Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 215 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10701 London Elite 16-Blue 1612 11-4 73% 16 OH
10702 MoCo Jrs 17 Adidas 1612 29-20 59% 17 TX
10703 Monsters 17-Elite black 1612 20-16 56% 17 MI
10704 Arete 10-Navy ethos 1612 14-9 56% 10 TX
10705 Miami Wave 12-Teal 1612 25-20 56% 12 FL
10706 UVA 16-Mafa 1612 27-22 55% 16 LA
10707 Pitt United 15-Red 1612 31-27 53% 15 PA
10708 Kairos 12 Beta 1612 31-28 53% 12 SD
10709 SG Elite 12-Excel 1612 23-20 53% 12 CA
10710 Pono 15-1 annette 1612 24-20 52% 15 TX
10711 DG Warriors 18-Gold -merk 1612 32-29 52% 18 OH
10712 APXVB 17-Chennin 1612 30-29 51% 17 UT
10713 Black Hills Juniors 17-Green 1612 4-4 50% 17 SD
10714 Apex 15-1 girls 1612 16-25 39% 15 SC
10715 Moorhead Juniors 16-1 1611 18-6 67% 16
10716 Columbia Jrs 16-1 black 1611 19-12 61% 16
10717 Netforce 16-Ryan 1611 11-8 58% 16
10718 GI Vikes 12-Black 1611 4-0 67% 12
10719 SVC JVC 17-1 1611 19-19 50% 17
10720 BCO Volleyball Club 14-Girls black 1611 7-2 78% 14
10721 Club 801 15-Regional callie 1611 16-21 43% 15 UT
10722 NNJ Volleyball 14-Kuna 1611 4-4 50% 14 NV
10723 Power 15-Purple 1611 25-22 47% 15 TX
10724 Club W 14-Red 1611 6-1 86% 14 WI
10725 Notorious 16-Adam/leo 1611 12-3 80% 16 CA
10726 Lakeshore Storm 14-Blue 1611 11-4 73% 14 WI
10727 NH Brainerd 14-1 1611 8-3 73% 14 MN
10728 Club SyrV 14U Premier 1611 52-18 73% 14 NY
10729 Vision 17-Exv blue 1611 19-33 35% 17 CA
10730 Optimum Volleyball Club 16-1 1611 5-1 83% 16 MO
10731 RVC Impact 12-White 1611 5-1 83% 12 NM
10732 WTNVB 11-1 1611 4-1 80% 11 TN
10733 CLUB STEEL 12-Zoi 1611 8-1 89% 12 FL
10734 The EDGE 16-Walter black 1611 31-22 58% 16 CO
10735 405 Drive 14-National 1611 25-13 66% 14 OK
10736 VEVA Fury 16-Blue 1611 26-18 59% 16 PA
10737 Northridge 12-Besser 1611 4-1 80% 12
10738 Measina Volleyball Club 16-Team 1611 4-1 80% 16
10739 Desert Stars Angels 14-1 1611 21-8 72% 14
10740 MUSVB 11-Black 1611 7-1 64% 11
10741 Kulia 12 1611 3-0 100% 12 HI
10742 JAG VBC 14-2 1611 15-6 71% 14 WI
10743 Boltz 18-25 1611 14-6 70% 18 AZ
10744 Midwest Penguins 14-R 1611 35-16 69% 14 WI
10745 WV Galaxy 13 1611 21-10 68% 13 WV
10746 NE Shock 15-Fire 1611 10-5 67% 15 CT
10747 MGA 18-Black 1611 27-14 66% 18 MA
10748 STARZ 11-Blue 1611 20-8 71% 11 IL
10749 Rise 12-S 1611 25-11 66% 12 CA
10750 BVC 15-Black 1611 43-23 65% 15 MN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.