Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 209 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10401 RVA 14-C.palea 1616 15-30 33% 14 IA
10402 Sonshine 17 1616 9-2 82% 17 CO
10403 Big Sky 14-2 eastside 1616 39-23 61% 14 MT
10404 South Shore Slam 17-National 1616 6-3 67% 17 WI
10405 Wythe Elite 16-Kelsey 1616 20-8 71% 16 TN
10406 Elevate 14-Spunky monkeys 1616 20-14 59% 14 WI
10407 DIGS 11-Maroon 1616 5-1 83% 11 MN
10408 GVJ 14-Jess & denise 1616 16-3 84% 14 AZ
10409 FORZA1 15 National 1616 36-18 67% 15 CA
10410 BSVBC 12-White 1616 24-14 60% 12 IL
10411 RRVC 15 National 1616 47-21 69% 15 VA
10412 HRVC Hurricanes 13-1 1616 3-2 60% 13 ON
10413 RWYVA 14-Purple 1615 12-5 71% 14 MN
10414 AVA 14 1615 10-6 63% 14 HI
10415 808 Athletic Club 17 Albert 1615 11-12 48% 17 HI
10416 Sporting Albany Girls 13 1615 22-10 67% 13 NY
10417 BPR 13 1615 10-6 63% 13 PR
10418 PAEVA 18-Black 1615 24-18 57% 18 PA
10419 GALVESTON VC 15-1 xtreme 1615 23-8 74% 15 TX
10420 DN 18-Black 1615 4-4 36% 18 TX
10421 Sunshine 14-South bay 1615 28-24 54% 14 CA
10422 TKVBC 16-Mavericks elite 2 1615 28-24 54% 16 GA
10423 NIVA 17-GREY 1615 29-20 59% 17 IN
10424 MIVBC 16-1 1615 30-10 68% 16 VA
10425 Oiler Attack 15-Steel 1615 5-1 83% 15 OH
10426 MMVC 14 1615 4-2 50% 14 NV
10427 NorStar 14-Copper 1615 21-14 60% 14 CA
10428 Club 801 16-National jeff 1615 34-38 47% 16 UT
10429 A'o a Koa Volleyball 14-G 1615 18-10 64% 14 HI
10430 407 12-Orange 1615 33-36 48% 12 FL
10431 Gulfside 15-Select 1615 43-27 61% 15 FL
10432 SynergyForce 14-Black 1615 30-22 58% 14 CA
10433 Exodus VBC 14-1 1615 5-1 83% 14 CA
10434 ESO 17-Elite 1615 36-23 61% 17 OH
10435 Douglas Volleyball Club 14 1615 18-8 69% 14 WY
10436 PVC-Sarah 18-1 1615 5-2 71% 18 WA
10437 New Prague JO 14-Black 1615 5-0 100% 14 MN
10438 Fallon Wave 12 1615 7-1 88% 12 NV
10439 Xcel VB 14-4 green 1615 17-6 63% 14 TX
10440 COA 11-Piranhas 1615 31-16 66% 11 IN
10441 Select 12-Travel 1615 16-6 73% 12 ND
10442 MSVB 13-National 1615 25-18 58% 13 AK
10443 HJV 15-Molten 1615 24-8 75% 15 TX
10444 NVPUR 12-Jaca 1615 7-0 100% 12 PR
10445 Air VBC 17-National 1615 14-7 67% 17 WI
10446 JJVA 17 Teal 1615 21-59 26% 17 FL
10447 Rise 16-1 1615 35-20 63% 16 OK
10448 LVS 12-2 1615 5-1 83% 12 PR
10449 OPVC 13 Lemons 1615 18-8 69% 13 OH
10450 WACO VBC 15-Ua red 1615 22-13 58% 15 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.