2025-2026 Season — Page 186 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9251 | Tulsa Power 17-1 | 1633 | 39-19 | 64% | 17 | OK |
| 9252 | Revolution 17-Blue | 1633 | 24-16 | 60% | 17 | IL |
| 9253 | MARIN 14-North | 1633 | 20-13 | 61% | 14 | CA |
| 9254 | EVA 14-Green | 1633 | 20-10 | 67% | 14 | KY |
| 9255 | 573 15-National k | 1633 | 15-11 | 58% | 15 | MO |
| 9256 | AJV 17 Helix | 1633 | 40-27 | 60% | 17 | TX |
| 9257 | Fearless Elite 13-2 | 1633 | 23-14 | 59% | 13 | AR |
| 9258 | Wave 14 | 1633 | 16-8 | 62% | 14 | CA |
| 9259 | MDC Volley 14-National | 1633 | 25-12 | 64% | 14 | OR |
| 9260 | S-N-P 18-Coach karissa | 1633 | 7-2 | 78% | 18 | CA |
| 9261 | Apex Volleyball Club 15-1 | 1633 | 7-4 | 44% | 15 | MO |
| 9262 | MCV 14-Whitson | 1633 | 8-2 | 80% | 14 | NC |
| 9263 | Wolf Pack 15-Black | 1633 | 17-13 | 57% | 15 | TX |
| 9264 | ATOMIC 12-Smack national | 1633 | 5-3 | 63% | 12 | AZ |
| 9265 | Stars 16-Blue | 1633 | 9-4 | 56% | 16 | ND |
| 9266 | Creole Big Apple 16 | 1633 | 24-17 | 59% | 16 | NY |
| 9267 | Rollers 12-Silver | 1633 | 26-8 | 68% | 12 | TX |
| 9268 | Tyrants 14-Black | 1633 | 38-34 | 53% | 14 | CA |
| 9269 | STORM 15-Evie | 1633 | 20-24 | 45% | 15 | CA |
| 9270 | MVI 18-Cass | 1633 | 11-0 | 100% | 18 | ID |
| 9271 | Houston Force 12-Jedi | 1633 | 13-6 | 68% | 12 | TX |
| 9272 | Fusion 15-Blue | 1633 | 28-31 | 47% | 15 | PA |
| 9273 | LevelOne Sherwood 12-1 | 1633 | 11-5 | 69% | 12 | OR |
| 9274 | NIVA 14-Black | 1633 | 48-27 | 64% | 14 | IN |
| 9275 | SRVC Storm 18 | 1633 | 25-17 | 56% | 18 | MD |
| 9276 | SA Elite 12-1 navy | 1633 | 25-21 | 54% | 12 | TX |
| 9277 | Vision 13-Exv blue | 1633 | 23-32 | 41% | 13 | TX |
| 9278 | NDVBC Hurricanes 16 | 1633 | 17-4 | 71% | 16 | MO |
| 9279 | SMV 14-4 silver | 1633 | 38-25 | 60% | 14 | MN |
| 9280 | COLA 16-Blue | 1633 | 25-16 | 61% | 16 | CA |
| 9281 | Butte Elite 17 | 1633 | 16-10 | 62% | 17 | CA |
| 9282 | SPVA 13-1 | 1633 | 15-4 | 79% | 13 | MN |
| 9283 | NSSC 17 Nike | 1633 | 37-22 | 60% | 17 | MO |
| 9284 | Idaho LUV 16-Maegen | 1633 | 9-10 | 43% | 16 | ID |
| 9285 | 417 MoJrs 13-Nat black | 1633 | 23-9 | 70% | 13 | MO |
| 9286 | Prime Volleyball Club 17-Adidas | 1633 | 29-26 | 53% | 17 | CA |
| 9287 | Premier Nebraska 18-2 | 1633 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | NE |
| 9288 | Payson 18-S shelli/kenzie | 1633 | 26-13 | 67% | 18 | AZ |
| 9289 | Southwest 18-N katie | 1633 | 22-31 | 42% | 18 | OH |
| 9290 | Club 1 14-Royal | 1633 | 19-10 | 66% | 14 | IL |
| 9291 | NUF 18-Black | 1633 | 54-24 | 69% | 18 | IN |
| 9292 | EVP Rise 13-1 | 1633 | 9-4 | 69% | 13 | ON |
| 9293 | Titans Asteria 14 | 1633 | 7-8 | 47% | 14 | ON |
| 9294 | Monon 10-1mi orcas | 1632 | 14-7 | 67% | 10 | IN |
| 9295 | ARSELEAGLES 18-1cuba | 1632 | 5-1 | 83% | 18 | PR |
| 9296 | CVT Phoenix 16-Gold | 1632 | 7-1 | 88% | 16 | NY |
| 9297 | Stewie 14-Blue | 1632 | 22-15 | 59% | 14 | MN |
| 9298 | MT NW 16-1 aubrey | 1632 | 17-19 | 40% | 16 | MT |
| 9299 | NSVBC 18-Select | 1632 | 18-15 | 55% | 18 | WI |
| 9300 | Niagara Frontier 17 Navy | 1632 | 27-29 | 47% | 17 | NY |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.