2025-2026 Season — Page 185 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9201 | OCVC 11-Slunks | 1634 | 20-14 | 59% | 11 | CA |
| 9202 | Vortex 18-S - joe | 1634 | 4-1 | 50% | 18 | GA |
| 9203 | TX Legends 16-Black | 1634 | 34-24 | 58% | 16 | TX |
| 9204 | Enspire 12-Stacey | 1634 | 36-18 | 67% | 12 | CA |
| 9205 | MEVC 10-Challengers | 1634 | 18-8 | 62% | 10 | MD |
| 9206 | TAV Houston 15-Blue | 1634 | 20-22 | 48% | 15 | TX |
| 9207 | Krush VBC 10-1 | 1634 | 18-8 | 67% | 10 | MO |
| 9208 | Power 13-Purple | 1634 | 28-15 | 62% | 13 | TX |
| 9209 | InnovativeVC 15-1rossy | 1634 | 10-4 | 71% | 15 | PR |
| 9210 | LVA 18-1 | 1634 | 15-6 | 71% | 18 | HI |
| 9211 | WPVC 15-Armour silver | 1634 | 37-33 | 53% | 15 | FL |
| 9212 | Vail Peak 13 | 1634 | 30-11 | 73% | 13 | CO |
| 9213 | Avalanche Volleyball Club 14 Avalanche Kelsey | 1634 | 19-11 | 61% | 14 | MI |
| 9214 | WSRVC 10-E. forsell | 1634 | 22-9 | 71% | 10 | WY |
| 9215 | RVA 17-Navy | 1634 | 54-46 | 54% | 17 | WI |
| 9216 | Kulia 10-Gold | 1634 | 12-4 | 75% | 10 | HI |
| 9217 | Morehead Madness 12 Morehead Madness.Pink.12 | 1634 | 17-4 | 81% | 12 | HI |
| 9218 | Chadron Elite 16 | 1634 | 8-7 | 53% | 16 | WY |
| 9219 | Club Sand 17-Surf | 1634 | 11-6 | 65% | 17 | UT |
| 9220 | WCJ 14-1 | 1634 | 21-9 | 68% | 14 | TX |
| 9221 | Powers Volleyball Club 17-1 | 1634 | 30-23 | 57% | 17 | FL |
| 9222 | MAVS KC Select 12-1 | 1634 | 16-1 | 84% | 12 | KS |
| 9223 | 1United 11-Regional | 1634 | 18-15 | 51% | 11 | TX |
| 9224 | StriveVBC 16-1 | 1634 | 5-3 | 63% | 16 | TX |
| 9225 | GVA 18-Pink | 1634 | 14-9 | 61% | 18 | PR |
| 9226 | NorCal 11-1 black | 1634 | 26-29 | 47% | 11 | CA |
| 9227 | Putnam 18 Ashland | 1634 | 20-10 | 67% | 18 | OH |
| 9228 | Legit 12-Gray | 1634 | 6-3 | 67% | 12 | IA |
| 9229 | FCE 12-1 | 1634 | 8-7 | 53% | 12 | FL |
| 9230 | Elevate Athletics Hawaii 15 Elevate Athletics Hawaii (AH) | 1634 | 6-3 | 67% | 15 | HI |
| 9231 | Kelowna Volleyball Club 14-Black | 1634 | 6-3 | 67% | 14 | |
| 9232 | TAV 13-Blue (NTR) | 1634 | 21-13 | 58% | 13 | |
| 9233 | OGVC 14-Power | 1633 | 15-7 | 60% | 14 | ND |
| 9234 | River City Jrs 17 Navy | 1633 | 22-25 | 47% | 17 | IA |
| 9235 | NC Intensity 14-Laina | 1633 | 9-3 | 75% | 14 | NC |
| 9236 | Premier 18-1 blue | 1633 | 26-8 | 72% | 18 | AL |
| 9237 | SJVC 11-Blue | 1633 | 5-1 | 83% | 11 | FL |
| 9238 | Core STL 11 Navy | 1633 | 28-23 | 54% | 11 | MO |
| 9239 | oe 13-1 | 1633 | 21-9 | 70% | 13 | OH |
| 9240 | VIRAGO 14-National | 1633 | 27-12 | 69% | 14 | OK |
| 9241 | Jays 14-Blue | 1633 | 5-1 | 83% | 14 | ND |
| 9242 | Silverton Bearcats 14-2 | 1633 | 19-8 | 70% | 14 | OR |
| 9243 | Aces Elite 14-White | 1633 | 5-1 | 83% | 14 | NV |
| 9244 | Roanoke United 17-Red | 1633 | 35-26 | 57% | 17 | VA |
| 9245 | FIGSV 13-1 | 1633 | 30-11 | 73% | 13 | CA |
| 9246 | Heroes 14-Seal | 1633 | 28-10 | 74% | 14 | TX |
| 9247 | Sky High Adidas 14-Red | 1633 | 27-23 | 54% | 14 | IL |
| 9248 | Artesanas 14-Doris | 1633 | 3-3 | 50% | 14 | PR |
| 9249 | NorthShore 14-Puffer fish | 1633 | 35-10 | 78% | 14 | MI |
| 9250 | NLVA 14-Adam | 1633 | 18-12 | 60% | 14 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.