Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 193 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9601 WiseTown VBC 17 1627 8-4 67% 17
9602 Mater Dei Jr Cats 13-Embry 1627 16-7 70% 13 IN
9603 Volitude 15-Black 1627 28-13 68% 15 CA
9604 De Pere Diggers 15-S 1627 12-4 75% 15 WI
9605 CSVC 14-Blue 1627 21-10 68% 14 NC
9606 Epic 14-Adidas 1627 30-20 60% 14 WI
9607 TX LEGACY 14-National 1627 27-14 63% 14 TX
9608 Annapolis 14 Travel 1627 22-14 61% 14 MD
9609 PSVC 14 Lauryn 1627 27-11 71% 14 SC
9610 Northeast 14-Blue 1627 19-13 59% 14 CT
9611 Clarksville VBC 14 Amy 1627 32-19 62% 14 TN
9612 SA Elite 16-1 navy 1627 32-28 53% 16 TX
9613 797 Empire 16 1627 3-1 75% 16 TX
9614 ID ONE 14-Black 1627 8-3 73% 14 ID
9615 1United 14-Elite blue 1627 32-13 67% 14 TX
9616 Blaine 14-1 1627 11-4 73% 14 MN
9617 Illini United 13 1627 13-9 59% 13 IL
9618 Quickset 12-White 1627 25-9 74% 12 PA
9619 SVJ 18-1 1627 6-2 75% 18 VA
9620 Texas One 12-Navy 1627 15-4 60% 12 TX
9621 SPVC 12-Adidas 1627 18-22 45% 12 CA
9622 RVC 16-Relentless 1627 50-24 68% 16 TX
9623 UVA 11-Juan 1627 6-2 75% 11 LA
9624 Lockdown VBC 16-Falcons 1627 24-28 46% 16 MA
9625 Ultra Blues 16 1627 12-4 71% 16 OR
9626 CSNS 16-1 1627 23-11 68% 16 SC
9627 Club Gold 16-Blue 1627 7-7 50% 16 WA
9628 ONE Volleyball Academy 18-2 1627 10-5 67% 18 KS
9629 GRV 16-Black 1627 22-30 42% 16 IN
9630 NBVBC 12-Blue 1627 24-8 75% 12 MI
9631 RCVS 15-1 angela 1627 7-10 41% 15 PR
9632 Kali 14-F emily 1627 4-8 33% 14 PR
9633 TEXAS FIERCE ELITE 17-1 1627 3-4 43% 17 TX
9634 CMASS EDGE 17-Blue 1627 42-32 57% 17 MA
9635 EC Power DE 14-Black 1627 21-29 42% 14 DE
9636 Club Selah U12 Silver 1627 9-3 75% 12 WA
9637 Skylie 11-Black 1627 1-0 100% 11
9638 Prior Lake Sunsetters 12 1627 5-0 100% 12
9639 Six Pack Legit 14-G gray 1627 5-1 83% 14
9640 TOV 16-Navy 1627 6-2 75% 16
9641 HNLV 16-2 1627 25-13 66% 16
9642 PBEVC Xtreme 13-2 1627 22-16 56% 13
9643 Rise 15-Blue 1627 5-0 100% 15 CA
9644 Excel 13-N blue 1627 1-0 100% 13 TX
9645 PILIPA'A NA WAHINE 16-Blue 1627 6-1 86% 16 HI
9646 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 17-4 1627 6-1 86% 17 KS
9647 MAVS KC 17-1 1627 4-1 80% 17 KS
9648 C1VB 12-State blue 1627 18-5 78% 12 SC
9649 Hunter's 12U Red 1627 28-9 76% 12 FL
9650 Elevation elite vbc 16-1 1627 27-8 77% 16 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.