Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 199 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9901 LA6 10 1623 24-8 71% 10 LA
9902 NIVB 14-Black 1623 29-19 60% 14 MN
9903 High Line 14-Aspiring pnk 1623 35-13 69% 14 PA
9904 St. Pete 13 Teal 1623 43-25 63% 13 FL
9905 PSVBA 16-Elite 1 1623 15-8 65% 16 WA
9906 SVC 13 Gold 1623 16-8 67% 13 IA
9907 Absolute 13-White 1623 31-28 53% 13 CA
9908 308 Exclusive VBC 18-Black 1623 13-9 59% 18 NE
9909 Twisters Volleyball Club 16 Twisters16-TERI 1623 5-3 63% 16 CA
9910 Stacks Teal 12 1623 19-9 61% 12 MT
9911 VIP ACADEMY 15-1 1623 4-11 27% 15 TX
9912 MVP 14-Blue 1623 35-37 49% 14 WI
9913 Diablo VBC 14-1 1623 6-2 75% 14 NV
9914 NorthShore 16-Colvin 1623 20-9 69% 16 OH
9915 Columbia 17-Black 1623 28-34 45% 17 MD
9916 Club One AZ 14-Copper 1623 42-22 66% 14 AZ
9917 Twisters 14-Rylee 1623 30-14 68% 14 CA
9918 FVC 11-Thunder 1623 3-0 75% 11 NE
9919 A5 Regional 15-Becky 1623 26-7 79% 15 GA
9920 Ultimate G15-Blue 1623 35-18 66% 15 IL
9921 Miyagi-Do 16 Miyagi-Do 1623 4-1 80% 16 TX
9922 MN North 13-1 navy 1623 48-21 70% 13 MN
9923 Xtreme VBC 12 Adidas 1623 16-9 64% 12 WI
9924 SUSA 16-Navy 1623 5-3 63% 16 UT
9925 MAUNALANI RISE 14 1623 6-1 86% 14 HI
9926 LKN Swarm 13-Black 1623 31-24 56% 13 NC
9927 CUVC 13-R allison 1623 9-7 56% 13 NC
9928 LBVC 16-Jon 1623 39-23 63% 16 CA
9929 CHiX 14-PiNK 1623 26-25 51% 14 OH
9930 SG Elite 14-Elite joey 1623 16-13 55% 14 CA
9931 Club Z 15-Madi 1623 19-23 43% 15 NM
9932 Illini Elite 16-White 1623 51-28 65% 16 IL
9933 ATTACK VOLLEYBALL CLUB 12-1 1623 4-1 57% 12 MI
9934 SJVC 14-Royals 1623 3-0 100% 14 FL
9935 Bama Elite 15-N wolfpack 1623 36-18 67% 15 AL
9936 Munciana 15 Warriors 1623 30-39 43% 15 IN
9937 Sunset 14 1622 17-12 59% 14 OR
9938 PAEVA 17-Maroon 1622 28-23 55% 17 PA
9939 Dead Frog 17-Green 1622 28-14 67% 17 MI
9940 864 Elite 17-Kendall 1622 30-16 65% 17 SC
9941 Pine Bush VBC 17 1622 20-9 67% 17 NY
9942 Buckeyefire 17-1 1622 35-22 61% 17 OH
9943 UEPA 17-Gold 1622 10-6 59% 17 TX
9944 Dinamite 13-Monica 1622 5-2 71% 13 CA
9945 Beach Cities 14-Smack 1622 29-25 54% 14 CA
9946 HOU STELLAR 15-Navy 1622 16-5 76% 15 TX
9947 DIG 14-Blue - anne 1622 24-9 63% 14 TX
9948 MAVA 15-Blue 1622 45-29 61% 15 KY
9949 IMUA UVC 12-Aqua 1622 10-1 91% 12 CA
9950 CYVBC Surge 13-Black 1622 21-25 46% 13 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.