2025-2026 Season — Page 215 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10701 | Measina Volleyball Club 16-Team | 1612 | 4-1 | 80% | 16 | |
| 10702 | Illini Elite Tournaments 12 Morton Aces | 1612 | 4-1 | 80% | 12 | |
| 10703 | NAVC Griffins 17 NAVC Griffins | 1612 | 5-2 | 71% | 17 | |
| 10704 | Image 18-Black | 1612 | 8-8 | 44% | 18 | |
| 10705 | VIP 15-Elite | 1612 | 11-14 | 35% | 15 | |
| 10706 | BCO Volleyball Club 14-Girls black | 1611 | 7-2 | 78% | 14 | |
| 10707 | Red Storm 15-National white | 1611 | 26-23 | 53% | 15 | LA |
| 10708 | Northridge 12-Besser | 1611 | 4-1 | 80% | 12 | IN |
| 10709 | APXVB 17-Chennin | 1611 | 30-29 | 51% | 17 | UT |
| 10710 | CCVC 13-National | 1611 | 28-14 | 67% | 13 | AL |
| 10711 | ENCORE 13-Navy | 1611 | 4-2 | 67% | 13 | CA |
| 10712 | Texas United 18-Red | 1611 | 15-10 | 60% | 18 | TX |
| 10713 | Gators VBC 17 Premier | 1611 | 25-18 | 58% | 17 | OH |
| 10714 | Volisur 14-1 | 1611 | 12-12 | 50% | 14 | PR |
| 10715 | MoCo MAVS 16-White | 1611 | 40-22 | 65% | 16 | TX |
| 10716 | SMVA 17-1 | 1611 | 21-8 | 68% | 17 | AL |
| 10717 | MPV 17-National black | 1611 | 22-26 | 46% | 17 | UT |
| 10718 | Eagles Select 12 | 1611 | 7-2 | 78% | 12 | IA |
| 10719 | Kairos 12-White | 1611 | 15-8 | 65% | 12 | SD |
| 10720 | MJVA 16-Elite teal | 1611 | 28-21 | 57% | 16 | TN |
| 10721 | Nalu NIELSON 16 | 1611 | 4-3 | 57% | 16 | UT |
| 10722 | P3R 15-Platinum | 1611 | 24-22 | 52% | 15 | PA |
| 10723 | CYVBC Surge 16-Black | 1611 | 21-26 | 45% | 16 | OH |
| 10724 | Invasion 13-Blue | 1611 | 16-12 | 57% | 13 | MO |
| 10725 | Black Swamp 13-2 | 1611 | 12-4 | 75% | 13 | OH |
| 10726 | Club South 13-Black | 1611 | 16-8 | 67% | 13 | WA |
| 10727 | NVA 16-Navy | 1611 | 7-2 | 70% | 16 | NE |
| 10728 | South Mountain Velocity 13 SM Velocity Force Select | 1611 | 19-27 | 39% | 13 | AZ |
| 10729 | EPAN 15 | 1611 | 19-12 | 61% | 15 | WV |
| 10730 | RVC Impact 12-White | 1611 | 5-1 | 83% | 12 | TX |
| 10731 | Plybon 15 | 1611 | 3-1 | 75% | 15 | OH |
| 10732 | Premier 14-Royal | 1611 | 7-2 | 70% | 14 | PA |
| 10733 | WTNVB 11-1 | 1611 | 4-1 | 80% | 11 | TN |
| 10734 | Titanium 16 Navy | 1611 | 18-7 | 62% | 16 | MO |
| 10735 | East Texas 13-B | 1611 | 13-4 | 68% | 13 | LA |
| 10736 | MN Select 13-Black | 1611 | 29-13 | 69% | 13 | MN |
| 10737 | ECVBA 13-1 | 1611 | 28-16 | 64% | 13 | CA |
| 10738 | SCBandits 18-1 | 1611 | 3-7 | 30% | 18 | ON |
| 10739 | MUSVB 11-Black | 1611 | 7-1 | 64% | 11 | |
| 10740 | OP2 11-1 elite | 1611 | 3-1 | 60% | 11 | |
| 10741 | Cobra 14-Black | 1610 | 12-5 | 63% | 14 | MA |
| 10742 | IVC 13-Elite | 1610 | 6-3 | 67% | 13 | IA |
| 10743 | Rocky Elite 17 National | 1610 | 42-25 | 63% | 17 | CO |
| 10744 | Cape Cod 14-Jaime | 1610 | 11-2 | 73% | 14 | MA |
| 10745 | SOINE 10-1 | 1610 | 16-7 | 70% | 10 | KY |
| 10746 | PVA 13-2 | 1610 | 4-1 | 80% | 13 | MO |
| 10747 | CIA 18-Black | 1610 | 15-17 | 47% | 18 | IA |
| 10748 | STARZ 11-Blue | 1610 | 20-8 | 71% | 11 | IL |
| 10749 | SPVB 14-Red | 1610 | 24-27 | 47% | 14 | IL |
| 10750 | UNION 12-In grey | 1610 | 29-19 | 60% | 12 | IN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.