Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 204 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10151 FTL 13-Fusion teddy 1620 22-38 37% 13 FL
10152 YVA 16-Zach 1619 20-9 69% 16
10153 CPAC 14-Black 1619 4-1 80% 14
10154 HPVBC Impact 14U 1619 27-7 79% 14
10155 LI Knights 15-1 1619 10-5 67% 15
10156 GIRLIE GIRLIE 18 1619 5-1 71% 18
10157 Impact Vball Club 14 1619 15-10 58% 14
10158 Champions 14-Short 1619 9-3 60% 14
10159 Aleta 15-2 1619 11-6 65% 15 OH
10160 SOMD 15-Black 1619 27-11 68% 15 MD
10161 DYNAMITE 13-Regional 1619 19-8 70% 13 CA
10162 Crossfire 14-Pink 1619 8-2 80% 14 MN
10163 London Elite 14-Blue 1619 6-0 100% 14 OH
10164 FORZA1 15 National 1619 36-18 67% 15 CA
10165 Pelican State 14-Blue 1619 24-12 67% 14 LA
10166 AZ REV North 14-Premier 1619 29-15 66% 14 AZ
10167 Prodigy 15-3 elite 1619 36-20 64% 15 NY
10168 The Shore 16-Premier 1619 21-13 62% 16 MI
10169 TX Legends 17-Black 1619 25-18 58% 17 TX
10170 Gators VBC 16 Premier 1619 24-18 57% 16 OH
10171 Catalyst 12-White 1619 12-6 57% 12 TX
10172 KODA 16-Katskill 1619 23-6 68% 16 NY
10173 BeSomeone Goats 12-Navy 1619 11-8 58% 12 TX
10174 Sanford Sports 15-White 1619 25-17 60% 15 SD
10175 HBJ 16-Kobie/emmie 1619 28-12 70% 16 AR
10176 SA Empire 15 Legacy 1619 22-10 69% 15 TX
10177 High Tide 12 Elite 1619 20-9 69% 12 FL
10178 Aspire NW 15-2 royal 1619 26-15 63% 15 WA
10179 HVVC 12-Blue 1619 23-14 62% 12 MI
10180 Rose City 12-2 1619 11-4 65% 12 OR
10181 NIVA 15-GREY 1619 30-17 64% 15 IN
10182 BRUSA 14-Carlos 1619 17-10 63% 14 CA
10183 VV U15 1619 20-10 61% 15 VA
10184 Legit 15-G suzanne 1619 7-2 78% 15
10185 Onondaga Storm 18 1619 15-5 75% 18
10186 Dubuque Insanity 13-1 1619 3-0 75% 13
10187 Blaze 12-Jr lady bullets 1619 7-3 70% 12
10188 Image 16-Red 1619 14-14 44% 16
10189 1FVBC 17-1 national 1619 3-5 38% 17
10190 Air VBC 17-N 1619 4-0 100% 17 WI
10191 TNT 16-Black 1619 7-1 88% 16 PA
10192 Iowa Elite 16-S 1619 3-0 75% 16 IA
10193 108 BVC 15-Hybrid 1619 23-8 74% 15 VA
10194 South Shore Slam 16 Lime 1619 24-9 73% 16 WI
10195 Monon 13-5r sparrows 1619 32-13 71% 13 IN
10196 USA SOUTH 15-Premier black 1619 25-10 71% 15 FL
10197 Boise Ignite 18-Natl 1619 5-2 71% 18 ID
10198 PEVC 13-N javi 1619 31-23 57% 13 FL
10199 Sideout VBC 15-1 1619 5-4 56% 15 WA
10200 Northern Revival 16 1619 39-31 56% 16 MN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.