Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 188 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9351 Tstreet 18-Chris 1632 21-30 41% 18 CA
9352 Mass Pats 14-1 hustle 1632 26-11 67% 14 MA
9353 Boise Ignite 18-Natl 1632 5-2 71% 18 ID
9354 MAVS KC 14-2 1632 3-2 43% 14 KS
9355 adidas DYNASTY 15-3 1632 6-1 75% 15 KS
9356 LAV 12-Regional white 1632 30-13 70% 12 AL
9357 GRV 15-Black 1632 26-30 46% 15 IN
9358 NorthShore 11 Schlotterer 1632 7-3 70% 11 OH
9359 BCS Skyline H 12 Molten 1632 10-4 63% 12 TX
9360 HEAT 15-Black 1632 21-11 64% 15 TX
9361 Plumas Volleyball 18 Plumas Volleyball Club 1631 9-5 64% 18
9362 Storm 18-Nationals 1631 16-9 64% 18
9363 EliteVBTC 17-Blue 1631 29-45 39% 17 OH
9364 Premier Nebraska 17-Red 1631 14-13 52% 17 NE
9365 TX432 17-1 1631 3-4 43% 17 NV
9366 Austin Skyline 16-B kilee 1631 20-27 43% 16 TX
9367 MVP 60450 13U Black 1631 28-8 78% 13 IL
9368 Rockwood Thunder 11-Black 1631 16-8 59% 11 MO
9369 City Beach 13-Black 1631 42-22 66% 13 CA
9370 Crush 14-S 1631 18-11 62% 14 CA
9371 Club Integrity 13-1 1631 31-20 61% 13 PA
9372 C2 Sports 15 Crown 1631 42-22 66% 15 TN
9373 LANCERS SCARLET 13 1631 4-0 80% 13 IA
9374 Synergy 15 Flare 1631 25-39 39% 15 PA
9375 Coastal 15-Elite 1631 33-31 52% 15 FL
9376 RCVS 15-1 angela 1631 7-10 41% 15 PR
9377 Attack 15-Smack 1631 19-12 59% 15 IA
9378 VC United 13-1 premier 1631 15-6 71% 13 IL
9379 Cloud Peak 15 Elite 1631 30-16 65% 15 WY
9380 CGSV 13-Bates 1631 9-5 64% 13 OH
9381 Xcel VB 15-2 national 1631 27-11 69% 15 TX
9382 CCJ 14-1 jeo 1631 20-11 65% 14 OR
9383 FaR Out 15 Silver 1631 27-12 69% 15 MI
9384 OPVC 15-Marquardt 1631 26-17 60% 15 OH
9385 CVC 17 1631 25-11 69% 17 NY
9386 Watertown JO 17 1631 9-4 69% 17 MN
9387 Crossroads 14U Blue 1631 18-11 62% 14 TX
9388 Mauloa 12 1631 15-4 75% 12 HI
9389 AZ Sky 14-N1 1631 36-28 56% 14 AZ
9390 DaKine 14-National navy 1631 34-32 52% 14 WA
9391 All In 12 Local 1631 39-16 65% 12 AL
9392 GSI 13-Green 1631 7-5 58% 13 FL
9393 6UP Revolution 15-1 1631 2-3 40% 15 MI
9394 North Point 12-Regional 1631 14-3 74% 12 TX
9395 MOCO Volleyball Club LLC 13 MOCO (MD) Motion 1631 7-7 50% 13 MD
9396 ENCORE 17-Navy 1631 7-8 47% 17 CA
9397 EP STRiVE VBC 12-S black 1631 26-16 60% 12 TX
9398 Flight 18-Black 1631 19-17 53% 18 MI
9399 Impact VC 11-1 1631 17-7 71% 11 TX
9400 CCV 14-1 1631 20-16 56% 14 MN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.