Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 216 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10751 MGA 18-Black 1610 27-14 66% 18 MA
10752 108 BVC 14-Hybrid 1610 19-10 66% 14 VA
10753 AR VC 14-B 1610 9-3 75% 14 GA
10754 Static Volleyball Club 15-1 1610 21-16 57% 15 MO
10755 Riptide 16-S elite 1610 31-15 67% 16 FL
10756 Midwest Penguins 14-R 1610 35-16 69% 14 WI
10757 Ozark Juniors 12 National 1610 22-35 37% 12 AR
10758 CHAVC 14-Black 1610 21-30 41% 14 NC
10759 OR Performance 12-A 1610 3-3 50% 12 PR
10760 NSDVB 16 1610 24-15 62% 16 CA
10761 Victorium 13-Ua 1610 23-24 49% 13 AZ
10762 BTownVBC 15-Red 1610 25-17 60% 15 IN
10763 Eclipse 14-1 (CH) 1610 27-35 40% 14 CA
10764 Moorhead Juniors 16-1 1610 18-6 67% 16 ND
10765 CinciVB Acad 11-Bostick 1610 5-1 83% 11 OH
10766 United VBA 14-Gray 1610 18-11 62% 14 TX
10767 Mindset Premier 14-White 1610 35-12 74% 14 IL
10768 South Shore Slam 16 Lime 1610 24-9 73% 16 WI
10769 Kidron VBC Cluff 16 1610 8-2 80% 16 OH
10770 MVP 13-1 1610 30-14 68% 13 OH
10771 Banzai VBC 14-Select 1610 11-16 41% 14 NE
10772 Excel NW 12-1 lux 1610 20-15 57% 12 WA
10773 NPJ Bend 15-National 1610 22-24 48% 15 OR
10774 Idaho Show 17-Natl wong 1610 4-3 57% 17 ID
10775 Mana Toa 13-1 1610 4-2 67% 13 AL
10776 Midwest Marvels 13 Midwest Marvels Maroon 1610 15-6 63% 13 MI
10777 Holtville 18-Nayeli 1610 6-2 75% 18 CA
10778 Cowley Select 14-1 1610 14-5 74% 14 KS
10779 Iowa One 17-Aly 1610 20-11 61% 17 IA
10780 Havoc Elite 17-1 1610 31-38 45% 17 MN
10781 CAVE 13-Gold 1610 15-7 68% 13 PA
10782 ADREN 15-2 1610 21-10 68% 15 OH
10783 Sandia Elite 14-N1 1610 20-18 53% 14 TX
10784 HOS 12-Orange 1610 12-7 63% 12 NY
10785 MOVA UA 18-Gold 1610 39-13 72% 18 MO
10786 BVC 12-1 1610 7-6 54% 12 MN
10787 Impact Vball Club 14 1610 15-10 58% 14 MO
10788 FWFIRE 12-P 1610 8-9 40% 12 TX
10789 LC Spark 13 LC Spark Ignite 1610 16-7 70% 13 NM
10790 Lions 13-Indigo 1610 12-6 67% 13 IL
10791 AVA 15-Premier 2 1610 15-8 65% 15 NY
10792 SVA 14-1 1610 13-9 59% 14 CA
10793 JNVBC 13-Black 1610 10-5 59% 13 IA
10794 ACESZ 14-Black 1610 9-4 69% 14 MI
10795 Accelerate 14-Pink 1610 28-13 68% 14 LA
10796 CLUB UNION CLUB UNION 18-Red 1610 12-9 52% 18 UT
10797 Elevation 14-Ascent 1610 27-24 53% 14 CO
10798 Athlete HQ 16-Rutkowski 1610 32-16 67% 16 OH
10799 Niceville Sharks Volleyball Club 15-Silver 1610 27-13 68% 15 AL
10800 OPVC 15 Dunaway 1610 16-9 64% 15 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.