2025-2026 Season — Page 184 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9151 | 573 15-National k | 1634 | 15-11 | 58% | 15 | MO |
| 9152 | FORZA1 NORTH 15-National red | 1634 | 19-15 | 56% | 15 | CA |
| 9153 | Prime 17-Adidas | 1634 | 29-26 | 53% | 17 | CA |
| 9154 | WPVC 15-Armour silver | 1634 | 37-33 | 53% | 15 | FL |
| 9155 | Boss CLE 16-2 | 1634 | 26-24 | 52% | 16 | OH |
| 9156 | Sideout 17-N artem | 1634 | 37-36 | 51% | 17 | NJ |
| 9157 | 1United 11-Regional | 1634 | 18-15 | 51% | 11 | TX |
| 9158 | Vortex 18-S - joe | 1634 | 4-1 | 50% | 18 | UT |
| 9159 | STORM 15-Evie | 1634 | 20-24 | 45% | 15 | CA |
| 9160 | Milwaukee Jr's 16-1 | 1634 | 32-40 | 44% | 16 | WI |
| 9161 | WACO VBC 16-Ua red | 1634 | 26-13 | 65% | 16 | TX |
| 9162 | H2 14-1 longhorns | 1634 | 23-17 | 55% | 14 | MO |
| 9163 | Skagit U14-Red | 1634 | 22-8 | 69% | 14 | WA |
| 9164 | TAV 14-Teal | 1634 | 15-5 | 75% | 14 | TN |
| 9165 | Xcel 17-Blue | 1634 | 3-4 | 43% | 17 | TX |
| 9166 | Tribe 14-Elite white | 1634 | 30-41 | 42% | 14 | FL |
| 9167 | Premier Nebraska 18-2 | 1634 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | NE |
| 9168 | Vision 13-Exv blue | 1634 | 23-32 | 41% | 13 | CA |
| 9169 | CCV 14-1 | 1634 | 20-16 | 56% | 14 | AZ |
| 9170 | NL 18-Gold | 1634 | 14-3 | 82% | 18 | |
| 9171 | Legit 12-Gray | 1634 | 6-3 | 67% | 12 | |
| 9172 | DVVC 12-1 | 1634 | 2-6 | 25% | 12 | |
| 9173 | Lions SWest Prairie 14-S | 1634 | 22-13 | 63% | 14 | IL |
| 9174 | Central VBC 16-Silver | 1634 | 18-7 | 72% | 16 | CA |
| 9175 | oe 13-1 | 1634 | 21-9 | 70% | 13 | OH |
| 9176 | Surge 15-Lime | 1634 | 18-8 | 69% | 15 | RI |
| 9177 | WVC 12-1 | 1634 | 15-7 | 68% | 12 | MN |
| 9178 | Krush VBC 10-1 | 1634 | 18-8 | 67% | 10 | MI |
| 9179 | NorthShore 17-Oney/hed | 1634 | 14-7 | 67% | 17 | OH |
| 9180 | United 17 AR | 1634 | 22-11 | 67% | 17 | CO |
| 9181 | VC United 16-1 premier | 1634 | 24-12 | 67% | 16 | IL |
| 9182 | CVBC 13-2s | 1634 | 18-9 | 67% | 13 | IN |
| 9183 | Shakopee 12-1 | 1634 | 14-7 | 64% | 12 | MN |
| 9184 | GPA 17-Green elite | 1634 | 41-23 | 64% | 17 | OH |
| 9185 | COLA 12-Blue | 1634 | 25-17 | 60% | 12 | CA |
| 9186 | Downstate 16-Cobras | 1633 | 33-25 | 57% | 16 | |
| 9187 | WSRVC 10-E. forsell | 1633 | 22-9 | 71% | 10 | |
| 9188 | Northside Elite 11-Gold | 1633 | 11-3 | 79% | 11 | |
| 9189 | TCU Titans 12-Black | 1633 | 5-0 | 100% | 12 | |
| 9190 | Wolf Pack 15-Black | 1633 | 17-13 | 57% | 15 | MA |
| 9191 | Loudoun Elite 15 Morales | 1633 | 46-35 | 57% | 15 | VA |
| 9192 | SA Elite 12-1 navy | 1633 | 25-21 | 54% | 12 | TX |
| 9193 | SEVC 13 National | 1633 | 29-23 | 56% | 13 | WA |
| 9194 | BORINQUEN COQUI 16-2f | 1633 | 9-10 | 47% | 16 | PR |
| 9195 | Xcel VB 13-1 adidas | 1633 | 23-15 | 59% | 13 | TX |
| 9196 | Empowered 16-Elite red | 1633 | 35-12 | 74% | 16 | IN |
| 9197 | CCV 16-Synergy | 1633 | 28-7 | 78% | 16 | AZ |
| 9198 | OPU 11-1 | 1633 | 29-22 | 57% | 11 | FL |
| 9199 | OC volleyball 18 | 1633 | 30-18 | 63% | 18 | CA |
| 9200 | Manhattan Mamba 13-1 | 1633 | 13-7 | 62% | 13 | KS |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.