Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 190 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9451 Crushers 18 BOOM 1630 19-10 66% 18 OR
9452 Big City M 14-Elite 1630 25-13 66% 14 NY
9453 C2 Sports 15 Crown 1630 42-22 66% 15 TN
9454 CWAVE Basilisco 13 1630 22-12 65% 13 OH
9455 TAV Houston 11-Royal 1630 15-6 65% 11 TX
9456 The RIDGE 10-1 blue 1630 9-3 64% 10 AR
9457 St. Pete 13 Teal 1630 43-25 63% 13 FL
9458 VEVA Brave 16-Blue 1630 33-21 61% 16 PA
9459 Five Starz 18-Black dana 1630 21-18 54% 18 CA
9460 Sunset West 15-Storm 1629 4-0 100% 15
9461 Titanium 16 Navy 1629 18-7 62% 16
9462 South Central NE 14-White 1629 8-2 80% 14
9463 Prince George Youth Volleyball Club 14-Aaa girls kodiaks red 1629 7-2 78% 14
9464 WE 18-1 1629 4-4 50% 18
9465 Chadron Elite 16 1629 8-7 53% 16
9466 Central Oregon COVC 17-National 1629 6-1 86% 17 OR
9467 TX Ultimate 11-Blue 1629 8-2 80% 11 TX
9468 AVA 15-Premier 1 1629 18-13 58% 15 NY
9469 CVC 17 1629 25-11 69% 17
9470 OK Charge 12-1 stillwater 1629 15-7 63% 12 OK
9471 Local Girl 14-S 1629 25-15 63% 14 SC
9472 High Line 14-Aspiring pnk 1629 35-13 69% 14 PA
9473 Sky High Adidas 14-Red 1629 27-23 54% 14 IL
9474 TEV 18-Dale/lora 1629 31-22 58% 18 TN
9475 FIVA 14-S 1629 4-1 80% 14 FL
9476 MDC Volley 14-National 1629 25-12 64% 14 OR
9477 PAEVA 14-Maroon 1629 32-16 67% 14 CA
9478 Top Select 14-Top white 1629 55-27 67% 14 FL
9479 Whirlwind VBC 14-1 1629 15-6 71% 14 NY
9480 CCJRS 14 National 1629 14-8 64% 14 AL
9481 GRV 15-Black 1629 26-30 46% 15 IN
9482 SPVA 13-1 1629 15-4 79% 13 MN
9483 METRO Elite 16-Black 1629 24-11 69% 16 SC
9484 KW Revolution 13-Elite 1629 23-15 61% 13 TX
9485 Vantage 13-Blue smack 1629 10-5 67% 13 WV
9486 TAV South 18 Royal 1629 21-26 45% 18 TX
9487 NKYVC 14-4 thunder 1629 24-16 60% 14 KY
9488 Iowa Rockets 17-1 1629 35-23 59% 17 IA
9489 Iowa Select 16-Black 1629 22-18 52% 16 IA
9490 TeamLVC 15-Pink 1629 34-15 69% 15 NY
9491 Madtown 10-1 select 1629 14-4 74% 10 WI
9492 Mililani 18-S 1629 21-11 66% 18 HI
9493 Chi City Elite 14-1 1629 25-35 42% 14 IL
9494 Impact VC 11-1 1629 17-7 71% 11 TX
9495 SLAM 13-Teal 1629 13-3 72% 13 MA
9496 RVA 15-Grey 1629 5-0 100% 15 WI
9497 TAMPA UNITED VBA 18-Black 1629 20-24 45% 18 FL
9498 FaR Out 15 Silver 1629 27-12 69% 15 MI
9499 City 17-Blue 1629 33-17 66% 17 CA
9500 NKYVC 16-3.2 typhoon 1629 33-32 51% 16 KY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.