2025-2026 Season — Page 202 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10051 | WSRVC 12-Sarah deschenes | 1621 | 14-11 | 56% | 12 | WY |
| 10052 | Rogue 14-Go | 1621 | 24-43 | 36% | 14 | OH |
| 10053 | ATLHEAT 12-1 | 1621 | 24-7 | 73% | 12 | GA |
| 10054 | BVA 16-1 | 1621 | 9-5 | 64% | 16 | MN |
| 10055 | SA Juniors 14 Carolina | 1621 | 26-11 | 70% | 14 | TX |
| 10056 | Red Slam 13 | 1621 | 19-6 | 76% | 13 | IN |
| 10057 | PAEVA 14-Maroon | 1621 | 32-16 | 67% | 14 | PA |
| 10058 | TVS 12 Alicia | 1621 | 10-5 | 67% | 12 | TX |
| 10059 | MVP 12-Gold | 1621 | 25-12 | 68% | 12 | SC |
| 10060 | River City Jrs 14-White | 1621 | 20-10 | 67% | 14 | IA |
| 10061 | RVA 12-Mixed | 1621 | 9-4 | 64% | 12 | MD |
| 10062 | HJV 14-National | 1621 | 16-16 | 50% | 14 | TX |
| 10063 | adidas DYNASTY 17-2 | 1621 | 6-1 | 86% | 17 | KS |
| 10064 | AAC 14-Regional | 1621 | 27-13 | 68% | 14 | FL |
| 10065 | Metro Performance 17-1 | 1620 | 5-1 | 83% | 17 | |
| 10066 | SYA Club 15 SYA Sharks | 1620 | 19-12 | 56% | 15 | |
| 10067 | 1United 15-N silver | 1620 | 24-23 | 49% | 15 | TX |
| 10068 | WTM 11-1 | 1620 | 14-6 | 70% | 11 | TX |
| 10069 | Katy United 15-Adidas | 1620 | 57-65 | 46% | 15 | TX |
| 10070 | Santa Fe Storm 12-1 joe | 1620 | 7-1 | 88% | 12 | CO |
| 10071 | Amarillo Xtreme 18-Queens | 1620 | 15-7 | 68% | 18 | TX |
| 10072 | Bay Area Eagles 14-1 oliver | 1620 | 6-15 | 29% | 14 | CA |
| 10073 | L2 Volleyball Club 14-Chelsea | 1620 | 3-5 | 38% | 14 | MI |
| 10074 | Manhattan Mayhem 14-P | 1620 | 10-5 | 67% | 14 | KS |
| 10075 | KVA Kako'o VBA 14-Hunny | 1620 | 5-3 | 63% | 14 | NV |
| 10076 | Monti Heat 16-G | 1620 | 5-0 | 100% | 16 | IA |
| 10077 | ITVC 15-1 | 1620 | 5-3 | 63% | 15 | WA |
| 10078 | Sidewinder 16-2 | 1620 | 25-6 | 81% | 16 | AZ |
| 10079 | L2 18-2 | 1620 | 31-21 | 60% | 18 | MI |
| 10080 | TCVA 16-Black adidas | 1620 | 32-26 | 55% | 16 | TX |
| 10081 | Alamo 15-Gold 1 | 1620 | 38-19 | 66% | 15 | TX |
| 10082 | SA Empire 15 Legacy | 1620 | 22-10 | 69% | 15 | TX |
| 10083 | FRVBC 17-3 white | 1620 | 19-20 | 49% | 17 | CO |
| 10084 | Westchester 14 | 1620 | 19-13 | 59% | 14 | NJ |
| 10085 | Memphis Metro 15-Elite black | 1620 | 4-4 | 50% | 15 | TN |
| 10086 | DYS 14-Thunder | 1620 | 32-13 | 71% | 14 | VA |
| 10087 | SIVA 13 JENN | 1620 | 21-9 | 70% | 13 | WA |
| 10088 | FCE 13-1 | 1620 | 7-8 | 47% | 13 | FL |
| 10089 | WD Nation 17-White | 1620 | 22-20 | 52% | 17 | LA |
| 10090 | CSVC 14-2 panthers | 1620 | 25-9 | 74% | 14 | IN |
| 10091 | Intense 18-State | 1620 | 17-5 | 77% | 18 | SC |
| 10092 | MAVS 816 13-Regional | 1620 | 16-13 | 55% | 13 | KS |
| 10093 | OVA 16-G phx elite | 1620 | 19-22 | 46% | 16 | AZ |
| 10094 | Spark 14-1 ari | 1620 | 27-18 | 60% | 14 | CA |
| 10095 | LV Force VB 16-Red | 1620 | 31-26 | 54% | 16 | PA |
| 10096 | NYC Impact 16-National | 1620 | 33-20 | 62% | 16 | NY |
| 10097 | GO Volley 12-Black | 1620 | 20-19 | 48% | 12 | VA |
| 10098 | LAV 12-National black | 1620 | 32-31 | 51% | 12 | AL |
| 10099 | West Shore YMCA 14-Blue | 1620 | 7-4 | 64% | 14 | PA |
| 10100 | CYVBC Surge 11-Blue | 1620 | 19-9 | 68% | 11 | OH |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.