Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 202 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10051 Matchbox 13-Black 1621 16-7 70% 13 SD
10052 HVA 18-Performance red 1621 3-0 100% 18 TX
10053 NorthShore 16-Colvin 1621 20-9 69% 16 OH
10054 OPVC 13 Lemons 1621 18-8 69% 13 OH
10055 307 Impact Impact 18 1621 15-7 68% 18 WY
10056 RVA Girls 11 1621 34-15 68% 11 MD
10057 C2 12-1 regional orange rylee 1621 12-6 67% 12 TN
10058 Edge Elite 16-Gold 1621 15-8 65% 16 PA
10059 VC Denver 13-Black 1621 34-18 65% 13 CO
10060 McFarland Crush 13U 1621 16-8 64% 13 WI
10061 Xtreme VBC 12 Adidas 1621 16-9 64% 12 WI
10062 SUSA 16-Navy 1621 5-3 63% 16 UT
10063 Tri-State Elite 11-White 1621 17-10 63% 11 OH
10064 Venetian Bay 17 1621 5-3 63% 17 FL
10065 HOS 12-Orange 1621 12-7 63% 12 NY
10066 NYCLBVC 16-Blue elite 1621 31-18 63% 16 NY
10067 Evolution 12-Red 1621 8-3 62% 12 CA
10068 Texas United 16-Red 1621 41-25 62% 16 TX
10069 Columbia 13-Black 1621 48-27 62% 13 MD
10070 COV Team FB 11-1 1621 35-26 57% 11 CA
10071 TC ELITE 16-D 1621 9-5 56% 16 LA
10072 SPVC 15-Adidas 1621 30-25 55% 15 CA
10073 Ocean 16-National 1621 11-9 55% 16 NJ
10074 MAVS 816 13-Regional 1621 16-13 55% 13 KS
10075 LV Force VB 16-Red 1621 31-26 54% 16 PA
10076 Wicked Northeast 18-Gold 1621 13-11 54% 18 ME
10077 Roots 15-3 maple 1621 23-20 53% 15 TX
10078 Pgh Elite 16-Premier 1621 34-39 47% 16 PA
10079 Basin Elite 12 1621 4-3 44% 12 UT
10080 Stewie 13-Blue 1620 16-8 64% 13
10081 Thunder 14-Navy 1620 10-5 63% 14
10082 CPVB 14-National 1620 19-13 54% 14
10083 Fairfield 14-White 1620 5-1 83% 14
10084 Ridgeline 14-S 1620 11-13 38% 14
10085 WTM 11-1 1620 14-6 70% 11
10086 Hammerin Hawks 11-1 1620 4-0 100% 11
10087 Iron 12-Grey 1620 6-3 67% 12
10088 Rockwood Thunder 16-Black 1620 35-23 57% 16 MO
10089 CUVC 13-R allison 1620 9-7 56% 13 NC
10090 MVA 13-Black 1620 20-8 71% 13 FL
10091 BVA Davie 14-N flavia 1620 41-31 57% 14 FL
10092 Lions 12-Blue 1620 16-13 55% 12 IL
10093 Calcasieu Impact 16-S 1620 19-13 58% 16 LA
10094 Turlock Crush 14-Stacey 1620 22-14 61% 14 CA
10095 TW Skyline 14-Black 1620 21-25 46% 14 TX
10096 Monsters 13-Elite black 1620 25-10 71% 13 MI
10097 CHAVC 14-Black 1620 21-30 41% 14 NC
10098 CUVC 18-Orange 1620 20-14 59% 18 NC
10099 OK Charge 17-Nat'l tulsa 1620 38-33 54% 17 OK
10100 Illini Elite 13-Cardinal 1620 15-16 48% 13 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.