Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 209 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10401 Orion Chargers 10-Black 1616 7-4 54% 10 IL
10402 ATLHEAT 12-1 1616 24-7 73% 12 GA
10403 Sonshine 17 1616 9-2 82% 17
10404 EC Volley 16 1616 8-4 53% 16
10405 Absolute 12-White 1616 16-23 41% 12 CA
10406 NPVA 16-1 1616 4-0 100% 16 OR
10407 DIGS 11-Maroon 1616 5-1 83% 11 NJ
10408 Desert Sports 12-Elite 1616 12-3 80% 12 CA
10409 NWI Premier 12-Black 1616 7-2 78% 12 IA
10410 VV 15-1 1616 18-5 78% 15 VA
10411 CWAVE Elbert 14 1616 16-5 76% 14 OH
10412 Illini NW 12U Orange 1616 17-5 77% 12 IL
10413 Idaho Show 15-Natl hadden 1616 6-2 75% 15 ID
10414 ATHENA VB 16-5 chrome regional 1616 37-13 74% 16 OR
10415 JJVA Club 18-A 1616 19-7 73% 18 FL
10416 Servus 12 1616 11-4 73% 12 CA
10417 Kako'o 16-Kawika 1616 4-4 50% 16 HI
10418 Gators 13-Black 1616 23-23 50% 13 MA
10419 Blue Royals 15 Gold 1616 30-32 48% 15 WA
10420 CI ELITE 17-RED 1616 30-38 44% 17 IL
10421 Academy North 17 National 1616 20-33 38% 17 CA
10422 LES 12-Nick 1615 10-2 67% 12
10423 Bridger 14-1 1615 16-6 53% 14
10424 Georgetown Impact 16-2 1615 8-4 62% 16
10425 Cutthroat 16-1 1615 12-6 60% 16
10426 Paris Purge 14 1615 13-6 65% 14
10427 Shockwave VB Academy 13-1 1615 6-2 75% 13
10428 Concord 14-Chupp 1615 4-1 80% 14
10429 Burley 14 1615 3-0 75% 14
10430 SRS 16-Blue 1615 33-20 62% 16 SC
10431 Idaho Show 13-1 1615 5-3 63% 13 ID
10432 RVA 17-Boahen 1615 25-13 66% 17 IA
10433 Mindset Regional 14-Red 1615 18-8 69% 14 IL
10434 Club Fusion 14-2 national 1615 31-18 63% 14 IL
10435 MN Royals 14-1 1615 15-9 63% 14 MN
10436 A'o a Koa Volleyball 14-G 1615 18-10 64% 14 HI
10437 Rise 16-1 1615 35-20 63% 16 CA
10438 CUVB 14-Black 1615 24-11 65% 14 TX
10439 LVS 12-2 1615 5-1 83% 12 PR
10440 Exodus VBC 14-1 1615 5-1 83% 14 CA
10441 Lions Volleyball Club 15-Girls black 1615 7-2 78% 15 IL
10442 SAFB 14 Firestorm 1615 24-10 71% 14 TX
10443 USA South 11-Premier purp 1615 29-9 76% 11 FL
10444 BVA Davie 12-N mary 1615 28-34 45% 12 FL
10445 Roots 16-2 blue 1615 26-28 48% 16 TX
10446 Platinum 13-Bonnie 1615 4-4 50% 13 UT
10447 NSVBC 12-Select 1615 19-10 66% 12 WI
10448 Champion 16-Z purple 1615 26-10 72% 16 NC
10449 UEPA 16-Diamonds 1615 1-1 50% 16 TX
10450 808 Athletic Club 17 Albert 1615 11-12 48% 17 HI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.