Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 214 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10651 TAV 14-Teal 1612 20-8 67% 14 TN
10652 SA Empire 13-Legacy 1612 16-10 62% 13 TX
10653 HCS 16-Mamba 1612 6-2 75% 16 NV
10654 EPFury Garcia 14 1612 19-6 76% 14 TX
10655 Silver Hammers VBC 15-1 1612 28-13 68% 15 NJ
10656 Windthorst 11 1612 9-4 64% 11 TX
10657 EPIC Warren 16-S 1612 12-6 67% 16 OH
10658 Top-Tier 14 1612 19-5 76% 14 TX
10659 Alamo 18 Premier 1612 15-32 32% 18 TX
10660 COA 15-Empire 1612 33-16 67% 15 IN
10661 GJ 10 POWER 1612 23-9 72% 10 FL
10662 MKE Sting 11 Gold 1612 31-27 53% 11 WI
10663 Mana Toa 14-1 1612 6-1 86% 14 AL
10664 Power 15-Purple 1612 25-22 47% 15 TX
10665 RSVBC 16-1 1612 30-27 53% 16 WA
10666 Columbus 16-1 1612 2-5 20% 16 MT
10667 VCNebraska 16-Blue 1612 16-9 64% 16 NE
10668 UVA 14-Vivian 1612 23-18 56% 14 CA
10669 NKYVC 12-2 tide 1612 18-25 42% 12 KY
10670 TAV Houston 17-Blue 1612 33-26 56% 17 TX
10671 RIV 14-Black 1612 9-9 50% 14 WY
10672 RCVC 17-Raincity royals 1612 4-3 57% 17 WA
10673 Pipeline 14-Ultra ari 1612 24-15 62% 14 CA
10674 FH 12-Ikaika-celeste 1612 23-23 43% 12 TX
10675 Club SyrV 14U Premier 1612 52-18 73% 14 NY
10676 Hammerhead 16-1 1612 28-23 55% 16 MN
10677 Burley 14 1612 3-0 75% 14 UT
10678 ROCK Volleyball 15-Sun 1612 36-28 55% 15 PA
10679 purple storm 15-1 1612 4-0 80% 15 AL
10680 Metro VBC 15-Black 1612 36-21 63% 15 IN
10681 VOLT 13-2 1612 38-27 58% 13 ND
10682 SpikeZone VBC 17 1612 7-2 70% 17 GA
10683 FPVC 12-Ren 1612 12-5 71% 12 CA
10684 TUV 10-White 1612 5-0 71% 10 TX
10685 Lions SWest Prairie 14-1 1612 5-3 63% 14 MN
10686 Idaho ONE 16-Black 1612 22-27 45% 16 ID
10687 OK Premier 18 Diamonds 1612 41-13 76% 18 OK
10688 VEVA Brave 14-Blue 1612 101-86 54% 14 PA
10689 248 Elite 14-Blue 1612 13-6 68% 14 IL
10690 Mid Coast 16-1 1612 18-7 72% 16 CA
10691 Westside Volleyball Club 16 WVC Blue 1612 6-2 75% 16 CA
10692 TNT 17 Diamond 1612 20-10 67% 17 PA
10693 Volleyball Elite 12 1612 11-4 73% 12 MI
10694 Horseshoe 17-Red 1612 22-18 55% 17 PA
10695 Supernova 15 Allstars 1612 25-23 52% 15 CA
10696 Milwaukee Jr's 16-Elite 1612 138-90 61% 16 WI
10697 Schuylkill Eclipse Volleyball 17 Schuylkill Eclipse Lunar (3) 1612 4-2 67% 17 PA
10698 C2 13-1 regional blue molly 1612 10-4 71% 13 TN
10699 JAG VBC 14-2 1612 15-6 71% 14 WI
10700 L2 15-2 1612 34-28 55% 15 MI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.