2025-2026 Season — Page 196 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9751 | Colorado Elite 14 Grizzly | 1625 | 34-35 | 49% | 14 | CO |
| 9752 | Legacy 15-1 (OV) | 1625 | 16-12 | 57% | 15 | OH |
| 9753 | South County 18-Blue | 1625 | 33-11 | 75% | 18 | RI |
| 9754 | LOBOS 12-Black | 1625 | 28-17 | 62% | 12 | CO |
| 9755 | CI ELITE 12-Red | 1625 | 19-9 | 68% | 12 | IL |
| 9756 | GGVC Smoking Guns 13 | 1625 | 18-15 | 55% | 13 | TX |
| 9757 | FORZA1 NORTH 14-Elite red | 1625 | 20-8 | 71% | 14 | CA |
| 9758 | MN Royals 14-1 | 1625 | 15-9 | 63% | 14 | MN |
| 9759 | Shasta Elite 12-S - maila/leila | 1625 | 7-0 | 100% | 12 | CA |
| 9760 | SA Elite 11-1 navy | 1625 | 27-21 | 56% | 11 | TX |
| 9761 | Ridgeland Reds-Red 11 | 1625 | 5-5 | 50% | 11 | WI |
| 9762 | Waco Lightning 11-Blue | 1625 | 9-2 | 64% | 11 | TX |
| 9763 | SMV 14-1 | 1625 | 11-3 | 79% | 14 | MN |
| 9764 | PEAK 13-4 | 1625 | 29-12 | 71% | 13 | OK |
| 9765 | Mililani 14-1 | 1625 | 0-0 | 0% | 14 | HI |
| 9766 | ID Crush 16-Henry | 1625 | 42-29 | 59% | 16 | ID |
| 9767 | Endless VBC 15-Navy | 1625 | 9-6 | 60% | 15 | TX |
| 9768 | Elite Alliance 18-1 | 1625 | 7-3 | 70% | 18 | SD |
| 9769 | TOVC 11-Wilmer | 1625 | 7-11 | 39% | 11 | PR |
| 9770 | CLUB STEEL 13-Navy | 1625 | 36-29 | 55% | 13 | FL |
| 9771 | Spa City 14-Aqua | 1625 | 29-25 | 53% | 14 | NY |
| 9772 | Luminosity 13-1 | 1625 | 14-6 | 70% | 13 | WI |
| 9773 | Aleta 17-2 | 1625 | 22-11 | 67% | 17 | OH |
| 9774 | TEV 12-Gc davina/erin | 1625 | 19-8 | 70% | 12 | TN |
| 9775 | CSVC 14-Blue | 1625 | 21-10 | 68% | 14 | NC |
| 9776 | NIVA 14-GREY | 1625 | 30-17 | 64% | 14 | IN |
| 9777 | CINCY EAST 13-3 white | 1625 | 18-7 | 72% | 13 | OH |
| 9778 | TAMPA UNITED VBA 16-Red | 1625 | 33-40 | 45% | 16 | FL |
| 9779 | The Edge 14-Black (RM) | 1625 | 30-37 | 45% | 14 | CO |
| 9780 | Storm 14-National black | 1625 | 9-7 | 56% | 14 | TX |
| 9781 | Mineral Area 14 Royal | 1625 | 18-9 | 64% | 14 | MO |
| 9782 | Rise 13 Mau | 1625 | 12-6 | 67% | 13 | CA |
| 9783 | AV 15-2 emerald | 1625 | 5-3 | 63% | 15 | GA |
| 9784 | SMV 15-1 | 1625 | 12-5 | 71% | 15 | MN |
| 9785 | Spikehers 15-Blue | 1625 | 14-9 | 61% | 15 | NY |
| 9786 | Hustle Volleyball Club 15-Girls selects | 1625 | 7-2 | 78% | 15 | MN |
| 9787 | Putnam 16-A ashland | 1625 | 42-13 | 76% | 16 | OH |
| 9788 | Highlands 17-Extreme | 1625 | 25-13 | 66% | 17 | PA |
| 9789 | MCV 14-1 | 1625 | 17-4 | 81% | 14 | CA |
| 9790 | Club 1 11-Skronkstrong | 1625 | 20-10 | 67% | 11 | IL |
| 9791 | DYNASTY 14 Adidas | 1625 | 11-10 | 52% | 14 | KS |
| 9792 | Empowered 16-Elite red | 1625 | 35-12 | 74% | 16 | IN |
| 9793 | Pacific Coast Volleyball Club 14-Girls red | 1625 | 6-3 | 67% | 14 | |
| 9794 | KLUB 12-1 | 1624 | 8-3 | 73% | 12 | NV |
| 9795 | SOVC Bruce/Stewart 16-R | 1624 | 4-2 | 67% | 16 | OH |
| 9796 | SGV 16-Inferno | 1624 | 8-1 | 89% | 16 | GA |
| 9797 | AZ REV 14-Black | 1624 | 29-28 | 51% | 14 | AZ |
| 9798 | High Desert Elite 17-Elite | 1624 | 18-11 | 62% | 17 | CO |
| 9799 | ECJVC 12-Select | 1624 | 21-11 | 66% | 12 | NC |
| 9800 | Boiler Jrs 12-R black | 1624 | 25-14 | 64% | 12 | IN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.