2025-2026 Season — Page 183 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9101 | CUVC 18-Premier | 1635 | 21-18 | 54% | 18 | NC |
| 9102 | Maks 13-S | 1635 | 15-12 | 54% | 13 | ID |
| 9103 | LEVBC 13-National | 1635 | 30-24 | 54% | 13 | MD |
| 9104 | Core STL 11 Navy | 1635 | 28-23 | 54% | 11 | MO |
| 9105 | Seal Beach 18-Black | 1635 | 24-22 | 52% | 18 | CA |
| 9106 | HP Illinois 13-1 silver | 1635 | 25-20 | 51% | 13 | IL |
| 9107 | Arsenal 18 Gold | 1635 | 20-19 | 50% | 18 | TX |
| 9108 | NKJV 17-Blue | 1635 | 23-25 | 48% | 17 | KY |
| 9109 | Madfrog 13-N white | 1635 | 18-19 | 47% | 13 | TX |
| 9110 | CORE Girls 16-Platinum | 1635 | 33-40 | 45% | 16 | CA |
| 9111 | Apex Volleyball Club 15-1 | 1635 | 7-4 | 44% | 15 | MO |
| 9112 | MARIN 14-North | 1635 | 20-13 | 61% | 14 | CA |
| 9113 | Augusta 4:12 14-Robinson | 1635 | 20-5 | 80% | 14 | VA |
| 9114 | Mustang VB Club 14 | 1635 | 15-3 | 71% | 14 | NY |
| 9115 | SC Legends 14-Black | 1635 | 15-6 | 71% | 14 | CA |
| 9116 | Lions 14 Sky | 1635 | 25-11 | 69% | 14 | IL |
| 9117 | WI Flight 14 Slate | 1635 | 11-4 | 73% | 14 | WI |
| 9118 | TX432 14-Gold | 1635 | 18-11 | 62% | 14 | TX |
| 9119 | VIRAGO 14-National | 1635 | 27-12 | 69% | 14 | OK |
| 9120 | STORM 14-Albert | 1635 | 17-4 | 81% | 14 | CA |
| 9121 | PVA 14-1 | 1635 | 25-11 | 69% | 14 | SC |
| 9122 | Mid-Michigan ACES 14 Brynn | 1635 | 11-5 | 69% | 14 | MI |
| 9123 | Warsaw 11-Purple | 1635 | 5-0 | 100% | 11 | |
| 9124 | Absolute SubZero BVC 18-Romer | 1635 | 8-2 | 80% | 18 | |
| 9125 | PRV Lisee 15-1 | 1635 | 10-3 | 77% | 15 | |
| 9126 | South Texas STVA 17-Navy 2 | 1635 | 6-3 | 67% | 17 | |
| 9127 | Texas 432 15-Gold | 1635 | 6-3 | 55% | 15 | |
| 9128 | IconVBC 14-Elite larry | 1635 | 15-5 | 75% | 14 | CA |
| 9129 | NSSC 17 Nike | 1635 | 37-22 | 60% | 17 | MO |
| 9130 | Jays 14-Blue | 1634 | 5-1 | 83% | 14 | |
| 9131 | Lawrence Landsharks 14-1 | 1634 | 13-6 | 57% | 14 | |
| 9132 | Kelowna Volleyball Club 14-Black | 1634 | 6-3 | 67% | 14 | |
| 9133 | Dynasty 16-2 | 1634 | 13-4 | 76% | 16 | |
| 9134 | KLUB 12-S | 1634 | 7-4 | 64% | 12 | |
| 9135 | ACS 15-Elite | 1634 | 23-14 | 62% | 15 | |
| 9136 | CVC 14-BLUE | 1634 | 22-32 | 41% | 14 | OH |
| 9137 | FTL 15-Fusion open-usa h | 1634 | 5-0 | 100% | 15 | FL |
| 9138 | SoCal Legends 11-Elite | 1634 | 13-1 | 93% | 11 | CA |
| 9139 | Gold Cal Jrs Air 12-1 | 1634 | 10-2 | 83% | 12 | CA |
| 9140 | EVA 15-1 | 1634 | 13-3 | 81% | 15 | CO |
| 9141 | TEV 16-Gary/cindy | 1634 | 20-6 | 77% | 16 | TN |
| 9142 | SF Juniors 11-3 | 1634 | 9-3 | 75% | 11 | CA |
| 9143 | TEV 13-Gc amanda | 1634 | 20-8 | 71% | 13 | TN |
| 9144 | Club GSL St. George 16-Comp - josh | 1634 | 15-1 | 71% | 16 | UT |
| 9145 | BVC 16-National embrey | 1634 | 26-15 | 63% | 16 | AL |
| 9146 | Butte Elite 17 | 1634 | 16-10 | 62% | 17 | CA |
| 9147 | MEVC 10-Challengers | 1634 | 18-8 | 62% | 10 | MD |
| 9148 | Colorado Springs Alt CSA 12-Navy | 1634 | 18-11 | 62% | 12 | CO |
| 9149 | AJV 17 Helix | 1634 | 40-27 | 60% | 17 | TX |
| 9150 | Boost 13-Navy | 1634 | 11-7 | 58% | 13 | IA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.