2025-2026 Season — Page 208 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10351 | AZ REV 14-Black | 1617 | 29-28 | 51% | 14 | AZ |
| 10352 | Madfrog 11-E green | 1617 | 17-16 | 49% | 11 | TX |
| 10353 | Elevate Athletics 16-Black mike | 1617 | 17-19 | 47% | 16 | UT |
| 10354 | TAMPA UNITED VBA 16-Red | 1617 | 33-40 | 45% | 16 | FL |
| 10355 | ID Peak 16-National jayde | 1617 | 10-12 | 45% | 16 | ID |
| 10356 | Spiketown 15-1 national | 1617 | 15-19 | 44% | 15 | OR |
| 10357 | JJVA 17 Teal | 1617 | 21-59 | 26% | 17 | FL |
| 10358 | NorCal 17-2 blue | 1617 | 24-22 | 52% | 17 | CA |
| 10359 | Basin Elite 13-Silver | 1617 | 6-8 | 29% | 13 | UT |
| 10360 | PRVC 10-Val | 1616 | 20-8 | 71% | 10 | |
| 10361 | ACS 17-Elite | 1616 | 25-14 | 64% | 17 | |
| 10362 | Green Wave 14U | 1616 | 13-6 | 65% | 14 | |
| 10363 | Valor 14 | 1616 | 6-3 | 67% | 14 | |
| 10364 | Shoreline 16-Gold | 1616 | 35-17 | 67% | 16 | |
| 10365 | Lawrence Landsharks 12-1 | 1616 | 8-3 | 73% | 12 | |
| 10366 | AVB Fire 13-1 | 1616 | 14-6 | 70% | 13 | MN |
| 10367 | Rollers 14 Royal | 1616 | 30-14 | 68% | 14 | TX |
| 10368 | Allons 10-Maci | 1616 | 13-5 | 68% | 10 | LA |
| 10369 | Thrive 14-Gold | 1616 | 19-19 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 10370 | TUVA 17-Elite | 1616 | 26-37 | 41% | 17 | NC |
| 10371 | SBVC Girls 15 Premier | 1616 | 32-15 | 68% | 15 | CA |
| 10372 | IVC 15-National angela | 1616 | 20-8 | 67% | 15 | TX |
| 10373 | Arkansas Jrs 17-National | 1616 | 4-2 | 67% | 17 | AR |
| 10374 | GVA 10-Orange | 1616 | 14-12 | 54% | 10 | PR |
| 10375 | Optimum Volleyball Club 15-1 | 1616 | 6-1 | 67% | 15 | MO |
| 10376 | 517 Elite 12-Black | 1616 | 7-3 | 70% | 12 | MI |
| 10377 | Gulfside 15-Select | 1616 | 43-27 | 61% | 15 | FL |
| 10378 | HBJ 17-Ravyn | 1616 | 25-12 | 68% | 17 | AR |
| 10379 | MN Premier 16-1 | 1616 | 18-9 | 67% | 16 | MN |
| 10380 | Athlete HQ 16-Rutkowski | 1616 | 32-16 | 67% | 16 | OH |
| 10381 | ASTARZ 17 | 1616 | 5-3 | 63% | 17 | AB |
| 10382 | Air VBC 17-National | 1616 | 14-7 | 67% | 17 | WI |
| 10383 | FPVC 12-Ren | 1616 | 12-5 | 71% | 12 | CA |
| 10384 | Diablo 15-1 black | 1616 | 22-14 | 61% | 15 | CA |
| 10385 | Cajun Elite 13 Hannah | 1616 | 23-9 | 72% | 13 | LA |
| 10386 | Galena Vipers 15U | 1616 | 16-7 | 62% | 15 | IA |
| 10387 | Chicago Elite 12-Peach | 1616 | 12-5 | 71% | 12 | IL |
| 10388 | SMVA 17-1 | 1616 | 21-8 | 68% | 17 | AL |
| 10389 | OCVC 12-Joise | 1616 | 25-11 | 68% | 12 | KY |
| 10390 | SMV 14-4 silver | 1616 | 38-25 | 60% | 14 | MN |
| 10391 | HJV 11-National | 1616 | 8-5 | 57% | 11 | TX |
| 10392 | TAV 13-Gold | 1616 | 31-19 | 55% | 13 | TX |
| 10393 | MOVSelect 18-Green | 1616 | 20-14 | 59% | 18 | OH |
| 10394 | Digs 17-Red | 1616 | 30-30 | 50% | 17 | NJ |
| 10395 | SPVB 14-White | 1616 | 31-24 | 56% | 14 | IL |
| 10396 | STL Crossfire 12-T1 | 1616 | 24-16 | 60% | 12 | MO |
| 10397 | Vital 16-Paige | 1616 | 7-3 | 70% | 16 | MN |
| 10398 | AVA 14 | 1616 | 10-6 | 63% | 14 | HI |
| 10399 | COA 11-Piranhas | 1616 | 31-16 | 66% | 11 | IN |
| 10400 | Venom 13-Red | 1616 | 39-29 | 57% | 13 | AZ |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.