Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 205 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10201 Onondaga Thunder 16 1618 12-7 60% 16 NY
10202 Texas Heat 14-1 1618 22-10 67% 14 TX
10203 Dunes 18-Black 1618 20-20 50% 18 IN
10204 Lena Legends 12 Lena Legends (GL) 1618 6-2 75% 12 IL
10205 Core STL 16-Carolina 1618 25-25 49% 16 MO
10206 LEGACY 13-Elite jon 1618 39-38 51% 13 FL
10207 Avalanche 16 1618 57-19 74% 16 MI
10208 HVVC 14-Black 1618 29-10 73% 14 MI
10209 Mizuno CNVBC 16-John 1618 27-20 57% 16 MO
10210 Austin County 12-Red 1618 8-2 80% 12 TX
10211 Waupaca Fire 14 1618 7-3 70% 14 WI
10212 Apex NW 15-Ascent 1618 5-2 71% 15 WA
10213 Lena Legends 15U 1618 16-7 70% 15 IL
10214 Cleveland Elite 15-Walsh 1618 16-12 57% 15 OH
10215 Culver VBC 18-1 1618 12-4 75% 18 OR
10216 Madfrog 11-E green 1618 17-16 49% 11 TX
10217 CPVBC 18-Blue 1618 26-15 63% 18 PA
10218 MoCo Jrs 17 Adidas 1618 29-20 59% 17 TX
10219 CSNS Dev- 12-Maroon 1618 11-3 73% 12 SC
10220 Onondaga Hurricanes 17 1618 11-1 92% 17 NY
10221 CWAVE Elbert 14 1618 16-5 76% 14 OH
10222 SPVC 15-Adidas 1618 30-25 55% 15 CA
10223 STVA 14-Navy-1 1618 34-27 56% 14 TX
10224 McALLEN PREMIER 15-Lightning 1618 8-7 53% 15 TX
10225 Club V 14-Prodigy kolton 1618 37-34 52% 14 UT
10226 Rockwood Thunder 16-Black 1618 35-23 57% 16 MO
10227 Shock 12-Ua storm 1618 19-10 66% 12 IL
10228 TAVBC 12 Teal 1618 4-0 80% 12 TN
10229 SVC 12 Silver 1618 14-7 67% 12 IA
10230 Mililani 15-S 1618 27-16 63% 15 HI
10231 ID Crush TF 13-Kat 1618 8-10 40% 13 ID
10232 South County 17-Sarah 1618 18-14 53% 17 UT
10233 TX Legends 17-Black 1618 25-18 58% 17 TX
10234 LAVA North 12-Molten 1618 27-14 66% 12 CA
10235 TUVA 17-Elite 1618 26-37 41% 17 NC
10236 Local Girl 12 Navy 1618 26-12 68% 12 SC
10237 CINCY EAST 17-1 black 1618 40-25 62% 17 OH
10238 Club Apex 12-Black 1618 24-11 69% 12 KY
10239 SA Force 14 Select 1618 28-11 68% 14 TX
10240 NRV Elite Force 17 NRV Elite Force 1618 23-8 74% 17 VA
10241 Quantum Volleyball Acadmey 17 16 Hydrogen (FL) 1618 4-1 80% 17 FL
10242 Southern Elite Volleyball Club 13-1 1618 20-6 77% 13 AL
10243 Husky 13 1618 8-4 67% 13 CT
10244 Midwest Iowa Thunder 13 1618 17-8 68% 13 MN
10245 Dubuque Insanity 13-1 1618 3-0 75% 13 IA
10246 CHAMP 13-1 1618 10-1 91% 13 AL
10247 Wisconsin Attack 13-Red 1618 28-14 67% 13 WI
10248 CCV 16-Synergy 1618 28-7 78% 16 AZ
10249 Sideout 16-F orlando 1618 13-5 72% 16 FL
10250 Acceleration Volleyball 16 AVB Fire 15/16's Black (NO) 1618 9-2 82% 16 MN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.