2025-2026 Season — Page 215 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10701 | London Elite 16-Blue | 1612 | 11-4 | 73% | 16 | OH |
| 10702 | MoCo Jrs 17 Adidas | 1612 | 29-20 | 59% | 17 | TX |
| 10703 | Monsters 17-Elite black | 1612 | 20-16 | 56% | 17 | MI |
| 10704 | Arete 10-Navy ethos | 1612 | 14-9 | 56% | 10 | TX |
| 10705 | Miami Wave 12-Teal | 1612 | 25-20 | 56% | 12 | FL |
| 10706 | UVA 16-Mafa | 1612 | 27-22 | 55% | 16 | LA |
| 10707 | Pitt United 15-Red | 1612 | 31-27 | 53% | 15 | PA |
| 10708 | Kairos 12 Beta | 1612 | 31-28 | 53% | 12 | SD |
| 10709 | SG Elite 12-Excel | 1612 | 23-20 | 53% | 12 | CA |
| 10710 | Pono 15-1 annette | 1612 | 24-20 | 52% | 15 | TX |
| 10711 | DG Warriors 18-Gold -merk | 1612 | 32-29 | 52% | 18 | OH |
| 10712 | APXVB 17-Chennin | 1612 | 30-29 | 51% | 17 | UT |
| 10713 | Black Hills Juniors 17-Green | 1612 | 4-4 | 50% | 17 | SD |
| 10714 | Apex 15-1 girls | 1612 | 16-25 | 39% | 15 | SC |
| 10715 | Moorhead Juniors 16-1 | 1611 | 18-6 | 67% | 16 | |
| 10716 | Columbia Jrs 16-1 black | 1611 | 19-12 | 61% | 16 | |
| 10717 | Netforce 16-Ryan | 1611 | 11-8 | 58% | 16 | |
| 10718 | GI Vikes 12-Black | 1611 | 4-0 | 67% | 12 | |
| 10719 | SVC JVC 17-1 | 1611 | 19-19 | 50% | 17 | |
| 10720 | BCO Volleyball Club 14-Girls black | 1611 | 7-2 | 78% | 14 | |
| 10721 | Club 801 15-Regional callie | 1611 | 16-21 | 43% | 15 | UT |
| 10722 | NNJ Volleyball 14-Kuna | 1611 | 4-4 | 50% | 14 | NV |
| 10723 | Power 15-Purple | 1611 | 25-22 | 47% | 15 | TX |
| 10724 | Club W 14-Red | 1611 | 6-1 | 86% | 14 | WI |
| 10725 | Notorious 16-Adam/leo | 1611 | 12-3 | 80% | 16 | CA |
| 10726 | Lakeshore Storm 14-Blue | 1611 | 11-4 | 73% | 14 | WI |
| 10727 | NH Brainerd 14-1 | 1611 | 8-3 | 73% | 14 | MN |
| 10728 | Club SyrV 14U Premier | 1611 | 52-18 | 73% | 14 | NY |
| 10729 | Vision 17-Exv blue | 1611 | 19-33 | 35% | 17 | CA |
| 10730 | Optimum Volleyball Club 16-1 | 1611 | 5-1 | 83% | 16 | MO |
| 10731 | RVC Impact 12-White | 1611 | 5-1 | 83% | 12 | NM |
| 10732 | WTNVB 11-1 | 1611 | 4-1 | 80% | 11 | TN |
| 10733 | CLUB STEEL 12-Zoi | 1611 | 8-1 | 89% | 12 | FL |
| 10734 | The EDGE 16-Walter black | 1611 | 31-22 | 58% | 16 | CO |
| 10735 | 405 Drive 14-National | 1611 | 25-13 | 66% | 14 | OK |
| 10736 | VEVA Fury 16-Blue | 1611 | 26-18 | 59% | 16 | PA |
| 10737 | Northridge 12-Besser | 1611 | 4-1 | 80% | 12 | |
| 10738 | Measina Volleyball Club 16-Team | 1611 | 4-1 | 80% | 16 | |
| 10739 | Desert Stars Angels 14-1 | 1611 | 21-8 | 72% | 14 | |
| 10740 | MUSVB 11-Black | 1611 | 7-1 | 64% | 11 | |
| 10741 | Kulia 12 | 1611 | 3-0 | 100% | 12 | HI |
| 10742 | JAG VBC 14-2 | 1611 | 15-6 | 71% | 14 | WI |
| 10743 | Boltz 18-25 | 1611 | 14-6 | 70% | 18 | AZ |
| 10744 | Midwest Penguins 14-R | 1611 | 35-16 | 69% | 14 | WI |
| 10745 | WV Galaxy 13 | 1611 | 21-10 | 68% | 13 | WV |
| 10746 | NE Shock 15-Fire | 1611 | 10-5 | 67% | 15 | CT |
| 10747 | MGA 18-Black | 1611 | 27-14 | 66% | 18 | MA |
| 10748 | STARZ 11-Blue | 1611 | 20-8 | 71% | 11 | IL |
| 10749 | Rise 12-S | 1611 | 25-11 | 66% | 12 | CA |
| 10750 | BVC 15-Black | 1611 | 43-23 | 65% | 15 | MN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.