Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 217 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10801 Rise 18-Yellow 1610 10-4 71% 18 CA
10802 Cowley Select 14-1 1610 14-5 74% 14 KS
10803 CLUB STEEL 13-Navy 1610 22-16 58% 13 FL
10804 NVA 16-Navy 1610 7-2 70% 16 NE
10805 NIVA 11-WHITE 1610 28-17 62% 11 IN
10806 SLVVC 17-Blue 1610 37-18 65% 17 CA
10807 PIVC Storm 15-Elite 1610 26-17 60% 15 AL
10808 Premier 14-Royal 1610 7-2 70% 14 PA
10809 TVA 14-1 rise ayanna 1610 9-6 60% 14 FL
10810 Texas Fury 16 Impact 1610 28-22 54% 16 TX
10811 KIVA SB 12-Red 1610 4-0 100% 12
10812 NDVBC Lightning 11 1610 6-3 67% 11
10813 Image 18-Black 1610 8-8 44% 18
10814 BAVC 18-National sal 1610 25-12 68% 18 CA
10815 Club Koa 14-Crest 1610 25-12 68% 14 CA
10816 Kako'o VBA 15 Ron 1610 20-10 67% 15 HI
10817 PVA 13-Blue 1610 30-15 67% 13 VA
10818 ENCORE 13-Navy 1610 4-2 67% 13 CA
10819 Legacy Elite VBA 16-E 1610 32-16 67% 16 OH
10820 Unified 12-1 1610 22-11 67% 12 MI
10821 EVRC 16-Laura 1610 19-10 66% 16 IN
10822 Bama Elite 16-N iron titans 1610 35-18 66% 16 AL
10823 Lakes 16-1 1610 17-9 65% 16 MN
10824 Lions SWest Prairie 14-1 1610 5-3 63% 14 IL
10825 CV Starlings 16-Brandi 1610 17-16 52% 16 CA
10826 FH 11-Ikaika-ashleigh 1610 12-11 50% 11 TX
10827 Victorium 13-Ua 1610 23-24 49% 13 AZ
10828 407 12-Orange 1610 33-36 48% 12 FL
10829 CIA 18-Black 1610 15-17 47% 18 IA
10830 NOVA Juniors 14-S navy 1610 25-32 44% 14 OH
10831 PREVA 15-1 1610 3-4 43% 15 PR
10832 Banzai VBC 14-Select 1610 11-16 41% 14 NE
10833 Delaware United 13 Navy 1610 16-23 41% 13 DE
10834 Paramount VBC 18 Cozad 1610 22-32 40% 18 VA
10835 South County 14-Blue 1610 12-23 34% 14 RI
10836 Columbus 16-1 1610 2-5 20% 16 OH
10837 Elite 18-National 1609 20-17 53% 18
10838 Iowa PowerPlex 16-Nelson 1609 4-1 80% 16
10839 Gardiner 16-1 1609 8-4 57% 16
10840 South Central NE 15-Red 1609 7-3 70% 15
10841 SEV 14-1 1609 13-4 76% 14 AL
10842 Slam VBC 16-1 1609 6-5 55% 16 MA
10843 575 12-Lpn jefff 1609 34-27 56% 12 GA
10844 RVBC 17U Blue 1609 12-6 55% 17 PA
10845 Zona VBC 15-Red 1609 36-24 60% 15 AZ
10846 Roncalli Juniors 11-1 1609 17-5 77% 11 IN
10847 Jaguars 16-Black 1609 30-17 63% 16 NY
10848 PVA 13-2 1609 4-1 80% 13 MO
10849 MIDTN Volleyball 13-Blue 1609 24-8 75% 13 TN
10850 Rose City 15-1 1609 12-5 71% 15 OR
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.