Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 199 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9901 Impact 15-Black 1623 26-24 52% 15 TX
9902 Maunalani 16 1623 10-2 77% 16 HI
9903 WV Galaxy 16 1623 38-22 63% 16 WV
9904 Putnam 16-A ashland 1623 42-13 76% 16 WV
9905 M2 Volleyball 16-E3 1623 43-24 64% 16 GA
9906 Angels 16-Shannon 1623 26-13 63% 16 NM
9907 HRVC Hurricanes 12-1 1623 3-2 60% 12 ON
9908 DVBC Defiance 13-S - sarah 1623 4-0 100% 13
9909 Mizuno Northern Lights 15-X 1623 6-0 100% 15
9910 ʻEleu-Malulani 12 1623 7-1 88% 12
9911 MAUNALANI RISE 14 1623 6-1 86% 14
9912 Jackson Elite 16-2025 1623 9-2 75% 16
9913 H. Prep Dev 12-White 1623 8-2 50% 12
9914 Red Slam 13 1623 19-6 76% 13 IN
9915 Metro 12-2 travel 1623 6-2 75% 12 DC
9916 MVA 15-2 1623 6-2 75% 15 FL
9917 No Limits 15 National 1623 52-17 74% 15 FL
9918 FCA Force 15-1 grace 1623 8-3 73% 15 NC
9919 HVVC 14-Black 1623 29-10 73% 14 MI
9920 Momentum 14-Black 1623 16-6 73% 14 FL
9921 Matchbox 12-Black 1623 8-2 73% 12 SD
9922 Wild Bunch 14-S 1623 13-4 68% 14 IL
9923 Absolute 13-White 1623 31-28 53% 13 CA
9924 SynergyForce 17-Gold 1623 25-27 48% 17 CA
9925 Golden State 13-Black 1623 13-16 45% 13 CA
9926 Austin Skyline 16-B kilee 1623 20-27 43% 16 TX
9927 FaR Out 12-Black 1623 21-30 41% 12 MI
9928 Club Cactus 18-Mizuno 1623 24-35 41% 18 AZ
9929 TOVC 11-Wilmer 1623 7-11 39% 11 CA
9930 CoJrs 11-Christi 1623 3-5 38% 11 CO
9931 MAVS 816 15-2 1623 5-2 31% 15 KS
9932 KC Thunder 14-Blue 1622 13-6 68% 14
9933 Hendo 14-15 1 1622 4-0 80% 14
9934 ZZU 14-1 1622 9-6 60% 14
9935 Stewie 14-Blue 1622 22-15 59% 14
9936 ATx Aces Blue 12 1622 6-9 40% 12
9937 Chadron Elite 15 1622 13-7 65% 15
9938 ATX Aces Blue 11 1622 10-4 71% 11
9939 Gold Rush 12U 1622 9-6 60% 12
9940 TPV 13-Zulu 1622 39-30 57% 13
9941 SEVC 13-1 1622 26-12 68% 13 AL
9942 KeAloha 18-1 ancients 1622 26-32 45% 18 IN
9943 GSA 14 1622 6-2 75% 14 NJ
9944 CSVC 14-2 panthers 1622 25-9 74% 14 IN
9945 SA Juniors 14 Carolina 1622 26-11 70% 14 TX
9946 AP 14-White 1622 21-11 62% 14 TX
9947 Storm 14-National black 1622 9-7 56% 14 CO
9948 DS Elite 14-Diamond 1622 34-28 55% 14 TX
9949 SG Elite 14-Elite joey 1622 16-13 55% 14 CA
9950 CHiX 14-PiNK 1622 26-25 51% 14 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.