2025-2026 Season — Page 214 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10651 | TAV 14-Teal | 1612 | 20-8 | 67% | 14 | TN |
| 10652 | SA Empire 13-Legacy | 1612 | 16-10 | 62% | 13 | TX |
| 10653 | HCS 16-Mamba | 1612 | 6-2 | 75% | 16 | NV |
| 10654 | EPFury Garcia 14 | 1612 | 19-6 | 76% | 14 | TX |
| 10655 | Silver Hammers VBC 15-1 | 1612 | 28-13 | 68% | 15 | NJ |
| 10656 | Windthorst 11 | 1612 | 9-4 | 64% | 11 | TX |
| 10657 | EPIC Warren 16-S | 1612 | 12-6 | 67% | 16 | OH |
| 10658 | Top-Tier 14 | 1612 | 19-5 | 76% | 14 | TX |
| 10659 | Alamo 18 Premier | 1612 | 15-32 | 32% | 18 | TX |
| 10660 | COA 15-Empire | 1612 | 33-16 | 67% | 15 | IN |
| 10661 | GJ 10 POWER | 1612 | 23-9 | 72% | 10 | FL |
| 10662 | MKE Sting 11 Gold | 1612 | 31-27 | 53% | 11 | WI |
| 10663 | Mana Toa 14-1 | 1612 | 6-1 | 86% | 14 | AL |
| 10664 | Power 15-Purple | 1612 | 25-22 | 47% | 15 | TX |
| 10665 | RSVBC 16-1 | 1612 | 30-27 | 53% | 16 | WA |
| 10666 | Columbus 16-1 | 1612 | 2-5 | 20% | 16 | MT |
| 10667 | VCNebraska 16-Blue | 1612 | 16-9 | 64% | 16 | NE |
| 10668 | UVA 14-Vivian | 1612 | 23-18 | 56% | 14 | CA |
| 10669 | NKYVC 12-2 tide | 1612 | 18-25 | 42% | 12 | KY |
| 10670 | TAV Houston 17-Blue | 1612 | 33-26 | 56% | 17 | TX |
| 10671 | RIV 14-Black | 1612 | 9-9 | 50% | 14 | WY |
| 10672 | RCVC 17-Raincity royals | 1612 | 4-3 | 57% | 17 | WA |
| 10673 | Pipeline 14-Ultra ari | 1612 | 24-15 | 62% | 14 | CA |
| 10674 | FH 12-Ikaika-celeste | 1612 | 23-23 | 43% | 12 | TX |
| 10675 | Club SyrV 14U Premier | 1612 | 52-18 | 73% | 14 | NY |
| 10676 | Hammerhead 16-1 | 1612 | 28-23 | 55% | 16 | MN |
| 10677 | Burley 14 | 1612 | 3-0 | 75% | 14 | UT |
| 10678 | ROCK Volleyball 15-Sun | 1612 | 36-28 | 55% | 15 | PA |
| 10679 | purple storm 15-1 | 1612 | 4-0 | 80% | 15 | AL |
| 10680 | Metro VBC 15-Black | 1612 | 36-21 | 63% | 15 | IN |
| 10681 | VOLT 13-2 | 1612 | 38-27 | 58% | 13 | ND |
| 10682 | SpikeZone VBC 17 | 1612 | 7-2 | 70% | 17 | GA |
| 10683 | FPVC 12-Ren | 1612 | 12-5 | 71% | 12 | CA |
| 10684 | TUV 10-White | 1612 | 5-0 | 71% | 10 | TX |
| 10685 | Lions SWest Prairie 14-1 | 1612 | 5-3 | 63% | 14 | MN |
| 10686 | Idaho ONE 16-Black | 1612 | 22-27 | 45% | 16 | ID |
| 10687 | OK Premier 18 Diamonds | 1612 | 41-13 | 76% | 18 | OK |
| 10688 | VEVA Brave 14-Blue | 1612 | 101-86 | 54% | 14 | PA |
| 10689 | 248 Elite 14-Blue | 1612 | 13-6 | 68% | 14 | IL |
| 10690 | Mid Coast 16-1 | 1612 | 18-7 | 72% | 16 | CA |
| 10691 | Westside Volleyball Club 16 WVC Blue | 1612 | 6-2 | 75% | 16 | CA |
| 10692 | TNT 17 Diamond | 1612 | 20-10 | 67% | 17 | PA |
| 10693 | Volleyball Elite 12 | 1612 | 11-4 | 73% | 12 | MI |
| 10694 | Horseshoe 17-Red | 1612 | 22-18 | 55% | 17 | PA |
| 10695 | Supernova 15 Allstars | 1612 | 25-23 | 52% | 15 | CA |
| 10696 | Milwaukee Jr's 16-Elite | 1612 | 138-90 | 61% | 16 | WI |
| 10697 | Schuylkill Eclipse Volleyball 17 Schuylkill Eclipse Lunar (3) | 1612 | 4-2 | 67% | 17 | PA |
| 10698 | C2 13-1 regional blue molly | 1612 | 10-4 | 71% | 13 | TN |
| 10699 | JAG VBC 14-2 | 1612 | 15-6 | 71% | 14 | WI |
| 10700 | L2 15-2 | 1612 | 34-28 | 55% | 15 | MI |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.