Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 207 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10301 OCVC 12-Joise 1617 25-11 68% 12 WY
10302 NJ RONIN 15-Katana 1617 9-8 53% 15 NJ
10303 Bridger 14-1 1617 16-6 53% 14 MT
10304 Diablo 15-1 black 1617 22-14 61% 15 CA
10305 DG Warriors 18-Gold -merk 1617 32-29 52% 18 OH
10306 ARSEL 17-1 1617 10-3 77% 17 PR
10307 Fierce 18 1617 13-2 87% 18 PA
10308 ENCORE 13-Navy derek 1617 29-29 50% 13 CA
10309 Tribe 16-1 1617 5-1 83% 16 OH
10310 South Shore Slam 16-Nat 1617 13-16 45% 16 WI
10311 Fremont Flames 14 1617 4-0 100% 14 CO
10312 Monon 11-1m energy 1617 15-8 65% 11 IN
10313 Roots 15-2 blue 1617 33-26 56% 15 TX
10314 Gulfside 10-Elite 1617 18-13 58% 10 FL
10315 Victorium 11-Ua 1617 26-18 59% 11 AZ
10316 Peak VA 13-Black 1617 15-15 44% 13 TX
10317 South County 15-Kristin 1617 23-7 64% 15 UT
10318 CVS 16 Brandi 1617 33-21 61% 16 CA
10319 IVC 13-Garrison 1617 8-2 73% 13 TX
10320 360 Volleyball Club 15 15.1 1617 7-1 88% 15 TX
10321 ADREN 13-2 1617 6-0 100% 13 OH
10322 Vision 17-Exv blue 1617 19-33 35% 17 TX
10323 Xtreme 13-Ali 1617 8-3 73% 13 NJ
10324 VVVBC 14 Silver 1617 23-9 72% 14 WA
10325 Hard Hitters 14-Black 1617 13-9 54% 14 TX
10326 GSA 14-National 1617 35-32 52% 14 NJ
10327 EVA 14 Elite 1617 27-29 47% 14 AR
10328 LES 14 Charlotte 1617 29-18 60% 14 AL
10329 City Beach 17-Black 1617 46-23 67% 17 CA
10330 Powerwest Volleyball Club 14-White 1617 8-1 89% 14
10331 FSJ 10 1617 22-9 71% 10 AR
10332 Minneota 18 1616 10-2 77% 18 MN
10333 Rollers 14 Royal 1616 30-14 68% 14 TX
10334 Champion 14-N purple 1616 33-19 63% 14 NC
10335 Uno Girls 18 Elite 1616 20-10 67% 18 IL
10336 ACT 13-Tuan 1616 21-23 48% 13 CA
10337 Legacy 11-Elite east 1616 31-13 70% 11 MI
10338 Kako'o VBA 16 Kawika 1616 15-11 58% 16 HI
10339 Premier 15-Royal 1616 7-4 64% 15 PA
10340 Blue Royals 15 Gold 1616 30-32 48% 15 WA
10341 TeamLVC Girls 14-Black 1616 31-34 48% 14 NY
10342 Sunshine 14-Hollywood 1616 22-13 63% 14 CA
10343 NPVA 16-1 1616 4-0 100% 16 OR
10344 OK Charge 17-Nat'l tulsa 1616 38-33 54% 17 OK
10345 PVA 14-1 1616 25-11 69% 14 SC
10346 ASTARZ 17 1616 5-3 63% 17 WA
10347 Fox Valley Performance 17 FVP G17/18u Regional 1616 21-11 66% 17 WI
10348 Tsunami 15-2e jeff 1616 39-27 59% 15 GA
10349 Platinum 13-Bonnie 1616 4-4 50% 13 UT
10350 Lawrence Landsharks 12-1 1616 8-3 73% 12 KS
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.