Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 203 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10101 BLVC 15-Black 1620 8-5 57% 15 UT
10102 The 606 17-Prime 1620 27-20 57% 17 IL
10103 Sideout VBC 15-1 1620 5-4 56% 15 WA
10104 ECJVC 16-Premier 1620 28-12 68% 16 NC
10105 BVA Davie 12-N mary 1620 28-34 45% 12 FL
10106 Evolution 12-Red 1620 8-3 62% 12 IA
10107 Pulse 14-Black 1620 17-10 63% 14 CA
10108 MCV 18-Davis 1620 17-7 71% 18 NC
10109 Train4F 17-1 1620 39-16 71% 17 OH
10110 NYCLBVC 17-Blue elite 1620 31-17 65% 17 NJ
10111 Hammerin Hawks 11-1 1620 4-0 100% 11 IA
10112 DVC 13-Purple 1620 7-3 70% 13 OH
10113 Club Fusion 13-1 national 1620 14-8 64% 13 IL
10114 CCV 11-1 1620 4-0 100% 11 MN
10115 MSSVC 16-Lightning 1620 5-2 71% 16 WV
10116 Peak VA 15-Blue 1620 25-20 52% 15 TX
10117 SBVC Girls 15 Premier 1620 32-15 68% 15 CA
10118 The Academy Volleyball Club 13-1 polster 1620 5-3 63% 13 IN
10119 Desert Sports 12-Elite 1620 12-3 80% 12 CA
10120 RVBC 16-Royal 1620 14-3 82% 16 PA
10121 Legit 15-G suzanne 1620 7-2 78% 15 IA
10122 Weber Elite Volleyball Club 12 Weber Elite Whitney 1620 5-5 36% 12 UT
10123 MVA 12-Stephania 1620 29-34 46% 12 FL
10124 Mojo 16-A 1620 7-4 64% 16 OH
10125 Reign 12-Black 1620 50-21 69% 12 FL
10126 Renegade Volleyball Club 14 Renegade Black 1620 7-1 88% 14 MN
10127 Alliance 14-Regional blac 1620 8-2 80% 14 TN
10128 Chadron Elite 15 1620 13-7 65% 15 NE
10129 Cleveland Chaos 12U 1619 13-7 65% 12 NC
10130 GVC 15-1 1619 21-32 40% 15 CT
10131 NORCO 11-Blue 1619 17-4 81% 11 CO
10132 CPAC 14-Black 1619 4-1 80% 14 SD
10133 SISU VB 18-1 1619 24-22 52% 18 MA
10134 Illini Elite 18-L navy 1619 16-8 67% 18 IL
10135 Vortex 13-Sam 1619 13-12 45% 13 UT
10136 OVA 13-National j 1619 23-16 59% 13 CA
10137 Ignite 18 Blaze 1619 29-23 56% 18 TX
10138 STX DIVAS 12 1619 17-11 61% 12 TX
10139 AVA TX 16 Attack 1619 27-29 47% 16 TX
10140 EPFury 12-S 1619 30-17 56% 12 TX
10141 TORCH 14-Kayla 1619 13-14 48% 14 CA
10142 Club 801 15-Regional callie 1619 16-21 43% 15 UT
10143 SRVC Royals 14 1619 46-12 79% 14 MD
10144 Wisconsin Elite 15-White 1619 28-10 74% 15 WI
10145 TNT 16-Black 1619 7-1 88% 16 MA
10146 Cape Coast 15-Athena 1619 27-31 47% 15 FL
10147 Gators 13-Black 1619 23-23 50% 13 MA
10148 Club Monarch 18-1 1619 4-1 80% 18 SD
10149 HJV 11-National 1619 8-5 57% 11 TX
10150 BRUSA 14-Carlos 1619 17-10 63% 14 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.