Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 182 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9051 MCV 14-Whitson 1636 8-2 80% 14 NC
9052 EVOLUTION 14-Red 1636 17-4 74% 14 CA
9053 WAVE 11-Kali 1636 24-11 69% 11 CA
9054 Podio Sports 13-S 1636 36-16 69% 13 WA
9055 SMASH 14-S fire 1636 30-26 54% 14 MA
9056 Lions Starved Rock 14-Red 1636 31-21 60% 14 IL
9057 Club Fire 14-Green 1636 9-1 90% 14 TX
9058 Milwaukee Jr's 14-Premier 1636 42-18 70% 14 WI
9059 ForceVC 14-2 1636 29-13 69% 14 OH
9060 H. Prep Dev 11-Red 1636 14-2 78% 11
9061 MN Freeze 13-Black 1636 10-5 67% 13
9062 South Texas STVA 15-Navy 2 1636 5-3 63% 15
9063 Slainte 17-National 1636 18-12 60% 17 CA
9064 VUVC 15-Black 1636 9-11 45% 15 NV
9065 THVBC 13-1 1635 4-0 67% 13
9066 Premier 18-1 blue 1635 26-8 72% 18
9067 Mighty Mo 14-Periman 1635 12-16 39% 14
9068 AVA 16-Midnight 1635 40-27 60% 16 VA
9069 Adrenaline 13-Maggie 1635 27-18 60% 13 IA
9070 TopSpin 16-Red 1635 24-17 59% 16 PR
9071 FL Conquer 16 National 1635 6-0 100% 16 FL
9072 STORM VBC 12-Marleena 1635 6-1 86% 12 CO
9073 LOSO 18-1 abby 1635 5-1 83% 18 OH
9074 EXCELL 16-1 1635 10-3 77% 16 SC
9075 Kulia 10-Gold 1635 12-4 75% 10 HI
9076 Vibe 12-Ava 1635 21-7 75% 12 CA
9077 NE Elite 15-Echo 1635 23-8 74% 15 NE
9078 Hollywood 15-1 rise elite 1635 12-5 71% 15 OH
9079 Dinamite 13-Monica 1635 5-2 71% 13 CA
9080 LVA 18-1 1635 15-6 71% 18 HI
9081 JJVA Club 11-A 1635 17-7 71% 11 FL
9082 Ta'ahine AZ 12-Tu'ipulotu 1635 32-14 70% 12 AZ
9083 Flight 15 Marigolds 1635 24-11 69% 15 IL
9084 TX STORM 13-R 1635 26-10 68% 13 TX
9085 515 Elite 15 1635 10-5 67% 15 IA
9086 Tsunami 13-1e dustin 1635 40-20 67% 13 GA
9087 Croix Attack 13-1 1635 19-10 66% 13 WI
9088 HP South 15-Titanium 1635 32-16 65% 15 MO
9089 PV 11U Navy 1635 13-5 65% 11 MA
9090 WENTZVILLE HEAT 12-1 navy 1635 15-8 65% 12 MO
9091 CLVC 13-Red 1635 13-7 65% 13 NC
9092 VolleyFX 16 Charm 1635 30-15 65% 16 NY
9093 MATRIX 17 National 1635 37-21 64% 17 CA
9094 Tulsa Power 17-1 1635 39-19 64% 17 OK
9095 Empower 12-Blaze 1635 21-12 64% 12 CA
9096 Hometown Heat 15-Flare 1635 24-14 63% 15 WI
9097 EVA 12 National 1635 36-21 61% 12 AR
9098 VC Denver 14-Black 1635 33-21 61% 14 CO
9099 CTX Juniors 16-Mizuno 1635 28-21 57% 16 TX
9100 NSVBC 18-Select 1635 18-15 55% 18 WI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.