2025-2026 Season — Page 197 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9801 | Mineral Area 13-Elite | 1624 | 16-5 | 73% | 13 | MO |
| 9802 | Voodoo Volleyball Club 16 Voodoo Eclipse | 1624 | 19-9 | 68% | 16 | LA |
| 9803 | COAST 17-3 mia m | 1624 | 30-22 | 58% | 17 | CA |
| 9804 | Beach South 15-Black | 1624 | 24-22 | 52% | 15 | NC |
| 9805 | SA Elite 16-1 navy | 1624 | 32-28 | 53% | 16 | TX |
| 9806 | TEV 18-Dale/lora | 1624 | 31-22 | 58% | 18 | TN |
| 9807 | Red Rock 18-Leslie - danville/walnut creek | 1624 | 20-27 | 43% | 18 | CA |
| 9808 | Gigantes 12-1 enrique | 1624 | 9-7 | 56% | 12 | FL |
| 9809 | 949 G13-Black | 1624 | 33-14 | 70% | 13 | CA |
| 9810 | MVSA 13 Phoenix | 1624 | 45-22 | 64% | 13 | MD |
| 9811 | Hendo 14-15 1 | 1624 | 4-0 | 80% | 14 | NV |
| 9812 | Sonics 17-1 | 1624 | 10-4 | 71% | 17 | NY |
| 9813 | Fusion 14 Titanium | 1624 | 14-6 | 70% | 14 | CA |
| 9814 | CHiX 15-PiNK | 1624 | 20-38 | 34% | 15 | OH |
| 9815 | REIGNORL 17 CRAIG | 1624 | 36-16 | 69% | 17 | FL |
| 9816 | AVC 12-Red | 1624 | 19-9 | 68% | 12 | FL |
| 9817 | Turlock Crush 14-Stacey | 1624 | 22-14 | 61% | 14 | CA |
| 9818 | BVC 13-Jodi | 1624 | 26-18 | 59% | 13 | CA |
| 9819 | ACT 12-Corey | 1624 | 32-21 | 60% | 12 | CA |
| 9820 | Columbia 13-Black | 1624 | 48-27 | 62% | 13 | MD |
| 9821 | Sundogs 18-Uw elite | 1624 | 6-0 | 100% | 18 | MT |
| 9822 | SWVBC 14-White | 1624 | 24-9 | 73% | 14 | WI |
| 9823 | Pitt United 15-Red | 1624 | 31-27 | 53% | 15 | PA |
| 9824 | Madfrog 10-N black | 1624 | 23-22 | 48% | 10 | TX |
| 9825 | TTC 14-Elite | 1624 | 30-11 | 73% | 14 | FL |
| 9826 | NKJV 16-Blue | 1624 | 20-34 | 37% | 16 | KY |
| 9827 | Club Koa 16 Crest | 1624 | 34-17 | 67% | 16 | CA |
| 9828 | Miami Bombers 13-Gonzalo | 1624 | 21-10 | 68% | 13 | FL |
| 9829 | Panther Juniors 13 | 1624 | 29-17 | 63% | 13 | IN |
| 9830 | OPEAK 17-1 elite | 1624 | 4-3 | 57% | 17 | MN |
| 9831 | ʻEleu-Malulani 12 | 1624 | 7-1 | 88% | 12 | HI |
| 9832 | Northeast 14-Blue | 1624 | 19-13 | 59% | 14 | CT |
| 9833 | SWVBC G13-BLUE | 1624 | 22-15 | 59% | 13 | WI |
| 9834 | ESVBC 14-Sharks national | 1624 | 22-15 | 59% | 14 | IA |
| 9835 | No Limits 12-Navy | 1624 | 31-27 | 53% | 12 | FL |
| 9836 | TNT 16-Fire | 1624 | 25-17 | 60% | 16 | PA |
| 9837 | Matchbox 12-Black | 1624 | 8-2 | 73% | 12 | SD |
| 9838 | K1 Bayamon David 11-20 | 1624 | 3-2 | 60% | 11 | PR |
| 9839 | MN CORE 11-1 | 1624 | 6-2 | 75% | 11 | MN |
| 9840 | LEGACY 11-Premier taylor | 1624 | 30-17 | 64% | 11 | FL |
| 9841 | THVBC 13-1 | 1624 | 4-0 | 67% | 13 | NE |
| 9842 | NHouston Elite 15-Usa | 1624 | 19-16 | 54% | 15 | TX |
| 9843 | Legacy 12-Elite east | 1624 | 34-14 | 71% | 12 | MI |
| 9844 | ENCORE 17-Navy wolfpack | 1624 | 19-29 | 40% | 17 | CA |
| 9845 | NorthShore 17-Oney/hed | 1624 | 14-7 | 67% | 17 | OH |
| 9846 | Adrenaline 17-Jeff | 1624 | 27-20 | 57% | 17 | IA |
| 9847 | 26 SoV 15-1 | 1624 | 27-17 | 61% | 15 | WA |
| 9848 | Mana Toa 17-Kelli | 1624 | 8-3 | 73% | 17 | AL |
| 9849 | MOCO Volleyball Club LLC 15 MOCO (MD) Monsoon | 1624 | 8-4 | 67% | 15 | MD |
| 9850 | Nestor 16-Alex | 1624 | 5-4 | 56% | 16 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.