Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 195 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9701 K1 Volley 11-Oscar 1626 13-7 65% 11 PR
9702 ENVY 16-Blizzard 1626 39-12 76% 16 NE
9703 NIVA 16-WHITE 1626 30-23 57% 16 IN
9704 MIDTN 16-BLUE 1626 18-10 64% 16 TN
9705 SIVA 12-White 1626 15-9 60% 12 UT
9706 Fusion 17-Alyssa 1626 11-8 58% 17 IL
9707 Attack 15-Smack 1626 19-12 59% 15 IA
9708 Mineral Area 13-Elite 1626 16-5 73% 13 MO
9709 HOVA 15-A red elite 1626 21-13 62% 15 OH
9710 SIVA 15 KIANA 1626 36-21 63% 15 WA
9711 Molten 18-Red (nani) 1626 7-1 88% 18 AZ
9712 A5 South 18-Josh 1626 23-21 52% 18 GA
9713 Dig 14-Black-lexi 1626 2-0 100% 14 TX
9714 Blocksport 17-Nat 1626 9-8 45% 17 TX
9715 ENCORE 17-Navy wolfpack 1626 19-29 40% 17 CA
9716 Arete 11-Navy ethos 1626 20-19 49% 11 TX
9717 Anthem United 11-Agape 1626 5-0 100% 11 GA
9718 TX IMPACT 12-2 pink 1626 4-2 67% 12 TX
9719 MCV 14-1 1626 17-4 81% 14 NC
9720 CJV 17-National white 1626 25-40 38% 17 NC
9721 PVA 15-4 1626 9-5 56% 15 MO
9722 FH 16-Ikaika-mady/pearl 1626 15-17 45% 16 TX
9723 Illini Elite 18-L navy 1626 16-8 67% 18 IL
9724 JAG VBC 12-1 national 1626 30-20 60% 12 WI
9725 Black Hills Juniors 14-Black 1626 5-1 83% 14 SD
9726 Tstreet 18-Chris 1626 21-30 41% 18 CA
9727 Beach South 15-Black 1626 24-22 52% 15 NC
9728 Quantum 16-Hydrogen 1626 6-1 86% 16
9729 SSVC Sunukjian 14-1 1626 25-4 86% 14
9730 IBV 12 10 1626 7-2 78% 10
9731 Vikes 13-Black 1626 6-2 75% 13
9732 Legit 16-G mike 1626 7-2 70% 16
9733 LevelOne 16-1 1626 11-5 69% 16
9734 Chaska 12-1 1626 8-4 67% 12
9735 Eastside Ice Tempest 18-1 1626 28-13 67% 18
9736 Panther Juniors 13 1626 29-17 63% 13
9737 SA Renegades Molten 13-2 1626 19-11 63% 13
9738 StriveVBC 16-1 1626 5-3 63% 16
9739 Nestor 16-Alex 1626 5-4 56% 16
9740 No Limits 16 National (NTR) 1626 15-13 44% 16
9741 EVC 14 National 1626 32-20 62% 14 IL
9742 DaKine 14-National navy 1626 34-32 52% 14 WA
9743 MVVC G 14-White 1626 27-20 57% 14 CA
9744 MVP 12-Gold 1626 25-12 68% 12 SC
9745 CRU MAX 15 1625 17-16 52% 15
9746 EPFury Garcia 14 1625 19-6 76% 14
9747 Pacific Coast Volleyball Club 14-Girls red 1625 6-3 67% 14
9748 Minneota 18 1625 10-2 77% 18
9749 Ark Volley 14-Reg plus- navy 1625 35-15 69% 14
9750 BVA 16-1 1625 9-5 64% 16 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.