Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 201 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
10001 Central VBC 16-Silver 1622 18-7 72% 16 CA
10002 YVA 16-Zach 1622 20-9 69% 16 MT
10003 Quickset 12-White 1622 25-9 74% 12 PA
10004 A5 12-Shelly 1622 25-12 68% 12 GA
10005 797 Empire 16-S 1622 21-7 75% 16 TX
10006 HRVC Hurricanes 12-1 1622 3-2 60% 12 ON
10007 YSVC 17-1 1622 15-6 71% 17 NC
10008 RVC 12-1 black 1621 5-1 83% 12 WY
10009 MiElite 12-Pipeline west 1621 14-5 74% 12 MI
10010 Flyers 11-Usa-rico 1621 20-19 40% 11 TX
10011 Exodus 14-S royals 1621 11-4 73% 14 CA
10012 Texas Fury 16 Impact 1621 28-22 54% 16 TX
10013 Jr Trojans 13 Royal 1621 14-9 58% 13 IN
10014 San Antonio Raiders Club Volleyball 18-Force 1621 3-4 43% 18 TX
10015 AVBC 17-A hauenstein/goon 1621 19-12 61% 17 OH
10016 PVA 13-National summit 1621 14-17 45% 13 NY
10017 Legit 13-Diane 1621 3-0 75% 13 IA
10018 Eudora Chaos Volleyball Club 14-1 1621 6-1 86% 14 KS
10019 Blaine 14-1 1621 11-4 73% 14 MN
10020 SCVC 14-1 christopher 1621 18-8 69% 14 TN
10021 Gold 17-1 blue 1621 4-4 50% 17 NV
10022 IA Juniors 12-Black 1621 30-18 63% 12 IA
10023 Gold Rush 12U 1621 9-6 60% 12 IN
10024 Rice City 13-Red 1621 21-7 72% 13 LA
10025 Club South 14-Black 1621 18-13 58% 14 WA
10026 SynergyForce 17-Gold 1621 25-27 48% 17 CA
10027 Aspire NW 15-2 royal 1621 26-15 63% 15 OR
10028 Muscle 13-Black 1621 20-10 63% 13 TX
10029 Pgh Elite 13-Premier 1621 19-27 41% 13 PA
10030 Roots 15-3 maple 1621 23-20 53% 15 TX
10031 Vibe 14-Typhoon 1621 30-13 70% 14 CA
10032 Lions Starved Rock 12-Ruby 1621 10-6 63% 12 IL
10033 Monsters 17-Elite black 1621 20-16 56% 17 MI
10034 Fulshear Elite 13 1621 24-11 69% 13 TX
10035 1FVBC 17-1 national 1621 3-5 38% 17 NV
10036 TVS 11 Moni 1621 6-3 60% 11 TX
10037 Xtreme 18-Nat - deb 1621 8-6 57% 18 NJ
10038 Rose City Netters 14-Natalie 1621 5-0 100% 14 WY
10039 Resilient Volleyball Club 15-Black 1621 20-24 42% 15 TX
10040 HP Illinois 12-Silver 1621 20-10 67% 12 MO
10041 TX Premier 13-National 1621 33-22 60% 13 TX
10042 KIVA 12 KIVA Kristi (PR) (26) 1621 2-3 40% 12 KY
10043 Wolfpack 15-S 1621 15-7 68% 15 IN
10044 NF PIRATES 17-Gold 1621 30-12 71% 17 FL
10045 Iowa Select 14-White 1621 15-10 52% 14 IA
10046 Katy Stars 17 Elite 1621 34-21 61% 17 TX
10047 HVA 18-Performance red 1621 3-0 100% 18 TX
10048 Jax Skyline 15-Silver 1621 47-23 67% 15 FL
10049 Team One 15-Pearl 1621 23-11 68% 15 IN
10050 AVC Nebraska 14-White 1621 9-9 50% 14 NE
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.