Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 180 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
8951 Club One AZ 14-Platinum 1637 26-44 37% 14 AZ
8952 UVA 14-Elite 1637 1-2 33% 14 LA
8953 Wrecking Crew 17-Elite 1637 4-0 100% 17 TX
8954 Spikers 12-1 1637 5-0 100% 12 KS
8955 DBQ Thunder 13 1637 10-1 91% 13 IA
8956 RVC 12-1 black 1637 5-1 83% 12 TX
8957 Wildfire 15-Gustavo 1637 30-9 77% 15 FL
8958 DVC 14-Volt 1637 9-3 75% 14 OH
8959 Prime 12-Natalia 1637 18-6 75% 12 CA
8960 SWVBC 14-White 1637 24-9 73% 14 WI
8961 IVC 14-1 1637 29-12 71% 14 OH
8962 ARVC 14-Black 1637 31-13 70% 14 NC
8963 HOS 16U Orange 1637 34-15 69% 16 NY
8964 MEVC 17-Black 1637 31-15 67% 17 MD
8965 VIPER 13-Elite 1637 27-14 66% 13 CA
8966 G3 13-National jessica 1637 46-24 66% 13 MO
8967 Adrenaline 17-Lindsey/shelly 1637 17-8 65% 17 IA
8968 Madtown 18-2 national 1637 31-17 65% 18 WI
8969 All In 12 Local 1637 39-16 65% 12 AL
8970 GSJ 15 National 1637 34-20 63% 15 SC
8971 BAVC 16-National alan 1637 31-18 63% 16 CA
8972 Wave 14 1637 16-8 62% 14 CA
8973 FVC 18-1 1637 26-15 60% 18 CA
8974 TORCH 12-Avery 1637 28-19 60% 12 CA
8975 Next 14-Blue 1637 32-21 60% 14 OH
8976 Elevation 15-Ascent 1637 38-26 59% 15 CO
8977 MAVS KC 13 Premier 1637 13-9 59% 13 KS
8978 Circle City 12-White 1637 30-22 58% 12 IN
8979 Balance 14-White 1637 39-29 57% 14 IL
8980 Elevation 12-Timberline 1637 35-27 56% 12 CO
8981 NPJ Portland 14 Premier 1637 31-28 53% 14 OR
8982 FCE 12-1 1637 8-7 53% 12 WI
8983 NKYVC 16-3.1 typhoon 1637 26-31 46% 16 KY
8984 Supernova 16 Allstars 1637 14-31 31% 16 CA
8985 VBL Lotus 17-3 1637 7-1 88% 17
8986 Fremont County Flames 13 1637 8-3 73% 13
8987 Hanami 16-Pink 1637 18-7 72% 16
8988 Independent 12-Pfeiffer 1637 5-2 71% 12
8989 NDVBC Hurricanes 16 1637 17-4 71% 16
8990 SRVC Storm 18 1637 25-17 56% 18
8991 HardRock 17 1637 25-22 53% 17
8992 H. Skyline TW 15-1 1637 2-4 33% 15
8993 Five Starz 16-Red april 1637 15-17 47% 16 CA
8994 ACAD 13-Red 1637 22-27 45% 13 NY
8995 Valley Fusion 14-S 1636 4-0 100% 14
8996 PRVC 14-John 1636 5-8 38% 14
8997 FCVBC 15-Black 1636 11-9 52% 15
8998 Champions 17-Elite 1636 11-4 73% 17
8999 UEPA 18-G 1636 14-18 42% 18 TX
9000 Premier EDGE 18 1636 13-19 39% 18 DE
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.