Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 198 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9851 SEV 16-Armour 1624 9-7 56% 16 AL
9852 HP Illinois 12-Silver 1624 20-10 67% 12 IL
9853 Houston Force 12-Jedi 1624 13-6 68% 12 TX
9854 NJ RONIN 15-Katana 1624 9-8 53% 15 NJ
9855 MAVA 15-Blue 1624 45-29 61% 15 KY
9856 EXCEL 11-Blue 1624 19-20 44% 11 TX
9857 ESO 17-Elite 1624 36-23 61% 17 OH
9858 ENCORE 17-Navy 1624 7-8 47% 17 CA
9859 High Desert Elite 17-Elite 1624 18-11 62% 17 CO
9860 HOU STELLAR 15-Navy 1624 16-5 76% 15 TX
9861 LEGACY 11-Premier taylor 1624 30-17 64% 11 FL
9862 Wythe Elite 16-Kelsey 1624 20-8 71% 16 VA
9863 SPVC 14-Adidas 1624 21-20 51% 14 CA
9864 KIVA 13-Grey 1624 39-17 70% 13 KY
9865 Illini Elite 16-White 1624 51-28 65% 16 IL
9866 VCN 15-Black 1624 9-6 60% 15 NE
9867 K1 Bayamon David 11-20 1624 3-2 60% 11 PR
9868 TX432 11-Black 1624 25-21 54% 11 TX
9869 Miami Hype 13-Prime 1624 31-43 42% 13 FL
9870 Madfrig 11-N green 1624 1-0 100% 11
9871 HPVBC DIGGIN' DIVAS 12 1624 22-13 63% 12
9872 OPEAK 17-1 elite 1624 4-3 57% 17
9873 Lunar 15-1 1624 15-17 47% 15
9874 FIGSV 17-1 1624 20-18 53% 17 CA
9875 Westchester 14 1623 19-13 59% 14
9876 IVC Garrison 14 1623 14-6 64% 14
9877 Omaha Roadrunners 17 1623 5-0 100% 17
9878 Stacks Teal 12 1623 19-9 61% 12
9879 Magic 14 Apex 1623 20-11 65% 14 TX
9880 Sunset 14 1623 17-12 59% 14 OR
9881 Nome VBC 14 1623 1-0 25% 14 AK
9882 ACT 12-Corey 1623 32-21 60% 12 CA
9883 949 G13-Black 1623 33-14 70% 13 CA
9884 CGSV 15-Conners 1623 10-6 63% 15 OH
9885 TX Legends 16-Black 1623 34-24 58% 16 TX
9886 NKJV 15-White 1623 19-15 56% 15 KY
9887 ARSEL 17-1 1623 10-3 77% 17 PR
9888 SSVA 17-National 1623 16-7 70% 17 PA
9889 OVC 16-1 1623 21-14 57% 16 MO
9890 CE Lake Charles 13-Red 1623 14-8 64% 13 LA
9891 MVP 13-1 1623 30-14 68% 13 OH
9892 Elite Alliance 12-1 1623 17-9 63% 12 SD
9893 CCVV 11-Fuchsia 1623 33-23 59% 11 FL
9894 ACT 13-Tuan 1623 21-23 48% 13 CA
9895 308 Exclusive VBC 18-Black 1623 13-9 59% 18 NE
9896 Dinos 15-1 1623 7-1 88% 15 AB
9897 Fulshear Elite 13 1623 24-11 69% 13 TX
9898 SJVC 14-Royals 1623 3-0 100% 14 FL
9899 LOBOS 12-Black 1623 28-17 62% 12 CO
9900 C4 13-Red 1623 15-11 58% 13 TN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.