Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 213 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10601 YSVC 17-1 1613 15-6 71% 17 NC
10602 NKYVC 12-4 thunder 1613 20-10 67% 12 KY
10603 VC United 16-Yellow elite 1613 26-15 63% 16 IL
10604 NLVC 14-Elite 1613 31-17 65% 14 NJ
10605 Club North Volleyball KC 16-2 1613 7-4 41% 16 MO
10606 McAllen PREMIER 14-1 1613 18-10 64% 14 TX
10607 Rise 13-Regional 1613 7-2 78% 13 CA
10608 Next Level 13-2 1613 7-2 78% 13 CA
10609 ECVBA 13-1 1613 28-16 64% 13 CA
10610 Iowa One 17-Aly 1613 20-11 61% 17 IA
10611 Team One 15-Pearl 1613 23-11 68% 15 IL
10612 ACCV 16 Bk el Travels 16-1 1613 5-0 100% 16
10613 Fort Worth Fire 15-Purple 1613 5-3 63% 15
10614 Locked In 17-1 1613 10-7 59% 17
10615 RIV 14-Black 1613 9-9 50% 14
10616 Sundogs 18-Uw elite 1613 6-0 100% 18 SK
10617 Ballhawks 15-1 1613 5-1 83% 15 ON
10618 WTNVB 17-1 1613 4-1 80% 17 TN
10619 Lomanview 10-Aleysa 1613 4-1 80% 10 PR
10620 Kidron VBC Cluff 16 1613 8-2 80% 16 OH
10621 Ark Select 16-N 1613 4-0 80% 16 AR
10622 NorCal 18-2 blue 1613 43-27 61% 18 CA
10623 MEVC 18 National 1613 30-19 60% 18 MD
10624 NorStar 14-Copper 1613 21-14 60% 14 CA
10625 Tribe 13 1613 6-1 60% 13 FL
10626 BTownVBC 15-Red 1613 25-17 60% 15 IN
10627 EVA 18 Elite 1613 17-12 59% 18 AR
10628 Tsunami 15-2e jeff 1613 39-27 59% 15 GA
10629 NIVA 17-GREY 1613 29-20 59% 17 IN
10630 Gulfside 10-Elite 1613 18-13 58% 10 FL
10631 Southern Elite 12 Elite 1613 18-13 58% 12 LA
10632 Temecula Viper 13-1 hannah/marlee 1613 18-14 56% 13 CA
10633 Idaho ONE 14-Black 1613 24-18 56% 14 ID
10634 TKVBC 16-Mavericks elite 2 1613 28-24 54% 16 GA
10635 RSVBC 16-1 1613 30-27 53% 16 WA
10636 Red Storm 15-National white 1613 26-23 53% 15 LA
10637 No Limits 12-Navy 1613 31-27 53% 12 FL
10638 CLUB UNION CLUB UNION 18-Red 1613 12-9 52% 18 UT
10639 Legend 14 1613 26-31 46% 14 CA
10640 Texas Tornados 17Adidas 1613 19-23 45% 17 TX
10641 BAE 13-1 mariah 1613 3-4 43% 13 CA
10642 ID Crush TF 13-Kat 1613 8-10 40% 13 UT
10643 Flyers 11-Usa-rico 1613 20-19 40% 11 TX
10644 SoCal VBC 16-Cardiff 1613 16-25 39% 16 CA
10645 DN 18-Black 1613 4-4 36% 18 TX
10646 SA Force 15-Darkside 1613 23-40 35% 15 TX
10647 305VBC 16-E jorgito 1613 8-25 24% 16 FL
10648 Bandits 16-1 1612 5-0 100% 16
10649 AV 16-1 1612 18-9 67% 16
10650 CR SURGE 16-Tori 1612 4-2 67% 16
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.