Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 211 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10501 Club One 15-1 black 1614 19-8 70% 15 OH
10502 AAC 15-Elite 1614 45-21 68% 15 FL
10503 Mem Metro 14-Elite red 1614 35-23 60% 14 TN
10504 Cajun Elite 15-1 1614 4-3 57% 15 LA
10505 Balboa Bay 13-Blue 1614 27-22 55% 13 CA
10506 NDVBC Cyclone 14 1614 19-10 56% 14 MO
10507 LAVA North 15 Molten 1614 26-22 54% 15 CA
10508 W.Tucson 14-Blue 1614 5-3 63% 14 CA
10509 Warriors Elite VBC 14-S black 1614 9-4 60% 14 NV
10510 Flyers 16-Usa-brian 1614 25-31 42% 16 TX
10511 Jersey Jrs 16-2 1614 19-9 68% 16 NJ
10512 BHJ 15-Green 1614 16-12 57% 15 SD
10513 Academy 15-E copperheads 1614 46-37 55% 15 IN
10514 MOVSelect 18-Green 1614 20-14 59% 18 OH
10515 clubSAV 16-Mizuno 1614 20-28 42% 16 GA
10516 Mean Green 13-1 1614 11-4 73% 13 TX
10517 UVA 16-Mafa 1614 27-22 55% 16 CA
10518 Zoo City Volleyball Club 16 Scorpions (CR) (8) 1614 4-1 80% 16 NC
10519 WVBA 14 Molten 1614 38-32 54% 14 WA
10520 Sky High Adidas 10-Elite 1614 12-6 57% 10 IL
10521 SSVA 15u Navy 1614 19-6 68% 15 PA
10522 WTXVC Kryptonite 17 1614 23-15 61% 17 TX
10523 Red Storm 16-National white 1614 25-18 58% 16 LA
10524 Onondaga Storm 18 1614 15-5 75% 18 NY
10525 Panda 18-1 1614 23-15 61% 18 CA
10526 South Shore 16-Red south shore 16 red 1614 5-3 63% 16 NV
10527 WVBA 13 adidas 1614 32-36 47% 13 WA
10528 OVVC 14-White 1614 6-0 100% 14 OH
10529 G-Force 14-Black 1614 8-1 80% 14 IA
10530 FC United 14 Teal 1614 20-10 65% 14 MO
10531 Dinamite 14-Miguel 1614 5-3 63% 14 CA
10532 BVC 17-1 bolts 1614 6-2 75% 17 DE
10533 Epic 13-Adidas 1614 40-24 63% 13 WI
10534 Boss CLE 13-3 1614 18-6 75% 13 OH
10535 CLEVELAND VOLLEYBALL COMPANY 11-Blue 1614 22-20 52% 11 OH
10536 Prime 15-Morgan 1614 31-26 54% 15 CA
10537 TCVA 17-Green adidas 1614 29-22 57% 17 TX
10538 DCVA 12-R 1614 5-4 56% 12 CO
10539 TVA Smack 15-Top tier 1614 29-19 60% 15 CA
10540 NorCal Volleyball Club 12 NorCal Juniors Ashley 6 1614 13-7 65% 12 CA
10541 Colorado Elite 18-Grizzly 1614 29-19 60% 18 CO
10542 MODE 13-National 1614 7-10 41% 13 WA
10543 RAGE 16-Scott 1614 27-19 59% 16 CA
10544 SVBC Spirit 12-Elite 1614 4-1 80% 12 IA
10545 Pillar 12-Purple 1614 19-6 76% 12 OH
10546 Northeast 16-Blue 1614 23-13 64% 16 CT
10547 Rise 17-2 1614 26-15 63% 17 OH
10548 Lincoln Fusion 12-Natalie 1614 12-3 80% 12 IL
10549 LES 12-Nick 1614 10-2 67% 12 AL
10550 GCVC 18 Silver 1614 14-23 38% 18 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.