2025-2026 Season — Page 190 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9451 | Crushers 18 BOOM | 1630 | 19-10 | 66% | 18 | OR |
| 9452 | Big City M 14-Elite | 1630 | 25-13 | 66% | 14 | NY |
| 9453 | C2 Sports 15 Crown | 1630 | 42-22 | 66% | 15 | TN |
| 9454 | CWAVE Basilisco 13 | 1630 | 22-12 | 65% | 13 | OH |
| 9455 | TAV Houston 11-Royal | 1630 | 15-6 | 65% | 11 | TX |
| 9456 | The RIDGE 10-1 blue | 1630 | 9-3 | 64% | 10 | AR |
| 9457 | St. Pete 13 Teal | 1630 | 43-25 | 63% | 13 | FL |
| 9458 | VEVA Brave 16-Blue | 1630 | 33-21 | 61% | 16 | PA |
| 9459 | Five Starz 18-Black dana | 1630 | 21-18 | 54% | 18 | CA |
| 9460 | Sunset West 15-Storm | 1629 | 4-0 | 100% | 15 | |
| 9461 | Titanium 16 Navy | 1629 | 18-7 | 62% | 16 | |
| 9462 | South Central NE 14-White | 1629 | 8-2 | 80% | 14 | |
| 9463 | Prince George Youth Volleyball Club 14-Aaa girls kodiaks red | 1629 | 7-2 | 78% | 14 | |
| 9464 | WE 18-1 | 1629 | 4-4 | 50% | 18 | |
| 9465 | Chadron Elite 16 | 1629 | 8-7 | 53% | 16 | |
| 9466 | Central Oregon COVC 17-National | 1629 | 6-1 | 86% | 17 | OR |
| 9467 | TX Ultimate 11-Blue | 1629 | 8-2 | 80% | 11 | TX |
| 9468 | AVA 15-Premier 1 | 1629 | 18-13 | 58% | 15 | NY |
| 9469 | CVC 17 | 1629 | 25-11 | 69% | 17 | |
| 9470 | OK Charge 12-1 stillwater | 1629 | 15-7 | 63% | 12 | OK |
| 9471 | Local Girl 14-S | 1629 | 25-15 | 63% | 14 | SC |
| 9472 | High Line 14-Aspiring pnk | 1629 | 35-13 | 69% | 14 | PA |
| 9473 | Sky High Adidas 14-Red | 1629 | 27-23 | 54% | 14 | IL |
| 9474 | TEV 18-Dale/lora | 1629 | 31-22 | 58% | 18 | TN |
| 9475 | FIVA 14-S | 1629 | 4-1 | 80% | 14 | FL |
| 9476 | MDC Volley 14-National | 1629 | 25-12 | 64% | 14 | OR |
| 9477 | PAEVA 14-Maroon | 1629 | 32-16 | 67% | 14 | CA |
| 9478 | Top Select 14-Top white | 1629 | 55-27 | 67% | 14 | FL |
| 9479 | Whirlwind VBC 14-1 | 1629 | 15-6 | 71% | 14 | NY |
| 9480 | CCJRS 14 National | 1629 | 14-8 | 64% | 14 | AL |
| 9481 | GRV 15-Black | 1629 | 26-30 | 46% | 15 | IN |
| 9482 | SPVA 13-1 | 1629 | 15-4 | 79% | 13 | MN |
| 9483 | METRO Elite 16-Black | 1629 | 24-11 | 69% | 16 | SC |
| 9484 | KW Revolution 13-Elite | 1629 | 23-15 | 61% | 13 | TX |
| 9485 | Vantage 13-Blue smack | 1629 | 10-5 | 67% | 13 | WV |
| 9486 | TAV South 18 Royal | 1629 | 21-26 | 45% | 18 | TX |
| 9487 | NKYVC 14-4 thunder | 1629 | 24-16 | 60% | 14 | KY |
| 9488 | Iowa Rockets 17-1 | 1629 | 35-23 | 59% | 17 | IA |
| 9489 | Iowa Select 16-Black | 1629 | 22-18 | 52% | 16 | IA |
| 9490 | TeamLVC 15-Pink | 1629 | 34-15 | 69% | 15 | NY |
| 9491 | Madtown 10-1 select | 1629 | 14-4 | 74% | 10 | WI |
| 9492 | Mililani 18-S | 1629 | 21-11 | 66% | 18 | HI |
| 9493 | Chi City Elite 14-1 | 1629 | 25-35 | 42% | 14 | IL |
| 9494 | Impact VC 11-1 | 1629 | 17-7 | 71% | 11 | TX |
| 9495 | SLAM 13-Teal | 1629 | 13-3 | 72% | 13 | MA |
| 9496 | RVA 15-Grey | 1629 | 5-0 | 100% | 15 | WI |
| 9497 | TAMPA UNITED VBA 18-Black | 1629 | 20-24 | 45% | 18 | FL |
| 9498 | FaR Out 15 Silver | 1629 | 27-12 | 69% | 15 | MI |
| 9499 | City 17-Blue | 1629 | 33-17 | 66% | 17 | CA |
| 9500 | NKYVC 16-3.2 typhoon | 1629 | 33-32 | 51% | 16 | KY |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.