10814 MN Select 15-3 1609 37-36 51% 15 MN
10815 360 14-Kaos red 1609 18-18 45% 14 TX
10816 AVBC 13 National 1609 24-21 53% 13 MI
10817 Catalyst 12-White 1609 13-8 52% 12 TX
10818 Jr Huskies 13-1 1609 10-7 59% 13 IN
10819 Bayside Vipers 12-1 1609 15-8 65% 12 NY
10820 Buckeye 16-Red elite 1609 28-15 65% 16 OH
10821 Victory 15-Elite gray 1609 26-22 49% 15 TX
10822 TORCH 16-Nicolette 1609 19-19 50% 16 CA
10823 E381 ADA 18-1 1609 6-1 86% 18 NY
10824 OK Charge South 13-1 1609 31-14 69% 13 OK
10825 Dig This! VBC 18-Black national 1609 3-1 75% 18 NV
10826 Mintonette Sports 14-4 1609 38-26 59% 14 OH
10827 Boston United 17-National - kyle 1609 24-39 38% 17 MA
10828 CI Spikers 15-1 1609 13-8 62% 15 MN
10829 MiElite 13-Elite 1609 21-29 42% 13 MI
10830 SPARKS VBC 17 NAVY 1609 31-25 55% 17 PA
10831 Roncalli Juniors 11-1 1609 17-5 77% 11 IN
10832 CMASS EDGE 16-White 1609 26-19 58% 16 MA
10833 Wisconsin Attack 16-Blue 1609 23-19 55% 16 WI
10834 Club Focus 17 FOCUS 1972 1609 18-8 69% 17 OH
10835 Coalition 18-1 1609 27-17 61% 18 CO
10836 Black Rock Chelsea 14 1609 26-11 65% 14 UT
10837 RVA 17-Boahen 1609 25-13 66% 17 IA
10838 Lakes 16-1 1609 17-9 65% 16 MN
10839 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 16-3 1609 9-3 75% 16 KS
10840 SC Rockstar 11-Paige 1609 16-5 76% 11 CA
10841 Sky High Adidas 14-Silver 1609 33-20 62% 14 IL
10842 Titanas Morovis 15 Titanas Osvaldo Diaz 1609 10-8 56% 15 PR
10843 TVS 12-Tahla 1609 3-1 60% 12 TX
10844 Chicago Elite 11-Honeydew 1609 10-5 67% 11 IL
10845 Iowa Elite 16-S 1609 3-0 75% 16 IA
10846 SA Magic 15-Elite 1609 31-29 49% 15 TX
10847 Cajun Elite 10-Payton/jenni 1609 17-6 74% 10 LA
10848 Cloud Peak 11 Elite 1609 34-16 68% 11 WY
10849 NxtLvl 17-Blue 1609 24-34 41% 17 PA
10850 Southland Aces 15-1 black 1609 18-12 60% 15 MO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.