Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 194 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9651 SOVC Bruce/Stewart 16-R 1627 4-2 67% 16 OH
9652 SVC 13 Gold 1627 16-8 67% 13 IA
9653 Flight School 17-1 stealth 1627 29-14 66% 17 TX
9654 NYCLBVC 17-Blue elite 1627 31-17 65% 17 NY
9655 FC Elite 15 Adidas 1627 22-12 65% 15 WI
9656 Cleveland Chaos 12U 1627 13-7 65% 12 NC
9657 Heroes 13 Ranger 1627 18-8 64% 13 TX
9658 FLIGHT 15-Select sparks 1627 10-6 63% 15 MI
9659 AVC 15-1 1627 65-39 63% 15 FL
9660 MOD Regional 15-Blue 1627 13-8 62% 15 IL
9661 Heat 15 Flame 1627 26-16 62% 15 WI
9662 UNION 15-Blue 1627 46-30 61% 15 CA
9663 Club Integrity 13-1 1627 31-20 61% 13 PA
9664 Mater Dei Jr Cats 11-Taylor 1627 11-6 61% 11 IN
9665 Vegas United G13-Black 1627 17-11 61% 13 NV
9666 Wizard 16-B 1627 17-11 61% 16 FL
9667 ENVY 12-Black 1627 9-6 60% 12 NE
9668 Endless VBC 15-Navy 1627 9-6 60% 15 TX
9669 MT NW 13-1 jada 1627 23-11 57% 13 MT
9670 Iowa Rockets 11-Black 1627 33-24 56% 11 IA
9671 ACCEL 16-Black beasley 1627 25-16 56% 16 TX
9672 Cowlitz 16-1 black 1627 22-17 56% 16 WA
9673 Rockwood Thunder 15-Black 1627 29-23 55% 15 MO
9674 Girlie Girlie 16-S 1626 4-0 100% 16
9675 Uptime 15-1 1626 10-5 67% 15
9676 Wichita Xpress 14-1 1626 6-1 86% 14
9677 EPFury 14 1626 23-8 68% 14
9678 Manhattan Mayhem 14-P 1626 10-5 67% 14
9679 516 Elite 13-Black 1626 32-25 56% 13 NY
9680 MCV 18-Davis 1626 17-7 71% 18 NC
9681 Blue Royals 13 Pearl 1626 37-23 62% 13 WA
9682 MAVS 816 14-1 1626 5-2 71% 14 KS
9683 Galena Fusion 14 1626 16-7 62% 14 IA
9684 NYC Impact 17-National 1626 5-1 83% 17 NY
9685 OK Charge 14-2 west 1626 18-7 72% 14 OK
9686 Diablo VBC 14-1 1626 6-2 75% 14 CA
9687 Cajun Elite 14 Nyah 1626 22-8 73% 14 LA
9688 SG Elite 17-Roshambo lauryn 1626 22-24 48% 17 CA
9689 H Skyline 13-White 1626 14-11 56% 13 TX
9690 FSJ 15-Elite 1626 28-12 70% 15 AR
9691 SG Elite 13 Excel 1626 25-15 63% 13 CA
9692 Jammers 15-Nyah 1626 35-25 58% 15 HI
9693 LAVA 12-1 a 1626 22-10 69% 12 OH
9694 TX LEGACY 16-Adidas 1626 21-30 41% 16 TX
9695 TIV 12-Black 1626 6-2 75% 12 TX
9696 SOUTHWEST 13-Black 1626 6-0 100% 13 WI
9697 Champion 15-Surry purple 1626 24-10 71% 15 NC
9698 Victoria Juniors 12-1 1626 8-3 73% 12 TX
9699 Actsports 18-Miller 1626 18-10 64% 18 VA
9700 Colorado Elite 13-Grizzly 1626 28-29 49% 13 CO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.