2025-2026 Season — Page 213 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10601 | NSVBC 12-Select | 1613 | 19-10 | 66% | 12 | WI |
| 10602 | C2 12-1 regional orange rylee | 1613 | 12-6 | 67% | 12 | TN |
| 10603 | CWAVE Venere 11 | 1613 | 9-5 | 64% | 11 | OH |
| 10604 | SA Lightning 14-1 | 1613 | 19-12 | 61% | 14 | TX |
| 10605 | ESVC1 17-1 | 1613 | 5-2 | 71% | 17 | MA |
| 10606 | Lomanview 10-Aleysa | 1613 | 4-1 | 80% | 10 | PR |
| 10607 | Austin Skyline 11-Royal | 1613 | 25-19 | 57% | 11 | TX |
| 10608 | KODA 16-Katskill | 1613 | 23-6 | 68% | 16 | NY |
| 10609 | Fresno Heat HEAT 15-National boo | 1613 | 4-3 | 57% | 15 | NV |
| 10610 | HBJ 16-Kobie/emmie | 1613 | 28-12 | 70% | 16 | AR |
| 10611 | NKYVC 12-4 thunder | 1613 | 20-10 | 67% | 12 | KY |
| 10612 | Matchbox 13-Black | 1613 | 16-7 | 70% | 13 | SD |
| 10613 | STORM 18-Ryan | 1613 | 25-28 | 47% | 18 | CA |
| 10614 | ID Crush 14-Vinson | 1613 | 23-18 | 56% | 14 | ID |
| 10615 | Set'em Up 14 | 1613 | 3-1 | 75% | 14 | FL |
| 10616 | Tribe 13 | 1613 | 6-1 | 60% | 13 | UT |
| 10617 | S-N-P 16-Coach jessica | 1613 | 4-3 | 57% | 16 | CA |
| 10618 | Attack VBC 18-Mizuno lime | 1613 | 15-14 | 52% | 18 | MI |
| 10619 | 405 Drive 14-National | 1613 | 25-13 | 66% | 14 | OK |
| 10620 | Furder 14 Gigi | 1613 | 23-11 | 68% | 14 | AL |
| 10621 | RSVBC 18-1 | 1613 | 32-21 | 57% | 18 | WA |
| 10622 | ERAA 14-1 | 1613 | 20-17 | 54% | 14 | MN |
| 10623 | Midwest Momentum Volleyball 18-1 | 1613 | 11-2 | 79% | 18 | IL |
| 10624 | Rise 13-Regional | 1613 | 7-2 | 78% | 13 | CA |
| 10625 | EAA 16 | 1613 | 19-9 | 68% | 16 | KY |
| 10626 | NYCLBVC 16-Blue elite | 1613 | 31-18 | 63% | 16 | NJ |
| 10627 | Volley Queens 13-1 | 1613 | 10-3 | 77% | 13 | PR |
| 10628 | NIVA South 14-Crocodiles | 1613 | 4-1 | 80% | 14 | IN |
| 10629 | Delta Juniors 13-2 | 1613 | 3-0 | 100% | 13 | CO |
| 10630 | MEVC 18 National | 1613 | 30-19 | 60% | 18 | MD |
| 10631 | CMASS EDGE 15-Black | 1613 | 19-48 | 28% | 15 | MA |
| 10632 | 305VBC 16-E jorgito | 1613 | 8-25 | 24% | 16 | FL |
| 10633 | SRS 16-Blue | 1613 | 33-20 | 62% | 16 | SC |
| 10634 | NOVA Juniors 14-S navy | 1613 | 25-32 | 44% | 14 | OH |
| 10635 | SDVBC 18-Danielle | 1613 | 24-28 | 46% | 18 | CA |
| 10636 | United 14-1 GJ | 1613 | 12-9 | 43% | 14 | CO |
| 10637 | CI ELITE 17-RED | 1613 | 30-38 | 44% | 17 | IL |
| 10638 | Mets 13-1 andy | 1613 | 5-9 | 36% | 13 | PR |
| 10639 | Delaware United Volleyball Club 13-Navy | 1613 | 16-23 | 41% | 13 | DE |
| 10640 | Ballhawks 15-1 | 1613 | 5-1 | 83% | 15 | ON |
| 10641 | South Central NE 15-Red | 1613 | 7-3 | 70% | 15 | NE |
| 10642 | Kako'o VBA 15 Ron | 1613 | 20-10 | 67% | 15 | HI |
| 10643 | Excel 13-N white | 1613 | 1-1 | 50% | 13 | TX |
| 10644 | ACCV 16 Bk el Travels 16-1 | 1613 | 5-0 | 100% | 16 | |
| 10645 | Hallsville VC 14-Black | 1613 | 11-3 | 73% | 14 | |
| 10646 | Aspire Volleyball Club 12 Aspire Rising Pink (NC) | 1612 | 20-5 | 80% | 12 | |
| 10647 | CWAVE Basilisco 12 | 1612 | 28-18 | 61% | 12 | OH |
| 10648 | SVC Rips 17-1 | 1612 | 48-33 | 59% | 17 | GA |
| 10649 | XTEAM 15-1 | 1612 | 5-2 | 71% | 15 | NV |
| 10650 | Red Storm 15-Nw | 1612 | 5-3 | 63% | 15 | LA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.