Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 215 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10701 Measina Volleyball Club 16-Team 1612 4-1 80% 16
10702 Illini Elite Tournaments 12 Morton Aces 1612 4-1 80% 12
10703 NAVC Griffins 17 NAVC Griffins 1612 5-2 71% 17
10704 Image 18-Black 1612 8-8 44% 18
10705 VIP 15-Elite 1612 11-14 35% 15
10706 BCO Volleyball Club 14-Girls black 1611 7-2 78% 14
10707 Red Storm 15-National white 1611 26-23 53% 15 LA
10708 Northridge 12-Besser 1611 4-1 80% 12 IN
10709 APXVB 17-Chennin 1611 30-29 51% 17 UT
10710 CCVC 13-National 1611 28-14 67% 13 AL
10711 ENCORE 13-Navy 1611 4-2 67% 13 CA
10712 Texas United 18-Red 1611 15-10 60% 18 TX
10713 Gators VBC 17 Premier 1611 25-18 58% 17 OH
10714 Volisur 14-1 1611 12-12 50% 14 PR
10715 MoCo MAVS 16-White 1611 40-22 65% 16 TX
10716 SMVA 17-1 1611 21-8 68% 17 AL
10717 MPV 17-National black 1611 22-26 46% 17 UT
10718 Eagles Select 12 1611 7-2 78% 12 IA
10719 Kairos 12-White 1611 15-8 65% 12 SD
10720 MJVA 16-Elite teal 1611 28-21 57% 16 TN
10721 Nalu NIELSON 16 1611 4-3 57% 16 UT
10722 P3R 15-Platinum 1611 24-22 52% 15 PA
10723 CYVBC Surge 16-Black 1611 21-26 45% 16 OH
10724 Invasion 13-Blue 1611 16-12 57% 13 MO
10725 Black Swamp 13-2 1611 12-4 75% 13 OH
10726 Club South 13-Black 1611 16-8 67% 13 WA
10727 NVA 16-Navy 1611 7-2 70% 16 NE
10728 South Mountain Velocity 13 SM Velocity Force Select 1611 19-27 39% 13 AZ
10729 EPAN 15 1611 19-12 61% 15 WV
10730 RVC Impact 12-White 1611 5-1 83% 12 TX
10731 Plybon 15 1611 3-1 75% 15 OH
10732 Premier 14-Royal 1611 7-2 70% 14 PA
10733 WTNVB 11-1 1611 4-1 80% 11 TN
10734 Titanium 16 Navy 1611 18-7 62% 16 MO
10735 East Texas 13-B 1611 13-4 68% 13 LA
10736 MN Select 13-Black 1611 29-13 69% 13 MN
10737 ECVBA 13-1 1611 28-16 64% 13 CA
10738 SCBandits 18-1 1611 3-7 30% 18 ON
10739 MUSVB 11-Black 1611 7-1 64% 11
10740 OP2 11-1 elite 1611 3-1 60% 11
10741 Cobra 14-Black 1610 12-5 63% 14 MA
10742 IVC 13-Elite 1610 6-3 67% 13 IA
10743 Rocky Elite 17 National 1610 42-25 63% 17 CO
10744 Cape Cod 14-Jaime 1610 11-2 73% 14 MA
10745 SOINE 10-1 1610 16-7 70% 10 KY
10746 PVA 13-2 1610 4-1 80% 13 MO
10747 CIA 18-Black 1610 15-17 47% 18 IA
10748 STARZ 11-Blue 1610 20-8 71% 11 IL
10749 SPVB 14-Red 1610 24-27 47% 14 IL
10750 UNION 12-In grey 1610 29-19 60% 12 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.