Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 206 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10251 Raptors volleyball 15-Red 1618 7-2 78% 15 UT
10252 Omaha Roadrunners 17 1618 5-0 100% 17 NE
10253 Volleystars 14-S 1618 5-1 83% 14 NV
10254 HPSTL 15-White 1618 24-24 48% 15 MO
10255 Crossfire 14-Pink 1618 8-2 80% 14 MN
10256 HVA Heat 13-Pink 1618 18-10 64% 13 LA
10257 SLAM 16-P black 1618 30-19 61% 16 MA
10258 TN Heat 15 Phoenix 1618 17-5 77% 15 TN
10259 Digs 17-Red 1618 30-30 50% 17 NJ
10260 Storm 12-Black (NTR) 1618 20-12 57% 12
10261 FIVA 14-S 1618 4-1 80% 14 FL
10262 United VBA 13-Gray 1618 19-12 61% 13 TX
10263 SoCal VBC 16-Cardiff 1617 16-25 39% 16 CA
10264 Grandlake 14-Rammel 1617 6-0 100% 14 OH
10265 Havoc 18-1 1617 8-3 73% 18 OR
10266 Monon 12-3r pumas 1617 23-16 59% 12 IN
10267 DIG 13-Blue 1617 22-13 61% 13 TX
10268 Benson 12-2 1617 2-1 40% 12 MN
10269 Fierce 15 1617 4-1 67% 15 PA
10270 SA Elite 16-American 1617 20-25 44% 16 MA
10271 C4 13-Red 1617 15-11 58% 13 SC
10272 AVC CLE 13-Blue 1617 30-23 57% 13 OH
10273 NYC Volleyball Academy 18-Amsterdam 1617 23-17 57% 18 NY
10274 STL Crossfire 12-T1 1617 24-16 60% 12 MO
10275 Aspire 17 Premier 1617 39-31 56% 17 AZ
10276 SEVA 13 Crimson 1617 25-11 69% 13 TN
10277 Empire 13-National zoe 1617 8-7 53% 13 CA
10278 Ichiban 11-Eagles 1617 27-6 79% 11 GA
10279 OK Charge 13-1 west 1617 25-9 74% 13 OK
10280 AMP I 10 1617 5-1 83% 10 HI
10281 NBVBC 12-Blue 1617 24-8 75% 12 MI
10282 Blaze 17-1 1617 3-0 60% 17 MN
10283 CPVBC 17-Blue 1617 40-22 65% 17 PA
10284 GVA 10-Orange 1617 14-12 54% 10 PR
10285 AVA 17-N marion 1617 33-29 53% 17 OH
10286 Vital 17-2 royal 1617 42-38 53% 17 MN
10287 AVA 13 Coral 1617 38-25 60% 13 FL
10288 CPVB 14-National 1617 19-13 54% 14 CT
10289 LOSO 15-1 chelsea 1617 4-2 67% 15 OH
10290 SAFB 14 Firestorm 1617 24-10 71% 14 TX
10291 Pipeline 15-Ultra amanda 1617 29-18 62% 15 CA
10292 USANY Five Rivers 18-3 1617 9-2 82% 18 NY
10293 HUNTERS VBC 16 1617 15-10 58% 16 FL
10294 ARVC 14-White adidas 1617 25-19 57% 14 NM
10295 LCHV 15-Ignition 1617 3-0 100% 15 FL
10296 CTRUS 14-1 1617 10-2 83% 14 CA
10297 VVA 12-King 1617 4-1 80% 12 CA
10298 RUVBC 16-1 1617 41-21 66% 16 IL
10299 Dig Deep 14-Stars 1617 21-24 47% 14 NH
10300 Monon 12-2mi wildcats 1617 14-7 67% 12 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.