Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 206 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10251 HEAT 16-National ryan 1618 23-16 59% 16 CA
10252 Pipeline 15-Ultra amanda 1618 29-18 62% 15 CA
10253 United VBA 13-Gray 1618 19-12 61% 13 TX
10254 JET 11-M.evers 1618 17-6 74% 11 TX
10255 SPIRIT VBC 16-2 1618 32-23 58% 16 OH
10256 AMP I 10 1618 5-1 83% 10
10257 TAVBC 12 Teal 1618 4-0 80% 12 TN
10258 USANY Five Rivers 18-3 1618 9-2 82% 18
10259 Six Pack Legit 11-G gray 1618 4-1 80% 11
10260 Raptors volleyball 15-Red 1618 7-2 78% 15
10261 Set it Off 15 1618 41-13 76% 15
10262 CSNS Dev- 12-Maroon 1618 11-3 73% 12
10263 WVC Ashley Black 16-S 1618 19-7 66% 16
10264 OP2 13-3 1618 3-2 60% 13
10265 BLVC 15-Black 1618 8-5 57% 15
10266 Dallas Premier 15-Crimsontaylor 1618 5-4 56% 15
10267 CTRUS 14-1 1618 10-2 83% 14 CA
10268 Colorado Elite 14 Grizzly 1618 34-35 49% 14 CO
10269 GALVESTON VC 15-1 xtreme 1618 23-8 74% 15 TX
10270 Ox Imp 13-1 1618 19-7 73% 13 MI
10271 Sky High 13-Kleiner - spr 1618 11-4 73% 13 IL
10272 IVC 13-Garrison 1618 8-2 73% 13 TX
10273 Sideout 16-F orlando 1618 13-5 72% 16 FL
10274 Rice City 13-Red 1618 21-7 72% 13 LA
10275 Apex NW 15-Ascent 1618 5-2 71% 15 WA
10276 BCO 14-Black 1617 5-2 71% 14
10277 WSRVC 12-Sarah deschenes 1617 14-11 56% 12
10278 Benson 12-2 1617 2-1 40% 12
10279 Metro Performance 17-1 1617 5-1 83% 17
10280 St. Charles Heat 11-1 1617 8-3 73% 11
10281 Hot Shots 13-Purple 1617 12-8 52% 13
10282 EVP Vision 13-3 1617 4-1 80% 13
10283 Riptide 16-S elite 1617 31-15 67% 16 FL
10284 Tenacity 15-1 1617 32-16 67% 15 TN
10285 HPSTL 15-White 1617 24-24 48% 15 MO
10286 Jax Skyline 17-Black 1617 30-34 47% 17 FL
10287 Columbia 17-Black 1617 28-34 45% 17 MD
10288 EVA 14 Elite 1617 27-29 47% 14 AR
10289 Katy United 15-Adidas 1617 37-41 47% 15 TX
10290 VVA 12-King 1617 4-1 80% 12 CA
10291 253 Elite 14-Ekahi 1617 33-21 61% 14 WA
10292 108 BVC 14-Hybrid 1617 19-10 66% 14 VA
10293 Monon 12-2mi wildcats 1617 14-7 67% 12 IN
10294 SA Force 14 Select 1617 28-11 68% 14 TX
10295 Oiler Attack 15-Steel 1617 5-1 83% 15 OH
10296 DIG 13-Blue 1617 22-13 61% 13 TX
10297 Local Girl 12 Navy 1617 26-12 68% 12 SC
10298 ESO 14 Elite 1617 25-20 56% 14 OH
10299 High Voltage 14-1 1617 17-13 57% 14 MN
10300 Millennium 12-Hixon 1617 17-11 61% 12 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.