2025-2026 Season — Page 192 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9551 | PEVC 13-N javi | 1628 | 31-23 | 57% | 13 | AL |
| 9552 | MAVS KC 17-1 | 1628 | 4-1 | 80% | 17 | KS |
| 9553 | Metro 12-2 travel | 1628 | 6-2 | 75% | 12 | DC |
| 9554 | Digtown 12-Spring elite | 1628 | 13-4 | 72% | 12 | IL |
| 9555 | WI Flight 14 Slate | 1628 | 11-4 | 73% | 14 | WI |
| 9556 | SLAM 13-Teal | 1628 | 13-3 | 72% | 13 | MN |
| 9557 | NWJRS 14-Slate | 1628 | 5-0 | 100% | 14 | WA |
| 9558 | M2 Volleyball 16-E3 | 1628 | 43-24 | 64% | 16 | GA |
| 9559 | VC Denver 13-Black | 1628 | 34-18 | 65% | 13 | CO |
| 9560 | Inspire Volleyball Club 13-National | 1628 | 27-18 | 57% | 13 | AK |
| 9561 | MOD Volleyball Club 13-Gold south | 1628 | 6-1 | 86% | 13 | IL |
| 9562 | PNW VBC 14-1 black | 1628 | 21-12 | 64% | 14 | OR |
| 9563 | ECVC 12-White | 1628 | 15-5 | 75% | 12 | VA |
| 9564 | Mogollon 15-1 | 1628 | 18-4 | 82% | 15 | AZ |
| 9565 | HUNTERS VBC 17 | 1628 | 8-3 | 73% | 17 | CA |
| 9566 | JET 13-Xtra | 1628 | 4-1 | 67% | 13 | TX |
| 9567 | Champion 16-Z purple | 1628 | 26-10 | 72% | 16 | NC |
| 9568 | Areté 15-Navy ethos | 1628 | 26-26 | 46% | 15 | TX |
| 9569 | WHS NCWVBC 18-2 black | 1628 | 6-4 | 60% | 18 | WA |
| 9570 | Tribe 15-Proffitt | 1628 | 22-8 | 73% | 15 | OH |
| 9571 | Miami Wave 14-Teal | 1628 | 34-12 | 74% | 14 | FL |
| 9572 | SIVA 12-White | 1628 | 15-9 | 60% | 12 | ID |
| 9573 | Wicked Northeast 18-Gold | 1628 | 13-11 | 54% | 18 | ME |
| 9574 | South Central NE 14-White | 1628 | 8-2 | 80% | 14 | NE |
| 9575 | Point Break VBC 15 Loren | 1628 | 25-9 | 74% | 15 | CA |
| 9576 | WVC 12-1 | 1628 | 15-7 | 68% | 12 | MN |
| 9577 | Croix Attack 16-1 | 1628 | 20-8 | 71% | 16 | WI |
| 9578 | RSVBC 18-National | 1628 | 4-2 | 67% | 18 | NV |
| 9579 | RVA Girls 11 | 1628 | 34-15 | 68% | 11 | MD |
| 9580 | 797 Empire 16 | 1628 | 3-1 | 75% | 16 | TX |
| 9581 | Mater Dei Jr Cats 13-Embry | 1628 | 16-7 | 70% | 13 | IN |
| 9582 | LAVA 12-1 a | 1628 | 22-10 | 69% | 12 | OH |
| 9583 | Top Select 15-Top yellow | 1628 | 60-24 | 71% | 15 | FL |
| 9584 | Nawahi 14-1 | 1628 | 6-1 | 86% | 14 | HI |
| 9585 | RVA 15-Grey | 1628 | 5-0 | 100% | 15 | WI |
| 9586 | Wisconsin Blaze 14-Red | 1628 | 30-13 | 70% | 14 | WI |
| 9587 | NHE 12-Blue | 1628 | 2-1 | 67% | 12 | TX |
| 9588 | Vital 16-Paige | 1628 | 7-3 | 70% | 16 | MI |
| 9589 | Club South 18-White | 1628 | 27-19 | 59% | 18 | WA |
| 9590 | JCC JRs 12-S pink | 1628 | 7-3 | 70% | 12 | MN |
| 9591 | MARIN 14-West | 1628 | 42-19 | 69% | 14 | CA |
| 9592 | AP 14-Wilco yellow | 1628 | 24-17 | 59% | 14 | TX |
| 9593 | DCVC 13-National | 1628 | 30-19 | 60% | 13 | IA |
| 9594 | MVVC G 14-White | 1628 | 27-20 | 57% | 14 | CA |
| 9595 | CSV 16-1 | 1628 | 3-4 | 43% | 16 | WA |
| 9596 | Lawrence Landsharks 14-1 | 1628 | 13-6 | 57% | 14 | KS |
| 9597 | Blocksport 17-Nat | 1628 | 9-8 | 45% | 17 | TX |
| 9598 | C1VB 17-One | 1628 | 40-30 | 57% | 17 | SC |
| 9599 | Top Select 14-Top white | 1628 | 55-27 | 67% | 14 | FL |
| 9600 | A5 Volleyball Club 16-North | 1628 | 8-5 | 62% | 16 | GA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.