Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 200 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9951 Rapid Fire 13-Black 1622 14-8 64% 13 IL
9952 Six Pack Legit 14-G gray 1622 5-1 83% 14 IA
9953 TC ELITE 16-D 1622 9-5 56% 16 LA
9954 WF Elite 13-Black 1622 21-10 66% 13 TX
9955 EVA 15 Navy 1622 27-11 71% 15 AR
9956 Legend Volleyball Club 14 1622 26-31 46% 14 CA
9957 Ignite AZ 12-National 1622 59-54 52% 12 AZ
9958 KLUB 12-S 1622 7-4 64% 12 NV
9959 Jax Skyline 17-Black 1622 30-34 47% 17 FL
9960 DBQ Insanity Dubuque Digz 14 1622 5-1 83% 14 IA
9961 San Gabriel Elite Volleyball Club 17-Roshambo lauryn 1622 22-24 48% 17 CA
9962 Guns Up VBC 14 Elite 1622 24-17 59% 14 TX
9963 516 Elite 13-Black 1622 32-25 56% 13 NY
9964 Key Largo Crush 15 Key Largo Crush 1622 4-1 80% 15 FL
9965 Sonshine 18 1622 10-2 83% 18 CO
9966 C2 13-1 reg blue molly 1622 20-10 67% 13 TN
9967 864 Elite 10-George 1622 21-9 70% 10 SC
9968 Capitanas 11-1 - christian rosario 1622 4-2 67% 11 PR
9969 Skyline 11-Silver bryana 1622 10-7 45% 11 TX
9970 Ark Volley 14-Reg plus- navy 1622 35-15 69% 14 AR
9971 MAVS KC 11-2 1622 4-1 57% 11 KS
9972 Idaho ONE 14-North 1622 20-15 56% 14 ID
9973 Next Level 15-2 1622 5-3 63% 15 PR
9974 FCA Force 14 1622 17-9 65% 14 KY
9975 Main Beach 14-Premier 1622 9-2 82% 14 CA
9976 KeAloha 15-1 cp 1622 24-13 65% 15 IN
9977 Club Cactus 18-Mizuno 1622 24-35 41% 18 AZ
9978 Five Starz 18-Black dana 1622 24-23 51% 18 CA
9979 307 Impact Impact 18 1622 15-7 68% 18 WY
9980 H. Prep 12-Mizuno 1622 26-18 59% 12 TX
9981 TAV 13-Gold 1622 31-19 55% 13 TX
9982 Drive Nation 14-Black 1622 13-15 46% 14 TX
9983 MAVS 816 15-2 1622 5-2 31% 15 KS
9984 ID Peak 16-National jayde 1622 10-12 45% 16 UT
9985 SF Elite 12 Ella 1622 18-14 56% 12 CA
9986 Catalyst 14-Black 1622 18-10 64% 14 TX
9987 Magic 14 Apex 1622 20-11 65% 14 TX
9988 CUVB 14-Black 1622 24-11 65% 14 TX
9989 Impact 14-Parker 1622 21-18 54% 14 MI
9990 UPTEMPO 14 Natali 1622 10-3 77% 14 CA
9991 XTEAM 15-Assassins 1622 4-3 57% 15 CA
9992 EliteVBTC 15 National 1622 39-28 58% 15 OH
9993 ECVBA 16-Brennan 1622 16-10 62% 16 CA
9994 NASA 14-Purple holly 1622 30-16 65% 14 AL
9995 Mintonette Sports 14-3 1622 28-38 42% 14 OH
9996 ECVBA 16-1 1622 25-18 58% 16 CA
9997 Cougar Volleyball Club 15-G joel 1622 8-1 89% 15 IA
9998 FVA 16-Blaze - a 1622 17-8 59% 16 AK
9999 Texas Wave 14-Orange 1622 6-1 86% 14 CA
10000 ATHENA VB 16-5 chrome regional 1622 37-13 74% 16 OR
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.