Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 197 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9801 Mineral Area 13-Elite 1624 16-5 73% 13 MO
9802 Voodoo Volleyball Club 16 Voodoo Eclipse 1624 19-9 68% 16 LA
9803 COAST 17-3 mia m 1624 30-22 58% 17 CA
9804 Beach South 15-Black 1624 24-22 52% 15 NC
9805 SA Elite 16-1 navy 1624 32-28 53% 16 TX
9806 TEV 18-Dale/lora 1624 31-22 58% 18 TN
9807 Red Rock 18-Leslie - danville/walnut creek 1624 20-27 43% 18 CA
9808 Gigantes 12-1 enrique 1624 9-7 56% 12 FL
9809 949 G13-Black 1624 33-14 70% 13 CA
9810 MVSA 13 Phoenix 1624 45-22 64% 13 MD
9811 Hendo 14-15 1 1624 4-0 80% 14 NV
9812 Sonics 17-1 1624 10-4 71% 17 NY
9813 Fusion 14 Titanium 1624 14-6 70% 14 CA
9814 CHiX 15-PiNK 1624 20-38 34% 15 OH
9815 REIGNORL 17 CRAIG 1624 36-16 69% 17 FL
9816 AVC 12-Red 1624 19-9 68% 12 FL
9817 Turlock Crush 14-Stacey 1624 22-14 61% 14 CA
9818 BVC 13-Jodi 1624 26-18 59% 13 CA
9819 ACT 12-Corey 1624 32-21 60% 12 CA
9820 Columbia 13-Black 1624 48-27 62% 13 MD
9821 Sundogs 18-Uw elite 1624 6-0 100% 18 MT
9822 SWVBC 14-White 1624 24-9 73% 14 WI
9823 Pitt United 15-Red 1624 31-27 53% 15 PA
9824 Madfrog 10-N black 1624 23-22 48% 10 TX
9825 TTC 14-Elite 1624 30-11 73% 14 FL
9826 NKJV 16-Blue 1624 20-34 37% 16 KY
9827 Club Koa 16 Crest 1624 34-17 67% 16 CA
9828 Miami Bombers 13-Gonzalo 1624 21-10 68% 13 FL
9829 Panther Juniors 13 1624 29-17 63% 13 IN
9830 OPEAK 17-1 elite 1624 4-3 57% 17 MN
9831 ʻEleu-Malulani 12 1624 7-1 88% 12 HI
9832 Northeast 14-Blue 1624 19-13 59% 14 CT
9833 SWVBC G13-BLUE 1624 22-15 59% 13 WI
9834 ESVBC 14-Sharks national 1624 22-15 59% 14 IA
9835 No Limits 12-Navy 1624 31-27 53% 12 FL
9836 TNT 16-Fire 1624 25-17 60% 16 PA
9837 Matchbox 12-Black 1624 8-2 73% 12 SD
9838 K1 Bayamon David 11-20 1624 3-2 60% 11 PR
9839 MN CORE 11-1 1624 6-2 75% 11 MN
9840 LEGACY 11-Premier taylor 1624 30-17 64% 11 FL
9841 THVBC 13-1 1624 4-0 67% 13 NE
9842 NHouston Elite 15-Usa 1624 19-16 54% 15 TX
9843 Legacy 12-Elite east 1624 34-14 71% 12 MI
9844 ENCORE 17-Navy wolfpack 1624 19-29 40% 17 CA
9845 NorthShore 17-Oney/hed 1624 14-7 67% 17 OH
9846 Adrenaline 17-Jeff 1624 27-20 57% 17 IA
9847 26 SoV 15-1 1624 27-17 61% 15 WA
9848 Mana Toa 17-Kelli 1624 8-3 73% 17 AL
9849 MOCO Volleyball Club LLC 15 MOCO (MD) Monsoon 1624 8-4 67% 15 MD
9850 Nestor 16-Alex 1624 5-4 56% 16 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.