Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 212 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10551 Ballistic 13 1614 22-8 73% 13 MI
10552 Zona VBC 15-Red 1614 36-24 60% 15 AZ
10553 NLVA 15-Adam 1614 25-10 71% 15 CA
10554 BRAVO 12-Black 1614 33-17 66% 12 KY
10555 Allegiance 12-White 1614 9-4 47% 12 TX
10556 SA Spartans 16-Alpha 1614 22-18 54% 16 TX
10557 Valor 14 1614 6-3 67% 14 IA
10558 Dallas Premier 15-Crimson w 1614 5-2 71% 15 TX
10559 Mhvc 14-1 1614 16-6 73% 14 CA
10560 Eliz. VB 15-1 1614 12-5 71% 15 TN
10561 HEAT 12 NATIONAL 1614 21-11 66% 12 OK
10562 EC Volley 16 1614 8-4 53% 16 IA
10563 Mountain State Storm Volleyball Club 12 12 Rain 1614 7-3 70% 12 WV
10564 MVVC G 12-Pink 1614 24-8 75% 12 CA
10565 Dubuque Insanity 14-2 1614 4-0 100% 14 IA
10566 West E 14-Black 1614 13-14 48% 14 PA
10567 PAVC - NC 16-Onyx 1614 31-21 60% 16 NC
10568 575 12-Lpn jefff 1614 34-27 56% 12 GA
10569 BAE 13-1 mariah 1614 3-4 43% 13 NV
10570 Southernmost 13-Black 1614 8-2 80% 13 FL
10571 Mesa Juniors VBCO 16-Black 1614 24-18 57% 16 CO
10572 Shoreline 16-Gold 1614 35-17 67% 16 MN
10573 NYC Impact Volleyball Club 15-National 1614 4-4 50% 15 NJ
10574 SA Force 15-Darkside 1614 23-40 35% 15 TX
10575 Mid Minnesota Aces VBC 13 Mid Minnesota Aces VBC (NO) 1613 11-6 55% 13
10576 Shockwave Volleyball Club 14-Black 1613 9-8 53% 14
10577 BC 15-1 1613 5-3 63% 15 LA
10578 True to Form Athletics 15 True to Form FLIGHT 1613 6-3 67% 15 NY
10579 Sanford Sports 15-White 1613 25-17 60% 15 SD
10580 IGNITE 13-Black 1613 20-9 69% 13 OH
10581 FLIGHT 14-Select gibbs 1613 12-4 75% 14 MI
10582 Acceleration Volleyball 18 AVB Fire 17-1/18-1 (NO) 1613 10-2 83% 18 MN
10583 Lakas 14-Elite 1613 17-15 53% 14 CA
10584 Roots 12-1 green 1613 30-23 57% 12 TX
10585 Ozark Juniors 12-Blue 1613 24-13 65% 12 AR
10586 SG Elite 12-Excel 1613 23-20 53% 12 CA
10587 Idaho ONE 14-Black 1613 24-18 56% 14 ID
10588 WTNVB 17-1 1613 4-1 80% 17 TN
10589 ALJRS 12 National 1613 18-9 67% 12 AL
10590 DVA 13-Premier 1613 24-17 59% 13 PA
10591 SWMNVB 15-2 1613 26-17 60% 15 MN
10592 MN Select 12-Gray 1613 30-12 71% 12 MN
10593 Ark Select 16-N 1613 4-0 80% 16 LA
10594 Southwest 15-N deb 1613 31-24 56% 15 OH
10595 Electric Volleyball 17-1 1613 9-6 60% 17 KS
10596 ECVA 15-Teal 1613 32-26 55% 15 NC
10597 Allons 10-Maci 1613 13-5 68% 10 LA
10598 NorCal 15-3 white 1613 29-21 58% 15 CA
10599 Pono 15-1 annette 1613 24-20 52% 15 NV
10600 CE Lake Charles 10-Red 1613 18-5 75% 10 LA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.