2025-2026 Season — Page 211 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10501 | ALJRS 12 National | 1614 | 18-9 | 67% | 12 | |
| 10502 | CVC 11-2 pearson | 1614 | 14-6 | 70% | 11 | |
| 10503 | Furder 14 Gigi | 1614 | 23-11 | 68% | 14 | |
| 10504 | W.Tucson 14-Blue | 1614 | 5-3 | 63% | 14 | |
| 10505 | LES 14 Charlotte | 1614 | 29-18 | 60% | 14 | |
| 10506 | FCVBC 18-Ron | 1614 | 20-9 | 69% | 18 | |
| 10507 | Titans Khaos 17 | 1614 | 1-6 | 14% | 17 | |
| 10508 | Club Monarch 18-1 | 1614 | 4-1 | 80% | 18 | TX |
| 10509 | STVA 14-Navy-1 | 1614 | 34-27 | 56% | 14 | TX |
| 10510 | Sunshine 14-South bay | 1614 | 28-24 | 54% | 14 | CA |
| 10511 | VOLT 13-2 | 1614 | 38-27 | 58% | 13 | ND |
| 10512 | WD Nation 17-White | 1614 | 22-20 | 52% | 17 | LA |
| 10513 | 865VB 15-Elite | 1614 | 23-9 | 72% | 15 | TN |
| 10514 | Kairos 12-White | 1614 | 15-8 | 65% | 12 | SD |
| 10515 | RVA Girls 14 | 1614 | 44-17 | 72% | 14 | MD |
| 10516 | SA Elite 15-American | 1614 | 23-23 | 50% | 15 | TX |
| 10517 | EU 15-Black | 1614 | 26-31 | 46% | 15 | IN |
| 10518 | Dead Frog 17-Green | 1614 | 28-14 | 67% | 17 | MI |
| 10519 | MKE Sting 11 Gold | 1614 | 31-27 | 53% | 11 | WI |
| 10520 | Allegiance 12-White | 1614 | 9-4 | 47% | 12 | TX |
| 10521 | Roots 15-2 blue | 1614 | 33-26 | 56% | 15 | TX |
| 10522 | Legacy 11-Elite east | 1614 | 31-13 | 70% | 11 | MI |
| 10523 | SA Elite 16-American | 1614 | 20-25 | 44% | 16 | TX |
| 10524 | SMV 15-1 | 1614 | 12-5 | 71% | 15 | MN |
| 10525 | C1VB 13 Select | 1614 | 26-12 | 68% | 13 | SC |
| 10526 | Maui Encore 16-S | 1614 | 11-5 | 69% | 16 | HI |
| 10527 | BORINQUEN COQUI 12-2f | 1614 | 11-12 | 48% | 12 | PR |
| 10528 | Sartell 17-1 | 1614 | 21-8 | 66% | 17 | MN |
| 10529 | CUVC 16-N2 | 1614 | 30-16 | 65% | 16 | NC |
| 10530 | ENCORE 13-Navy derek | 1614 | 29-29 | 50% | 13 | CA |
| 10531 | SA Spartans 16-Alpha | 1614 | 22-18 | 54% | 16 | TX |
| 10532 | Attack VBC 18-Mizuno lime | 1614 | 15-14 | 52% | 18 | TX |
| 10533 | Colorado Springs Alt CSA 16-Navy | 1614 | 15-15 | 50% | 16 | CO |
| 10534 | Momentum Volleyball 13-Brock | 1614 | 26-12 | 68% | 13 | CO |
| 10535 | IGNITE 13-Black | 1614 | 20-9 | 69% | 13 | OH |
| 10536 | CWAVE Venere 11 | 1614 | 9-5 | 64% | 11 | OH |
| 10537 | FLIGHT 14-Select gibbs | 1614 | 12-4 | 75% | 14 | MI |
| 10538 | Adrenaline 18 Jeff | 1614 | 16-14 | 53% | 18 | IA |
| 10539 | LAVA North 12-Molten | 1614 | 27-14 | 66% | 12 | CA |
| 10540 | Red Rock 15-Jason - san francisco | 1614 | 25-23 | 52% | 15 | CA |
| 10541 | Set'em Up 14 | 1614 | 3-1 | 75% | 14 | FL |
| 10542 | EAA 16 | 1614 | 19-9 | 68% | 16 | MN |
| 10543 | G-Force 14-Black | 1614 | 8-1 | 80% | 14 | WI |
| 10544 | Wisconsin Elite 15-White | 1614 | 28-10 | 74% | 15 | WI |
| 10545 | Black Swamp 13-2 | 1614 | 12-4 | 75% | 13 | OH |
| 10546 | Sky High 13-Van gerven | 1614 | 14-5 | 74% | 13 | IL |
| 10547 | Delta Juniors 13-2 | 1614 | 3-0 | 100% | 13 | |
| 10548 | Mizuno Northern Lights 13-2 | 1614 | 4-1 | 80% | 13 | |
| 10549 | Midwest Momentum Volleyball 18-1 | 1614 | 11-2 | 79% | 18 | |
| 10550 | HCS 16-Mamba | 1614 | 6-2 | 75% | 16 |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.