Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 184 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9151 573 15-National k 1634 15-11 58% 15 MO
9152 FORZA1 NORTH 15-National red 1634 19-15 56% 15 CA
9153 Prime 17-Adidas 1634 29-26 53% 17 CA
9154 WPVC 15-Armour silver 1634 37-33 53% 15 FL
9155 Boss CLE 16-2 1634 26-24 52% 16 OH
9156 Sideout 17-N artem 1634 37-36 51% 17 NJ
9157 1United 11-Regional 1634 18-15 51% 11 TX
9158 Vortex 18-S - joe 1634 4-1 50% 18 UT
9159 STORM 15-Evie 1634 20-24 45% 15 CA
9160 Milwaukee Jr's 16-1 1634 32-40 44% 16 WI
9161 WACO VBC 16-Ua red 1634 26-13 65% 16 TX
9162 H2 14-1 longhorns 1634 23-17 55% 14 MO
9163 Skagit U14-Red 1634 22-8 69% 14 WA
9164 TAV 14-Teal 1634 15-5 75% 14 TN
9165 Xcel 17-Blue 1634 3-4 43% 17 TX
9166 Tribe 14-Elite white 1634 30-41 42% 14 FL
9167 Premier Nebraska 18-2 1634 3-4 43% 18 NE
9168 Vision 13-Exv blue 1634 23-32 41% 13 CA
9169 CCV 14-1 1634 20-16 56% 14 AZ
9170 NL 18-Gold 1634 14-3 82% 18
9171 Legit 12-Gray 1634 6-3 67% 12
9172 DVVC 12-1 1634 2-6 25% 12
9173 Lions SWest Prairie 14-S 1634 22-13 63% 14 IL
9174 Central VBC 16-Silver 1634 18-7 72% 16 CA
9175 oe 13-1 1634 21-9 70% 13 OH
9176 Surge 15-Lime 1634 18-8 69% 15 RI
9177 WVC 12-1 1634 15-7 68% 12 MN
9178 Krush VBC 10-1 1634 18-8 67% 10 MI
9179 NorthShore 17-Oney/hed 1634 14-7 67% 17 OH
9180 United 17 AR 1634 22-11 67% 17 CO
9181 VC United 16-1 premier 1634 24-12 67% 16 IL
9182 CVBC 13-2s 1634 18-9 67% 13 IN
9183 Shakopee 12-1 1634 14-7 64% 12 MN
9184 GPA 17-Green elite 1634 41-23 64% 17 OH
9185 COLA 12-Blue 1634 25-17 60% 12 CA
9186 Downstate 16-Cobras 1633 33-25 57% 16
9187 WSRVC 10-E. forsell 1633 22-9 71% 10
9188 Northside Elite 11-Gold 1633 11-3 79% 11
9189 TCU Titans 12-Black 1633 5-0 100% 12
9190 Wolf Pack 15-Black 1633 17-13 57% 15 MA
9191 Loudoun Elite 15 Morales 1633 46-35 57% 15 VA
9192 SA Elite 12-1 navy 1633 25-21 54% 12 TX
9193 SEVC 13 National 1633 29-23 56% 13 WA
9194 BORINQUEN COQUI 16-2f 1633 9-10 47% 16 PR
9195 Xcel VB 13-1 adidas 1633 23-15 59% 13 TX
9196 Empowered 16-Elite red 1633 35-12 74% 16 IN
9197 CCV 16-Synergy 1633 28-7 78% 16 AZ
9198 OPU 11-1 1633 29-22 57% 11 FL
9199 OC volleyball 18 1633 30-18 63% 18 CA
9200 Manhattan Mamba 13-1 1633 13-7 62% 13 KS
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.