Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 185 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9201 OCVC 11-Slunks 1634 20-14 59% 11 CA
9202 Vortex 18-S - joe 1634 4-1 50% 18 GA
9203 TX Legends 16-Black 1634 34-24 58% 16 TX
9204 Enspire 12-Stacey 1634 36-18 67% 12 CA
9205 MEVC 10-Challengers 1634 18-8 62% 10 MD
9206 TAV Houston 15-Blue 1634 20-22 48% 15 TX
9207 Krush VBC 10-1 1634 18-8 67% 10 MO
9208 Power 13-Purple 1634 28-15 62% 13 TX
9209 InnovativeVC 15-1rossy 1634 10-4 71% 15 PR
9210 LVA 18-1 1634 15-6 71% 18 HI
9211 WPVC 15-Armour silver 1634 37-33 53% 15 FL
9212 Vail Peak 13 1634 30-11 73% 13 CO
9213 Avalanche Volleyball Club 14 Avalanche Kelsey 1634 19-11 61% 14 MI
9214 WSRVC 10-E. forsell 1634 22-9 71% 10 WY
9215 RVA 17-Navy 1634 54-46 54% 17 WI
9216 Kulia 10-Gold 1634 12-4 75% 10 HI
9217 Morehead Madness 12 Morehead Madness.Pink.12 1634 17-4 81% 12 HI
9218 Chadron Elite 16 1634 8-7 53% 16 WY
9219 Club Sand 17-Surf 1634 11-6 65% 17 UT
9220 WCJ 14-1 1634 21-9 68% 14 TX
9221 Powers Volleyball Club 17-1 1634 30-23 57% 17 FL
9222 MAVS KC Select 12-1 1634 16-1 84% 12 KS
9223 1United 11-Regional 1634 18-15 51% 11 TX
9224 StriveVBC 16-1 1634 5-3 63% 16 TX
9225 GVA 18-Pink 1634 14-9 61% 18 PR
9226 NorCal 11-1 black 1634 26-29 47% 11 CA
9227 Putnam 18 Ashland 1634 20-10 67% 18 OH
9228 Legit 12-Gray 1634 6-3 67% 12 IA
9229 FCE 12-1 1634 8-7 53% 12 FL
9230 Elevate Athletics Hawaii 15 Elevate Athletics Hawaii (AH) 1634 6-3 67% 15 HI
9231 Kelowna Volleyball Club 14-Black 1634 6-3 67% 14
9232 TAV 13-Blue (NTR) 1634 21-13 58% 13
9233 OGVC 14-Power 1633 15-7 60% 14 ND
9234 River City Jrs 17 Navy 1633 22-25 47% 17 IA
9235 NC Intensity 14-Laina 1633 9-3 75% 14 NC
9236 Premier 18-1 blue 1633 26-8 72% 18 AL
9237 SJVC 11-Blue 1633 5-1 83% 11 FL
9238 Core STL 11 Navy 1633 28-23 54% 11 MO
9239 oe 13-1 1633 21-9 70% 13 OH
9240 VIRAGO 14-National 1633 27-12 69% 14 OK
9241 Jays 14-Blue 1633 5-1 83% 14 ND
9242 Silverton Bearcats 14-2 1633 19-8 70% 14 OR
9243 Aces Elite 14-White 1633 5-1 83% 14 NV
9244 Roanoke United 17-Red 1633 35-26 57% 17 VA
9245 FIGSV 13-1 1633 30-11 73% 13 CA
9246 Heroes 14-Seal 1633 28-10 74% 14 TX
9247 Sky High Adidas 14-Red 1633 27-23 54% 14 IL
9248 Artesanas 14-Doris 1633 3-3 50% 14 PR
9249 NorthShore 14-Puffer fish 1633 35-10 78% 14 MI
9250 NLVA 14-Adam 1633 18-12 60% 14 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.