Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 185 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9201 Elevate 15-Pink 1633 15-6 71% 15 TX
9202 Roanoke United 15-Red 1633 22-16 58% 15 VA
9203 CORE Girls 15-Platinum 1633 31-31 50% 15 CA
9204 Tstreet IE 16-Taylor 1633 21-35 38% 16 CA
9205 Roanoke United 17-Red 1633 23-14 62% 17 VA
9206 BCS Skyline H 12 Molten 1633 10-4 63% 12 TX
9207 Amarillo Xtreme 13 Legacy 1633 19-10 66% 13 TX
9208 808 AC 10-Co-ed white 1633 5-0 100% 10 HI
9209 Aces Elite 14-White 1633 5-1 83% 14 MN
9210 BHJ 15-Black 1633 29-15 66% 15 SD
9211 TX Impact 11-Pink 1633 4-0 100% 11 TX
9212 TKVBC 14-Ranger elite 1633 47-27 64% 14 GA
9213 Endless VBC 14-Navy 1633 9-6 60% 14 TX
9214 DYS 15-Thunder 1633 30-16 65% 15 VA
9215 Digtown 12-Spring elite 1633 13-4 72% 12 IL
9216 AZ REV 13-Black 1633 37-22 63% 13 AZ
9217 DG Warriors 15 1633 34-18 65% 15 OH
9218 Florida Conquer 17-National 1633 36-15 71% 17 FL
9219 Attack VBC 16-Elite 1633 29-12 71% 16 TX
9220 NM Rev 17-Trey 1633 38-20 66% 17 AZ
9221 ECJVC 12-Select 1633 21-11 66% 12 NC
9222 PREVA 15-Yare 1633 7-3 70% 15 PR
9223 InnovativeVC 15-1rossy 1633 10-4 71% 15 PR
9224 Avoli 15-F milton 1633 9-2 82% 15 PR
9225 SJVC 11-Blue 1633 5-1 83% 11 FL
9226 Watertown JO 17 1633 9-4 69% 17 MN
9227 Artesanas 14-Doris 1633 3-3 50% 14 PR
9228 Networks Academy 16-3 1633 28-11 70% 16 AL
9229 Tribe 15-Proffitt 1633 22-8 73% 15 OH
9230 DINAMITE 16-1 1633 5-3 63% 16 CA
9231 ND Elite 18-Winter emery 1633 15-5 71% 18 ND
9232 Club GSL St. George 14-Comp - markay 1633 11-1 73% 14 UT
9233 SC6FM 16-1 1633 5-1 83% 16 CA
9234 LevelOne Sherwood 12-1 1633 11-5 69% 12 OR
9235 SOVC Smith 11-R 1633 4-1 80% 11 OH
9236 Arch City 18 1633 11-3 79% 18 MO
9237 EPVC 18-1 1633 17-8 68% 18 OH
9238 Diablo VBC 14-Brentwood 1633 20-9 69% 14 CA
9239 Panther Girls 14-Black 1633 25-15 63% 14 CO
9240 SC Legends 18-Elite 1633 11-7 61% 18 CA
9241 FaR Out 14-Grey 1633 34-10 77% 14 MI
9242 Ama Xtreme 14-Riot 1633 6-0 86% 14
9243 S-N-P 18-Coach karissa 1633 7-2 78% 18
9244 STRiVEVBC 17-1 1633 5-4 56% 17
9245 Gold VBC 17 (NC) 1633 4-1 80% 17 CA
9246 FIGSV 13-1 1633 30-11 73% 13 CA
9247 B2 B 16-Nike 1633 5-3 63% 16 CA
9248 Niagara Frontier 17 Navy 1633 27-29 47% 17 NY
9249 CHAMP 13-1 1632 10-1 91% 13
9250 MCE 18-1 1632 16-9 64% 18
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.