Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 197 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9801 MVA 12-Stephania 1625 29-34 46% 12 FL
9802 HPRIME 12-Black 1625 3-0 75% 12 TX
9803 Anthem United 15-Navy 1625 6-0 100% 15 GA
9804 TX Premier 13-National 1625 33-22 60% 13 TX
9805 Highlands 17-Extreme 1625 25-13 66% 17 PA
9806 DIG VBC 15-Black 1625 3-4 43% 15 TX
9807 Hustle Volleyball Club 15-Girls selects 1625 7-2 78% 15
9808 Xtreme Mean 17 1625 16-12 57% 17
9809 Tropical Touch 18-Teine samoa moni 1625 33-14 70% 18 CA
9810 Waco Lightning 11-Blue 1625 9-2 64% 11 TX
9811 NorCal 11-1 black 1625 26-29 47% 11 CA
9812 MALULANI 14 1624 14-13 50% 14
9813 KLUB 12-1 1624 8-3 73% 12
9814 WHS NCWVBC 18-2 black 1624 6-4 60% 18
9815 Eagan 14 1624 5-1 83% 14
9816 DBQ Insanity Dubuque Digz 14 1624 5-1 83% 14
9817 TEV 12-Gc davina/erin 1624 19-8 70% 12 TN
9818 Oasis 14-National 1624 25-12 68% 14 CA
9819 Aspire NW 16-1 beaverton 1624 27-29 48% 16 WA
9820 TTC 14-Elite 1624 30-11 73% 14 FL
9821 Dunes 18-Black 1624 20-20 50% 18 IN
9822 Club Fusion 14-Royal 1624 30-9 77% 14 IL
9823 A~Town 14-1 1624 9-1 90% 14 SC
9824 314 VBC 18-Red 1624 15-9 63% 18 MO
9825 Alabama Perf 14-N red 1624 40-21 66% 14 AL
9826 FVC 11-Thunder 1624 3-0 75% 11 CA
9827 MVP 16 Silver 1624 52-34 60% 16 OH
9828 Impact 14-Parker 1624 21-18 54% 14 MI
9829 Metro VBC 13-Travel 1624 1-6 14% 13 DC
9830 Champion 14-N purple 1624 33-19 63% 14 NC
9831 IVC 13-Elite 1624 6-3 67% 13 IA
9832 PREVAIL Girls 15-Platinum 1624 26-11 70% 15 PA
9833 VIRAGO 16 Elite 1624 40-21 65% 16 OK
9834 Luminosity 13-1 1624 14-6 70% 13 WI
9835 PVC 17-1 1624 39-28 58% 17 FL
9836 ATTACK VOLLEYBALL CLUB 12-1 1624 4-1 57% 12 TX
9837 Rapid Fire 15-Black 1624 21-12 64% 15 IL
9838 PVA 13-National summit 1624 14-17 45% 13 PA
9839 COA 15-Empire 1624 33-16 67% 15 IN
9840 NASA 14-Purple holly 1624 30-16 65% 14 AL
9841 Muscle 13-Black 1624 20-10 63% 13 TX
9842 NW Elite 14-1 gold 1624 28-18 61% 14 OR
9843 FVA 14-Blaze - m 1624 17-12 57% 14 AK
9844 ESVBC 18-Ninjas national 1624 21-31 40% 18 MD
9845 Xtreme 18-Nat - deb 1624 8-6 57% 18 NJ
9846 South County 16-National 1624 30-23 57% 16 RI
9847 DCVC 13-National 1624 30-19 60% 13 IA
9848 Culver VBC 18-1 1624 12-4 75% 18 OR
9849 Club South 18-White 1624 27-19 59% 18 WA
9850 LEGACY 16-Elite koree 1624 35-32 52% 16 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.