Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 208 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10351 AZ REV 14-Black 1617 29-28 51% 14 AZ
10352 Madfrog 11-E green 1617 17-16 49% 11 TX
10353 Elevate Athletics 16-Black mike 1617 17-19 47% 16 UT
10354 TAMPA UNITED VBA 16-Red 1617 33-40 45% 16 FL
10355 ID Peak 16-National jayde 1617 10-12 45% 16 ID
10356 Spiketown 15-1 national 1617 15-19 44% 15 OR
10357 JJVA 17 Teal 1617 21-59 26% 17 FL
10358 NorCal 17-2 blue 1617 24-22 52% 17 CA
10359 Basin Elite 13-Silver 1617 6-8 29% 13 UT
10360 PRVC 10-Val 1616 20-8 71% 10
10361 ACS 17-Elite 1616 25-14 64% 17
10362 Green Wave 14U 1616 13-6 65% 14
10363 Valor 14 1616 6-3 67% 14
10364 Shoreline 16-Gold 1616 35-17 67% 16
10365 Lawrence Landsharks 12-1 1616 8-3 73% 12
10366 AVB Fire 13-1 1616 14-6 70% 13 MN
10367 Rollers 14 Royal 1616 30-14 68% 14 TX
10368 Allons 10-Maci 1616 13-5 68% 10 LA
10369 Thrive 14-Gold 1616 19-19 50% 14 CA
10370 TUVA 17-Elite 1616 26-37 41% 17 NC
10371 SBVC Girls 15 Premier 1616 32-15 68% 15 CA
10372 IVC 15-National angela 1616 20-8 67% 15 TX
10373 Arkansas Jrs 17-National 1616 4-2 67% 17 AR
10374 GVA 10-Orange 1616 14-12 54% 10 PR
10375 Optimum Volleyball Club 15-1 1616 6-1 67% 15 MO
10376 517 Elite 12-Black 1616 7-3 70% 12 MI
10377 Gulfside 15-Select 1616 43-27 61% 15 FL
10378 HBJ 17-Ravyn 1616 25-12 68% 17 AR
10379 MN Premier 16-1 1616 18-9 67% 16 MN
10380 Athlete HQ 16-Rutkowski 1616 32-16 67% 16 OH
10381 ASTARZ 17 1616 5-3 63% 17 AB
10382 Air VBC 17-National 1616 14-7 67% 17 WI
10383 FPVC 12-Ren 1616 12-5 71% 12 CA
10384 Diablo 15-1 black 1616 22-14 61% 15 CA
10385 Cajun Elite 13 Hannah 1616 23-9 72% 13 LA
10386 Galena Vipers 15U 1616 16-7 62% 15 IA
10387 Chicago Elite 12-Peach 1616 12-5 71% 12 IL
10388 SMVA 17-1 1616 21-8 68% 17 AL
10389 OCVC 12-Joise 1616 25-11 68% 12 KY
10390 SMV 14-4 silver 1616 38-25 60% 14 MN
10391 HJV 11-National 1616 8-5 57% 11 TX
10392 TAV 13-Gold 1616 31-19 55% 13 TX
10393 MOVSelect 18-Green 1616 20-14 59% 18 OH
10394 Digs 17-Red 1616 30-30 50% 17 NJ
10395 SPVB 14-White 1616 31-24 56% 14 IL
10396 STL Crossfire 12-T1 1616 24-16 60% 12 MO
10397 Vital 16-Paige 1616 7-3 70% 16 MN
10398 AVA 14 1616 10-6 63% 14 HI
10399 COA 11-Piranhas 1616 31-16 66% 11 IN
10400 Venom 13-Red 1616 39-29 57% 13 AZ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.