Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 198 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9851 SDVBC 16-Chris 1624 10-10 50% 16 CA
9852 575 13-Can matt 1624 40-22 65% 13 GA
9853 SPVB 16-White 1624 35-24 59% 16 IL
9854 Platform 12-Adidas 1624 29-19 57% 12 IA
9855 Dinos 15-1 1624 7-1 88% 15 AB
9856 Barrie Elites 13-1 united 1624 3-2 60% 13 ON
9857 Madfrig 11-N green 1624 1-0 100% 11
9858 Chicago Elite Volleyball Club 16 1624 3-4 43% 16 IL
9859 GO Volley 17-N 1623 9-25 26% 17 VA
9860 Left Coast 15-1 1623 22-19 54% 15 CA
9861 CUVC 15-National1 1623 8-10 44% 15 NC
9862 TX Impact 11-Navy 1623 4-0 100% 11 TX
9863 Avoli 17-F gabriella 1623 8-8 50% 17 PR
9864 Aspire NW 16-1 beaverton 1623 27-29 48% 16 OR
9865 Clarksville VBC 15 Charlsie 1623 34-25 57% 15 TN
9866 Elite Alliance Volleyball Club 12-1 1623 17-9 63% 12 SD
9867 GVC 18-2 shelby 1623 16-7 67% 18 AL
9868 Attack 12-Select 1623 30-21 59% 12 IL
9869 ESVBC 14-Diamondbacks 1623 16-8 67% 14 IA
9870 Sartell 14-1 1623 14-9 58% 14 MN
9871 FC Elite Tritons 14-1 1623 18-11 62% 14 WI
9872 WV Galaxy 16 1623 38-22 63% 16 WV
9873 Trinity 12 Blaze 1623 37-17 69% 12 FL
9874 VIRAGO 16 Elite 1623 40-21 65% 16 OK
9875 BHJ 17-Green 1623 14-9 61% 17 SD
9876 IVC Garrison 14 1623 14-6 64% 14 LA
9877 CE Lake Charles 13-Red 1623 14-8 64% 13 LA
9878 Countdown 14 National 1623 33-14 70% 14 FL
9879 SBVC Girls 14-Premier 1623 25-13 66% 14 CA
9880 CSNS 16-1 1623 23-11 68% 16 SC
9881 KCV 14-National mcclure 1623 30-27 51% 14 TX
9882 AVC 14-Navy 1623 19-15 53% 14 NE
9883 Heat 15 Flame 1623 26-16 62% 15 WI
9884 Forest City 15-1 aspen 1623 4-3 57% 15 OH
9885 NW Elite 14-1 gold 1623 28-18 61% 14 OR
9886 Texas One 12-Navy 1623 15-4 60% 12 TX
9887 Elevation elite vbc 16-1 1623 27-8 77% 16 CA
9888 SM16 16-1 1623 6-0 100% 16 OH
9889 Rice City 14-Red 1623 18-8 69% 14 LA
9890 Wild Bunch 14-S 1623 13-4 68% 14 MO
9891 TEXAS FURY 12 Impact 1623 24-7 77% 12 TX
9892 MVA 15-2 1623 6-2 75% 15 GA
9893 Gold Cal Jrs Air 12-1 1623 10-2 83% 12 CA
9894 HPRIME 12-Black 1623 3-0 75% 12 TX
9895 NIVA 16-WHITE 1623 30-23 57% 16 IN
9896 HBJ 12-Regional marissa 1623 17-5 77% 12 AR
9897 Stewie 13-Blue 1623 16-8 64% 13 MN
9898 Aleta 15-2 1623 11-6 65% 15 OH
9899 TC ELITE 13-B 1623 8-4 57% 13 LA
9900 Legend Volleyball Club 15 1623 29-36 44% 15 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.