Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 190 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9451 KC Power 12-2 1630 22-12 56% 12 KS
9452 Spartan Club 14 1630 8-1 89% 14 ID
9453 DYS 15-Thunder 1630 30-16 65% 15 VA
9454 New Boston VBC 14 New Boston14-GD 1630 6-0 100% 14 MI
9455 NKJV 17-Blue 1630 23-25 48% 17 KY
9456 LOSO 18-1 abby 1630 5-1 83% 18 OH
9457 Infinity 13-Green 1630 17-6 74% 13 OH
9458 WWVA 17-1 diamonds 1630 14-16 47% 17 NE
9459 Heroes 13 Ranger 1630 18-8 64% 13 TX
9460 SUVA 12-1 1630 4-2 67% 12 OH
9461 One Ohana 16 Adidas 1630 28-20 58% 16 WA
9462 MVC 12-Jocilyn 1630 6-8 33% 12 UT
9463 Tropical Touch 18-Teine samoa moni 1630 33-14 70% 18 CA
9464 VC United 16-1 premier 1630 24-12 67% 16 IL
9465 ARVC 16-White adidas 1630 33-16 67% 16 NM
9466 EliteVBTC 12-Black 1630 28-20 58% 12 OH
9467 APV 16-1 1630 4-3 57% 16 TX
9468 UEPA 18-G 1630 14-18 42% 18 TX
9469 MN Select 14-3 1630 38-32 54% 14 MN
9470 WGVC 16-Elite blue 1630 6-3 67% 16 FL
9471 Pacific 15 1630 4-4 50% 15 WA
9472 CVBC 13-2s 1630 18-9 67% 13 IN
9473 Infinity 15-Green 1630 32-29 52% 15 OH
9474 The RIDGE 10-1 blue 1630 9-3 64% 10 AR
9475 NE D-League 11-White 1630 4-0 80% 11 IA
9476 TAV Houston 11-Royal 1630 15-6 65% 11 TX
9477 Storm 12-Elite 1630 27-14 63% 12 CO
9478 Western Mass 15-Nila 1630 44-17 69% 15 MA
9479 Team Mascoutah VBC 11 1630 20-7 71% 11 MO
9480 CCVA 12-Power 1630 4-1 80% 12 CA
9481 Arsenal 18 Gold 1630 20-19 50% 18 TX
9482 TKVBC 14-Ranger elite 1630 47-27 64% 14 GA
9483 No Limits 14-Elite 1630 18-32 34% 14 TX
9484 LAWAKUA 10 1630 5-1 83% 10 HI
9485 CHOBEE 12 1630 20-6 77% 12 FL
9486 Texas United 16-Red 1630 41-25 62% 16 TX
9487 United 14-Black 1630 19-16 54% 14 AL
9488 City 17-Blue 1630 33-17 66% 17 CA
9489 WAVE 15 TSUNAMI 1630 43-29 60% 15 KY
9490 Warren Sixpack 16-Red 1630 22-23 49% 16 NJ
9491 Arch City 18 1630 11-3 79% 18 MO
9492 JAG VBC 12-1 national 1630 30-20 60% 12 WI
9493 Waco Lightning 11-Black 1630 12-6 63% 11 TX
9494 UEPA 14-Gold 1630 2-5 20% 14 TX
9495 SA Magic 16-Elite 1630 20-23 45% 16 TX
9496 Club 801 16-Regional ryley 1630 26-14 63% 16 UT
9497 BAJA 15-White 1630 8-2 80% 15 MX
9498 CAVC 17 Elite 1630 37-29 56% 17 VA
9499 Atomic! 16-Yack 1629 4-0 80% 16 MI
9500 Elite 18-National 1629 20-17 53% 18 MO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.