Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 202 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10051 WSRVC 12-Sarah deschenes 1621 14-11 56% 12 WY
10052 Rogue 14-Go 1621 24-43 36% 14 OH
10053 ATLHEAT 12-1 1621 24-7 73% 12 GA
10054 BVA 16-1 1621 9-5 64% 16 MN
10055 SA Juniors 14 Carolina 1621 26-11 70% 14 TX
10056 Red Slam 13 1621 19-6 76% 13 IN
10057 PAEVA 14-Maroon 1621 32-16 67% 14 PA
10058 TVS 12 Alicia 1621 10-5 67% 12 TX
10059 MVP 12-Gold 1621 25-12 68% 12 SC
10060 River City Jrs 14-White 1621 20-10 67% 14 IA
10061 RVA 12-Mixed 1621 9-4 64% 12 MD
10062 HJV 14-National 1621 16-16 50% 14 TX
10063 adidas DYNASTY 17-2 1621 6-1 86% 17 KS
10064 AAC 14-Regional 1621 27-13 68% 14 FL
10065 Metro Performance 17-1 1620 5-1 83% 17
10066 SYA Club 15 SYA Sharks 1620 19-12 56% 15
10067 1United 15-N silver 1620 24-23 49% 15 TX
10068 WTM 11-1 1620 14-6 70% 11 TX
10069 Katy United 15-Adidas 1620 57-65 46% 15 TX
10070 Santa Fe Storm 12-1 joe 1620 7-1 88% 12 CO
10071 Amarillo Xtreme 18-Queens 1620 15-7 68% 18 TX
10072 Bay Area Eagles 14-1 oliver 1620 6-15 29% 14 CA
10073 L2 Volleyball Club 14-Chelsea 1620 3-5 38% 14 MI
10074 Manhattan Mayhem 14-P 1620 10-5 67% 14 KS
10075 KVA Kako'o VBA 14-Hunny 1620 5-3 63% 14 NV
10076 Monti Heat 16-G 1620 5-0 100% 16 IA
10077 ITVC 15-1 1620 5-3 63% 15 WA
10078 Sidewinder 16-2 1620 25-6 81% 16 AZ
10079 L2 18-2 1620 31-21 60% 18 MI
10080 TCVA 16-Black adidas 1620 32-26 55% 16 TX
10081 Alamo 15-Gold 1 1620 38-19 66% 15 TX
10082 SA Empire 15 Legacy 1620 22-10 69% 15 TX
10083 FRVBC 17-3 white 1620 19-20 49% 17 CO
10084 Westchester 14 1620 19-13 59% 14 NJ
10085 Memphis Metro 15-Elite black 1620 4-4 50% 15 TN
10086 DYS 14-Thunder 1620 32-13 71% 14 VA
10087 SIVA 13 JENN 1620 21-9 70% 13 WA
10088 FCE 13-1 1620 7-8 47% 13 FL
10089 WD Nation 17-White 1620 22-20 52% 17 LA
10090 CSVC 14-2 panthers 1620 25-9 74% 14 IN
10091 Intense 18-State 1620 17-5 77% 18 SC
10092 MAVS 816 13-Regional 1620 16-13 55% 13 KS
10093 OVA 16-G phx elite 1620 19-22 46% 16 AZ
10094 Spark 14-1 ari 1620 27-18 60% 14 CA
10095 LV Force VB 16-Red 1620 31-26 54% 16 PA
10096 NYC Impact 16-National 1620 33-20 62% 16 NY
10097 GO Volley 12-Black 1620 20-19 48% 12 VA
10098 LAV 12-National black 1620 32-31 51% 12 AL
10099 West Shore YMCA 14-Blue 1620 7-4 64% 14 PA
10100 CYVBC Surge 11-Blue 1620 19-9 68% 11 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.