Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 195 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9701 Dig 14-Black-lexi 1626 2-0 100% 14 TX
9702 Golden State 13-Black 1626 13-16 45% 13 CA
9703 K1 Volley 11-Oscar 1626 13-7 65% 11 PR
9704 TX432 11-Black 1626 25-21 54% 11 TX
9705 Bridger 12-1 1626 14-14 48% 12 MT
9706 SF Elite 13-Jason 1626 19-25 43% 13 CA
9707 Michigan Volleyball Academy 15 MVA - Rise Academy 52 1626 18-34 35% 15 MI
9708 AP 14-White 1626 21-11 62% 14 TX
9709 SG Elite 18-Excel 1626 36-21 63% 18 CA
9710 Stingray VBA 14 Adidas 1626 23-14 61% 14 OK
9711 Ox Imp 13-1 1626 19-7 73% 13 MI
9712 West Shore YMCA 16-Blue 1626 18-11 62% 16 PA
9713 Sports Academy VBC 12-Premier 1626 7-3 70% 12 CA
9714 STRIKE 15-Red 1626 31-17 63% 15 AZ
9715 TX IMPACT 12-2 pink 1626 4-2 67% 12 TX
9716 Diablo 18-1 black 1626 25-17 60% 18 CA
9717 Infinity 15-Blue 1626 19-6 76% 15 WI
9718 NSSC 13-White 1626 14-5 74% 13 MO
9719 Eagan 14 1626 5-1 83% 14 MN
9720 ID ONE 14-Black 1626 8-3 73% 14 ID
9721 ESO 14-Prime 1626 14-7 67% 14 OH
9722 1United 14-Elite blue 1626 32-13 67% 14 TX
9723 360VBA 14-2 1626 28-12 70% 14 WI
9724 Cajun Elite 14 Nyah 1626 22-8 73% 14 LA
9725 Mizuno CNVBC 14-Katieh 1626 17-14 55% 14 MO
9726 TVC 17-Royal 1626 41-22 65% 17 OH
9727 FC United 17-Black 1626 20-10 63% 17 MO
9728 TeamLVC 15-Pink 1626 34-15 69% 15 NY
9729 ICE 14-Premier 1626 20-16 56% 14 WA
9730 MN Select 14-2 1626 27-39 41% 14 MN
9731 SA Renegades Molten 13-2 1626 19-11 63% 13 TX
9732 NASA BHM 14-PURPLE 1626 24-16 60% 14 AL
9733 LEVBC 13-National 1626 30-24 54% 13 MD
9734 Clarksville VBC 14 Amy 1626 32-19 62% 14 TN
9735 Performance Juniors 15-1 1626 38-14 73% 15 VA
9736 Viperes 15-Black 1626 3-3 50% 15 PA
9737 Showtime 14-1 1626 18-10 62% 14 TX
9738 No Limits 16 National (NTR) 1626 15-13 44% 16
9739 Vegas VS 16-S 1625 6-3 67% 16 NV
9740 AV Coach Kristal/Coach Vanessa 17 1625 6-2 75% 17 CA
9741 H Skyline 13-White 1625 14-11 56% 13 TX
9742 Flight School 17-1 stealth 1625 29-14 66% 17 TX
9743 Black Hills Juniors 14-Black 1625 5-1 83% 14 WY
9744 United 17 GJ 1625 27-13 68% 17 CO
9745 NWAS VBC 16-National 1625 34-40 46% 16 WA
9746 TIV 12-Black 1625 6-2 75% 12 TX
9747 ENVY 12-Black 1625 9-6 60% 12 IA
9748 Vision 16-Exv black 1625 19-15 49% 16 TX
9749 SA Force 16 National 1625 35-22 59% 16 TX
9750 Hawks VBC 12-1 1625 13-9 59% 12 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.