Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 207 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10301 AVBC 17-A hauenstein/goon 1617 19-12 61% 17 OH
10302 Blaze 17-1 1617 3-0 60% 17 IA
10303 East Texas 13-B 1617 13-4 68% 13 TX
10304 AP 14-Wilco yellow 1617 24-17 59% 14 TX
10305 TVS 12 Alicia 1617 10-5 67% 12 TX
10306 GSI 16-Teal naples 1617 30-23 57% 16 FL
10307 OPVC 15 Dunaway 1617 16-9 64% 15 OH
10308 Iowa Rockets 18-1 1617 25-19 57% 18 IA
10309 Boss CLE 13-3 1617 18-6 75% 13 OH
10310 CINCY EAST 17-1 black 1617 40-25 62% 17 OH
10311 Rapid Fire 13-Black 1617 14-8 64% 13 IL
10312 ID Crush 16-Henry 1617 42-29 59% 16 ID
10313 Sunshine 14-Hollywood 1617 22-13 63% 14 CA
10314 ESVBC 17-Avengers 1617 25-14 64% 17 MD
10315 OVA 13-National j 1617 23-16 59% 13 FL
10316 OK Premier 18 Diamonds 1617 41-13 76% 18 OK
10317 ECJVC 16-Premier 1617 28-12 68% 16 NC
10318 LCHV 15-Ignition 1617 3-0 100% 15 CA
10319 Boiler Jrs 12-R black 1617 25-14 64% 12 IN
10320 Eclipse Girls 14 1617 20-10 67% 14 CA
10321 Vegas United G15-Black 1617 13-10 57% 15 NV
10322 Monon 12-3r pumas 1617 23-16 59% 12 IN
10323 GVJ 14-Jess & denise 1617 16-3 84% 14 AZ
10324 Wisconsin Attack 13-Red 1617 28-14 67% 13 WI
10325 Ozark Juniors 15-National 1617 36-27 57% 15 AR
10326 Spiketown 16-1 1617 4-3 57% 16 OH
10327 Empire 13-National zoe 1617 8-7 53% 13 CA
10328 GSA 14-National 1617 35-32 52% 14 NJ
10329 The Edge 14-Black (RM) 1617 30-37 45% 14 CO
10330 CHiX 15-PiNK 1617 20-38 34% 15 OH
10331 Eclipse Girls 16-S lunar 1617 19-7 73% 16 CA
10332 Fierce 15 1617 4-1 67% 15
10333 Powerwest Volleyball Club 14-White 1617 8-1 89% 14
10334 Volleystars 14-S 1617 5-1 83% 14
10335 ELKHART 12U 1617 15-5 75% 12
10336 Douglas Volleyball Club 14 1617 18-8 69% 14
10337 Chaska 11-1 1617 8-4 67% 11
10338 RUVBC 16-1 1617 41-21 66% 16
10339 RIV 12-Red 1617 8-6 57% 12
10340 Mizuno Northern Lights 13-1 1617 2-3 40% 13
10341 River City Juniors 14-Navy 1617 3-5 38% 14
10342 Fremont Flames 14 1617 4-0 100% 14 CA
10343 Yuba Elite VBC 16-Pink 1617 21-8 72% 16 CA
10344 VVVBC 14 Silver 1617 23-9 72% 14 CO
10345 Mid Coast 16-1 1617 18-7 72% 16 CA
10346 Crank It 15-Black steve 1617 28-12 70% 15 MI
10347 DVC 13-Purple 1617 7-3 70% 13 OH
10348 Husky 13 1617 8-4 67% 13 CT
10349 Stormbreaker 12-Nova 1617 27-16 63% 12 CA
10350 SISU VB 18-1 1617 24-22 52% 18 MA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.