Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 200 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9951 OVC 14-1 1622 19-24 44% 14 MO
9952 NWAS VBC 16-National 1622 34-40 46% 16 WA
9953 OVA 16-G phx elite 1622 19-22 46% 16 FL
9954 Mana Toa 17-Kelli 1622 8-3 73% 17 AL
9955 CEV Onyx 14-3 1622 13-7 65% 14 OH
9956 Ultimate VBC 15-Blue 1622 6-1 86% 15 IL
9957 AVC 12-Red 1622 19-9 68% 12 FL
9958 DIG 14-Blue - anne 1622 24-9 63% 14 TX
9959 Catalyst 14-Black 1622 18-10 64% 14 TX
9960 Champion 14-Z purple 1622 15-9 63% 14 NC
9961 Mintonette Sports 14-3 1622 28-38 42% 14 OH
9962 Infinity 15-Blue 1622 19-6 76% 15 WI
9963 Texas United 18-Red 1622 15-10 60% 18 TX
9964 FSJ 10 1622 22-9 71% 10 AR
9965 CINCY EAST 13-3 white 1622 18-7 72% 13 OH
9966 Cougar Volleyball Club 15-G joel 1622 8-1 89% 15 BC
9967 purple storm 15-1 1622 4-0 80% 15 AL
9968 Ballistic 13 1622 22-8 73% 13 MI
9969 RockwoodThunder 13-Carolina 1622 21-9 64% 13 MO
9970 adidas DYNASTY 15-3 1622 6-1 75% 15 KS
9971 WF Elite 13-Black 1622 21-10 66% 13 TX
9972 NIVA 15 JADE 1622 35-14 71% 15 IN
9973 Reef VBC 15-National erika 1622 6-3 67% 15 CA
9974 Vital 17-2 royal 1622 42-38 53% 17 MN
9975 PSVBA 16-Elite 1 1622 15-8 65% 16 WA
9976 Direction 13 Royal 1622 31-15 67% 13 NC
9977 TVC 11-Black 1622 16-14 53% 11 OH
9978 864 Elite 10-George 1622 21-9 70% 10 SC
9979 VV 18-1 1622 6-2 75% 18 VA
9980 Dinamite 16-Miguel 1622 7-2 78% 16 CA
9981 Spiketown VBC 13-2 1622 5-1 83% 13 OH
9982 Tville Smash 13 1622 19-7 73% 13 IL
9983 ZTV 15-1 select 1622 22-18 52% 15 MT
9984 Milwaukee Jr's 15-Select 1622 39-23 63% 15 WI
9985 Capitanas 11-1 - christian rosario 1622 4-2 67% 11 PR
9986 SM16 16-1 1622 6-0 100% 16 OH
9987 IMUA UVC 12-Aqua 1622 10-1 91% 12 CA
9988 FIGSV 15-1 1622 17-10 63% 15 CA
9989 ECVBA 16-Brennan 1622 16-10 62% 16 CA
9990 850 ELITE 16-1 1622 29-18 62% 16 FL
9991 Spikehers 15-Blue 1622 14-9 61% 15 NY
9992 OPVC 15-Marquardt 1622 26-17 60% 15 OH
9993 Diablo 18-1 black 1622 25-17 60% 18 CA
9994 UEPA 17-Gold 1622 10-6 59% 17 TX
9995 BVC 13-Jodi 1622 26-18 59% 13 CA
9996 Vital 17-Tabitha 1622 10-7 59% 17 MN
9997 SA Force 16 National 1622 35-22 59% 16 TX
9998 EliteVBTC 15 National 1622 39-28 58% 15 OH
9999 Jr Trojans 13 Royal 1622 14-9 58% 13 IN
10000 Pulse 18-Black 1622 38-29 57% 18 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.