Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 212 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10551 Hallsville VC 14-Black 1614 11-3 73% 14
10552 Dallas Premier 15-Crimson w 1614 5-2 71% 15
10553 Arete Athletics 12-Navy ethos 1614 3-4 43% 12
10554 SynergyForce 14-Black 1614 30-22 58% 14 CA
10555 Niagara Frontier 14 Navy 1614 21-19 50% 14 NY
10556 Major Impact 16-1 1614 8-0 100% 16 VA
10557 NVPUR 12-Jaca 1614 7-0 100% 12 PR
10558 Eudora Chaos 13-1 1614 6-1 86% 13 KS
10559 MVVC G 12-Pink 1614 24-8 75% 12 CA
10560 Reign Elite 11-Purple 1614 4-1 80% 11 OH
10561 Austin County 12-Red 1614 8-2 80% 12 TX
10562 South Shore 16-Red south shore 16 red 1614 5-3 63% 16 MA
10563 SA Empire 13-Legacy 1614 16-10 62% 13 TX
10564 Crossfire VBC 15-Blaze 1614 20-13 61% 15 MN
10565 808 Athletic Club 13-Keahi 1614 12-8 60% 13 HI
10566 SBS 11-Eileen 1614 6-3 60% 11 TX
10567 Bay Area Eagles 15-Juan 1614 26-18 59% 15 CA
10568 Gators VBC 17 Premier 1614 25-18 58% 17 OH
10569 Dunes 17-Black 1614 45-33 58% 17 IN
10570 Mizuno CNVBC 16-John 1614 27-20 57% 16 MO
10571 Austin Skyline 11-Royal 1614 25-19 57% 11 TX
10572 Cleveland Elite 15-Walsh 1614 16-12 57% 15 OH
10573 806 Volleyball Josh 13-S 1614 25-14 61% 13 TX
10574 NorCal 15-3 white 1614 29-21 58% 15 CA
10575 Texas Heat 18-1 1614 14-18 44% 18 TX
10576 WGVA 15-Black 1614 24-35 41% 15 GA
10577 Idaho LUV 17-Peyton 1614 9-15 38% 17 ID
10578 Downstate 14-Vipers 1613 25-15 61% 14
10579 Select 12-Travel 1613 16-6 73% 12
10580 Lincoln Fusion 12-Natalie 1613 12-3 80% 12
10581 ALJRS 13 American 1613 26-13 67% 13
10582 NIVA South 14-Crocodiles 1613 4-1 80% 14
10583 WTXVC Kryptonite 17 1613 23-15 61% 17
10584 C2 13-1 regional blue molly 1613 10-4 71% 13 TN
10585 Excel 13-N white 1613 1-1 50% 13 TX
10586 Cape Coast 15-Athena 1613 27-31 47% 15 FL
10587 MOVA UA 18-Gold 1613 39-13 72% 18 MO
10588 UPTEMPO 14 Natali 1613 10-3 77% 14 CA
10589 SKY Elite 15-1 1613 6-2 75% 15 PA
10590 ECVC 12-Nat sowal - maggie 1613 23-12 66% 12 FL
10591 Pipeline 14-Ultra ari 1613 24-15 62% 14 CA
10592 GoTime 15-1n 1613 43-26 62% 15 IN
10593 Blue Crush Hess 13 1613 17-7 71% 13 OH
10594 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 16-3 1613 9-3 75% 16 KS
10595 SA Lightning 14-1 1613 19-12 61% 14 TX
10596 Jersey Jrs 16-2 1613 19-9 68% 16 NJ
10597 Top-Tier 14 1613 19-5 76% 14 TX
10598 Bristol Crush 16-1 1613 17-6 74% 16 CT
10599 River City 11-Blue 1613 18-7 72% 11 WI
10600 NYCLI 15-Elite 1613 30-14 68% 15 NY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.