2025-2026 Season — Page 203 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10101 | 414 15-Blue | 1620 | 33-13 | 72% | 15 | WI |
| 10102 | RUV 14-Red | 1620 | 14-10 | 58% | 14 | VA |
| 10103 | Nova 18-Premier matt | 1620 | 24-21 | 53% | 18 | FL |
| 10104 | TC ELITE 16-Sonny | 1620 | 7-3 | 70% | 16 | LA |
| 10105 | MiElite 12-Pipeline west | 1620 | 14-5 | 74% | 12 | MI |
| 10106 | AAC 15-Elite | 1620 | 45-21 | 68% | 15 | FL |
| 10107 | Club Apex 12-Black | 1620 | 24-11 | 69% | 12 | SC |
| 10108 | AVA 13 Coral | 1620 | 38-25 | 60% | 13 | FL |
| 10109 | NIVB 14-Black | 1620 | 29-19 | 60% | 14 | MN |
| 10110 | CYVBC Surge 11-Blue | 1620 | 19-9 | 68% | 11 | OH |
| 10111 | Shock 12-Ua storm | 1620 | 19-10 | 66% | 12 | IL |
| 10112 | Buckeyefire 17-1 | 1620 | 35-22 | 61% | 17 | OH |
| 10113 | High Desert Elite 15-Elite | 1620 | 26-18 | 59% | 15 | CO |
| 10114 | DBQ Insanity 18-1 | 1620 | 11-4 | 73% | 18 | IA |
| 10115 | ECVA 15-Teal | 1620 | 32-26 | 55% | 15 | NC |
| 10116 | Uno Girls 18 Elite | 1620 | 20-10 | 67% | 18 | IL |
| 10117 | Sporting Albany Girls 13 | 1620 | 22-10 | 67% | 13 | NY |
| 10118 | TEXAS FURY 12 Impact | 1620 | 24-7 | 77% | 12 | TX |
| 10119 | SIVA 13 JENN | 1620 | 21-9 | 70% | 13 | WA |
| 10120 | ESVBC 14-Sharks national | 1620 | 22-15 | 59% | 14 | MD |
| 10121 | Hawks VBC 12-1 | 1620 | 13-9 | 59% | 12 | OH |
| 10122 | Monti Heat 16-G | 1620 | 5-0 | 100% | 16 | MN |
| 10123 | IVBA SOAR 17-Ren | 1620 | 29-21 | 58% | 17 | MS |
| 10124 | TORCH 14-Kayla | 1620 | 13-14 | 48% | 14 | CA |
| 10125 | Madfrog 10-N black | 1620 | 23-22 | 48% | 10 | TX |
| 10126 | NYCLI 13-Elite | 1620 | 24-13 | 65% | 13 | NY |
| 10127 | Club V 14-Prodigy kolton | 1620 | 37-34 | 52% | 14 | UT |
| 10128 | adidas DYNASTY 17-2 | 1620 | 6-1 | 86% | 17 | KS |
| 10129 | Alamo 15-Gold 1 | 1620 | 38-19 | 66% | 15 | TX |
| 10130 | Vital 15-2 royal | 1620 | 41-35 | 54% | 15 | MN |
| 10131 | CCV 11-1 | 1620 | 4-0 | 100% | 11 | AZ |
| 10132 | Club Apex 15-Grey | 1620 | 26-18 | 59% | 15 | SC |
| 10133 | Grandlake 14-Rammel | 1620 | 6-0 | 100% | 14 | OH |
| 10134 | Titans Eos 13 | 1620 | 10-3 | 77% | 13 | |
| 10135 | Holtville 18-Nayeli | 1620 | 6-2 | 75% | 18 | |
| 10136 | SGV 16-Inferno | 1620 | 8-1 | 89% | 16 | CA |
| 10137 | Tehachapi Starlings 14-S - kelsey | 1620 | 14-6 | 70% | 14 | CA |
| 10138 | KeAloha 15-1 cp | 1620 | 24-13 | 65% | 15 | IN |
| 10139 | CPVBC 17-Blue | 1620 | 40-22 | 65% | 17 | PA |
| 10140 | FC United 14 Teal | 1620 | 20-10 | 65% | 14 | MO |
| 10141 | RISE 18-Kui | 1620 | 21-12 | 64% | 18 | CA |
| 10142 | Rise 17-2 | 1620 | 26-15 | 63% | 17 | OH |
| 10143 | MAC 18-1 | 1620 | 10-6 | 63% | 18 | OR |
| 10144 | LBVC 16-Jon | 1620 | 34-20 | 63% | 16 | CA |
| 10145 | ITVC 15-1 | 1620 | 5-3 | 63% | 15 | WA |
| 10146 | FC Elite Tritons 14-1 | 1620 | 18-11 | 62% | 14 | WI |
| 10147 | NPJ Portland 16 Premier | 1620 | 37-23 | 62% | 16 | OR |
| 10148 | Fusion 15-Blue | 1620 | 28-31 | 47% | 15 | PA |
| 10149 | Skyline 11-Silver bryana | 1620 | 10-7 | 45% | 11 | TX |
| 10150 | NKJV 16-Blue | 1620 | 20-34 | 37% | 16 | KY |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.