Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 196 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9751 Colorado Elite 14 Grizzly 1625 34-35 49% 14 CO
9752 Legacy 15-1 (OV) 1625 16-12 57% 15 OH
9753 South County 18-Blue 1625 33-11 75% 18 RI
9754 LOBOS 12-Black 1625 28-17 62% 12 CO
9755 CI ELITE 12-Red 1625 19-9 68% 12 IL
9756 GGVC Smoking Guns 13 1625 18-15 55% 13 TX
9757 FORZA1 NORTH 14-Elite red 1625 20-8 71% 14 CA
9758 MN Royals 14-1 1625 15-9 63% 14 MN
9759 Shasta Elite 12-S - maila/leila 1625 7-0 100% 12 CA
9760 SA Elite 11-1 navy 1625 27-21 56% 11 TX
9761 Ridgeland Reds-Red 11 1625 5-5 50% 11 WI
9762 Waco Lightning 11-Blue 1625 9-2 64% 11 TX
9763 SMV 14-1 1625 11-3 79% 14 MN
9764 PEAK 13-4 1625 29-12 71% 13 OK
9765 Mililani 14-1 1625 0-0 0% 14 HI
9766 ID Crush 16-Henry 1625 42-29 59% 16 ID
9767 Endless VBC 15-Navy 1625 9-6 60% 15 TX
9768 Elite Alliance 18-1 1625 7-3 70% 18 SD
9769 TOVC 11-Wilmer 1625 7-11 39% 11 PR
9770 CLUB STEEL 13-Navy 1625 36-29 55% 13 FL
9771 Spa City 14-Aqua 1625 29-25 53% 14 NY
9772 Luminosity 13-1 1625 14-6 70% 13 WI
9773 Aleta 17-2 1625 22-11 67% 17 OH
9774 TEV 12-Gc davina/erin 1625 19-8 70% 12 TN
9775 CSVC 14-Blue 1625 21-10 68% 14 NC
9776 NIVA 14-GREY 1625 30-17 64% 14 IN
9777 CINCY EAST 13-3 white 1625 18-7 72% 13 OH
9778 TAMPA UNITED VBA 16-Red 1625 33-40 45% 16 FL
9779 The Edge 14-Black (RM) 1625 30-37 45% 14 CO
9780 Storm 14-National black 1625 9-7 56% 14 TX
9781 Mineral Area 14 Royal 1625 18-9 64% 14 MO
9782 Rise 13 Mau 1625 12-6 67% 13 CA
9783 AV 15-2 emerald 1625 5-3 63% 15 GA
9784 SMV 15-1 1625 12-5 71% 15 MN
9785 Spikehers 15-Blue 1625 14-9 61% 15 NY
9786 Hustle Volleyball Club 15-Girls selects 1625 7-2 78% 15 MN
9787 Putnam 16-A ashland 1625 42-13 76% 16 OH
9788 Highlands 17-Extreme 1625 25-13 66% 17 PA
9789 MCV 14-1 1625 17-4 81% 14 CA
9790 Club 1 11-Skronkstrong 1625 20-10 67% 11 IL
9791 DYNASTY 14 Adidas 1625 11-10 52% 14 KS
9792 Empowered 16-Elite red 1625 35-12 74% 16 IN
9793 Pacific Coast Volleyball Club 14-Girls red 1625 6-3 67% 14
9794 KLUB 12-1 1624 8-3 73% 12 NV
9795 SOVC Bruce/Stewart 16-R 1624 4-2 67% 16 OH
9796 SGV 16-Inferno 1624 8-1 89% 16 GA
9797 AZ REV 14-Black 1624 29-28 51% 14 AZ
9798 High Desert Elite 17-Elite 1624 18-11 62% 17 CO
9799 ECJVC 12-Select 1624 21-11 66% 12 NC
9800 Boiler Jrs 12-R black 1624 25-14 64% 12 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.