2025-2026 Season — Page 206 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10251 | Raptors volleyball 15-Red | 1618 | 7-2 | 78% | 15 | UT |
| 10252 | Omaha Roadrunners 17 | 1618 | 5-0 | 100% | 17 | NE |
| 10253 | Volleystars 14-S | 1618 | 5-1 | 83% | 14 | NV |
| 10254 | HPSTL 15-White | 1618 | 24-24 | 48% | 15 | MO |
| 10255 | Crossfire 14-Pink | 1618 | 8-2 | 80% | 14 | MN |
| 10256 | HVA Heat 13-Pink | 1618 | 18-10 | 64% | 13 | LA |
| 10257 | SLAM 16-P black | 1618 | 30-19 | 61% | 16 | MA |
| 10258 | TN Heat 15 Phoenix | 1618 | 17-5 | 77% | 15 | TN |
| 10259 | Digs 17-Red | 1618 | 30-30 | 50% | 17 | NJ |
| 10260 | Storm 12-Black (NTR) | 1618 | 20-12 | 57% | 12 | |
| 10261 | FIVA 14-S | 1618 | 4-1 | 80% | 14 | FL |
| 10262 | United VBA 13-Gray | 1618 | 19-12 | 61% | 13 | TX |
| 10263 | SoCal VBC 16-Cardiff | 1617 | 16-25 | 39% | 16 | CA |
| 10264 | Grandlake 14-Rammel | 1617 | 6-0 | 100% | 14 | OH |
| 10265 | Havoc 18-1 | 1617 | 8-3 | 73% | 18 | OR |
| 10266 | Monon 12-3r pumas | 1617 | 23-16 | 59% | 12 | IN |
| 10267 | DIG 13-Blue | 1617 | 22-13 | 61% | 13 | TX |
| 10268 | Benson 12-2 | 1617 | 2-1 | 40% | 12 | MN |
| 10269 | Fierce 15 | 1617 | 4-1 | 67% | 15 | PA |
| 10270 | SA Elite 16-American | 1617 | 20-25 | 44% | 16 | MA |
| 10271 | C4 13-Red | 1617 | 15-11 | 58% | 13 | SC |
| 10272 | AVC CLE 13-Blue | 1617 | 30-23 | 57% | 13 | OH |
| 10273 | NYC Volleyball Academy 18-Amsterdam | 1617 | 23-17 | 57% | 18 | NY |
| 10274 | STL Crossfire 12-T1 | 1617 | 24-16 | 60% | 12 | MO |
| 10275 | Aspire 17 Premier | 1617 | 39-31 | 56% | 17 | AZ |
| 10276 | SEVA 13 Crimson | 1617 | 25-11 | 69% | 13 | TN |
| 10277 | Empire 13-National zoe | 1617 | 8-7 | 53% | 13 | CA |
| 10278 | Ichiban 11-Eagles | 1617 | 27-6 | 79% | 11 | GA |
| 10279 | OK Charge 13-1 west | 1617 | 25-9 | 74% | 13 | OK |
| 10280 | AMP I 10 | 1617 | 5-1 | 83% | 10 | HI |
| 10281 | NBVBC 12-Blue | 1617 | 24-8 | 75% | 12 | MI |
| 10282 | Blaze 17-1 | 1617 | 3-0 | 60% | 17 | MN |
| 10283 | CPVBC 17-Blue | 1617 | 40-22 | 65% | 17 | PA |
| 10284 | GVA 10-Orange | 1617 | 14-12 | 54% | 10 | PR |
| 10285 | AVA 17-N marion | 1617 | 33-29 | 53% | 17 | OH |
| 10286 | Vital 17-2 royal | 1617 | 42-38 | 53% | 17 | MN |
| 10287 | AVA 13 Coral | 1617 | 38-25 | 60% | 13 | FL |
| 10288 | CPVB 14-National | 1617 | 19-13 | 54% | 14 | CT |
| 10289 | LOSO 15-1 chelsea | 1617 | 4-2 | 67% | 15 | OH |
| 10290 | SAFB 14 Firestorm | 1617 | 24-10 | 71% | 14 | TX |
| 10291 | Pipeline 15-Ultra amanda | 1617 | 29-18 | 62% | 15 | CA |
| 10292 | USANY Five Rivers 18-3 | 1617 | 9-2 | 82% | 18 | NY |
| 10293 | HUNTERS VBC 16 | 1617 | 15-10 | 58% | 16 | FL |
| 10294 | ARVC 14-White adidas | 1617 | 25-19 | 57% | 14 | NM |
| 10295 | LCHV 15-Ignition | 1617 | 3-0 | 100% | 15 | FL |
| 10296 | CTRUS 14-1 | 1617 | 10-2 | 83% | 14 | CA |
| 10297 | VVA 12-King | 1617 | 4-1 | 80% | 12 | CA |
| 10298 | RUVBC 16-1 | 1617 | 41-21 | 66% | 16 | IL |
| 10299 | Dig Deep 14-Stars | 1617 | 21-24 | 47% | 14 | NH |
| 10300 | Monon 12-2mi wildcats | 1617 | 14-7 | 67% | 12 | IN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.