2025-2026 Season — Page 187 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9301 | Epic United 14-National | 1632 | 27-16 | 63% | 14 | IL |
| 9302 | WiseTown VBC 17 | 1632 | 8-4 | 67% | 17 | PA |
| 9303 | NorCal 18-2 blue | 1632 | 43-27 | 61% | 18 | CA |
| 9304 | Renaissance 15-Black | 1632 | 43-34 | 56% | 15 | OH |
| 9305 | NPJ Seattle 15-Premier | 1632 | 49-28 | 64% | 15 | WA |
| 9306 | Elevate Athletics 15-Nike | 1632 | 10-10 | 50% | 15 | UT |
| 9307 | STL Crossfire 15 SR3 | 1632 | 29-13 | 69% | 15 | MO |
| 9308 | PREVA 15-Yare | 1632 | 7-3 | 70% | 15 | PR |
| 9309 | FC Flames 14-S | 1632 | 4-0 | 100% | 14 | CO |
| 9310 | Allegiance 16-Royal | 1632 | 36-18 | 67% | 16 | TX |
| 9311 | NPJ Portland 14-Orange | 1632 | 39-18 | 68% | 14 | OR |
| 9312 | MAVS KC 15-2 | 1632 | 5-2 | 71% | 15 | KS |
| 9313 | Cincy Crush 16-2 | 1632 | 27-12 | 69% | 16 | OH |
| 9314 | Ks Networks Volleyball Club 17-4 | 1632 | 6-1 | 86% | 17 | KS |
| 9315 | Rise 17-1 | 1632 | 23-18 | 56% | 17 | OH |
| 9316 | Venetian Bay 17 | 1632 | 5-3 | 63% | 17 | FL |
| 9317 | LVC 15-Pink | 1632 | 14-8 | 50% | 15 | NY |
| 9318 | Texas Lightning 12-Black | 1632 | 15-15 | 50% | 12 | TX |
| 9319 | PC Elite 14-1 | 1632 | 2-5 | 29% | 14 | TX |
| 9320 | GJ 16 PREMIER | 1632 | 34-25 | 58% | 16 | FL |
| 9321 | Crosscourt 18 | 1632 | 20-14 | 59% | 18 | PA |
| 9322 | Iowa Rockets 12 Gold | 1632 | 15-8 | 63% | 12 | IA |
| 9323 | DS Elite 14-Diamond | 1632 | 34-28 | 55% | 14 | TX |
| 9324 | CUVC 18-Orange | 1632 | 20-14 | 59% | 18 | NC |
| 9325 | Networks Academy 16-3 | 1632 | 28-11 | 70% | 16 | AL |
| 9326 | HardRock 17 | 1632 | 25-22 | 53% | 17 | NH |
| 9327 | BORINQUEN COQUI 16-2f | 1632 | 9-10 | 47% | 16 | PR |
| 9328 | Inside Out 14-Mizuno black | 1632 | 16-25 | 39% | 14 | MI |
| 9329 | SF Elite 18 Gold | 1632 | 26-30 | 46% | 18 | CA |
| 9330 | Seal Beach 12-Black | 1632 | 25-16 | 61% | 12 | CA |
| 9331 | CGSV 18-Huff | 1632 | 23-11 | 68% | 18 | OH |
| 9332 | PVA 15-4 | 1632 | 9-5 | 56% | 15 | MO |
| 9333 | Mater Dei Jr Cats 11-Taylor | 1632 | 11-6 | 61% | 11 | IN |
| 9334 | FDL Fusion 12-Purple | 1632 | 14-5 | 74% | 12 | WI |
| 9335 | SCVC 14-2 kloey | 1632 | 14-7 | 67% | 14 | TN |
| 9336 | MVA 15-National | 1632 | 53-26 | 67% | 15 | MD |
| 9337 | ACS 15-Elite | 1632 | 23-14 | 62% | 15 | NC |
| 9338 | Apex 12-1 girls | 1632 | 26-13 | 67% | 12 | SC |
| 9339 | Mem Metro 12-Elite blk | 1632 | 36-22 | 62% | 12 | TN |
| 9340 | Wrecking Crew 13-Elite | 1632 | 6-1 | 67% | 13 | TX |
| 9341 | 808 AC 10-Co-ed white | 1632 | 5-0 | 100% | 10 | HI |
| 9342 | West E 18-Purple | 1632 | 16-6 | 73% | 18 | PA |
| 9343 | ATOWN 17-1b | 1632 | 35-15 | 69% | 17 | SC |
| 9344 | Juab Volleyball Club 17-Jeanna | 1632 | 6-3 | 67% | 17 | UT |
| 9345 | Dynasty 16-2 | 1632 | 13-4 | 76% | 16 | IN |
| 9346 | Colorado Juniors 13-Emily | 1632 | 29-39 | 43% | 13 | CO |
| 9347 | Jackson Elite 16-2025 | 1632 | 9-2 | 75% | 16 | ID |
| 9348 | FORZA1 NORTH 17-National red | 1632 | 22-13 | 63% | 17 | CA |
| 9349 | UNION 15-Blue | 1632 | 46-30 | 61% | 15 | IN |
| 9350 | Galena Fusion 14 | 1632 | 16-7 | 62% | 14 | IA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.