Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 213 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10601 NSVBC 12-Select 1613 19-10 66% 12 WI
10602 C2 12-1 regional orange rylee 1613 12-6 67% 12 TN
10603 CWAVE Venere 11 1613 9-5 64% 11 OH
10604 SA Lightning 14-1 1613 19-12 61% 14 TX
10605 ESVC1 17-1 1613 5-2 71% 17 MA
10606 Lomanview 10-Aleysa 1613 4-1 80% 10 PR
10607 Austin Skyline 11-Royal 1613 25-19 57% 11 TX
10608 KODA 16-Katskill 1613 23-6 68% 16 NY
10609 Fresno Heat HEAT 15-National boo 1613 4-3 57% 15 NV
10610 HBJ 16-Kobie/emmie 1613 28-12 70% 16 AR
10611 NKYVC 12-4 thunder 1613 20-10 67% 12 KY
10612 Matchbox 13-Black 1613 16-7 70% 13 SD
10613 STORM 18-Ryan 1613 25-28 47% 18 CA
10614 ID Crush 14-Vinson 1613 23-18 56% 14 ID
10615 Set'em Up 14 1613 3-1 75% 14 FL
10616 Tribe 13 1613 6-1 60% 13 UT
10617 S-N-P 16-Coach jessica 1613 4-3 57% 16 CA
10618 Attack VBC 18-Mizuno lime 1613 15-14 52% 18 MI
10619 405 Drive 14-National 1613 25-13 66% 14 OK
10620 Furder 14 Gigi 1613 23-11 68% 14 AL
10621 RSVBC 18-1 1613 32-21 57% 18 WA
10622 ERAA 14-1 1613 20-17 54% 14 MN
10623 Midwest Momentum Volleyball 18-1 1613 11-2 79% 18 IL
10624 Rise 13-Regional 1613 7-2 78% 13 CA
10625 EAA 16 1613 19-9 68% 16 KY
10626 NYCLBVC 16-Blue elite 1613 31-18 63% 16 NJ
10627 Volley Queens 13-1 1613 10-3 77% 13 PR
10628 NIVA South 14-Crocodiles 1613 4-1 80% 14 IN
10629 Delta Juniors 13-2 1613 3-0 100% 13 CO
10630 MEVC 18 National 1613 30-19 60% 18 MD
10631 CMASS EDGE 15-Black 1613 19-48 28% 15 MA
10632 305VBC 16-E jorgito 1613 8-25 24% 16 FL
10633 SRS 16-Blue 1613 33-20 62% 16 SC
10634 NOVA Juniors 14-S navy 1613 25-32 44% 14 OH
10635 SDVBC 18-Danielle 1613 24-28 46% 18 CA
10636 United 14-1 GJ 1613 12-9 43% 14 CO
10637 CI ELITE 17-RED 1613 30-38 44% 17 IL
10638 Mets 13-1 andy 1613 5-9 36% 13 PR
10639 Delaware United Volleyball Club 13-Navy 1613 16-23 41% 13 DE
10640 Ballhawks 15-1 1613 5-1 83% 15 ON
10641 South Central NE 15-Red 1613 7-3 70% 15 NE
10642 Kako'o VBA 15 Ron 1613 20-10 67% 15 HI
10643 Excel 13-N white 1613 1-1 50% 13 TX
10644 ACCV 16 Bk el Travels 16-1 1613 5-0 100% 16
10645 Hallsville VC 14-Black 1613 11-3 73% 14
10646 Aspire Volleyball Club 12 Aspire Rising Pink (NC) 1612 20-5 80% 12
10647 CWAVE Basilisco 12 1612 28-18 61% 12 OH
10648 SVC Rips 17-1 1612 48-33 59% 17 GA
10649 XTEAM 15-1 1612 5-2 71% 15 NV
10650 Red Storm 15-Nw 1612 5-3 63% 15 LA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.