2025-2026 Season — Page 183 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9101 | Madtown 16-2 select | 1636 | 24-18 | 57% | 16 | WI |
| 9102 | MVSA 14 Heat | 1636 | 47-28 | 60% | 14 | MD |
| 9103 | Warren Sixpack 15-Red | 1636 | 29-18 | 62% | 15 | NJ |
| 9104 | White Stone 15-Power | 1636 | 27-12 | 69% | 15 | CA |
| 9105 | Set it Off 15 | 1636 | 41-13 | 76% | 15 | FL |
| 9106 | DIGS 13 Maroon | 1636 | 7-3 | 70% | 13 | MN |
| 9107 | H. Skyline TW 15-1 | 1636 | 2-4 | 33% | 15 | NV |
| 9108 | Mustangs 17 | 1636 | 6-2 | 67% | 17 | IA |
| 9109 | South Texas STVA 17-Navy 2 | 1636 | 6-3 | 67% | 17 | NV |
| 9110 | NL 18-Gold | 1636 | 14-3 | 82% | 18 | MI |
| 9111 | WAVE 11-Kali | 1636 | 24-11 | 69% | 11 | CA |
| 9112 | DVVC 12-1 | 1636 | 2-6 | 25% | 12 | NV |
| 9113 | TX432 14-Gold | 1636 | 24-14 | 62% | 14 | TX |
| 9114 | Platinum 16-Power | 1636 | 27-26 | 51% | 16 | UT |
| 9115 | Weber Elite Volleyball Club 14 Weber Elite Trina A | 1636 | 10-2 | 83% | 14 | UT |
| 9116 | Champions 16-Elite | 1636 | 14-5 | 74% | 16 | AL |
| 9117 | Onondaga VBC 15 Onondaga Lightning | 1635 | 12-5 | 63% | 15 | |
| 9118 | OC volleyball 18 | 1635 | 34-22 | 61% | 18 | CA |
| 9119 | Unified 11-1 | 1635 | 23-15 | 61% | 11 | MI |
| 9120 | PBEVC Fury Black 18-1 | 1635 | 40-13 | 75% | 18 | TX |
| 9121 | MiElite 14-Gold north | 1635 | 21-5 | 81% | 14 | MI |
| 9122 | STORM 14-Albert | 1635 | 17-4 | 81% | 14 | CA |
| 9123 | South Volley 14-2 milton | 1635 | 9-2 | 82% | 14 | PR |
| 9124 | SC Legends 14-Black | 1635 | 15-6 | 71% | 14 | CA |
| 9125 | Skagit U14-Red | 1635 | 22-8 | 69% | 14 | WA |
| 9126 | Ho'omau 14-Ipo | 1635 | 34-15 | 69% | 14 | HI |
| 9127 | CLVC 13-Red | 1635 | 13-7 | 65% | 13 | NC |
| 9128 | Crushers 18 BOOM | 1635 | 19-10 | 66% | 18 | TN |
| 9129 | Five Star 13-Black | 1635 | 38-19 | 67% | 13 | CO |
| 9130 | Tsunami 13-1e dustin | 1635 | 40-20 | 67% | 13 | GA |
| 9131 | SoDak Juniors 16-1 national | 1635 | 9-2 | 82% | 16 | MN |
| 9132 | West TN Volleyball 15 West Tn Warriors-KG | 1635 | 8-2 | 80% | 15 | TN |
| 9133 | MJ 14-Orange | 1635 | 19-16 | 48% | 14 | MT |
| 9134 | ACA 17-Black | 1635 | 20-12 | 63% | 17 | KS |
| 9135 | NPJ Seattle 14 National | 1635 | 36-41 | 47% | 14 | WA |
| 9136 | Augusta 4:12 14-Robinson | 1635 | 20-5 | 80% | 14 | VA |
| 9137 | Iron 12-Grey | 1635 | 6-3 | 67% | 12 | AL |
| 9138 | Vantage 16-Blue smack | 1635 | 36-15 | 71% | 16 | OH |
| 9139 | Circle City 12-White | 1635 | 30-22 | 58% | 12 | IN |
| 9140 | AVA 14-Coral | 1635 | 30-39 | 43% | 14 | FL |
| 9141 | Force 16-Adidas sel bl gr | 1635 | 32-11 | 74% | 16 | MI |
| 9142 | MAKO 16 | 1635 | 17-6 | 74% | 16 | IN |
| 9143 | Lions SWest Prairie 14-S | 1635 | 22-13 | 63% | 14 | IL |
| 9144 | LAVA West 12-Molten | 1635 | 30-24 | 56% | 12 | CA |
| 9145 | Avoli 15-F milton | 1635 | 9-2 | 82% | 15 | PR |
| 9146 | AJV 11 adidas | 1635 | 25-13 | 66% | 11 | TX |
| 9147 | WACO VBC 16-Ua red | 1635 | 26-13 | 65% | 16 | TX |
| 9148 | NPJ Seattle 18-National | 1635 | 28-33 | 44% | 18 | WA |
| 9149 | SA Force 17 National | 1635 | 35-15 | 70% | 17 | TX |
| 9150 | Hometown Heat 15-Flare | 1635 | 24-14 | 63% | 15 | WI |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.