2025-2026 Season — Page 205 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10201 | Idaho ONE 14-North | 1619 | 20-15 | 56% | 14 | ID |
| 10202 | Lions Cityside 12-2 | 1619 | 16-13 | 55% | 12 | IL |
| 10203 | Club Tonka 14-1 | 1619 | 27-22 | 55% | 14 | MN |
| 10204 | NHouston Elite 15-Usa | 1619 | 19-16 | 54% | 15 | TX |
| 10205 | Platinum 16-Power | 1619 | 27-26 | 51% | 16 | UT |
| 10206 | Academy North 15-Hp-1 | 1619 | 29-29 | 50% | 15 | CA |
| 10207 | Core STL 16-Carolina | 1619 | 25-25 | 49% | 16 | MO |
| 10208 | 1United 15-N silver | 1619 | 24-23 | 49% | 15 | TX |
| 10209 | AVA TX 16 Attack | 1619 | 27-29 | 47% | 16 | TX |
| 10210 | Dig Deep 14-Stars | 1619 | 21-24 | 47% | 14 | NH |
| 10211 | South Shore Slam 16-Nat | 1619 | 13-16 | 45% | 16 | WI |
| 10212 | Peak VA 13-Black | 1619 | 15-15 | 44% | 13 | TX |
| 10213 | Red Rock 18-Leslie - danville/walnut creek | 1619 | 20-27 | 43% | 18 | CA |
| 10214 | RVA 14-C.palea | 1619 | 15-30 | 33% | 14 | IA |
| 10215 | Bay Area Eagles 14-1 oliver | 1619 | 6-15 | 29% | 14 | CA |
| 10216 | Midwest Iowa Thunder 13 | 1618 | 17-8 | 68% | 13 | |
| 10217 | GVC 14-Blue | 1618 | 17-18 | 49% | 14 | |
| 10218 | Venom Dynasty 18-Girls | 1618 | 4-2 | 67% | 18 | |
| 10219 | Vision 16-Exv black | 1618 | 19-15 | 49% | 16 | CA |
| 10220 | McALLEN PREMIER 15-Lightning | 1618 | 8-7 | 53% | 15 | TX |
| 10221 | RAGE 15-Mika | 1618 | 26-28 | 48% | 15 | CA |
| 10222 | NPJ Bend 15-National | 1618 | 22-24 | 48% | 15 | OR |
| 10223 | PAEVA 17-Maroon | 1618 | 28-23 | 55% | 17 | CA |
| 10224 | Ignite 18 Blaze | 1618 | 29-23 | 56% | 18 | TX |
| 10225 | AZ Sky 14-N1 | 1618 | 36-28 | 56% | 14 | AZ |
| 10226 | Elevate 14-Spunky monkeys | 1618 | 20-14 | 59% | 14 | WI |
| 10227 | Alliance 14-Regional | 1618 | 16-7 | 70% | 14 | TN |
| 10228 | Waupaca Fire 14 | 1618 | 7-3 | 70% | 14 | WI |
| 10229 | Diggersz 14-Spring | 1618 | 9-3 | 75% | 14 | IL |
| 10230 | 360VBA 14-2 | 1618 | 28-12 | 70% | 14 | WI |
| 10231 | ECVBA 16-1 | 1618 | 25-18 | 58% | 16 | CA |
| 10232 | EAA 14-BLUE | 1618 | 33-16 | 67% | 14 | MN |
| 10233 | Club One AZ 14-Copper | 1618 | 42-22 | 66% | 14 | AZ |
| 10234 | Club South 14-Black | 1618 | 18-13 | 58% | 14 | WA |
| 10235 | SVC 14-1 | 1618 | 32-21 | 60% | 14 | OH |
| 10236 | Mojo 16-A | 1618 | 7-4 | 64% | 16 | OH |
| 10237 | Southwest 15-N deb | 1618 | 31-24 | 56% | 15 | OH |
| 10238 | Madison Elite 12 Teal | 1618 | 18-6 | 75% | 12 | WI |
| 10239 | 26 SoV 15-1 | 1618 | 27-17 | 61% | 15 | WA |
| 10240 | STX DIVAS 12 | 1618 | 17-11 | 61% | 12 | TX |
| 10241 | Monon 11-1m energy | 1618 | 15-8 | 65% | 11 | IN |
| 10242 | LOSO 15-1 chelsea | 1618 | 4-2 | 67% | 15 | OH |
| 10243 | EVA 13-Green cierra | 1618 | 20-10 | 67% | 13 | KY |
| 10244 | Ultimate G15-Blue | 1618 | 35-18 | 66% | 15 | IL |
| 10245 | Tsunami 13-2e ish | 1618 | 36-22 | 62% | 13 | GA |
| 10246 | Manhattan Mamba 16-1 | 1618 | 29-20 | 57% | 16 | KS |
| 10247 | H. Prep 12-Mizuno | 1618 | 26-18 | 59% | 12 | TX |
| 10248 | South Shore Slam 17-National | 1618 | 6-3 | 67% | 17 | WI |
| 10249 | Victorium 11-Ua | 1618 | 26-18 | 59% | 11 | AZ |
| 10250 | Chicago Elite 11-Honeydew | 1618 | 10-5 | 67% | 11 | IL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.