Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 196 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9751 NIVA 14-GREY 1625 30-17 64% 14 IN
9752 Pulse 14-Black 1625 17-10 63% 14 CA
9753 Showtime 14-1 1625 18-10 62% 14 TN
9754 Crossroads 14U Blue 1625 18-11 62% 14 TX
9755 Stingray VBA 14 Adidas 1625 23-14 61% 14 OK
9756 Sartell 14-1 1625 14-9 58% 14 MN
9757 AVC 14-Navy 1625 19-15 53% 14 FL
9758 KCV 14-National mcclure 1625 30-27 51% 14 TX
9759 TEVA 16-6 1625 20-12 63% 16 NJ
9760 REIGNORL 17 CRAIG 1625 36-16 69% 17 FL
9761 Sonics 17-1 1625 10-4 71% 17 MI
9762 Club Koa 16 Crest 1625 34-17 67% 16 CA
9763 MN Select 14-2 1625 27-39 41% 14 MN
9764 Allegiance 16-Royal 1625 36-18 67% 16 TX
9765 Top Select 15-Top yellow 1625 60-24 71% 15 FL
9766 SA Elite 11-1 navy 1625 27-21 56% 11 TX
9767 FORZA1 NORTH 14-Elite red 1625 20-8 71% 14 CA
9768 SA Magic 16-Elite 1625 20-23 45% 16 TX
9769 Freeze ND 15 Polar 1625 20-11 63% 15 ND
9770 Exodus 14-S royals 1625 11-4 73% 14 CA
9771 BORINQUEN COQUI 10-2f 1625 14-7 67% 10 PR
9772 SOVC Joseph 15-R 1625 6-0 100% 15 OH
9773 VIP ACADEMY 15-1 1625 4-11 27% 15 TX
9774 TNT 16-Fire 1625 25-17 60% 16 PA
9775 Fusion 14 Titanium 1625 14-6 70% 14 IL
9776 United VBA 16-Purple 1625 38-29 57% 16 TX
9777 West Shore YMCA 16-Blue 1625 18-11 62% 16 PA
9778 APV 16-1 1625 4-3 57% 16 TX
9779 Ka Ulukoa 17 Amber 1625 23-25 48% 17 HI
9780 Monon 18-1o mania 1625 19-34 36% 18 IN
9781 Anthem United 13-Tony 1625 3-0 75% 13 GA
9782 Shock 16-Ua storm 1625 28-17 62% 16 IL
9783 SVC 12 Silver 1625 14-7 67% 12 IA
9784 New Prague JO 14-Black 1625 5-0 100% 14 MN
9785 Infinity 15-Green 1625 32-29 52% 15 OH
9786 Premier Nebraska 17-Red 1625 14-13 52% 17 NE
9787 BVA 17-N alain 1625 29-42 41% 17 CA
9788 MVC 12-Jocilyn 1625 6-8 33% 12 FL
9789 C4 18-1 stephanie 1625 33-11 75% 18 TN
9790 South County 16-Lacie 1625 18-14 56% 16 RI
9791 OPVC 12-Castner 1625 25-21 54% 12 OH
9792 Miami Bombers 13-Gonzalo 1625 21-10 68% 13 FL
9793 LA South 11-S 1625 27-15 61% 11 LA
9794 RVA 12U Navy 1625 65-41 61% 12 WI
9795 Elevate Athletics 15-Nike 1625 10-10 50% 15 UT
9796 GVC 18-2 shelby 1625 16-7 67% 18 AL
9797 TVC 17-Royal 1625 41-22 65% 17 OH
9798 CVC 16-Black 1625 13-45 22% 16 OH
9799 Legacy 15-1 (OV) 1625 16-12 57% 15 OH
9800 TVA Smack 15-Top tier 1625 29-19 60% 15 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.