Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 181 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
9001 ECJVC 18-National 1638 24-18 57% 18 NC
9002 ETVMR 15 1638 8-3 73% 15 PR
9003 Adrenaline 17-Lindsey/shelly 1638 17-8 65% 17 IA
9004 Pulse 11-Black 1638 26-16 62% 11 CA
9005 ID Crush 15-Martens 1638 37-26 59% 15 ID
9006 Torrance Volleyball Club 16 1638 26-20 57% 16 CA
9007 MoCo Volleyball Club 16 MOCO Mayhem 1637 22-26 46% 16
9008 Endless VBC 14-Navy 1637 9-6 60% 14 TX
9009 PRVC 14-John 1637 5-8 38% 14 WY
9010 L2 14-2 1637 23-38 38% 14 MI
9011 Ace 17-1 hondo 1637 9-7 56% 17 AK
9012 Club GSL St. George 14-Comp - markay 1637 11-1 73% 14 UT
9013 Tribe 13-Howard 1637 17-5 77% 13 OH
9014 YSVC 14-1 1637 14-5 74% 14 NC
9015 AVC CLE 15 Gold 1637 36-16 69% 15 OH
9016 SMASH 15-S lava 1637 24-21 53% 15 MA
9017 Wrecking Crew 17-Elite 1637 4-0 100% 17 TX
9018 MEVC 17-Black 1637 31-15 67% 17 SC
9019 HOU PVA 13-Mizuno 1637 5-3 63% 13 TX
9020 LAV 15-Regional white 1637 32-10 76% 15 AL
9021 CJV 12 Mizuno 1637 32-21 60% 12 NC
9022 Rockwood Thunder 18-White 1637 28-20 58% 18 MO
9023 Lassen Club Volleyball Company 14-1 1637 9-3 75% 14 CA
9024 RockwoodThunder 13-Carolina 1637 21-9 64% 13 MO
9025 CLUB 43 13-1 1637 25-21 54% 13 MN
9026 South Texas STVA 15-Navy 2 1637 5-3 63% 15 NV
9027 Hanami 16-Pink 1637 18-7 72% 16 NV
9028 MAVS KC 13 Premier 1637 13-9 59% 13 KS
9029 PowerPlex 12-Sieck 1637 30-20 60% 12 IA
9030 Independent 12-Pfeiffer 1637 5-2 71% 12 IN
9031 FH 11-2 ikaika ashleigh 1637 17-16 46% 11 TX
9032 Apex VBTC 17-Apex red 1637 21-27 44% 17 OH
9033 NorCal 16-2 blue 1637 24-23 51% 16 CA
9034 TopSpin 16-Red 1637 24-17 59% 16 KY
9035 Seal Beach 18-Black 1637 24-22 52% 18 CA
9036 SADDLEBACK 16-Jake 1637 36-26 58% 16 CA
9037 Hobcab VBC 15-1 1637 25-9 74% 15 KY
9038 Edge Elite 16-Gold 1637 15-8 65% 16 PA
9039 Manhattan Mamba 13-1 1637 13-7 62% 13 KS
9040 Rushmore Crossfire 17 18U 1637 5-1 83% 17 MT
9041 SouthJamm 16-Red 1637 18-5 75% 16 AL
9042 DVC 14-Volt 1637 9-3 75% 14 OH
9043 Spikers 12-1 1637 5-0 100% 12 KS
9044 Panda 16-2 1637 24-19 56% 16 CA
9045 GP 14-State gold 1637 57-22 72% 14 FL
9046 G3 13-National jessica 1637 46-24 66% 13 MO
9047 Ohana 17-Girls national 1637 4-3 57% 17 IA
9048 Headlines VBC 15-Orange 1637 40-20 67% 15 OH
9049 Starling South Central Los Angeles 14 Starling SCLA Garcia 1637 8-1 89% 14 CA
9050 Rockwood Thunder 14-Black 1637 52-25 68% 14 MO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.