2025-2026 Season — Page 202 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10051 | Matchbox 13-Black | 1621 | 16-7 | 70% | 13 | SD |
| 10052 | HVA 18-Performance red | 1621 | 3-0 | 100% | 18 | TX |
| 10053 | NorthShore 16-Colvin | 1621 | 20-9 | 69% | 16 | OH |
| 10054 | OPVC 13 Lemons | 1621 | 18-8 | 69% | 13 | OH |
| 10055 | 307 Impact Impact 18 | 1621 | 15-7 | 68% | 18 | WY |
| 10056 | RVA Girls 11 | 1621 | 34-15 | 68% | 11 | MD |
| 10057 | C2 12-1 regional orange rylee | 1621 | 12-6 | 67% | 12 | TN |
| 10058 | Edge Elite 16-Gold | 1621 | 15-8 | 65% | 16 | PA |
| 10059 | VC Denver 13-Black | 1621 | 34-18 | 65% | 13 | CO |
| 10060 | McFarland Crush 13U | 1621 | 16-8 | 64% | 13 | WI |
| 10061 | Xtreme VBC 12 Adidas | 1621 | 16-9 | 64% | 12 | WI |
| 10062 | SUSA 16-Navy | 1621 | 5-3 | 63% | 16 | UT |
| 10063 | Tri-State Elite 11-White | 1621 | 17-10 | 63% | 11 | OH |
| 10064 | Venetian Bay 17 | 1621 | 5-3 | 63% | 17 | FL |
| 10065 | HOS 12-Orange | 1621 | 12-7 | 63% | 12 | NY |
| 10066 | NYCLBVC 16-Blue elite | 1621 | 31-18 | 63% | 16 | NY |
| 10067 | Evolution 12-Red | 1621 | 8-3 | 62% | 12 | CA |
| 10068 | Texas United 16-Red | 1621 | 41-25 | 62% | 16 | TX |
| 10069 | Columbia 13-Black | 1621 | 48-27 | 62% | 13 | MD |
| 10070 | COV Team FB 11-1 | 1621 | 35-26 | 57% | 11 | CA |
| 10071 | TC ELITE 16-D | 1621 | 9-5 | 56% | 16 | LA |
| 10072 | SPVC 15-Adidas | 1621 | 30-25 | 55% | 15 | CA |
| 10073 | Ocean 16-National | 1621 | 11-9 | 55% | 16 | NJ |
| 10074 | MAVS 816 13-Regional | 1621 | 16-13 | 55% | 13 | KS |
| 10075 | LV Force VB 16-Red | 1621 | 31-26 | 54% | 16 | PA |
| 10076 | Wicked Northeast 18-Gold | 1621 | 13-11 | 54% | 18 | ME |
| 10077 | Roots 15-3 maple | 1621 | 23-20 | 53% | 15 | TX |
| 10078 | Pgh Elite 16-Premier | 1621 | 34-39 | 47% | 16 | PA |
| 10079 | Basin Elite 12 | 1621 | 4-3 | 44% | 12 | UT |
| 10080 | Stewie 13-Blue | 1620 | 16-8 | 64% | 13 | |
| 10081 | Thunder 14-Navy | 1620 | 10-5 | 63% | 14 | |
| 10082 | CPVB 14-National | 1620 | 19-13 | 54% | 14 | |
| 10083 | Fairfield 14-White | 1620 | 5-1 | 83% | 14 | |
| 10084 | Ridgeline 14-S | 1620 | 11-13 | 38% | 14 | |
| 10085 | WTM 11-1 | 1620 | 14-6 | 70% | 11 | |
| 10086 | Hammerin Hawks 11-1 | 1620 | 4-0 | 100% | 11 | |
| 10087 | Iron 12-Grey | 1620 | 6-3 | 67% | 12 | |
| 10088 | Rockwood Thunder 16-Black | 1620 | 35-23 | 57% | 16 | MO |
| 10089 | CUVC 13-R allison | 1620 | 9-7 | 56% | 13 | NC |
| 10090 | MVA 13-Black | 1620 | 20-8 | 71% | 13 | FL |
| 10091 | BVA Davie 14-N flavia | 1620 | 41-31 | 57% | 14 | FL |
| 10092 | Lions 12-Blue | 1620 | 16-13 | 55% | 12 | IL |
| 10093 | Calcasieu Impact 16-S | 1620 | 19-13 | 58% | 16 | LA |
| 10094 | Turlock Crush 14-Stacey | 1620 | 22-14 | 61% | 14 | CA |
| 10095 | TW Skyline 14-Black | 1620 | 21-25 | 46% | 14 | TX |
| 10096 | Monsters 13-Elite black | 1620 | 25-10 | 71% | 13 | MI |
| 10097 | CHAVC 14-Black | 1620 | 21-30 | 41% | 14 | NC |
| 10098 | CUVC 18-Orange | 1620 | 20-14 | 59% | 18 | NC |
| 10099 | OK Charge 17-Nat'l tulsa | 1620 | 38-33 | 54% | 17 | OK |
| 10100 | Illini Elite 13-Cardinal | 1620 | 15-16 | 48% | 13 | IL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.