Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 183 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9101 Madtown 16-2 select 1636 24-18 57% 16 WI
9102 MVSA 14 Heat 1636 47-28 60% 14 MD
9103 Warren Sixpack 15-Red 1636 29-18 62% 15 NJ
9104 White Stone 15-Power 1636 27-12 69% 15 CA
9105 Set it Off 15 1636 41-13 76% 15 FL
9106 DIGS 13 Maroon 1636 7-3 70% 13 MN
9107 H. Skyline TW 15-1 1636 2-4 33% 15 NV
9108 Mustangs 17 1636 6-2 67% 17 IA
9109 South Texas STVA 17-Navy 2 1636 6-3 67% 17 NV
9110 NL 18-Gold 1636 14-3 82% 18 MI
9111 WAVE 11-Kali 1636 24-11 69% 11 CA
9112 DVVC 12-1 1636 2-6 25% 12 NV
9113 TX432 14-Gold 1636 24-14 62% 14 TX
9114 Platinum 16-Power 1636 27-26 51% 16 UT
9115 Weber Elite Volleyball Club 14 Weber Elite Trina A 1636 10-2 83% 14 UT
9116 Champions 16-Elite 1636 14-5 74% 16 AL
9117 Onondaga VBC 15 Onondaga Lightning 1635 12-5 63% 15
9118 OC volleyball 18 1635 34-22 61% 18 CA
9119 Unified 11-1 1635 23-15 61% 11 MI
9120 PBEVC Fury Black 18-1 1635 40-13 75% 18 TX
9121 MiElite 14-Gold north 1635 21-5 81% 14 MI
9122 STORM 14-Albert 1635 17-4 81% 14 CA
9123 South Volley 14-2 milton 1635 9-2 82% 14 PR
9124 SC Legends 14-Black 1635 15-6 71% 14 CA
9125 Skagit U14-Red 1635 22-8 69% 14 WA
9126 Ho'omau 14-Ipo 1635 34-15 69% 14 HI
9127 CLVC 13-Red 1635 13-7 65% 13 NC
9128 Crushers 18 BOOM 1635 19-10 66% 18 TN
9129 Five Star 13-Black 1635 38-19 67% 13 CO
9130 Tsunami 13-1e dustin 1635 40-20 67% 13 GA
9131 SoDak Juniors 16-1 national 1635 9-2 82% 16 MN
9132 West TN Volleyball 15 West Tn Warriors-KG 1635 8-2 80% 15 TN
9133 MJ 14-Orange 1635 19-16 48% 14 MT
9134 ACA 17-Black 1635 20-12 63% 17 KS
9135 NPJ Seattle 14 National 1635 36-41 47% 14 WA
9136 Augusta 4:12 14-Robinson 1635 20-5 80% 14 VA
9137 Iron 12-Grey 1635 6-3 67% 12 AL
9138 Vantage 16-Blue smack 1635 36-15 71% 16 OH
9139 Circle City 12-White 1635 30-22 58% 12 IN
9140 AVA 14-Coral 1635 30-39 43% 14 FL
9141 Force 16-Adidas sel bl gr 1635 32-11 74% 16 MI
9142 MAKO 16 1635 17-6 74% 16 IN
9143 Lions SWest Prairie 14-S 1635 22-13 63% 14 IL
9144 LAVA West 12-Molten 1635 30-24 56% 12 CA
9145 Avoli 15-F milton 1635 9-2 82% 15 PR
9146 AJV 11 adidas 1635 25-13 66% 11 TX
9147 WACO VBC 16-Ua red 1635 26-13 65% 16 TX
9148 NPJ Seattle 18-National 1635 28-33 44% 18 WA
9149 SA Force 17 National 1635 35-15 70% 17 TX
9150 Hometown Heat 15-Flare 1635 24-14 63% 15 WI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.