Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 183 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9101 CUVC 18-Premier 1635 21-18 54% 18 NC
9102 Maks 13-S 1635 15-12 54% 13 ID
9103 LEVBC 13-National 1635 30-24 54% 13 MD
9104 Core STL 11 Navy 1635 28-23 54% 11 MO
9105 Seal Beach 18-Black 1635 24-22 52% 18 CA
9106 HP Illinois 13-1 silver 1635 25-20 51% 13 IL
9107 Arsenal 18 Gold 1635 20-19 50% 18 TX
9108 NKJV 17-Blue 1635 23-25 48% 17 KY
9109 Madfrog 13-N white 1635 18-19 47% 13 TX
9110 CORE Girls 16-Platinum 1635 33-40 45% 16 CA
9111 Apex Volleyball Club 15-1 1635 7-4 44% 15 MO
9112 MARIN 14-North 1635 20-13 61% 14 CA
9113 Augusta 4:12 14-Robinson 1635 20-5 80% 14 VA
9114 Mustang VB Club 14 1635 15-3 71% 14 NY
9115 SC Legends 14-Black 1635 15-6 71% 14 CA
9116 Lions 14 Sky 1635 25-11 69% 14 IL
9117 WI Flight 14 Slate 1635 11-4 73% 14 WI
9118 TX432 14-Gold 1635 18-11 62% 14 TX
9119 VIRAGO 14-National 1635 27-12 69% 14 OK
9120 STORM 14-Albert 1635 17-4 81% 14 CA
9121 PVA 14-1 1635 25-11 69% 14 SC
9122 Mid-Michigan ACES 14 Brynn 1635 11-5 69% 14 MI
9123 Warsaw 11-Purple 1635 5-0 100% 11
9124 Absolute SubZero BVC 18-Romer 1635 8-2 80% 18
9125 PRV Lisee 15-1 1635 10-3 77% 15
9126 South Texas STVA 17-Navy 2 1635 6-3 67% 17
9127 Texas 432 15-Gold 1635 6-3 55% 15
9128 IconVBC 14-Elite larry 1635 15-5 75% 14 CA
9129 NSSC 17 Nike 1635 37-22 60% 17 MO
9130 Jays 14-Blue 1634 5-1 83% 14
9131 Lawrence Landsharks 14-1 1634 13-6 57% 14
9132 Kelowna Volleyball Club 14-Black 1634 6-3 67% 14
9133 Dynasty 16-2 1634 13-4 76% 16
9134 KLUB 12-S 1634 7-4 64% 12
9135 ACS 15-Elite 1634 23-14 62% 15
9136 CVC 14-BLUE 1634 22-32 41% 14 OH
9137 FTL 15-Fusion open-usa h 1634 5-0 100% 15 FL
9138 SoCal Legends 11-Elite 1634 13-1 93% 11 CA
9139 Gold Cal Jrs Air 12-1 1634 10-2 83% 12 CA
9140 EVA 15-1 1634 13-3 81% 15 CO
9141 TEV 16-Gary/cindy 1634 20-6 77% 16 TN
9142 SF Juniors 11-3 1634 9-3 75% 11 CA
9143 TEV 13-Gc amanda 1634 20-8 71% 13 TN
9144 Club GSL St. George 16-Comp - josh 1634 15-1 71% 16 UT
9145 BVC 16-National embrey 1634 26-15 63% 16 AL
9146 Butte Elite 17 1634 16-10 62% 17 CA
9147 MEVC 10-Challengers 1634 18-8 62% 10 MD
9148 Colorado Springs Alt CSA 12-Navy 1634 18-11 62% 12 CO
9149 AJV 17 Helix 1634 40-27 60% 17 TX
9150 Boost 13-Navy 1634 11-7 58% 13 IA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.