Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 210 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10451 HEAT 12 NATIONAL 1615 21-11 66% 12 OK
10452 Silver Hammers VBC 15-1 1615 28-13 68% 15 NJ
10453 Amarillo Xtreme 18-Queens 1615 15-7 68% 18 TX
10454 NecTr 15-Rue 1615 4-1 80% 15 NV
10455 MVSA 13 Phoenix 1615 45-22 64% 13 MD
10456 CE Lake Charles 10-Red 1615 18-5 75% 10 LA
10457 Mana Toa 14-1 1615 6-1 86% 14 AL
10458 Peake Volleyball Academy 17-Blue 1615 6-2 75% 17 VA
10459 Bayside Vipers 12-1 1615 15-8 65% 12 NY
10460 City Beach 17-Black 1615 46-23 67% 17 CA
10461 Southernmost 13-Black 1615 8-2 80% 13 FL
10462 MMVC 14 1615 4-2 50% 14 OH
10463 Mean Green 13-1 1615 11-4 73% 13 TX
10464 Ozark Juniors 12-Blue 1615 24-13 65% 12 AR
10465 Spikezone 17-1 1615 5-3 63% 17 TX
10466 East Texas 15-Black 1615 9-4 69% 15 TX
10467 Aspire NW 12-1 empire 1615 17-9 63% 12 WA
10468 SSVA 15u Navy 1615 19-6 68% 15 PA
10469 PEAK 13-4 1615 29-12 71% 13 AZ
10470 Fallon Wave 12 1615 7-1 88% 12
10471 OP2 12-3 national 1615 4-1 80% 12
10472 PVC-Sarah 18-1 1615 5-2 71% 18
10473 PITSTOP 16-99 1615 5-2 71% 16
10474 Cape Cod 14-Jaime 1615 11-2 73% 14 MA
10475 DIGS 12 Maroon 1615 5-0 100% 12 NJ
10476 SF Elite VBC 12-Ella 1615 5-2 71% 12 CA
10477 NLVA 15-Adam 1615 25-10 71% 15 CA
10478 BPR 13 1615 10-6 63% 13 PR
10479 Panda 18-1 1615 23-15 61% 18 CA
10480 TVS 12-Tahla 1615 3-1 60% 12 TX
10481 Husky 18-Northeast 1615 26-17 60% 18 CT
10482 SUPERIOR 13-2 gold 1615 29-18 60% 13 TX
10483 WACO VBC 15-Ua red 1615 22-13 58% 15 TX
10484 Petite Elite 11 Athena 1615 11-8 58% 11 TX
10485 MJVA 16-Elite teal 1615 28-21 57% 16 TN
10486 XTEAM 15-Assassins 1615 4-3 57% 15 CA
10487 A5 10 Aneska 1615 24-18 57% 10 GA
10488 CLUB STEEL 15-Navy 1615 25-20 56% 15 FL
10489 Renaissance 15-Black 1615 43-34 56% 15 PA
10490 TAV Houston 17-Blue 1615 33-26 56% 17 TX
10491 LAVA North 15 Molten 1615 26-22 54% 15 CA
10492 Sandia Elite 14-N1 1615 20-18 53% 14 NM
10493 AVBC 13 National 1615 24-21 53% 13 AZ
10494 TVC 13 1615 31-28 52% 13 MS
10495 NKYVC 12-2 tide 1615 18-25 42% 12 KY
10496 Pgh Elite 13-Premier 1615 19-27 41% 13 PA
10497 MODE 13-National 1615 7-10 41% 13 WA
10498 Rancho Valley 16-Select maikel 1615 3-5 38% 16 CA
10499 SF Elite VBC 12-Nono 1615 3-5 38% 12 CA
10500 Volleyball Elite 12 1614 11-4 73% 12
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.