2025-2026 Season — Page 197 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9801 | MVA 12-Stephania | 1625 | 29-34 | 46% | 12 | FL |
| 9802 | HPRIME 12-Black | 1625 | 3-0 | 75% | 12 | TX |
| 9803 | Anthem United 15-Navy | 1625 | 6-0 | 100% | 15 | GA |
| 9804 | TX Premier 13-National | 1625 | 33-22 | 60% | 13 | TX |
| 9805 | Highlands 17-Extreme | 1625 | 25-13 | 66% | 17 | PA |
| 9806 | DIG VBC 15-Black | 1625 | 3-4 | 43% | 15 | TX |
| 9807 | Hustle Volleyball Club 15-Girls selects | 1625 | 7-2 | 78% | 15 | |
| 9808 | Xtreme Mean 17 | 1625 | 16-12 | 57% | 17 | |
| 9809 | Tropical Touch 18-Teine samoa moni | 1625 | 33-14 | 70% | 18 | CA |
| 9810 | Waco Lightning 11-Blue | 1625 | 9-2 | 64% | 11 | TX |
| 9811 | NorCal 11-1 black | 1625 | 26-29 | 47% | 11 | CA |
| 9812 | MALULANI 14 | 1624 | 14-13 | 50% | 14 | |
| 9813 | KLUB 12-1 | 1624 | 8-3 | 73% | 12 | |
| 9814 | WHS NCWVBC 18-2 black | 1624 | 6-4 | 60% | 18 | |
| 9815 | Eagan 14 | 1624 | 5-1 | 83% | 14 | |
| 9816 | DBQ Insanity Dubuque Digz 14 | 1624 | 5-1 | 83% | 14 | |
| 9817 | TEV 12-Gc davina/erin | 1624 | 19-8 | 70% | 12 | TN |
| 9818 | Oasis 14-National | 1624 | 25-12 | 68% | 14 | CA |
| 9819 | Aspire NW 16-1 beaverton | 1624 | 27-29 | 48% | 16 | WA |
| 9820 | TTC 14-Elite | 1624 | 30-11 | 73% | 14 | FL |
| 9821 | Dunes 18-Black | 1624 | 20-20 | 50% | 18 | IN |
| 9822 | Club Fusion 14-Royal | 1624 | 30-9 | 77% | 14 | IL |
| 9823 | A~Town 14-1 | 1624 | 9-1 | 90% | 14 | SC |
| 9824 | 314 VBC 18-Red | 1624 | 15-9 | 63% | 18 | MO |
| 9825 | Alabama Perf 14-N red | 1624 | 40-21 | 66% | 14 | AL |
| 9826 | FVC 11-Thunder | 1624 | 3-0 | 75% | 11 | CA |
| 9827 | MVP 16 Silver | 1624 | 52-34 | 60% | 16 | OH |
| 9828 | Impact 14-Parker | 1624 | 21-18 | 54% | 14 | MI |
| 9829 | Metro VBC 13-Travel | 1624 | 1-6 | 14% | 13 | DC |
| 9830 | Champion 14-N purple | 1624 | 33-19 | 63% | 14 | NC |
| 9831 | IVC 13-Elite | 1624 | 6-3 | 67% | 13 | IA |
| 9832 | PREVAIL Girls 15-Platinum | 1624 | 26-11 | 70% | 15 | PA |
| 9833 | VIRAGO 16 Elite | 1624 | 40-21 | 65% | 16 | OK |
| 9834 | Luminosity 13-1 | 1624 | 14-6 | 70% | 13 | WI |
| 9835 | PVC 17-1 | 1624 | 39-28 | 58% | 17 | FL |
| 9836 | ATTACK VOLLEYBALL CLUB 12-1 | 1624 | 4-1 | 57% | 12 | TX |
| 9837 | Rapid Fire 15-Black | 1624 | 21-12 | 64% | 15 | IL |
| 9838 | PVA 13-National summit | 1624 | 14-17 | 45% | 13 | PA |
| 9839 | COA 15-Empire | 1624 | 33-16 | 67% | 15 | IN |
| 9840 | NASA 14-Purple holly | 1624 | 30-16 | 65% | 14 | AL |
| 9841 | Muscle 13-Black | 1624 | 20-10 | 63% | 13 | TX |
| 9842 | NW Elite 14-1 gold | 1624 | 28-18 | 61% | 14 | OR |
| 9843 | FVA 14-Blaze - m | 1624 | 17-12 | 57% | 14 | AK |
| 9844 | ESVBC 18-Ninjas national | 1624 | 21-31 | 40% | 18 | MD |
| 9845 | Xtreme 18-Nat - deb | 1624 | 8-6 | 57% | 18 | NJ |
| 9846 | South County 16-National | 1624 | 30-23 | 57% | 16 | RI |
| 9847 | DCVC 13-National | 1624 | 30-19 | 60% | 13 | IA |
| 9848 | Culver VBC 18-1 | 1624 | 12-4 | 75% | 18 | OR |
| 9849 | Club South 18-White | 1624 | 27-19 | 59% | 18 | WA |
| 9850 | LEGACY 16-Elite koree | 1624 | 35-32 | 52% | 16 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.