Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 186 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9251 Seal Beach 12-Black 1632 25-16 61% 12 CA
9252 PowerPlex 12-Sieck 1632 30-20 60% 12 IA
9253 COVC 17-1 1632 8-6 57% 17 OR
9254 NPJ Seattle 14 National 1632 36-41 47% 14 WA
9255 WAVE 15 TSUNAMI 1632 43-29 60% 15 KY
9256 VA Elite 14 1632 34-46 40% 14 VA
9257 NASA BHM 14-PURPLE 1632 24-16 60% 14 AL
9258 Inside Out 14-Mizuno black 1632 16-25 39% 14 MI
9259 MN Select 14-3 1632 38-32 54% 14 MN
9260 AVBC 14-National red 1632 31-27 53% 14 AZ
9261 OVVC 14-White 1632 6-0 100% 14 OH
9262 FDL Fusion 12-Purple 1632 14-5 74% 12 WI
9263 Tempest Volleyball 15-1 1632 15-4 79% 15 FL
9264 Pulse 11-Black 1632 26-16 62% 11 CA
9265 AVC CLE 15 Gold 1632 36-16 69% 15 OH
9266 Northern Lights 11-2 1632 35-20 64% 11 MN
9267 RUV 17-Red 1632 12-12 50% 17 VA
9268 AJV 17-Ross marie 1632 19-44 30% 17 GA
9269 TX432 17-1 1632 3-4 43% 17 TX
9270 FH 11-2 ikaika ashleigh 1632 5-5 38% 11 TX
9271 RVBC 16-Royal 1632 14-3 82% 16 PA
9272 STL Crossfire 15 SR3 1632 29-13 69% 15 MO
9273 HUNTERS VBC 17 1632 8-3 73% 17 FL
9274 RVA G15 Navy 1632 32-39 45% 15 WI
9275 C2 12-1 reg orange rylee 1632 7-3 70% 12 TN
9276 Monon 10-1mi orcas 1632 14-7 67% 10 IN
9277 ARSELEAGLES 18-1cuba 1632 5-1 83% 18 PR
9278 Diablo VBC 13-1 1632 5-2 71% 13 CA
9279 Club Dive 17-S 1632 7-1 88% 17 CO
9280 Flyers 16-Usa-brian 1632 25-31 42% 16 TX
9281 Premier 15-Crimson t 1632 23-18 55% 15 TX
9282 XTEAM 12-2 1632 4-4 50% 12 CA
9283 ACA 17-Black 1632 20-12 63% 17 CA
9284 Skyline 12-White adrian 1632 24-20 51% 12 TX
9285 FSJ 17-Elite 1632 27-22 54% 17 AR
9286 Maine Jrs 17-National 1632 48-22 69% 17 ME
9287 Valley Juniors 17-Black 1632 25-12 68% 17 VA
9288 417 MoJrs 13-Nat black 1632 23-9 70% 13 MO
9289 ARVC 13-Blue adidas 1632 26-16 62% 13 NM
9290 City Beach 13-Black 1632 42-22 66% 13 CA
9291 FSVC 16-Nike 1632 48-43 53% 16 CA
9292 Idaho LUV 16-Maegen 1632 9-10 43% 16 ID
9293 NorthShore 11 Schlotterer 1632 7-3 70% 11 OH
9294 865VB 14-Elite 1632 14-6 70% 14 TN
9295 PSVBC 14 PREMIER 1632 24-7 77% 14 WV
9296 Warren Sixpack 15-Red 1632 29-18 62% 15 NJ
9297 Xcel Xcel Volleyball 15-2 national 1632 6-2 75% 15
9298 Hanami 16-White 1632 17-8 68% 16
9299 ACESZ 14-Black 1632 9-4 69% 14 MI
9300 NIVA 14-Black 1632 48-27 64% 14 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.