Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 189 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9401 High Tide 16-Elite 1630 24-31 44% 16 FL
9402 Mass Pats 14-1 hustle 1630 26-11 67% 14 MA
9403 WF Waves 16-Chad 1630 27-26 51% 16 FL
9404 UEPA 14-Gold 1630 2-5 20% 14 TX
9405 United 14-Black 1630 19-16 54% 14 AL
9406 TC ELITE 13-B 1630 8-4 57% 13 LA
9407 CGSV 14-Jarrett 1630 15-7 68% 14 OH
9408 Momentum 10-Black 1630 13-5 72% 10 FL
9409 Left Coast 15-1 1630 22-19 54% 15 CA
9410 MVP 60450 13U Black 1630 28-8 78% 13 IL
9411 NorthShore 14-Puffer fish 1630 35-10 78% 14 MI
9412 Carolina ICE 15-1 1630 8-7 53% 15 SC
9413 Southwest 18-N katie 1630 22-31 42% 18 OH
9414 Annapolis 17 Travel 1630 15-14 45% 17 MD
9415 RAGE 14-Jerry 1630 26-11 70% 14 CA
9416 DINAMITE 14-1 1630 6-2 75% 14 CA
9417 RSVBC 18-National 1630 4-2 67% 18 WA
9418 SAVBC 15-1 1630 16-19 46% 15 CA
9419 Lena Legends 15U 1630 16-7 70% 15 IL
9420 NE D-League 11-White 1630 4-0 80% 11 NE
9421 Silverton Bearcats 14-2 1630 19-8 70% 14 OR
9422 TX Impact 11-Navy 1630 4-0 100% 11 TX
9423 FW Fire 18-Purple 1630 20-11 63% 18 TX
9424 Atomic! 16-Yack 1630 4-0 80% 16 MI
9425 Legacy 12-Elite east 1630 34-14 71% 12 MI
9426 WGVC 16-2 elite blue 1630 5-1 83% 16 FL
9427 NE Shock 17-1 1630 22-11 67% 17 CT
9428 Red Rock 16-Christian - redwood city 1630 20-32 38% 16 CA
9429 KC Power 12-2 1630 22-12 56% 12 KS
9430 ATOMIC 12-Smack national 1630 5-3 63% 12 MI
9431 Infinity 13-Green 1630 17-6 74% 13 OH
9432 Athlete HQ 16-Plasencio 1630 32-14 70% 16 OH
9433 Train4F 17-1 1630 39-16 71% 17 OH
9434 NKYVC 13-4 thunder 1630 22-11 67% 13 KY
9435 Rollers 12-Silver 1630 26-8 68% 12 TX
9436 Ho'omau 14-Ipo 1630 34-15 69% 14 HI
9437 knights 13 1630 8-3 73% 13 NY
9438 Club V CV 16-Kaylie 1630 4-4 50% 16 UT
9439 Miami Wave 14-Teal 1630 34-12 74% 14 FL
9440 DYS 14-Thunder 1630 32-13 71% 14 VA
9441 Northern Summit Volleyball Club 15 1630 7-2 78% 15
9442 AV Coach Kristal/Coach Vanessa 17 1630 6-2 75% 17
9443 MAKO 16 1630 17-6 74% 16
9444 Hoosier Hysteria 13-1 1630 6-3 67% 13
9445 CSV 16-1 1630 3-4 43% 16
9446 NSSC 13-White 1630 14-5 74% 13 MO
9447 Performance Juniors 15-1 1630 38-14 73% 15 VA
9448 Performance Juniors 13-1 1630 49-18 73% 13 VA
9449 Five Star 13-Black 1630 38-19 67% 13 CA
9450 Austin Skyline 15 Molten 1630 33-17 66% 15 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.