Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 186 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9251 Tulsa Power 17-1 1633 39-19 64% 17 OK
9252 Revolution 17-Blue 1633 24-16 60% 17 IL
9253 MARIN 14-North 1633 20-13 61% 14 CA
9254 EVA 14-Green 1633 20-10 67% 14 KY
9255 573 15-National k 1633 15-11 58% 15 MO
9256 AJV 17 Helix 1633 40-27 60% 17 TX
9257 Fearless Elite 13-2 1633 23-14 59% 13 AR
9258 Wave 14 1633 16-8 62% 14 CA
9259 MDC Volley 14-National 1633 25-12 64% 14 OR
9260 S-N-P 18-Coach karissa 1633 7-2 78% 18 CA
9261 Apex Volleyball Club 15-1 1633 7-4 44% 15 MO
9262 MCV 14-Whitson 1633 8-2 80% 14 NC
9263 Wolf Pack 15-Black 1633 17-13 57% 15 TX
9264 ATOMIC 12-Smack national 1633 5-3 63% 12 AZ
9265 Stars 16-Blue 1633 9-4 56% 16 ND
9266 Creole Big Apple 16 1633 24-17 59% 16 NY
9267 Rollers 12-Silver 1633 26-8 68% 12 TX
9268 Tyrants 14-Black 1633 38-34 53% 14 CA
9269 STORM 15-Evie 1633 20-24 45% 15 CA
9270 MVI 18-Cass 1633 11-0 100% 18 ID
9271 Houston Force 12-Jedi 1633 13-6 68% 12 TX
9272 Fusion 15-Blue 1633 28-31 47% 15 PA
9273 LevelOne Sherwood 12-1 1633 11-5 69% 12 OR
9274 NIVA 14-Black 1633 48-27 64% 14 IN
9275 SRVC Storm 18 1633 25-17 56% 18 MD
9276 SA Elite 12-1 navy 1633 25-21 54% 12 TX
9277 Vision 13-Exv blue 1633 23-32 41% 13 TX
9278 NDVBC Hurricanes 16 1633 17-4 71% 16 MO
9279 SMV 14-4 silver 1633 38-25 60% 14 MN
9280 COLA 16-Blue 1633 25-16 61% 16 CA
9281 Butte Elite 17 1633 16-10 62% 17 CA
9282 SPVA 13-1 1633 15-4 79% 13 MN
9283 NSSC 17 Nike 1633 37-22 60% 17 MO
9284 Idaho LUV 16-Maegen 1633 9-10 43% 16 ID
9285 417 MoJrs 13-Nat black 1633 23-9 70% 13 MO
9286 Prime Volleyball Club 17-Adidas 1633 29-26 53% 17 CA
9287 Premier Nebraska 18-2 1633 3-4 43% 18 NE
9288 Payson 18-S shelli/kenzie 1633 26-13 67% 18 AZ
9289 Southwest 18-N katie 1633 22-31 42% 18 OH
9290 Club 1 14-Royal 1633 19-10 66% 14 IL
9291 NUF 18-Black 1633 54-24 69% 18 IN
9292 EVP Rise 13-1 1633 9-4 69% 13 ON
9293 Titans Asteria 14 1633 7-8 47% 14 ON
9294 Monon 10-1mi orcas 1632 14-7 67% 10 IN
9295 ARSELEAGLES 18-1cuba 1632 5-1 83% 18 PR
9296 CVT Phoenix 16-Gold 1632 7-1 88% 16 NY
9297 Stewie 14-Blue 1632 22-15 59% 14 MN
9298 MT NW 16-1 aubrey 1632 17-19 40% 16 MT
9299 NSVBC 18-Select 1632 18-15 55% 18 WI
9300 Niagara Frontier 17 Navy 1632 27-29 47% 17 NY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.