2025-2026 Season — Page 201 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10001 | Central VBC 16-Silver | 1622 | 18-7 | 72% | 16 | CA |
| 10002 | YVA 16-Zach | 1622 | 20-9 | 69% | 16 | MT |
| 10003 | Quickset 12-White | 1622 | 25-9 | 74% | 12 | PA |
| 10004 | A5 12-Shelly | 1622 | 25-12 | 68% | 12 | GA |
| 10005 | 797 Empire 16-S | 1622 | 21-7 | 75% | 16 | TX |
| 10006 | HRVC Hurricanes 12-1 | 1622 | 3-2 | 60% | 12 | ON |
| 10007 | YSVC 17-1 | 1622 | 15-6 | 71% | 17 | NC |
| 10008 | RVC 12-1 black | 1621 | 5-1 | 83% | 12 | WY |
| 10009 | MiElite 12-Pipeline west | 1621 | 14-5 | 74% | 12 | MI |
| 10010 | Flyers 11-Usa-rico | 1621 | 20-19 | 40% | 11 | TX |
| 10011 | Exodus 14-S royals | 1621 | 11-4 | 73% | 14 | CA |
| 10012 | Texas Fury 16 Impact | 1621 | 28-22 | 54% | 16 | TX |
| 10013 | Jr Trojans 13 Royal | 1621 | 14-9 | 58% | 13 | IN |
| 10014 | San Antonio Raiders Club Volleyball 18-Force | 1621 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | TX |
| 10015 | AVBC 17-A hauenstein/goon | 1621 | 19-12 | 61% | 17 | OH |
| 10016 | PVA 13-National summit | 1621 | 14-17 | 45% | 13 | NY |
| 10017 | Legit 13-Diane | 1621 | 3-0 | 75% | 13 | IA |
| 10018 | Eudora Chaos Volleyball Club 14-1 | 1621 | 6-1 | 86% | 14 | KS |
| 10019 | Blaine 14-1 | 1621 | 11-4 | 73% | 14 | MN |
| 10020 | SCVC 14-1 christopher | 1621 | 18-8 | 69% | 14 | TN |
| 10021 | Gold 17-1 blue | 1621 | 4-4 | 50% | 17 | NV |
| 10022 | IA Juniors 12-Black | 1621 | 30-18 | 63% | 12 | IA |
| 10023 | Gold Rush 12U | 1621 | 9-6 | 60% | 12 | IN |
| 10024 | Rice City 13-Red | 1621 | 21-7 | 72% | 13 | LA |
| 10025 | Club South 14-Black | 1621 | 18-13 | 58% | 14 | WA |
| 10026 | SynergyForce 17-Gold | 1621 | 25-27 | 48% | 17 | CA |
| 10027 | Aspire NW 15-2 royal | 1621 | 26-15 | 63% | 15 | OR |
| 10028 | Muscle 13-Black | 1621 | 20-10 | 63% | 13 | TX |
| 10029 | Pgh Elite 13-Premier | 1621 | 19-27 | 41% | 13 | PA |
| 10030 | Roots 15-3 maple | 1621 | 23-20 | 53% | 15 | TX |
| 10031 | Vibe 14-Typhoon | 1621 | 30-13 | 70% | 14 | CA |
| 10032 | Lions Starved Rock 12-Ruby | 1621 | 10-6 | 63% | 12 | IL |
| 10033 | Monsters 17-Elite black | 1621 | 20-16 | 56% | 17 | MI |
| 10034 | Fulshear Elite 13 | 1621 | 24-11 | 69% | 13 | TX |
| 10035 | 1FVBC 17-1 national | 1621 | 3-5 | 38% | 17 | NV |
| 10036 | TVS 11 Moni | 1621 | 6-3 | 60% | 11 | TX |
| 10037 | Xtreme 18-Nat - deb | 1621 | 8-6 | 57% | 18 | NJ |
| 10038 | Rose City Netters 14-Natalie | 1621 | 5-0 | 100% | 14 | WY |
| 10039 | Resilient Volleyball Club 15-Black | 1621 | 20-24 | 42% | 15 | TX |
| 10040 | HP Illinois 12-Silver | 1621 | 20-10 | 67% | 12 | MO |
| 10041 | TX Premier 13-National | 1621 | 33-22 | 60% | 13 | TX |
| 10042 | KIVA 12 KIVA Kristi (PR) (26) | 1621 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | KY |
| 10043 | Wolfpack 15-S | 1621 | 15-7 | 68% | 15 | IN |
| 10044 | NF PIRATES 17-Gold | 1621 | 30-12 | 71% | 17 | FL |
| 10045 | Iowa Select 14-White | 1621 | 15-10 | 52% | 14 | IA |
| 10046 | Katy Stars 17 Elite | 1621 | 34-21 | 61% | 17 | TX |
| 10047 | HVA 18-Performance red | 1621 | 3-0 | 100% | 18 | TX |
| 10048 | Jax Skyline 15-Silver | 1621 | 47-23 | 67% | 15 | FL |
| 10049 | Team One 15-Pearl | 1621 | 23-11 | 68% | 15 | IN |
| 10050 | AVC Nebraska 14-White | 1621 | 9-9 | 50% | 14 | NE |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.