Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 192 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9551 PEVC 13-N javi 1628 31-23 57% 13 AL
9552 MAVS KC 17-1 1628 4-1 80% 17 KS
9553 Metro 12-2 travel 1628 6-2 75% 12 DC
9554 Digtown 12-Spring elite 1628 13-4 72% 12 IL
9555 WI Flight 14 Slate 1628 11-4 73% 14 WI
9556 SLAM 13-Teal 1628 13-3 72% 13 MN
9557 NWJRS 14-Slate 1628 5-0 100% 14 WA
9558 M2 Volleyball 16-E3 1628 43-24 64% 16 GA
9559 VC Denver 13-Black 1628 34-18 65% 13 CO
9560 Inspire Volleyball Club 13-National 1628 27-18 57% 13 AK
9561 MOD Volleyball Club 13-Gold south 1628 6-1 86% 13 IL
9562 PNW VBC 14-1 black 1628 21-12 64% 14 OR
9563 ECVC 12-White 1628 15-5 75% 12 VA
9564 Mogollon 15-1 1628 18-4 82% 15 AZ
9565 HUNTERS VBC 17 1628 8-3 73% 17 CA
9566 JET 13-Xtra 1628 4-1 67% 13 TX
9567 Champion 16-Z purple 1628 26-10 72% 16 NC
9568 Areté 15-Navy ethos 1628 26-26 46% 15 TX
9569 WHS NCWVBC 18-2 black 1628 6-4 60% 18 WA
9570 Tribe 15-Proffitt 1628 22-8 73% 15 OH
9571 Miami Wave 14-Teal 1628 34-12 74% 14 FL
9572 SIVA 12-White 1628 15-9 60% 12 ID
9573 Wicked Northeast 18-Gold 1628 13-11 54% 18 ME
9574 South Central NE 14-White 1628 8-2 80% 14 NE
9575 Point Break VBC 15 Loren 1628 25-9 74% 15 CA
9576 WVC 12-1 1628 15-7 68% 12 MN
9577 Croix Attack 16-1 1628 20-8 71% 16 WI
9578 RSVBC 18-National 1628 4-2 67% 18 NV
9579 RVA Girls 11 1628 34-15 68% 11 MD
9580 797 Empire 16 1628 3-1 75% 16 TX
9581 Mater Dei Jr Cats 13-Embry 1628 16-7 70% 13 IN
9582 LAVA 12-1 a 1628 22-10 69% 12 OH
9583 Top Select 15-Top yellow 1628 60-24 71% 15 FL
9584 Nawahi 14-1 1628 6-1 86% 14 HI
9585 RVA 15-Grey 1628 5-0 100% 15 WI
9586 Wisconsin Blaze 14-Red 1628 30-13 70% 14 WI
9587 NHE 12-Blue 1628 2-1 67% 12 TX
9588 Vital 16-Paige 1628 7-3 70% 16 MI
9589 Club South 18-White 1628 27-19 59% 18 WA
9590 JCC JRs 12-S pink 1628 7-3 70% 12 MN
9591 MARIN 14-West 1628 42-19 69% 14 CA
9592 AP 14-Wilco yellow 1628 24-17 59% 14 TX
9593 DCVC 13-National 1628 30-19 60% 13 IA
9594 MVVC G 14-White 1628 27-20 57% 14 CA
9595 CSV 16-1 1628 3-4 43% 16 WA
9596 Lawrence Landsharks 14-1 1628 13-6 57% 14 KS
9597 Blocksport 17-Nat 1628 9-8 45% 17 TX
9598 C1VB 17-One 1628 40-30 57% 17 SC
9599 Top Select 14-Top white 1628 55-27 67% 14 FL
9600 A5 Volleyball Club 16-North 1628 8-5 62% 16 GA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.