Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 216 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10751 West Shore YMCA 14-Blue 1611 7-4 64% 14 PA
10752 FCA Force 18-1 shane 1611 16-9 64% 18 NC
10753 South County 15-Kristin 1611 23-7 64% 15 RI
10754 SG Elite 18-Excel 1611 36-21 63% 18 CA
10755 Red Storm 15-Nw 1611 5-3 63% 15 LA
10756 310VBC 15-1 1611 5-3 63% 15 CA
10757 Sandhills 18-Erin 1611 14-9 61% 18 NC
10758 CITY 15-1 1611 15-6 60% 15 CA
10759 Mesa Juniors VBCO 16-Black 1611 24-18 57% 16 CO
10760 Tstreet 15-Samm c 1611 24-18 57% 15 CA
10761 Ignite AZ 16 National 1611 27-21 56% 16 AZ
10762 Charged Up 14 Royal 1611 14-11 56% 14 MI
10763 Aspire 17 Premier 1611 39-31 56% 17 AB
10764 LKN Swarm 13-Black 1611 31-24 56% 13 NC
10765 Horseshoe 17-Red 1611 22-18 55% 17 PA
10766 Balboa Bay 13-Blue 1611 27-22 55% 13 CA
10767 Aspire 16-Black 1611 37-30 55% 16 AB
10768 AVA 17-N marion 1611 33-29 53% 17 OH
10769 LAV 12-National black 1611 32-31 51% 12 AL
10770 ARIZONA STORM 18-Lightning 1611 22-31 42% 18 AZ
10771 Synergy 15 Flare 1611 25-39 39% 15 CA
10772 RUV 15-Red 1611 9-14 39% 15 VA
10773 TUV 10-White 1610 5-0 71% 10
10774 QCA 17-Under armour black 1610 19-10 66% 17
10775 Electric Volleyball 13-2 1610 11-3 79% 13
10776 Inspired VB 15-White 1610 26-14 65% 15 ND
10777 Club One 15-1 black 1610 19-8 70% 15 OH
10778 MIDTN Volleyball 16-Blue 1610 16-11 59% 16 TN
10779 Cajun Elite 15-1 1610 4-3 57% 15 LA
10780 Houston Force 13 Galaxy 1610 26-13 63% 13 TX
10781 Idaho ONE 15-Gray 1610 33-25 57% 15 ID
10782 NOLA Gabby/Chris 15 1610 30-28 52% 15 LA
10783 Academy 15-E copperheads 1610 46-37 55% 15 IN
10784 SWARM 16 1610 15-4 79% 16 SC
10785 OK Charge South 15-2 1610 37-15 71% 15 OK
10786 Webo 10-1s laura 1610 8-3 73% 10 IN
10787 Integrity 12-Intense blue 1610 17-29 33% 12 TX
10788 LEGND 12-Teal 1610 4-1 80% 12 OH
10789 Trinity 12 Blaze 1610 37-17 69% 12 FL
10790 River City Jrs 14-White 1610 16-7 70% 14 NE
10791 Max Performance 15-Blue 1610 34-21 60% 15 MA
10792 RWYVA 14-Purple 1610 12-5 71% 14 MN
10793 Big Sky 14-2 eastside 1610 39-23 61% 14 MT
10794 Excel NW 12-1 lux 1610 20-15 57% 12 WA
10795 AVA 15-Premier 2 1610 15-8 65% 15 NY
10796 CinciVB Acad 11-Bostick 1610 5-1 83% 11 OH
10797 ECVC 15-White 1610 26-11 70% 15 VA
10798 Prolink 14-Rachel 1610 28-24 54% 14 GA
10799 575 14-Wsnb ava 1610 38-25 60% 14 GA
10800 PAEVA 18-Black 1610 24-18 57% 18 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.