Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 188 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9351 Rise 13 Mau 1631 12-6 67% 13 CA
9352 PowerPlex 15-Mueller 1631 28-22 55% 15 IA
9353 Black Hills Juniors 15-Green 1631 5-4 56% 15 SD
9354 Miami Hype 11-Prep 1631 32-13 71% 11 FL
9355 MemphisVBAcademy 13-Pink 1631 36-17 68% 13 MS
9356 SVBC 12-Teal 1631 7-3 70% 12 IA
9357 SC Legends 16-Gold 1631 26-11 70% 16 CA
9358 Croix Attack 16-1 1631 20-8 71% 16 WI
9359 NORCO 11-Blue 1631 17-4 81% 11 CO
9360 ATOWN 17-1b 1631 35-15 69% 17 SC
9361 OCVC 11-Slunks 1631 20-14 59% 11 KY
9362 SAVBC 14 1631 7-2 78% 14 CA
9363 Husky 17-Northeast black 1631 36-17 68% 17 CT
9364 EliteVBTC 12-Black 1631 28-20 58% 12 OH
9365 NorthShore 18 Wood 1631 32-9 78% 18 OH
9366 SADDLEBACK 16-Jake 1631 36-26 58% 16 CA
9367 FORZA1 NORTH 17-National red 1631 22-13 63% 17 CA
9368 ECVC 12-White 1631 15-5 75% 12 VA
9369 Sidewinder 16-2 1631 25-6 81% 16 AZ
9370 Vibe 15-Riot 1631 29-22 57% 15 CA
9371 L2 16-3 1631 44-21 68% 16 MI
9372 Putnam 18 Ashland 1631 20-10 67% 18 WV
9373 LANCERS SCARLET 13 1631 4-0 80% 13
9374 Austin Velocity 16-3 sapphire 1631 6-2 75% 16
9375 RVC Legacy 18 1631 55-19 73% 18
9376 TIGERS 13 1631 32-16 67% 13
9377 Rallycats 11 1631 3-0 60% 11
9378 CVIBE 15-1-billy 1631 9-7 56% 15
9379 NLVA 14-Adam 1631 18-12 60% 14 CA
9380 Tyrants Girls 14-Black 1631 7-7 50% 14 CA
9381 Mogollon 15-1 1631 18-4 82% 15 AZ
9382 Point Break VBC 15 Loren 1631 25-9 74% 15 CA
9383 Apex 12-1 girls 1631 26-13 67% 12 SC
9384 Storm 12-Elite 1631 27-14 63% 12 CO
9385 Victorium 12-Ua 1631 31-21 60% 12 AZ
9386 ITVC 16-Margaret (NC) 1631 26-20 57% 16 CA
9387 LAVBC 13-BLACK 1631 28-22 56% 13 CA
9388 FCVBC 18-Black 1630 20-5 80% 18
9389 SCVC 14-2 kloey 1630 14-7 67% 14
9390 6UP Revolution 15-1 1630 2-3 40% 15
9391 FC Flames 14-S 1630 4-0 100% 14
9392 MJ 14-Orange 1630 19-16 48% 14
9393 Electric Volleyball 17-1 1630 6-2 75% 17
9394 Stars 16-Blue 1630 9-4 56% 16
9395 WGVC 16-Elite blue 1630 6-3 67% 16 FL
9396 MVI 18-Cass 1630 11-0 100% 18 CA
9397 FCA Force 14 1630 17-9 65% 14 KY
9398 PNW VBC 14-1 black 1630 21-12 64% 14 WA
9399 Buckeyefire 14-1 1630 34-19 64% 14 OH
9400 Crush 14-S 1630 18-11 62% 14 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.