Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 182 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9051 Goldfish 13-White 1637 4-0 100% 13 CO
9052 VBL Lotus 17-3 1637 7-1 88% 17 MA
9053 ACS 17-Elite 1637 25-14 64% 17 NC
9054 Momentum 15-White 1636 28-11 72% 15 CO
9055 Adrenaline 13-Maggie 1636 27-18 60% 13 IA
9056 VCN 15-Black 1636 9-6 60% 15 NE
9057 ForceVC 14-2 1636 29-13 69% 14 OH
9058 JJVA Club 11-A 1636 17-7 71% 11 FL
9059 NK 14-Blizzard 1636 12-3 75% 14 ND
9060 Amarillo Xtreme 13 Legacy 1636 19-10 66% 13 TX
9061 TX Ultimate 11-Green 1636 6-1 86% 11 TX
9062 Slainte 17-National 1636 18-12 60% 17 CA
9063 METRO Elite 17-Black 1636 7-4 64% 17 GA
9064 FaR Out 15 Bronze 1636 34-11 76% 15 MI
9065 AVB Fire 13-1 1636 14-6 70% 13 MN
9066 OVA 14-Negro 1636 6-0 100% 14 PR
9067 Athlete HQ 16-Plasencio 1636 32-14 70% 16 OH
9068 ARVC 14-Black 1636 31-13 70% 14 NC
9069 GSJ West 13-Black 1636 25-9 74% 13 SC
9070 Miami Hype 13-Prime 1636 31-43 42% 13 FL
9071 CORE Girls 16-Platinum 1636 33-40 45% 16 NJ
9072 SKPV 15-1 1636 24-7 77% 15 KY
9073 Whirlwind VBC 14-1 1636 15-6 71% 14 NY
9074 Empower 12-Blaze 1636 21-12 64% 12 IL
9075 Sideout 16-Elite 1636 40-24 63% 16 FL
9076 Podio Sports 13-S 1636 36-16 69% 13 WA
9077 Net Force 15-1 1636 5-2 50% 15 IA
9078 LA6 16-Jamie 1636 20-5 80% 16 LA
9079 TCU Titans 12-Black 1636 5-0 100% 12 MN
9080 WC 17-1 1636 6-2 75% 17 GA
9081 Atlantic Volleyball Academy 17 AVA_17_Elite 1636 8-9 47% 17 NY
9082 MiElite 17-National east 1636 28-23 55% 17 MI
9083 TW Skyline 14-Black 1636 21-25 46% 14 TX
9084 DBQ Thunder 12 1636 11-5 69% 12 IA
9085 BTownVBC 12-Red 1636 22-10 69% 12 IN
9086 Club Apex 15-Grey 1636 26-18 59% 15 KY
9087 Club R 14 R 14 Cierra 1636 7-5 50% 14 ID
9088 WSA Gators 14-Elite 1636 23-27 46% 14 FL
9089 CVC 14-BLUE 1636 22-32 41% 14 OH
9090 H. Prep Dev 11-Red 1636 14-2 78% 11 TX
9091 Capitanas 13-Open - nuno 1636 7-4 64% 13 PR
9092 Mid-Michigan ACES 14 Brynn 1636 11-5 69% 14 MI
9093 High Voltage 16-1 1636 11-7 61% 16 MN
9094 South County 16-National 1636 30-23 57% 16 RI
9095 Roanoke United 13-Red 1636 26-11 70% 13 VA
9096 Club SyrV 17-Premier 1636 34-23 60% 17 NY
9097 Maks 13-S 1636 15-12 54% 13 ID
9098 Absolute SubZero BVC 18-Romer 1636 8-2 80% 18 WA
9099 PVA 12-1 1636 6-2 75% 12 MO
9100 Fusion 14-Green 1636 6-0 100% 14 MN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.