2025-2026 Season — Page 188 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9351 | Rise 13 Mau | 1631 | 12-6 | 67% | 13 | CA |
| 9352 | PowerPlex 15-Mueller | 1631 | 28-22 | 55% | 15 | IA |
| 9353 | Black Hills Juniors 15-Green | 1631 | 5-4 | 56% | 15 | SD |
| 9354 | Miami Hype 11-Prep | 1631 | 32-13 | 71% | 11 | FL |
| 9355 | MemphisVBAcademy 13-Pink | 1631 | 36-17 | 68% | 13 | MS |
| 9356 | SVBC 12-Teal | 1631 | 7-3 | 70% | 12 | IA |
| 9357 | SC Legends 16-Gold | 1631 | 26-11 | 70% | 16 | CA |
| 9358 | Croix Attack 16-1 | 1631 | 20-8 | 71% | 16 | WI |
| 9359 | NORCO 11-Blue | 1631 | 17-4 | 81% | 11 | CO |
| 9360 | ATOWN 17-1b | 1631 | 35-15 | 69% | 17 | SC |
| 9361 | OCVC 11-Slunks | 1631 | 20-14 | 59% | 11 | KY |
| 9362 | SAVBC 14 | 1631 | 7-2 | 78% | 14 | CA |
| 9363 | Husky 17-Northeast black | 1631 | 36-17 | 68% | 17 | CT |
| 9364 | EliteVBTC 12-Black | 1631 | 28-20 | 58% | 12 | OH |
| 9365 | NorthShore 18 Wood | 1631 | 32-9 | 78% | 18 | OH |
| 9366 | SADDLEBACK 16-Jake | 1631 | 36-26 | 58% | 16 | CA |
| 9367 | FORZA1 NORTH 17-National red | 1631 | 22-13 | 63% | 17 | CA |
| 9368 | ECVC 12-White | 1631 | 15-5 | 75% | 12 | VA |
| 9369 | Sidewinder 16-2 | 1631 | 25-6 | 81% | 16 | AZ |
| 9370 | Vibe 15-Riot | 1631 | 29-22 | 57% | 15 | CA |
| 9371 | L2 16-3 | 1631 | 44-21 | 68% | 16 | MI |
| 9372 | Putnam 18 Ashland | 1631 | 20-10 | 67% | 18 | WV |
| 9373 | LANCERS SCARLET 13 | 1631 | 4-0 | 80% | 13 | |
| 9374 | Austin Velocity 16-3 sapphire | 1631 | 6-2 | 75% | 16 | |
| 9375 | RVC Legacy 18 | 1631 | 55-19 | 73% | 18 | |
| 9376 | TIGERS 13 | 1631 | 32-16 | 67% | 13 | |
| 9377 | Rallycats 11 | 1631 | 3-0 | 60% | 11 | |
| 9378 | CVIBE 15-1-billy | 1631 | 9-7 | 56% | 15 | |
| 9379 | NLVA 14-Adam | 1631 | 18-12 | 60% | 14 | CA |
| 9380 | Tyrants Girls 14-Black | 1631 | 7-7 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 9381 | Mogollon 15-1 | 1631 | 18-4 | 82% | 15 | AZ |
| 9382 | Point Break VBC 15 Loren | 1631 | 25-9 | 74% | 15 | CA |
| 9383 | Apex 12-1 girls | 1631 | 26-13 | 67% | 12 | SC |
| 9384 | Storm 12-Elite | 1631 | 27-14 | 63% | 12 | CO |
| 9385 | Victorium 12-Ua | 1631 | 31-21 | 60% | 12 | AZ |
| 9386 | ITVC 16-Margaret (NC) | 1631 | 26-20 | 57% | 16 | CA |
| 9387 | LAVBC 13-BLACK | 1631 | 28-22 | 56% | 13 | CA |
| 9388 | FCVBC 18-Black | 1630 | 20-5 | 80% | 18 | |
| 9389 | SCVC 14-2 kloey | 1630 | 14-7 | 67% | 14 | |
| 9390 | 6UP Revolution 15-1 | 1630 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | |
| 9391 | FC Flames 14-S | 1630 | 4-0 | 100% | 14 | |
| 9392 | MJ 14-Orange | 1630 | 19-16 | 48% | 14 | |
| 9393 | Electric Volleyball 17-1 | 1630 | 6-2 | 75% | 17 | |
| 9394 | Stars 16-Blue | 1630 | 9-4 | 56% | 16 | |
| 9395 | WGVC 16-Elite blue | 1630 | 6-3 | 67% | 16 | FL |
| 9396 | MVI 18-Cass | 1630 | 11-0 | 100% | 18 | CA |
| 9397 | FCA Force 14 | 1630 | 17-9 | 65% | 14 | KY |
| 9398 | PNW VBC 14-1 black | 1630 | 21-12 | 64% | 14 | WA |
| 9399 | Buckeyefire 14-1 | 1630 | 34-19 | 64% | 14 | OH |
| 9400 | Crush 14-S | 1630 | 18-11 | 62% | 14 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.