2025-2026 Season — Page 180 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8951 | Club One AZ 14-Platinum | 1637 | 26-44 | 37% | 14 | AZ |
| 8952 | UVA 14-Elite | 1637 | 1-2 | 33% | 14 | LA |
| 8953 | Wrecking Crew 17-Elite | 1637 | 4-0 | 100% | 17 | TX |
| 8954 | Spikers 12-1 | 1637 | 5-0 | 100% | 12 | KS |
| 8955 | DBQ Thunder 13 | 1637 | 10-1 | 91% | 13 | IA |
| 8956 | RVC 12-1 black | 1637 | 5-1 | 83% | 12 | TX |
| 8957 | Wildfire 15-Gustavo | 1637 | 30-9 | 77% | 15 | FL |
| 8958 | DVC 14-Volt | 1637 | 9-3 | 75% | 14 | OH |
| 8959 | Prime 12-Natalia | 1637 | 18-6 | 75% | 12 | CA |
| 8960 | SWVBC 14-White | 1637 | 24-9 | 73% | 14 | WI |
| 8961 | IVC 14-1 | 1637 | 29-12 | 71% | 14 | OH |
| 8962 | ARVC 14-Black | 1637 | 31-13 | 70% | 14 | NC |
| 8963 | HOS 16U Orange | 1637 | 34-15 | 69% | 16 | NY |
| 8964 | MEVC 17-Black | 1637 | 31-15 | 67% | 17 | MD |
| 8965 | VIPER 13-Elite | 1637 | 27-14 | 66% | 13 | CA |
| 8966 | G3 13-National jessica | 1637 | 46-24 | 66% | 13 | MO |
| 8967 | Adrenaline 17-Lindsey/shelly | 1637 | 17-8 | 65% | 17 | IA |
| 8968 | Madtown 18-2 national | 1637 | 31-17 | 65% | 18 | WI |
| 8969 | All In 12 Local | 1637 | 39-16 | 65% | 12 | AL |
| 8970 | GSJ 15 National | 1637 | 34-20 | 63% | 15 | SC |
| 8971 | BAVC 16-National alan | 1637 | 31-18 | 63% | 16 | CA |
| 8972 | Wave 14 | 1637 | 16-8 | 62% | 14 | CA |
| 8973 | FVC 18-1 | 1637 | 26-15 | 60% | 18 | CA |
| 8974 | TORCH 12-Avery | 1637 | 28-19 | 60% | 12 | CA |
| 8975 | Next 14-Blue | 1637 | 32-21 | 60% | 14 | OH |
| 8976 | Elevation 15-Ascent | 1637 | 38-26 | 59% | 15 | CO |
| 8977 | MAVS KC 13 Premier | 1637 | 13-9 | 59% | 13 | KS |
| 8978 | Circle City 12-White | 1637 | 30-22 | 58% | 12 | IN |
| 8979 | Balance 14-White | 1637 | 39-29 | 57% | 14 | IL |
| 8980 | Elevation 12-Timberline | 1637 | 35-27 | 56% | 12 | CO |
| 8981 | NPJ Portland 14 Premier | 1637 | 31-28 | 53% | 14 | OR |
| 8982 | FCE 12-1 | 1637 | 8-7 | 53% | 12 | WI |
| 8983 | NKYVC 16-3.1 typhoon | 1637 | 26-31 | 46% | 16 | KY |
| 8984 | Supernova 16 Allstars | 1637 | 14-31 | 31% | 16 | CA |
| 8985 | VBL Lotus 17-3 | 1637 | 7-1 | 88% | 17 | |
| 8986 | Fremont County Flames 13 | 1637 | 8-3 | 73% | 13 | |
| 8987 | Hanami 16-Pink | 1637 | 18-7 | 72% | 16 | |
| 8988 | Independent 12-Pfeiffer | 1637 | 5-2 | 71% | 12 | |
| 8989 | NDVBC Hurricanes 16 | 1637 | 17-4 | 71% | 16 | |
| 8990 | SRVC Storm 18 | 1637 | 25-17 | 56% | 18 | |
| 8991 | HardRock 17 | 1637 | 25-22 | 53% | 17 | |
| 8992 | H. Skyline TW 15-1 | 1637 | 2-4 | 33% | 15 | |
| 8993 | Five Starz 16-Red april | 1637 | 15-17 | 47% | 16 | CA |
| 8994 | ACAD 13-Red | 1637 | 22-27 | 45% | 13 | NY |
| 8995 | Valley Fusion 14-S | 1636 | 4-0 | 100% | 14 | |
| 8996 | PRVC 14-John | 1636 | 5-8 | 38% | 14 | |
| 8997 | FCVBC 15-Black | 1636 | 11-9 | 52% | 15 | |
| 8998 | Champions 17-Elite | 1636 | 11-4 | 73% | 17 | |
| 8999 | UEPA 18-G | 1636 | 14-18 | 42% | 18 | TX |
| 9000 | Premier EDGE 18 | 1636 | 13-19 | 39% | 18 | DE |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.