Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 180 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8951 CJV 18-National navy 1639 23-26 47% 18 NC
8952 SPVC 12-Adidas 1639 18-22 45% 12 CA
8953 Premier 12-Black cynthia 1639 13-16 45% 12 TX
8954 Hollywood 15-1 rise elite 1639 12-5 71% 15 OH
8955 Hawks 15-S 1639 31-11 72% 15 CT
8956 MARIN 14 Slate 1639 27-27 50% 14 CA
8957 Valkyries 18 Elite 1638 46-27 63% 18 IN
8958 Club V 15-Drew 1638 22-16 58% 15 UT
8959 Apex Volleyball Club 16-2 1638 6-1 75% 16 MO
8960 ACAD 13-Red 1638 22-27 45% 13 NY
8961 LS vball 16-1 1638 12-2 80% 16 NY
8962 Surge 15-Lime 1638 18-8 69% 15 PA
8963 Legend 12-Black 1638 20-6 74% 12 CA
8964 Ignite 13-1 1638 31-9 70% 13 AL
8965 417 MoJrs 17-Elite royal 1638 12-13 46% 17 MO
8966 LAVA North 16 Molten 1638 31-27 53% 16 CA
8967 Fremont County Flames 13 1638 8-3 73% 13 CO
8968 ZVC VBC 16-S 1638 5-2 71% 16 UT
8969 NNJ 16-Donny 1638 29-16 64% 16 NV
8970 EPFury 16-S 1638 32-12 73% 16 TX
8971 Intensity 14-Black 1638 35-16 69% 14 MD
8972 ECVA 18-Teal 1638 29-18 62% 18 NC
8973 APXVB 15 Rylee 1638 24-13 65% 15 UT
8974 FOG Rage 15 11 1638 3-4 43% 11 CA
8975 Alabama Perf 18-N white 1638 37-30 55% 18 AL
8976 Midwest Intensity VBC 14 1638 32-11 70% 14 MO
8977 G & G Volleyball 12-1 1638 22-10 69% 12 NJ
8978 SAVBC 15-1 1638 16-19 46% 15 CA
8979 Downstate 16-Cobras 1638 33-25 57% 16 NY
8980 EVA 13-Blue 1638 31-25 55% 13 KY
8981 XFVBC 14-1 1638 16-7 70% 14 VA
8982 314 VBC 18-Red 1638 15-9 63% 18 MO
8983 Air VBC 12-Blue 1638 20-9 69% 12 WI
8984 Pacific Coast 14-Black 1638 4-5 44% 14 WA
8985 NIVA 17-BLACK 1638 47-41 53% 17 IN
8986 ENVY 16-Blizzard 1638 39-12 76% 16 RI
8987 Voltage 14-Coach josh 1638 7-3 58% 14 PA
8988 Logan Area Volleyball Association (LAVA) 13-1 1638 18-9 67% 13 OH
8989 LADYA 14-1 1638 10-3 71% 14 PA
8990 EVA 15-1 1638 13-3 81% 15 CO
8991 CITY 16-1 1638 24-14 63% 16 NY
8992 PAEVA 16-Maroon 1638 26-21 55% 16 PA
8993 A5 West 16-Aerion 1638 17-20 46% 16 GA
8994 WVBA 17-Molten 1638 48-27 64% 17 WA
8995 Fusion Volleyball Club 17 Fusion Premier 1638 6-2 75% 17 VT
8996 IJV 10-Green 1638 14-3 67% 10 IL
8997 SAND 13-Gold 1638 25-17 60% 13 CA
8998 A5 13-Almira 1638 37-33 53% 13 GA
8999 Impulse 15-Red 1638 27-12 69% 15 IN
9000 Boss CLE 16-2 1638 26-24 52% 16 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.