Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 187 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9301 Epic United 14-National 1632 27-16 63% 14 IL
9302 WiseTown VBC 17 1632 8-4 67% 17 PA
9303 NorCal 18-2 blue 1632 43-27 61% 18 CA
9304 Renaissance 15-Black 1632 43-34 56% 15 OH
9305 NPJ Seattle 15-Premier 1632 49-28 64% 15 WA
9306 Elevate Athletics 15-Nike 1632 10-10 50% 15 UT
9307 STL Crossfire 15 SR3 1632 29-13 69% 15 MO
9308 PREVA 15-Yare 1632 7-3 70% 15 PR
9309 FC Flames 14-S 1632 4-0 100% 14 CO
9310 Allegiance 16-Royal 1632 36-18 67% 16 TX
9311 NPJ Portland 14-Orange 1632 39-18 68% 14 OR
9312 MAVS KC 15-2 1632 5-2 71% 15 KS
9313 Cincy Crush 16-2 1632 27-12 69% 16 OH
9314 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 17-4 1632 6-1 86% 17 KS
9315 Rise 17-1 1632 23-18 56% 17 OH
9316 Venetian Bay 17 1632 5-3 63% 17 FL
9317 LVC 15-Pink 1632 14-8 50% 15 NY
9318 Texas Lightning 12-Black 1632 15-15 50% 12 TX
9319 PC Elite 14-1 1632 2-5 29% 14 TX
9320 GJ 16 PREMIER 1632 34-25 58% 16 FL
9321 Crosscourt 18 1632 20-14 59% 18 PA
9322 Iowa Rockets 12 Gold 1632 15-8 63% 12 IA
9323 DS Elite 14-Diamond 1632 34-28 55% 14 TX
9324 CUVC 18-Orange 1632 20-14 59% 18 NC
9325 Networks Academy 16-3 1632 28-11 70% 16 AL
9326 HardRock 17 1632 25-22 53% 17 NH
9327 BORINQUEN COQUI 16-2f 1632 9-10 47% 16 PR
9328 Inside Out 14-Mizuno black 1632 16-25 39% 14 MI
9329 SF Elite 18 Gold 1632 26-30 46% 18 CA
9330 Seal Beach 12-Black 1632 25-16 61% 12 CA
9331 CGSV 18-Huff 1632 23-11 68% 18 OH
9332 PVA 15-4 1632 9-5 56% 15 MO
9333 Mater Dei Jr Cats 11-Taylor 1632 11-6 61% 11 IN
9334 FDL Fusion 12-Purple 1632 14-5 74% 12 WI
9335 SCVC 14-2 kloey 1632 14-7 67% 14 TN
9336 MVA 15-National 1632 53-26 67% 15 MD
9337 ACS 15-Elite 1632 23-14 62% 15 NC
9338 Apex 12-1 girls 1632 26-13 67% 12 SC
9339 Mem Metro 12-Elite blk 1632 36-22 62% 12 TN
9340 Wrecking Crew 13-Elite 1632 6-1 67% 13 TX
9341 808 AC 10-Co-ed white 1632 5-0 100% 10 HI
9342 West E 18-Purple 1632 16-6 73% 18 PA
9343 ATOWN 17-1b 1632 35-15 69% 17 SC
9344 Juab Volleyball Club 17-Jeanna 1632 6-3 67% 17 UT
9345 Dynasty 16-2 1632 13-4 76% 16 IN
9346 Colorado Juniors 13-Emily 1632 29-39 43% 13 CO
9347 Jackson Elite 16-2025 1632 9-2 75% 16 ID
9348 FORZA1 NORTH 17-National red 1632 22-13 63% 17 CA
9349 UNION 15-Blue 1632 46-30 61% 15 IN
9350 Galena Fusion 14 1632 16-7 62% 14 IA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.