Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 214 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10651 Idaho Peak IFJS JAYDE 14-S 1612 3-3 50% 14
10652 Empire 17-National bear & becky 1612 4-3 57% 17 CA
10653 RAGE 16-Scott 1612 27-19 59% 16 CA
10654 HJV 14-National 1612 16-16 50% 14 TX
10655 Xcel VB 14-4 green 1612 17-6 63% 14 TX
10656 MDJRS 14 Open 1612 35-17 61% 14 MD
10657 ARVC 14-White adidas 1612 25-19 57% 14 NM
10658 Spartans 14 1612 13-6 68% 14 IN
10659 Lakas 14-Elite 1612 17-15 53% 14 CA
10660 United 14-Rachael 1612 12-9 43% 14 CO
10661 FC Elite 15-Ex amber 1612 10-6 63% 15 WI
10662 PRISM 16-Katie 1612 19-7 73% 16 WA
10663 Aftershock 17-Black 1612 34-15 69% 17 CA
10664 CYVBC Surge 16-Black 1612 21-26 45% 16 OH
10665 MN Select 12-Gray 1612 30-12 71% 12 MN
10666 MN Attack 17-1 1612 17-10 61% 17 MN
10667 SLAM 16-P black 1612 30-19 61% 16 MA
10668 Windthorst 11 1612 9-4 64% 11 TX
10669 Alamo 18 Premier 1612 15-32 32% 18 TX
10670 Austin Skyline Junio 16-Black-kilee 1612 2-5 29% 16 TX
10671 Ultimate 13-Blue 1612 40-15 73% 13 IL
10672 SpikeZone VBC 17 1612 7-2 70% 17 TX
10673 GJ 10 POWER 1612 23-9 72% 10 FL
10674 Invasion 13-Blue 1612 16-12 57% 13 MO
10675 FWFIRE 12-P 1612 8-9 40% 12 TX
10676 STORM 18-Ryan 1612 25-28 47% 18 NY
10677 Club SyrV 18-Premier 1612 17-20 43% 18 NY
10678 clubSAV 16-Mizuno 1612 20-28 42% 16 GA
10679 UNION 12-In grey 1612 29-19 60% 12 CA
10680 Mets 13-1 andy 1612 5-9 36% 13 PR
10681 Rocky Elite 17 National 1612 42-25 63% 17 CO
10682 GO Volley 17-N 1612 9-25 26% 17 VA
10683 Club South 13-Black 1612 16-8 67% 13 WA
10684 ProPlay 13-Zoe 1612 5-3 63% 13 CA
10685 RVC 15-Black 1612 21-26 41% 15 TX
10686 Roots 12-1 green 1612 30-23 57% 12 TX
10687 WGVC 16-1 elite purple 1612 6-8 43% 16 FL
10688 FVA 16-Blaze - a 1612 17-8 59% 16 AK
10689 Rose City Netters 14-Natalie 1612 5-0 100% 14
10690 Dubuque Insanity 14-2 1612 4-0 100% 14
10691 SVBC Spirit 12-Elite 1612 4-1 80% 12
10692 S-N-P 16-Coach jessica 1612 4-3 57% 16
10693 Nalu NIELSON 16 1612 4-3 57% 16
10694 Austin Performance 12-Baden 1612 4-4 50% 12
10695 Gold 17-1 blue 1612 4-4 50% 17
10696 VIP 15-Elite 1612 11-14 35% 15
10697 Legacy 16-Elite east 1612 40-12 77% 16 MI
10698 Pillar 12-Purple 1612 19-6 76% 12 OH
10699 Plybon 15 1612 3-1 75% 15 OH
10700 Xtreme 13-Ali 1612 8-3 73% 13 NJ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.