2025-2026 Season — Page 191 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9501 | Club 801 16-Regional ryley | 1629 | 26-14 | 63% | 16 | UT |
| 9502 | FVA 17-Blaze - a | 1629 | 16-13 | 52% | 17 | AK |
| 9503 | Premier 13-Black cat | 1629 | 25-21 | 52% | 13 | TX |
| 9504 | 417 MoJrs 16-Nat black | 1629 | 18-11 | 62% | 16 | MO |
| 9505 | MN Select 15-2 | 1629 | 36-50 | 42% | 15 | MN |
| 9506 | OC Lady Elite 17-Black | 1629 | 42-23 | 65% | 17 | NY |
| 9507 | Mem Metro 14-Elite red | 1629 | 31-20 | 61% | 14 | TN |
| 9508 | North Point 12-Regional | 1629 | 14-3 | 74% | 12 | TX |
| 9509 | MAVS 816 12-2 | 1629 | 8-3 | 53% | 12 | KS |
| 9510 | NUF 18-Black | 1629 | 54-24 | 69% | 18 | IN |
| 9511 | Guns Up VBC 14 Elite | 1629 | 24-17 | 59% | 14 | TX |
| 9512 | Spa City 14-Aqua | 1629 | 29-25 | 53% | 14 | NY |
| 9513 | WVBA 17-Molten | 1629 | 48-27 | 64% | 17 | WA |
| 9514 | Prime 17-1 | 1629 | 17-9 | 65% | 17 | CA |
| 9515 | TriCounty ATTACK 12-Orange | 1629 | 5-3 | 63% | 12 | NJ |
| 9516 | Rockwood Thunder 11-Black | 1629 | 16-8 | 59% | 11 | MO |
| 9517 | Mem Metro 12-Elite blk | 1629 | 36-22 | 62% | 12 | TN |
| 9518 | SUVA 12-1 | 1629 | 4-2 | 67% | 12 | OH |
| 9519 | VooDoo VBKC 17-1 | 1629 | 10-5 | 67% | 17 | KS |
| 9520 | Texas Lightning 12-Black | 1629 | 15-15 | 50% | 12 | TX |
| 9521 | Headlines VBC 15-Orange | 1629 | 40-20 | 67% | 15 | OH |
| 9522 | Rockwall Heat 13-Ignite | 1629 | 8-1 | 89% | 13 | TX |
| 9523 | WENTZVILLE HEAT 18-1 navy | 1629 | 12-3 | 75% | 18 | MO |
| 9524 | Dubuque Force Dubuque Chaos 15 | 1629 | 6-0 | 100% | 15 | |
| 9525 | Shasta Elite 12-S - maila/leila | 1629 | 7-0 | 100% | 12 | |
| 9526 | Centennial CVA 11-1 becker | 1629 | 8-1 | 89% | 11 | |
| 9527 | Santa Fe Storm 12-1 joe | 1629 | 7-1 | 88% | 12 | |
| 9528 | Texas 432 15-Black | 1629 | 5-1 | 83% | 15 | |
| 9529 | GGVC Smoking Guns 13 | 1629 | 18-15 | 55% | 13 | |
| 9530 | SCVC 14-1 christopher | 1628 | 18-8 | 69% | 14 | |
| 9531 | JCC JRs 12-S pink | 1628 | 7-3 | 70% | 12 | |
| 9532 | Southwest Smoke 18-1 | 1628 | 11-0 | 100% | 18 | |
| 9533 | Eliz. VB 15-1 | 1628 | 12-5 | 71% | 15 | |
| 9534 | White Cloud Volleyball Club 11 | 1628 | 8-4 | 67% | 11 | |
| 9535 | ICE 14-Premier | 1628 | 20-16 | 56% | 14 | |
| 9536 | EP Ohana 12 | 1628 | 28-19 | 57% | 12 | |
| 9537 | AP 16 Neon | 1628 | 30-14 | 68% | 16 | TX |
| 9538 | NPJ Seattle 18-National | 1628 | 28-33 | 44% | 18 | WA |
| 9539 | PIRATAS ADN 10-1 | 1628 | 9-12 | 43% | 10 | PR |
| 9540 | Power 13-Purple | 1628 | 28-15 | 62% | 13 | TX |
| 9541 | Rancho 17-Gold | 1628 | 25-17 | 60% | 17 | CA |
| 9542 | Matrix 15-Olivia 2026 | 1628 | 18-8 | 69% | 15 | CA |
| 9543 | Brownsburg 12-U | 1628 | 6-2 | 75% | 12 | IN |
| 9544 | CPVBC 18-Blue | 1628 | 26-15 | 63% | 18 | PA |
| 9545 | SEVA 13 Crimson | 1628 | 25-11 | 69% | 13 | TN |
| 9546 | Impulse 15-Red | 1628 | 27-12 | 69% | 15 | IL |
| 9547 | Xcel VB 15-2 national | 1628 | 27-11 | 69% | 15 | TX |
| 9548 | EVA 15 Navy | 1628 | 27-11 | 71% | 15 | AR |
| 9549 | Team Mascoutah VBC 11 | 1628 | 20-7 | 71% | 11 | IL |
| 9550 | MVA 15-National | 1628 | 47-23 | 67% | 15 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.