Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 192 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9551 SWVBC G13-BLUE 1628 22-15 59% 13 WI
9552 South County 18-Blue 1628 33-11 75% 18 RI
9553 DYNASTY 14 Adidas 1628 11-10 52% 14 KS
9554 Attack 12-Select 1628 30-21 59% 12 IL
9555 Galena Invasion 12U 1628 14-5 74% 12 IA
9556 FORZA1 NORTH 16-Nat red 1628 13-7 65% 16 CA
9557 Five Star 17-Black 1628 40-31 56% 17 CA
9558 RockCity 12 A2 1628 14-6 70% 12 OH
9559 CLUB LEGACY 14-Alpha 1628 20-16 56% 14 NE
9560 Amarillo Xtreme 16 AGTG 1628 24-18 57% 16 TX
9561 Avoli 17-F gabriella 1628 8-8 50% 17 PR
9562 Iowa Rockets 12 Gold 1628 15-8 63% 12 IA
9563 OMNI 16-Prime 1628 31-22 58% 16 CA
9564 MIDTN Volleyball 14-Blue 1628 13-6 62% 14 TN
9565 Coastal 15-Elite 1628 33-31 52% 15 FL
9566 Adrenaline 17-Jeff 1628 27-20 57% 17 IA
9567 Eastside 12-S kenney 1628 7-2 78% 12 OH
9568 Katy Stars 17 Elite 1628 34-21 61% 17 TX
9569 West E 18-Purple 1628 16-6 73% 18 PA
9570 Synergy 17-Abbott 1628 17-8 68% 17 PA
9571 Arkansas Elite 12-2 1628 18-10 64% 12 AR
9572 Air VBC 17-Blue 1628 25-13 66% 17 WI
9573 JET 13-Xtra 1628 4-1 67% 13 TX
9574 SMVA 13-1 1628 14-8 61% 13 AL
9575 Wave 17 1628 14-3 74% 17 CA
9576 Tstreet 12-Chandler 1628 24-20 55% 12 CA
9577 Vision 15-Exv blue 1628 31-20 61% 15 CA
9578 Wisconsin Blaze 14-Red 1628 30-13 70% 14 WI
9579 Wolfpack 15-S 1628 15-7 68% 15 MA
9580 COAST 17-3 mia m 1628 30-22 58% 17 CA
9581 Mizuno CNVBC 14-Katieh 1628 17-14 55% 14 MO
9582 CVT Phoenix 16-Gold 1628 7-1 88% 16
9583 Lady Strikers White 14 1628 11-4 73% 14
9584 Volitives 17-Bleues 1628 4-3 57% 17
9585 H. Skyline TW 15-2 1628 4-4 50% 15
9586 FIELDHOUSE VBC 14-Courtney 1628 3-4 43% 14
9587 OCTANE HUSKIES 16 1628 8-3 73% 16 NY
9588 A-10 Gray 18-Girls 1628 29-18 62% 18 PA
9589 Pacific 15 1628 4-4 50% 15 CA
9590 FIGSV 12-1 1628 20-20 50% 12 CA
9591 KOKUA 13-1 1628 13-16 45% 13 WA
9592 Premier 12-Black cynthia 1628 13-16 45% 12 TX
9593 Tribe Doral 14 Elite 1628 29-37 44% 14 FL
9594 EliteVBTC 17-Blue 1628 29-45 39% 17 OH
9595 No Limits 14-Elite 1628 18-32 34% 14 FL
9596 TFVBC 13-1 1627 8-1 89% 13
9597 BAJA 15-White 1627 8-2 80% 15
9598 WWVA 17-1 diamonds 1627 14-16 47% 17
9599 MJVC 14-Black 1627 5-2 50% 14
9600 Barrie Elites 13-1 united 1627 3-2 60% 13
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.