Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 184 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9151 NOC 14-Blue 1635 25-11 69% 14 CA
9152 IconVBC 14-Elite larry 1635 15-5 75% 14 CA
9153 FTL 15-Fusion usa libertys 1635 6-1 86% 15 FL
9154 FORZA1 NORTH 15-National red 1635 19-15 56% 15 CA
9155 Ultimate VBC 15-Blue 1635 6-1 86% 15 IL
9156 Stars 12-Blue 1635 10-3 71% 12 ND
9157 A5 12-Kimberly 1635 23-14 62% 12 GA
9158 Club One AZ 14-Platinum 1635 26-44 37% 14 AZ
9159 Club Fire 14-Green 1635 9-1 90% 14 MN
9160 CUVC 18-Premier 1635 21-18 54% 18 NC
9161 FCVBC 15-Black 1635 11-9 52% 15 CO
9162 Warsaw 11-Purple 1635 5-0 100% 11 IN
9163 Vital 15-2 royal 1635 41-35 54% 15 MN
9164 Victorium 12-Ua 1635 31-21 60% 12 AZ
9165 HP Illinois 13-1 silver 1635 25-20 51% 13 MO
9166 SE Academy 10-S 1635 8-2 80% 10 LA
9167 Red Rock 16-Christian - redwood city 1635 20-32 38% 16 CA
9168 Xcel 17-Blue 1635 3-4 43% 17 AL
9169 FSJ 17-Elite 1635 27-22 54% 17 AR
9170 Southland 16-Black 1634 17-9 65% 16 LA
9171 Mindset Premier 15-Black 1634 47-15 76% 15 IL
9172 NKYVC 13-4 thunder 1634 22-11 67% 13 KY
9173 HOV 14 Navy 1634 28-16 64% 14 VA
9174 PSVBC 14 PREMIER 1634 24-7 77% 14 WV
9175 AVC 14-1 (MT) 1634 15-5 68% 14 MT
9176 Champion 15-Surry purple 1634 24-10 71% 15 NC
9177 Shakopee 12-1 1634 14-7 64% 12 MN
9178 SEVC 13 National 1634 29-23 56% 13 WA
9179 Virginia Elite Volleyball Club 14 1634 34-46 40% 14 VA
9180 ITVC 16-Margaret (NC) 1634 26-20 57% 16 CA
9181 DG Warriors 15 1634 34-18 65% 15 OH
9182 SEV 18-1 1634 23-16 59% 18 MN
9183 Uno Girls 14-Elite 1634 30-19 61% 14 IL
9184 MT NW 14-1 parker 1634 13-14 37% 14 MT
9185 STL Crossfire 18-R1 1634 38-13 75% 18 MO
9186 TX Impact 11-Pink 1634 4-0 100% 11 TX
9187 knights 13 1634 8-3 73% 13 ID
9188 Kali 14-F emily 1634 4-8 33% 14 PR
9189 TEV 13-Gc amanda 1634 20-8 71% 13 TN
9190 SF Juniors 11-4 1634 9-3 75% 11 CA
9191 Venom 13-Red 1634 39-29 57% 13 AZ
9192 ESVBC 18-Ninjas national 1634 21-31 40% 18 IA
9193 VUVC 15-Black 1634 22-21 51% 15 NV
9194 COLA 12-Blue 1634 25-17 60% 12 CA
9195 Club V CV 16-Kaylie 1634 4-4 50% 16 UT
9196 SVA 17-Joe 1634 49-44 52% 17 WA
9197 NKYVC 14-4 thunder 1634 24-16 60% 14 KY
9198 Xcel VB 13-1 adidas 1634 23-15 59% 13 TX
9199 OPU 11-1 1634 29-22 57% 11 FL
9200 Eastside 12-S kenney 1634 7-2 78% 12 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.