Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 181 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9001 Stars 12-Blue 1636 10-3 71% 12
9002 MWP 17-Purple 1636 31-17 65% 17
9003 MSVB 17Regional 1636 6-8 43% 17 AK
9004 DIGS 13 Maroon 1636 7-3 70% 13 NJ
9005 Fusion 14-Green 1636 6-0 100% 14 IL
9006 OVA 14-Negro 1636 6-0 100% 14 FL
9007 RCVC 16-2 1636 9-1 90% 16 AL
9008 TX Ultimate 11-Green 1636 6-1 86% 11 TX
9009 SOVC Winter 17-R 1636 5-1 83% 17 OH
9010 SE Academy 10-S 1636 8-2 80% 10 LA
9011 Tribe 13-Howard 1636 17-5 77% 13 OH
9012 FaR Out 15 Bronze 1636 34-11 76% 15 MI
9013 A3 13-X 1636 50-16 76% 13 TN
9014 STL Crossfire 18-R1 1636 38-13 75% 18 MO
9015 WC 17-1 1636 6-2 75% 17 TX
9016 PVA 12-1 1636 6-2 75% 12 MO
9017 Firecrackers 15-Red 1636 42-15 74% 15 NC
9018 WCJ 15-1 1636 19-7 73% 15 TX
9019 Havoc 18-1 1636 8-3 73% 18 AZ
9020 ETVMR 15 1636 8-3 73% 15 MD
9021 Cape Coast 12-Echo 1636 26-10 72% 12 FL
9022 EVC 18-1 1636 26-10 72% 18 CA
9023 SA Force 17 National 1636 35-15 70% 17 TX
9024 Club 1 11-Skronkstrong 1636 20-10 67% 11 IL
9025 AJV 11 adidas 1636 25-13 66% 11 TX
9026 JCVC 15-1 1636 7-4 64% 15 NC
9027 Capitanas 13-Open - nuno 1636 7-4 64% 13 PR
9028 VLBR NC 15-Haylie 1636 22-13 63% 15 NC
9029 ACESZ 16-Black 1636 13-8 62% 16 MI
9030 CJV 12 Mizuno 1636 32-21 60% 12 NC
9031 USA South 15-Mizuno 1636 33-23 59% 15 FL
9032 Crosscourt 18 1636 20-14 59% 18 PA
9033 PVA 16-Molten 1636 22-15 59% 16 MO
9034 CIA 16-Silver 1636 22-15 58% 16 IA
9035 GJ 16 PREMIER 1636 34-25 58% 16 FL
9036 GSI 13-Green 1636 7-5 58% 13 FL
9037 Rockwood Thunder 18-White 1636 28-20 58% 18 MO
9038 ENVY 15-National 1636 34-26 57% 15 NE
9039 VAQUERAS 12-F juan 1636 12-9 57% 12 PR
9040 ECJVC 18-National 1636 24-18 57% 18 NC
9041 Club Unite 15 National 1636 30-23 57% 15 TN
9042 SF TREMORS 11 HAWKS 1636 29-23 56% 11 CA
9043 LAVA West 12-Molten 1636 30-24 56% 12 CA
9044 Left Coast 17-1 1636 22-18 55% 17 CA
9045 MiElite 17-National east 1636 28-23 55% 17 MI
9046 Utah Mojo 16-National 1636 32-25 53% 16 UT
9047 A5 13-Almira 1636 37-33 53% 13 GA
9048 Club V 16-Prodigy jaime 1636 24-23 51% 16 UT
9049 TAV Houston 15-Blue 1636 20-22 48% 15 TX
9050 CJV 18-National navy 1636 23-26 47% 18 NC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.