Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 201 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10001 C1VB 17-One 1622 40-30 57% 17 SC
10002 Clarksville VBC 15 Charlsie 1622 34-25 57% 15 TN
10003 MAVS KC 11-2 1622 4-1 57% 11 KS
10004 SPARKS VBC 17 NAVY 1622 31-25 55% 17 PA
10005 Forest City 15-1 aspen 1622 4-3 57% 15 ON
10006 Miami Wave 17 Aqua 1622 39-33 54% 17 FL
10007 Prime 15-Morgan 1622 31-26 54% 15 CA
10008 Dig Deep 18-Ginger 1622 28-29 49% 18 NH
10009 GO Volley 12-Black 1622 20-19 48% 12 VA
10010 CYVBC Surge 13-Black 1622 21-25 46% 13 OH
10011 Loudoun Elite 16-Izzy/hailey 1622 6-9 40% 16 VA
10012 OMNI 12 National 1622 24-38 39% 12 CA
10013 Academy West 12 National 1622 19-36 35% 12 CA
10014 LVC 15-Pink 1622 14-8 50% 15 NY
10015 SF Elite 18 Gold 1622 26-30 46% 18 CA
10016 Pgh Elite 15-Premier 1622 26-39 40% 15 PA
10017 SRVC Royals 14 1621 46-12 79% 14
10018 Fierce 18 1621 13-2 87% 18
10019 ROCK Volleyball 15-Sun 1621 34-24 58% 15 PA
10020 SPVB 16-White 1621 35-24 59% 16 IL
10021 TVS 11 Moni 1621 6-3 60% 11 TX
10022 HUNTERS VBC 16 1621 15-10 58% 16 FL
10023 L2 18-2 1621 31-21 60% 18 MI
10024 AAC 14-Regional 1621 27-13 68% 14 FL
10025 Iowa Select 14-White 1621 15-10 52% 14 IA
10026 Twisters 14-Rylee 1621 30-14 68% 14 TX
10027 Rogue 14-Go 1621 24-43 36% 14 OH
10028 LVL 14 ERIN 1621 27-18 60% 14 LA
10029 Club 909 14-1 1621 20-10 67% 14 CA
10030 Main Beach 14-Premier 1621 9-2 82% 14 CA
10031 TXP 14 ADAM 1621 20-10 61% 14 TX
10032 CAVC 17 Elite 1621 37-29 56% 17 VA
10033 TCVA 17-Green adidas 1621 29-22 57% 17 CO
10034 Legend 15 1621 29-36 44% 15 CA
10035 Uno Girls 15-Elite 1621 21-28 43% 15 IL
10036 Sky High Adidas 10-Elite 1621 12-6 57% 10 IL
10037 South County 17-Sarah 1621 18-14 53% 17 RI
10038 Rockland 15 1621 18-13 58% 15 NY
10039 CUVC 15-National1 1621 8-10 44% 15 NC
10040 VC United 13-1 premier 1621 15-6 71% 13 IL
10041 Vortex 13-Sam 1621 13-12 45% 13 UT
10042 NHE 12-Blue 1621 2-1 67% 12
10043 Onondaga Thunder 16 1621 12-7 60% 16
10044 ADREN 13-2 1621 6-0 100% 13 OH
10045 HBJ 12-Regional marissa 1621 17-5 77% 12 AR
10046 797 Empire 16-S 1621 21-7 75% 16 TX
10047 Valley Heat AZ 12-Black 1621 46-16 74% 12 AZ
10048 Surge 16-2 elite blue 1621 18-7 72% 16 RI
10049 NF PIRATES 17-Gold 1621 30-12 71% 17 FL
10050 MN North 13-1 navy 1621 48-21 70% 13 MN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.