Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 203 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10101 414 15-Blue 1620 33-13 72% 15 WI
10102 RUV 14-Red 1620 14-10 58% 14 VA
10103 Nova 18-Premier matt 1620 24-21 53% 18 FL
10104 TC ELITE 16-Sonny 1620 7-3 70% 16 LA
10105 MiElite 12-Pipeline west 1620 14-5 74% 12 MI
10106 AAC 15-Elite 1620 45-21 68% 15 FL
10107 Club Apex 12-Black 1620 24-11 69% 12 SC
10108 AVA 13 Coral 1620 38-25 60% 13 FL
10109 NIVB 14-Black 1620 29-19 60% 14 MN
10110 CYVBC Surge 11-Blue 1620 19-9 68% 11 OH
10111 Shock 12-Ua storm 1620 19-10 66% 12 IL
10112 Buckeyefire 17-1 1620 35-22 61% 17 OH
10113 High Desert Elite 15-Elite 1620 26-18 59% 15 CO
10114 DBQ Insanity 18-1 1620 11-4 73% 18 IA
10115 ECVA 15-Teal 1620 32-26 55% 15 NC
10116 Uno Girls 18 Elite 1620 20-10 67% 18 IL
10117 Sporting Albany Girls 13 1620 22-10 67% 13 NY
10118 TEXAS FURY 12 Impact 1620 24-7 77% 12 TX
10119 SIVA 13 JENN 1620 21-9 70% 13 WA
10120 ESVBC 14-Sharks national 1620 22-15 59% 14 MD
10121 Hawks VBC 12-1 1620 13-9 59% 12 OH
10122 Monti Heat 16-G 1620 5-0 100% 16 MN
10123 IVBA SOAR 17-Ren 1620 29-21 58% 17 MS
10124 TORCH 14-Kayla 1620 13-14 48% 14 CA
10125 Madfrog 10-N black 1620 23-22 48% 10 TX
10126 NYCLI 13-Elite 1620 24-13 65% 13 NY
10127 Club V 14-Prodigy kolton 1620 37-34 52% 14 UT
10128 adidas DYNASTY 17-2 1620 6-1 86% 17 KS
10129 Alamo 15-Gold 1 1620 38-19 66% 15 TX
10130 Vital 15-2 royal 1620 41-35 54% 15 MN
10131 CCV 11-1 1620 4-0 100% 11 AZ
10132 Club Apex 15-Grey 1620 26-18 59% 15 SC
10133 Grandlake 14-Rammel 1620 6-0 100% 14 OH
10134 Titans Eos 13 1620 10-3 77% 13
10135 Holtville 18-Nayeli 1620 6-2 75% 18
10136 SGV 16-Inferno 1620 8-1 89% 16 CA
10137 Tehachapi Starlings 14-S - kelsey 1620 14-6 70% 14 CA
10138 KeAloha 15-1 cp 1620 24-13 65% 15 IN
10139 CPVBC 17-Blue 1620 40-22 65% 17 PA
10140 FC United 14 Teal 1620 20-10 65% 14 MO
10141 RISE 18-Kui 1620 21-12 64% 18 CA
10142 Rise 17-2 1620 26-15 63% 17 OH
10143 MAC 18-1 1620 10-6 63% 18 OR
10144 LBVC 16-Jon 1620 34-20 63% 16 CA
10145 ITVC 15-1 1620 5-3 63% 15 WA
10146 FC Elite Tritons 14-1 1620 18-11 62% 14 WI
10147 NPJ Portland 16 Premier 1620 37-23 62% 16 OR
10148 Fusion 15-Blue 1620 28-31 47% 15 PA
10149 Skyline 11-Silver bryana 1620 10-7 45% 11 TX
10150 NKJV 16-Blue 1620 20-34 37% 16 KY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.