Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 210 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10451 Fairfield 14-White 1615 5-1 83% 14 CT
10452 Concord 14-Chupp 1615 4-1 80% 14 IN
10453 Red Rock 15-Jason - san francisco 1615 25-23 52% 15 CA
10454 Dallas Premier 17-Black g 1615 3-6 33% 17 TX
10455 SA Elite 15-American 1615 23-23 50% 15 MA
10456 Idaho Show 13-1 1615 5-3 63% 13 ID
10457 Emerald Rain 17-Elite 1615 32-29 52% 17 WA
10458 CUVC 16-N2 1615 30-16 65% 16 NC
10459 RVBC 17U Blue 1615 12-6 55% 17 PA
10460 Tenacity 15-1 1615 32-16 67% 15 WI
10461 Absolute 12-White 1615 16-23 41% 12 CA
10462 Tsunami 13-2e ish 1615 36-22 62% 13 GA
10463 NecTr 15-Rue 1615 4-1 80% 15 NV
10464 RISE 712-15-1 1615 21-9 68% 15 IA
10465 UEPA 16-Diamonds 1615 1-1 50% 16 TX
10466 MAC 18-1 1615 10-6 63% 18 OR
10467 Lions Volleyball Club 15-Girls black 1615 7-2 78% 15 IL
10468 MATRIX 13 Elite 1615 24-17 59% 13 AL
10469 Eclipse Girls 16-S lunar 1615 19-7 73% 16 CA
10470 Max Performance 15-Blue 1615 34-21 60% 15 TX
10471 Elevate VBC 17 17 Pandamonium (BG) 1615 3-2 60% 17 WI
10472 TX432 15-1 1615 3-4 43% 15 TX
10473 RAGE 15-Mika 1615 26-28 48% 15 CA
10474 TVA 14-1 rise ayanna 1615 9-6 60% 14 FL
10475 SOUTHWEST 13-Black 1615 6-0 100% 13 MI
10476 ECVC 15-White 1615 26-11 70% 15 VA
10477 Sunshine 14-Excel 1615 29-24 55% 14 CA
10478 Legacy 16-Elite east 1615 40-12 77% 16 MI
10479 KIVA 13-Grey 1615 39-17 70% 13 KY
10480 305VBC 16-E jorge 1615 20-14 59% 16 FL
10481 Wayne 13 Wayne 1615 5-0 100% 13
10482 The Panthers 12 Panthers 1615 4-0 80% 12
10483 OP2 12-3 national 1615 4-1 80% 12
10484 Niagara Athletics Volleyball Club 14 Athletics AFTERSHOCK 1615 7-3 64% 14
10485 Titans Volleyball Association 13 Titans Aura - Matt 1615 2-3 40% 13 ON
10486 GoTime 15-1n 1614 43-26 62% 15 IN
10487 GSI 16-Teal naples 1614 30-23 57% 16 FL
10488 Idaho LUV 14-Kelsey 1614 10-11 43% 14 ID
10489 Reign Elite 11-Purple 1614 4-1 80% 11 OH
10490 CVC 11-2 pearson 1614 14-6 70% 11 TX
10491 Next Level 13-2 1614 7-2 78% 13 PR
10492 Peake Volleyball Academy 14-Blue 1614 31-15 67% 14 VA
10493 Actsports 18-Miller 1614 18-10 64% 18 VA
10494 ProPlay 13-Zoe 1614 5-3 63% 13 CA
10495 Adrenaline Volleyball Club 15-1 1614 22-23 49% 15 OH
10496 Maui Encore 16-S 1614 11-5 69% 16 HI
10497 FLIGHT 15-Select sparks 1614 10-6 63% 15 MI
10498 Uno Girls 15-Elite 1614 21-28 43% 15 IL
10499 NNJ Volleyball 14-Kuna 1614 4-4 50% 14 NV
10500 Top Flight 16-Elite 1614 15-29 34% 16 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.