Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 191 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9501 Club 801 16-Regional ryley 1629 26-14 63% 16 UT
9502 FVA 17-Blaze - a 1629 16-13 52% 17 AK
9503 Premier 13-Black cat 1629 25-21 52% 13 TX
9504 417 MoJrs 16-Nat black 1629 18-11 62% 16 MO
9505 MN Select 15-2 1629 36-50 42% 15 MN
9506 OC Lady Elite 17-Black 1629 42-23 65% 17 NY
9507 Mem Metro 14-Elite red 1629 31-20 61% 14 TN
9508 North Point 12-Regional 1629 14-3 74% 12 TX
9509 MAVS 816 12-2 1629 8-3 53% 12 KS
9510 NUF 18-Black 1629 54-24 69% 18 IN
9511 Guns Up VBC 14 Elite 1629 24-17 59% 14 TX
9512 Spa City 14-Aqua 1629 29-25 53% 14 NY
9513 WVBA 17-Molten 1629 48-27 64% 17 WA
9514 Prime 17-1 1629 17-9 65% 17 CA
9515 TriCounty ATTACK 12-Orange 1629 5-3 63% 12 NJ
9516 Rockwood Thunder 11-Black 1629 16-8 59% 11 MO
9517 Mem Metro 12-Elite blk 1629 36-22 62% 12 TN
9518 SUVA 12-1 1629 4-2 67% 12 OH
9519 VooDoo VBKC 17-1 1629 10-5 67% 17 KS
9520 Texas Lightning 12-Black 1629 15-15 50% 12 TX
9521 Headlines VBC 15-Orange 1629 40-20 67% 15 OH
9522 Rockwall Heat 13-Ignite 1629 8-1 89% 13 TX
9523 WENTZVILLE HEAT 18-1 navy 1629 12-3 75% 18 MO
9524 Dubuque Force Dubuque Chaos 15 1629 6-0 100% 15
9525 Shasta Elite 12-S - maila/leila 1629 7-0 100% 12
9526 Centennial CVA 11-1 becker 1629 8-1 89% 11
9527 Santa Fe Storm 12-1 joe 1629 7-1 88% 12
9528 Texas 432 15-Black 1629 5-1 83% 15
9529 GGVC Smoking Guns 13 1629 18-15 55% 13
9530 SCVC 14-1 christopher 1628 18-8 69% 14
9531 JCC JRs 12-S pink 1628 7-3 70% 12
9532 Southwest Smoke 18-1 1628 11-0 100% 18
9533 Eliz. VB 15-1 1628 12-5 71% 15
9534 White Cloud Volleyball Club 11 1628 8-4 67% 11
9535 ICE 14-Premier 1628 20-16 56% 14
9536 EP Ohana 12 1628 28-19 57% 12
9537 AP 16 Neon 1628 30-14 68% 16 TX
9538 NPJ Seattle 18-National 1628 28-33 44% 18 WA
9539 PIRATAS ADN 10-1 1628 9-12 43% 10 PR
9540 Power 13-Purple 1628 28-15 62% 13 TX
9541 Rancho 17-Gold 1628 25-17 60% 17 CA
9542 Matrix 15-Olivia 2026 1628 18-8 69% 15 CA
9543 Brownsburg 12-U 1628 6-2 75% 12 IN
9544 CPVBC 18-Blue 1628 26-15 63% 18 PA
9545 SEVA 13 Crimson 1628 25-11 69% 13 TN
9546 Impulse 15-Red 1628 27-12 69% 15 IL
9547 Xcel VB 15-2 national 1628 27-11 69% 15 TX
9548 EVA 15 Navy 1628 27-11 71% 15 AR
9549 Team Mascoutah VBC 11 1628 20-7 71% 11 IL
9550 MVA 15-National 1628 47-23 67% 15 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.