Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 187 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9301 Lions 14 Teal 1632 34-20 63% 14 IL
9302 Storm 18-Nationals 1631 16-9 64% 18
9303 Nawahi 14-1 1631 6-1 86% 14
9304 NK 14-Blizzard 1631 12-3 75% 14
9305 Texoma 14-Black 1631 16-4 76% 14
9306 OGVC 14-Power 1631 15-7 60% 14
9307 Westview 14 1631 11-6 65% 14
9308 AV 15-2 emerald 1631 5-3 63% 15
9309 LAWAKUA 10 1631 5-1 83% 10
9310 SVA 17-Joe 1631 49-44 52% 17 AZ
9311 Sierra Club 16-Pink 1631 4-0 100% 16
9312 Vail Peak 13 1631 30-11 73% 13 CO
9313 MAVS KC 15-2 1631 5-2 71% 15 KS
9314 Cool Sunshine 17-1 1631 19-10 66% 17
9315 Flight 18-Black 1631 19-17 53% 18 MI
9316 Revolution CBURG 15-White 1631 34-32 52% 15 PA
9317 Optimum Volleyball Club 14-1 1631 6-1 75% 14 MO
9318 Chi City 14-1 regional 1631 19-7 70% 14 IL
9319 NOC 14-Blue 1631 25-11 69% 14 CA
9320 MARIN 14-West 1631 42-19 69% 14 CA
9321 NPJ Portland 14-Orange 1631 39-18 68% 14 OR
9322 Amarillo Xtreme 14-Riot 1631 14-7 67% 14 TX
9323 ESO 14-Prime 1631 14-7 67% 14 OH
9324 CCJ 14-1 jeo 1631 20-11 65% 14 AL
9325 Yorktowne VB 14-Red 1631 31-14 69% 14 PA
9326 L2 14-2 1631 23-38 38% 14 MI
9327 VAVA 18-1 1631 15-16 48% 18 VA
9328 TCVA 16-Black adidas 1631 32-26 55% 16 CO
9329 HEAT 15-Black 1631 21-11 64% 15 TX
9330 Prime Time 14-Blue 1631 17-11 61% 14 IL
9331 Aces 15-S 1631 17-17 40% 15 TX
9332 Mineral Area 14 Royal 1631 18-9 64% 14 MO
9333 Goldfish 13-White 1631 4-0 100% 13 CO
9334 MT NW 14-1 parker 1631 13-14 37% 14 MT
9335 OC Lady Elite 13-Black 1631 23-8 74% 13 NY
9336 BVC 16-Faline and mack 1631 16-5 76% 16 VA
9337 Club Koa 16-Black 1631 34-17 67% 16 CA
9338 Madtown 16-2 select 1631 24-18 57% 16 WI
9339 Enspire 12-Stacey 1631 36-18 67% 12 CA
9340 FTL 15-Fusion usa libertys 1631 6-1 86% 15 FL
9341 CI ELITE 12-Red 1631 19-9 68% 12 IL
9342 Volley Queens 13-1 1631 10-3 77% 13 PR
9343 Wrecking Crew 13-Elite 1631 6-1 67% 13 TX
9344 NPJ Seattle 15-Premier 1631 49-28 64% 15 WA
9345 Alliance 14-Regional blac 1631 8-2 80% 14 TN
9346 A5 Regional 15-Becky 1631 26-7 79% 15 GA
9347 SoDak Juniors 16-1 national 1631 9-2 82% 16 SD
9348 Slam VBC 16 Gold 1631 5-0 100% 16 MA
9349 Fearless Elite 11-1 1631 20-10 67% 11 AR
9350 Club Sand 17-Surf 1631 11-6 65% 17 UT
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.